SkyeStarfall
@SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
she/they
- Comment on Womp womp womp womp 3 days ago:
Yeah, in a lot of fields it simply would pay more to go private lmao
Still, it feels more rewarding to contribute to the scientific body than to just make someone else rich
- Comment on No explanation needed 6 days ago:
I hate that this makes so much fucking sense
- Comment on "Oh wow a kryptonite radiation machine, I volunteer Superman to go inside! Doesn't feel so good does it?" 6 days ago:
It would still be extremely valuable, though
- Comment on aspirations 1 week ago:
Yeah, I remember th same thing as a freshman, it was not any different lol
- Comment on aspirations 1 week ago:
They don’t think that. The seemingly adults think that. So often I see people complaining about kids and their brainrot, and it’s not from the kids themselves
- Comment on Priorities 4 weeks ago:
Pretty sure it’s like insanely bad for you. It might straight up cause brain damage
So yeah, just smoke weed instead
- Comment on Is this true for Germans? 4 weeks ago:
It really is a funny feeling, where it looks genuinely awesome (in the literal sense) but at the same time is also horrifically destructive
- Comment on Off the Rails 4 weeks ago:
While you’re right, it’s also funny to say that god was a software developer under deadline pressure
- Comment on constants r fun 5 weeks ago:
That’s a diagram from the same article, actually
- Comment on You nomster! 5 weeks ago:
I would definitively notice immediately. It would just feel… wrong
- Comment on ‘Clair Obscur’ Leads The Game Awards 2025 Nominees With 12 Nods; ‘Silent Hill f’ Has Four Nominations 5 weeks ago:
I wonder, have you ever made a game yourself? I have
- Comment on Sea Level 5 weeks ago:
The big bang part is interesting, because, if humans become successful and manage to somehow make some sort of long-lasting archive that would survive on universal scales, we would be the ancients with old revelations to a potential future species. Able to impart knowledge that would have been undetectable for them, and an ancient map of the stars containing visions of countless other galaxies, and a peek into the very beginnings
Though, realistically, it’s likely that a hypothetical hyper-advanced technological species would have their ways of prodding the true nature of our universe, despite the greater challenges
- Comment on Christmas Animals 1 month ago:
Quick question, are you disabled yourself?
- Comment on Meanwhile Ball 1 month ago:
Wich turned it basically into an US exclusive product, and pretty much impossible to get outside of there
- Comment on I dunno 1 month ago:
Maths is so much more malleable and abstract than what you think it is. You really do not understand maths as well as you think you do, and I feel a bit sad for any student of yours that would wish to explore some deeper revelations of maths, just to be told “nope! That’s just how it is!” with no further thinking at all.
A lot of maths is chosen. Choices with good motivation, but choices nonetheless. So long as there not being contradictions or paradoxes, the formulation of a form of math is valid. Which is why you have different forms of maths with different rules.
And you really could use some more humility, it’s obnoxious when you act all so high and mighty and arrogant, with no interest in questioning your assumptions. Devolving into ridiculing the person you’re discussing with and a general vibe of “omfg I’m right you fucking idiot because I’m right how dumb can you get??”
Like, what is it that you want here, a book from the 700s of the one dude that invented arithmetics and told clearly “I chose this.”? You are making your arguments effectively unfalsifiable by just going “Nuh uh” all the time.
Get some humility and learn a bit about the foundations of maths. Like. Down to set theory. See for yourself what actually is the foundation. And, spoiler, it’s not a high school textbook. Hopefully I do not need to tell you how concepts are simplified for younger students, instead of overwhelming them with the complete knowledge of a subject.
- Comment on I dunno 1 month ago:
I mean, it is pretty clear here that you do not really understand the purpose of notation, nor what maths is. Notation is just a constructed language to convey a mathematical idea, it’s malleable
And yeah, it’s easy to just say “this page is wrong!” without any further argument. Nothing you referenced proved the convention as law, and neither is there any mathematical basis for any proof, because it simply is nonsensical to “prove” a notation. Have another source for this being convention www.themathdoctors.org/order-of-operations-why/ or math.stackexchange.com/…/mathematical-proof-for-o…. If you want a book about this, then there’s en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronshtein_and_Semendyayev that is cited by wikipedia. I’m sure you could also find stuff about this in a set theory book. Though good luck understanding them without sufficient experience in high-level maths
Really though, maths is so much more than “3+5=8 because that’s the correct answer!” But why is it the correct answer? In what context? What is the definition of addition? How can you prove that 1+1=2 from fundamental axioms? This is harder to answer than you might think.
