2π: two pi
π: one pus
Submitted 16 hours ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/0b1a5f57-dfef-4462-9de0-237cdff8739f.jpeg
2π: two pi
π: one pus
I thought it was octopuxen?
Its whatever your heart is telling you.
Any mistake I make is actually just my dialect
Don’t bother correcting my English grammar, as I have no respect for this language <3
And if folks knew what you meant, it’s fine
That is what ‘descriptive’ in level 4 means
I do like octopods. I will use that from now on and you can’t stop me.
Octopodes nuts
Octopoden!
There were manny of them! Manny much octopoden!
American English: “All of the above are valid.”
“Even ‘octopussies?’”
American English: “…sure.”
Search engines: this is a work computer
Just researching adaptations of classic literature.
It’s technically octopods
This is true for the scientific sense that it’s order Octopoda (e.g. the plural for members of Hexapoda is “hexapods” and “decapods” for Decapoda), but then it’s kind of like saying the plural for “lobster” is “nephropids”. The names are close for Octopoda and octopus, but it’s still taking the colloquial name and pluralizing it into its scientific name. I think it’s a reasonable alternative since it’s so close, but it’s not specifically “to bring it in line with cephalopod”; that’s just how pluralization of taxa ending in ‘poda’ works generally.
Once I learned that “octopodes” is pronounced oct-TOP-o-dees not OCT-uh-pohds it became my pluralization of choice.
Octopodes nuts
2 octopus = 1 hexadecipus
4 Quadropus = 8 bipus
Student: “language is prescriptive not descriptive”
Teacher: “you fail 3rd grade spelling”
And I absolutely support keeping people back who believe English should be guided and evolved through “Likes”.
Putting aside the technicalities (it is not language that is prescriptive or descriptive, but linguistics), that’s a widespread position among perfectly literate people, including professional linguists. Nothing to do with the number of “likes”.
Sure, languages evolve I guess but this isn’t really that IMO.
The whole idea of etymology is that you can figure out what a word means from its roots. If you throw all that out, you give up the scaffolding that makes words make any sense. Same goes for grammatical rules. It seems like the argument for descriptivism is “let’s not be elitist when people become less competent with the rules of a language”, and while that’s a fine ideal, yer usin ma words wrong!
I suspect there is also a body of professional linguists who oppose your point for the same reasons.
different languages and institutions have different viewpoints. Turkish and French are more prescriptive, english and spanish more descriptive*
Spanish from Spain has an official dictionary that dictates what is correct and isn’t. You can’t be more prescriptive than that. Sure, that dictionary adds words based on usage, even ones that are clear misspellings of the “real” word, but they are marked as so.
Lv7: the legs the two octopodum got tangled, so the octopodes asked help from two other octopodibus.
ENOUGH OF THE NOMINATIVE TYRANNY!
Call 'em whatever you like, they’re all octobussies to me.
Now I’m afraid to but too curious not to ask where might I find the octogoose?
In hell, next to cerberus probably.
you gotta make 'em yourself
my my my, what a cunning linguist!
Octopussies is actually the name for a harem of Maud Adams clones
Merriam Webster’s response: www.youtube.com/watch?v=s166nC_hiZ0
I spent the entire 2nd half of that video in fear that it was actually an elaborate “octopodeez nuts” joke
So… 2 cephalopods, 1 cephalopus ?
Cephalussy
It should just refer to the number of tentacles. So, for two of them, it would be sēdecimpus
Octopuses have limbs known as “arms.”
Tentacles are a different thing, like the two that squid have (the rest are also arms.)
Next, we pronounce “apoptosis”.
Cephalopus
Level 3 is the most correct.
Nah, level 1 is actually correct. Regardless of its etymology, octopus is an english word and should be pluralised accordingly.
Level 3 includes level 1 in it, with the addition of a correct plural using the original language’s rules.
Not really. Depending on the noun, the plural may be -us (called u-declination) instead of -i (called o-declination)
Example: modus is also modus in plural.
Octopus is a word of Greek origin. Nothing to do with Latin rules.
Octopiss
I cannot NOT read the title as Polysics singing “Coelakanth is Android”
If you’re at level 5, must you call it an octopoose? May we?
Here I was calling the octopussies.
Seriously, it should be “octopoda”.
dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 13 hours ago
One of my favorite things in life is using Latin or Greek plurals on words that it makes absolutely no sense to use them on, and do not follow the rules of any language naturally involved.
I had steak and potati for dinner last night. Just one steak, though, I cannot eat multiple steakices
dropcase@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Reminds me of a joke:
A Roman soldier walks into a bar and says, “I’ll have a martinus”
Bartender says, “don’t you mean a martini?”
The Roman says. “if I wanted more than one I would’ve asked for it!”
lemmyartistforhire@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
I also do this! My personal top 3 are:
Jesus - Jesi
Bus - Bi
Penis - Penorum
lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 hours ago
WROOOOONG! Now write the full declension table on that wall. And make sure to draw some pictures with it, so you never forget the word!
chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 3 hours ago
I have a wealthy friend who has a penorium in their house.
HamsterRage@lemmy.ca 12 hours ago
For decades now, my wife and I have used “Kleeni” as the plural of “Kleenex”.
Tortellinius@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Kleenex is Kneenēs according to the rules of Latin, actually
bitjunkie@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Looks like you beat us to level 7