REDACTED
@REDACTED@infosec.pub
- Comment on The Year Ahead for Battlefield 6 | 2026 Roadmap 15 hours ago:
At this point, I’m convinced they would get massive sales boost by introducing single-player skirmish mode as it feels like we don’t really have proper battlefield-like games for SP. The one I occasionally play is Ravenfield, heavily inspired by BF
- Comment on It's already running 1 day ago:
Nah I use both pretty regularly and I’m fairly sure macOS still makes you do the “nope sorry, press ok, go into system settings, security panel, become admin and click trust this unknown publisher” thing
Just like I have to go into windows defender settings and add exclusions (trust) to anything it deems suspicious
- Comment on Hacker group threatens to release Grand Theft Auto VI data in Rockstar Games attack 2 days ago:
And then delayed GTA again, yet claimed that firing developers would not affect release dates
- Comment on [deleted] 2 days ago:
So you’re AI?
- Comment on [deleted] 2 days ago:
I love how in the mirror she looks like a man
- Comment on They cannot see the things that will hurt them 3 days ago:
Do you not understand what is a state? Zapatista is essentially Amish community
- Comment on They cannot see the things that will hurt them 3 days ago:
You cannot imagine how little people cared about the things you care about in US (Ie. Israel/Gaza). It was mostly social media being loud about it, but it didn’t affect the results. If you genuinely thought Harris would support Israel more than Trump, I have few bridges to sell you.
Stop being so out of touch with everything.
- Comment on They cannot see the things that will hurt them 3 days ago:
But in reality, the real reason why democrats lost is because the party and majority who support it are quite lazy people. In all stats/online pollings the democrats should have won, but they didn’t because only minority actually went to vote.
- Comment on They cannot see the things that will hurt them 3 days ago:
I knew it was liberal party of MAGA that is bringing fascism
- Comment on Anon is worried about AAA sales 3 days ago:
No Man’s Sky
Minecraft
Kenshi
Subnautica and Raft
STALKER Trilogy
Metro
Valheim
Bright Memory
Outward
The long dark
The forest
- Comment on Like seriously, go get some experience first and come back to me kid 4 days ago:
Pretty sure I only have one ban, on YouShouldKnow, and I still have no clue why, never received a message about it, just noticed it.
- Comment on Anon is worried about AAA sales 6 days ago:
I never claimed big = good, this was the thing I argued against initially when I implied at the fact that size doesn’t matter, but you said I misinterpret you. What a weird convo we’re having. Starfield is most definitely not a more enjoyable game that Factorio.
There are far better options available, customized to your palate, what you find to define quality. Whatever you think of as ‘good’ in games is probably better served by something outside the AAA space by something specializing in that thing (Unless you really just like big more than anything
And yet, when I ask you for examples, you refuse, because I’ve played thousands of games, most being indie, and I’m still trying to understand what is it that you’re seeing that I don’t. Indie games are great, but they will never be GTA 5, they will never have such attention to detail, innovation, wow-factor, ecetera ecetera, they’re commonly just good at gameplay, but that’s it. Even the Factorio I mentioned. It was more addictive than the AAA looking Satisfactory, but I actually return to Satisfactory far more often than Factorio, and that’s my subconsciousness wanting it. There is just something very satisfactory about seeing your factory in such an impressive rendering, rather than just text-based (Ie. Idle games) or top-bottom 2D games.
So, again, unless you’re actually capable of answering my previous question about you proving examples of which games are better than the ones I named in that category, I’ll just assume you’re being emotional.
- Comment on Anon is worried about AAA sales 1 week ago:
You have an emotional reason to support them. Why should anyone listen to you about them if your views are emotionally tainted and your own standard requires detached judgement?
“Your opinion is not valid because you like, not dislike what I dislike” is what this sounds like.
Alright then, tell me which open world driving+action game is better than GTA or Cyberpunk? Which RPGs are better than Buldur’s gate, Elder scrolls and Kingdom Come? What other online shooters besides Battlefield, COD, Arma (besides those hero/competitive) are that popular and generally great? What about flight simulator? I’m sure there are indie studios beating Microsoft at that.
You cannot and will not convince me that AAA games are “middle of the road, mechanically stagnant”. AAA studios are literally the ones inventing new stuff and pushing the bar higher up, hence the increasing time between releases. From valve’s material rendering to real time lighting and ending with all kinds of misc things like TAA, texture tech, thousands of little mechanisms everyone now copies (especially from titles like Far Cry 3 that innovated alot). It has become incredibly hard to actually make a great AAA game, and logically that’s respectable for anyone who accomplishes this.
