SIMP? More like PGTOW (Planets Going Their Own Way)
This planet is no orbiter.
Submitted 1 day ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/7288a2a4-7383-4c7f-92ec-ca4c80eac1f9.jpeg
SIMP? More like PGTOW (Planets Going Their Own Way)
This planet is no orbiter.
I formally propose Planets Gone Wild. All in favor, say aye.
Orbs Gone Wild.
I hate that I laughed at that
wtf,they have several classifications.
welcome to science where theres names, AND acknowledgement that things change with new data
So, my understanding of auroras is, the planet’s magnetic field draws particles emitted by the sun toward the poles, and as those particles interact with the atmosphere they glow. So without a star and thus without solar wind, where do the aurora come from?
I mean, it has a magnetic field 6 or 7 orders of magnitude higher than ours. Id guess that extra strength allows it to pull particles from much further away and possibly from sources much more reticent to give up their particles than solar wind
Both the magnetic field strength and charged particle flux fall off proportional to the square of the distance from the planet / star respectively, so I doubt it gets much of anything even with a strong magnetic field unless it’s also near a star.
I’d also point out that the particles aren’t really attracted by the earths magnetic field, we’re just in the pathway, and the magnetic field funnels them to the poles. It’s more guidance than attraction.
I see cheap MRIs
Im guessing it only occurs when it is in a cloud or trail of charged particles. or perhaps there is a local (climatic?) cycle that sends charged particles to the poles.
Kind of, but not really.
Auroras dont necessarily need a stars radiation. Any old radiation will do, so long as there are charged particles floating around. Jupiter, for example, has gigantic continuous aurora around the magnetic poles. If auroras only came from the sun, and the earth is much closer to the sun than Jupiter, wouldn’t earth have a bigger aurora than Jupiter?
No, obviously. The size of the aurora depends on the size of the magnetic field interacting with charged particles and the number of those charged particles.
In the case of supermassive planets like Jupiter and this rogue planet, they produce way more of their own radiation than they recieve from the sun or space. This rogue “planet” in particular is so massive that it could actually fuse deuterium down in the core just with the pressures and temperatures of gravity crushing all that matter down. If you pumped enough hydrogen in there to quadruple the mass, it would probably ignite into a star quite comparable to our sun.
For that reason, it’s better to think of this as more of a baby star that didn’t quite eat enough wheaties than a planet in the traditional sense we think of here in our solar system.
With the crazy physics that come with suns and near dwarfs with similar mass, it’s no surprise that it generates a titanic magnetic field, and as a bonus, it produces its own radiation. It creates all the necessary ingredients it needs to make it’s own spectacular auroras with no actual outside interaction.
Tl;dr it makes it’s own aurora
The theory seems to be captured radiation fields. Earth even has one. A stray planet and its halo of interstellar objects might have a very large and complex radiation belt system.
Just what I was wondering.
Strangely Independent Massive Planet - Simp
Maybe we could attract it with an OnlyFans subscription.
You mean OnlyPlanets
Young, dumb, and not-orbiting a sun… ;)
Let’s not. I like the solar systems orbits exactly as they are
Well, there’s a stronger case being made every day for flinging ourselves into the sun.
Detecting SIMP J01365663+0933473 with the VLA through its auroral radio emission,
wait is this real or a joke? do we have a new planet that I’ve never heard of??
This planet isn't in our solar system. We've found 6,053 exoplanets already, so it's a safe bet that there's lots more of them than you're aware of
We have discovered over 6000 exoplanets in total, and over 100 in this year. I’d be surprised if you knew of all of them
I mean… it’s definitely possible, I have seen a person naming every subdivision of the world, which is a bit less than the amount of exoplanets we know (~4000 vs. ~6000), but only by 2000, so eventually some person will just do that.
Galaxy, not Solar System. There are a lot of planets in our galaxy that you’ve probably never heard of
Yep
Welcome to 2016. Mike brown and Konstantin Batygin basically proved that the only way we could explain the orbits of Pluto and other KBO was a massive 9th, yet to be discovered rogue planet more than likely ejected from our inner solar system during planet formation.
Interesting, I just finished reading Rendezvous With Rama.