- Comment on I dunno 1 month ago:
That’s a very simplistic view of maths. It’s convention en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations
Just because a definition of an operator contains another operator, does not require that operator to take precedence. As you pointed out, 2+3*4 could just as well be calculated to 5*4 and thus 20. There’s no mathematical contradiction there. Nothing broke. You just get a different answer. This is all perfectly in line with how maths work.
You can think of operators as functions, in that case, you could rewrite 2+3*4 as add(2, mult(3, 4)), for typical convention. But it could just as well be mult(add(2, 3), 4), where addition takes precedence. Or, similarly, for 2*3+4, as add(mult(2, 3), 4) for typical convention, or mult(2, add(3, 4)), where addition takes precedence. And I hope you see how, in here, everything seems to work just fine, it just depends on how you rearrange things. This sort of functional breakdown of operators is much closer to mathematical reality, and our operators is just convention, to make it easier to read.
Something in between would be requiring parentheses around every operator, to enforce order. Such as (2+(3*4)) or ((2+3)*4)
- Comment on I dunno 1 month ago:
The rules are socially agreed upon. They are not a mathematical truth. There is nothing about the order of multiple different operators in the definition of the operators themselves. An operator is simply just a function or mapping, and you can order those however you like. All that matters is just what calculation it is that you’re after
- Comment on I just learned 37% of Americans fear vaccinating their dog will cause the dog to develop autism. 😐 1 month ago:
I mean, dogs and cats can have mental illnesses or disorders, it’s just that they tend to be less impactful due to them being, well, pets. They have no responsibilities
From what I know, they can have traits reminiscent of human autism
- Comment on ‘Clair Obscur’ Leads The Game Awards 2025 Nominees With 12 Nods; ‘Silent Hill f’ Has Four Nominations 1 month ago:
I mean, it wasn’t though…
It’s clear you haven’t actually watched any of arc gameplay though, because it’s so far from what you’ve said it’s kinda laughable
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
It is life, but it’s not a multicellular life. Aka, it’s no more advanced than a single bacteria
- Comment on A rogue object so strange, scientists aren’t sure what to call it. 1 month ago:
We have discovered over 6000 exoplanets in total, and over 100 in this year. I’d be surprised if you knew of all of them
- Comment on It's nothing 1 month ago:
Sums up a surprising amount of our biology
Yeah, our bodies sometimes have weird random issues, who would have guessed a flesh robot built by trial and error is fucky wucky
- Comment on I dunno 1 month ago:
I mean, arithmetic order is just convention, not a mathematical truth. But that convention works in the way we know, yes, because that’s what’s… well… convention
- Comment on Assuming humanity last another few hundred years; How many human languages do you think are gonna be left in 100 years? In 200 years? 1 month ago:
Humans have a natural tendency to develop slang. Even in the internet age new slang and in-group languages/dialects are constantly formed
- Comment on ‘Clair Obscur’ Leads The Game Awards 2025 Nominees With 12 Nods; ‘Silent Hill f’ Has Four Nominations 2 months ago:
Mind elaborating? Are they actually atrocious, or is it just a genre you dont yourself enjoy?
- Comment on ‘Clair Obscur’ Leads The Game Awards 2025 Nominees With 12 Nods; ‘Silent Hill f’ Has Four Nominations 2 months ago:
I’m sorry, I know that’s probably not what you intend, but this really just reads as nothing but ragebait
- Comment on Trump's Big Beautiful Bill 2 months ago:
Good to know even powerful disgusting people abuse ticketing priority systems
Ah, who am I kidding, they’re probably the ones most likely to do so
- Comment on you're untapped value 2 months ago:
Due to the cooking XP potential in the uncooked chicken
- Comment on turing completeness 2 months ago:
And this has always been the obvious logical conclusion for a for profit dating app
And also similarly applies to other for profit software. It’s the whole idea behind enshittification
Which is why FOSS is king and should be supported as much as possible in as many areas as possible