- Comment on Anon is worried about AAA sales 1 week ago:
I honestly don’t understand your point. Just because the games are larger, they’re worse? The things you describe are commonly not even in many indie games (Ie. Animations).
So your logic is that if the product is not 11/10, it’s shit? I’m sorry that you’ve had such a terrible experience, but personally some of the best games I’ve ever played in my life were AAA games and I’m glad companies made/make them.
Also, your “quality over quantity” at the end is so out of touch due to everyone complaining about how long it takes nowadays to make AAA games. New entries used to be made in a year or two-three, now we’re entering “wait a decade or two till we make the second game”
- Comment on Anon is worried about AAA sales 1 week ago:
Damn, I guess I’ll just delete GTA games, cyberpunk, Witcher, Skyrim and others because it was just marketing
- Comment on Real 1 week ago:
These are always illustrations based on whatever data we could gather. We almost never “see” the planets themselves.
- Comment on Slippery 1 week ago:
Psychological addiction (what you talked about) vs physical addiction (what OP meant)
- Comment on Iran attacks Oracle as retribution for sacked employees 1 week ago:
I’m seeing a pattern in that list
- Comment on Iran attacks Oracle as retribution for sacked employees 1 week ago:
Not really. USA actually had a pretty good reputation after WW2 and before wars in ME. For quite some time, US actually looked like a good country.
- Comment on Mission to the Cloud Server 1 week ago:
Microsoft telemetry has reached space
- Comment on Killing the intellectual future of Iran. Science has no borders. 1 week ago:
I get what you’re saying, but there is no objective defence for what is Russia doing in Europe. Anyone who sides with Russia or defends Russia either has personal interests in it, or the person is so easily brainwashed they’re more dangerous than LLMs
- Comment on 2 weeks ago:
Fundamentally, you are saying “making money bad” which is just a naive and highly uneducated argument to have.
Yup, you missed my point, but I really don’t think I’m capable of better explaining how what is valve doing is possible only because they essentially have PC monopoly.
- Comment on 2 weeks ago:
Also, it’s funny that you talk about “monopolistic”, because epic has probably engaged in more monopolistic behavior with the EGS than steam ever has
This is stupid. Valve telling developers “you can’t sell your game cheaper on other platforms than on steam” is taking the cake away alone. Textbook anti-trust lawsuit (which might be already happening?)
You somehow keep ignoring the fact that valve makes more money than any other corporation per employee. They are clearly over-charging and you cannot argue against this. Stop defending meg corporations.
- Comment on 2 weeks ago:
You missed my point. I’ll repeat it.
30% cut was fine when infrastructure was just not there yet, but 64GB HDD no longer costs 100€ and internet is not metered in megabytes. Like I said, they’re making more money per employee than other corporations. If you genuinely think Valve and Gabe’s fleet of Yachts is not monopolistic pricing, then keep on defending corpos
- Comment on 2 weeks ago:
Seriously, we need more companies doing nothing and taking 30% fee, becoming super rich corporations making more money than any other company per employee, while devs wonder if they’ll break even
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
POV: You’re six
- Comment on oh ok 3 weeks ago:
I’ll take it as a “you’re right, but no”
- Comment on oh ok 3 weeks ago:
You’re thinking about biological lying. I’m talking about software.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasoning_system
If the question was to tell it’s darkest secret, but it instead chose to come up with an entertaining story instead of factually answering that question, like other Anthropic LLM models did, then by definition of reasoning system, the system (LLM) decided to lie. There are variables that made it “decide” this route, therefore it is not a static, expected output - at the core of it - it was a system’s choice
- Comment on oh ok 3 weeks ago:
Ehh, you obviously only understand LLMs on a very basic level with knowledge from 2021. This is like explaining jet engines by “air goes thru, plane moves forward”. Technically correct, but criminally undersimplified. They can very much decide to lie during reasoning phase.
In OPs image, you can clearly see it decided to make shit up because it reasonates that’s what human wants to hear. That’s quite rare example actually, I believe most models would default to “I’m an LLM model, I don’t have dark secrets”
- Comment on oh ok 3 weeks ago:
Being honest is an action, not an emotion. Researchers proved LLMs can lie on purpose.