If a massive object like that was to pass through our neighbourhood I think it could fling planets out of the solar system.
Even with this mass this planet would have to pass one of the outer planets extremely close and quite slowly to have a chance of dragging a planet out of the solar system.
This is the same sort of idea as when galaxies merge. There is little chance of our solar system being effected in that scenario. There is just too much space to space.
Aren’t we currently galaxy merging?
That’s one of my very favorite books. It’s fantastic at setting the mood. The further books are ok but not as much to my taste.
I still need to read the book! My main familiarity with RAMA is the 199(5?) PC game that was mind bogglingly obtuse with math puzzles but the world was SO fascinating! I need to figure out how to play it again with my grown up brain…
The soundtrack was INCREDIBLE…
Oh, I absolutely loved all of them, but it’s def a different kind of sci-fi (less human-techy).
I love that whole series!!
But yes, this simp is basically a failed star that was prob flung out of some nursery.
You may enjoy Fritz Leiber’s short story, “A Pail of Air”, which involves the Earth being ejected.
Ofc the simp is cucked in the corner not allowed to join the orgy of planets.
Doh!
Name seems wrong but you do you, SIMP 0136
So how come there’s an aurora when there’s no star to spray it with electromagnetic radiation?
Because the planet produces its own radiation. That much mass means this is less a “planet” and more of a proto star. It’s actually large enough to fuse deuterium if the right conditions were met. Pour enough hydrogen in there to raise the mass a three of four times what it has now and it’d be comparable to our sun.
So it’s like smoke or burning embers before a flame ignites?
Would this be a star which wasn’t big enough and fizzled out into a big planet?
Cool, thanks for that!
better question, is a star required for EMR?
Nah, that’s a yes or no question, that’s a worse question. I want to know what’s causing the aurora, if not a star.
I remember this Mainframe cartoon!
Borg Sphere Model 2025
That’s a picture of Jupiter and there’s a star needed for an aurora to happen.
Any scientific sources to back this story up?
No it is indeed an artists impression of the planet - it’s on the wiki page.
I’m assuming that aurora only needs solar wind to happen on earth - or that solar wind outside the heliosphere is strong enough you don’t need a star for it to happen.
In 2018 astronomers said "Detecting SIMP J01365663+0933473 with the VLA through its auroral radio emission, also means that we may have a new way of detecting exoplanets, including the elusive rogue ones not orbiting a parent star …
The picture is definitely just some artist’s conception, but it’s not claimed to be a photo or meant to be anything other than what it is, an artist’s conception. You’re right that for the most part, a star is needed for aurora, at least for the kind of aurora we have on Earth since it depends on the solar wind interacting with the planet’s magnetic field. But if there is anything that can be said about what we’ve discovered astronomically in the last century or so it’s that there are always exceptions to every supposed rule.
The authors attribute the auroras to SIMP-0136’s magnetic field being vastly more powerful than Jupiter’s (750 times stronger according to a previous study). Electrons (presumably stripped from atoms by internal processes) would flow with the field and hit atmospheric molecules fast enough to make them glow, they conclude.
Aside from the aurora part though, none of this is exceptional or rare (and maybe even the aurora part isn’t rare either). Rogue planets are probably extremely common, possibly even more common than planets that are gravitationally bound in a star system. And objects of this size, which is really around where we’d start calling it a brown dwarf, are also very common, with more of them than there are main sequence stars.
Thanks
He’s just jealous 'cause the dorks on Earth called him a failed star.
Just call it an URO and be done with it.
Follow internet tradition and call it Planet McPlanety-Face ?
Lonely queen.
Likely a brown dwarf or magnetar
Looks like a brown dwarf, especially from the Wiki page
I was going to say, I read somewhere at uni that if Jupiter was 14 times as large, it would have become a brown dwarf.
simp 0136 really needs love. seriously!
Looks fake
Isn’t this a screenshot from Star Control 2?
justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 1 day ago
So, my understanding is that the Simp is all alone?
TheBat@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Just like me fr
justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 1 day ago
If you are being serious, please find some local in person hobby groups that interest you and join them. It's absolutely worth it.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Pretty normal for simps. Sorry.
X@piefed.world 1 day ago
Being that size can be really fucking intimidating to others.