Dasus
@Dasus@lemmy.world
- Comment on Anon thinks there is a bicurious double standard 4 days ago:
I chuckled under my breath
- Comment on Labor and the Coalition have very different ideas about ties to the United States 4 days ago:
My comment specifically states “look at their comments”.
Bad faith brigading.
- Comment on Labor and the Coalition have very different ideas about ties to the United States 4 days ago:
Are you blind?
No. Just regular bad faith brigading. “Super smart.”
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
You don’t even realise it but your quality of rhetoric is devolving.
en.m.wikipedia.org/…/Framing_(social_sciences)
Propaganda isn’t synonymous with lying you uneducated twit.
For instance Davel@lemmy.ml did the exact same type of spamming of “don’t vote genocide joe” and later anti-harris articles. Are any of those untrue? No. Did it help Trump win? Yes. (No matter how marginal the effect.) He also claimed to be American, when he painfully clearly isn’t.
So yah, the quality of your rhetoric is going down. Maybe take a breather, have some krokodil, go to bed and try again tomorrow.
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
How do you think disinfo and misinfo shows up?
Oh you don’t think about it?
That’s why.
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
or spammy stuff.
He posts so much he doesn’t even have time to read the articles. Yet you pretend it isn’t spam.
Zzzzzzzzzzz
Grow up
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
I’ve stated it a dozen times. Are you honestly not seeing it, you’ve mangled you’ve brain so badly with cognitive dissonance that it’s literally blocking text from comments you reply to?
Or the simpler explanation that you’re just a bad faith bullshitter.
I don’t care a bit about him. I care about disinfo and misinfo.
I just wish even once there was one of you who knew how to argue even a little. But it’s like middle school level rhetoric. Such a bore.
You don’t care for misinformation and disinformation? Why not?
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
After like a dozen times of talking about how he can’t possibly read those articles he’s spamming, how do you think he would form his own opinion, when he doesn’t even read the articles?
You know this. You can try to draw this out as long as you want, but you’re just going around in circles, pretending not to see the obvious. It’s pathetic.
How do you think Russian disinfo and misinfo shows up online? Do you think they post “You should support Putin!” posts? That’s a rhetorical question, I know you will never answer any of this.
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
The childish avoidance was quite charming the first year or two, but now it’s getting just kinda tiresome.
“Oh Russian propaganda? No but everyone has an agenda, so Russian propaganda is nothing more than than that!”
See before; “this is the rhetorical equivalent of fighting 5-year olds”
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
“Harassed”, sure buddy.
Dude makes 12 posts an hour, every hour, for months, and calling him out on it is harassment?
So by calling me out now, aren’t you harassing me?
When you browse new, he’s all you see.
Stop being obtuse and pretending there aren’t bad actors.
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
Hey if you’re bothered, you can just block me. ;>
You don’t think disinformation online is everyone’s problem?
Or are you gonna hope that by having ignored the questions in the last comment about you maintain your extraordinary cognitive dissonance, I’m gonna accept the implication that it isn’t spam?
If you’re getting so upset online, maybe take a break from it?
- Comment on Labor and the Coalition have very different ideas about ties to the United States 5 days ago:
I don’t believe a single person actually has trouble knowing what I mean, but lots of people in bad faith will pretend as if they do.
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
So you’re still maintaining that propaganda doesn’t exist?
It’s not a newsbot just posting articles as they come out. It’s not a person reading articles and sharing interesting content.
It’s a person spamming pre-selected articles without even reading them. Thus they’re not adding anything, because they don’t even understand what the thing is they’re posting. They’re spamming.
If it was a person who posted the things he read, it would be different. But it’s not. It’s clearly spam with an agenda, and again, if you can’t see it, I can’t help you. Perhaps try taking some media literacy courses?
Then again, to be honest, I think you completely understand my point and this is the same age old tired bad faith bullshit.
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
But me commenting on three cross-posted posts about how this guy is spamming, that’s spam. But his posts, which far outnumber my comments, are not spam, but my criticism of his spam is?
No need to follow anyone around. You never browse new? He spams his links, so they appear at the exact same time. He doesn’t read the things he posts, he spams. Just because you’re having a tantrum, stomping your foot and pretending he isn’t, that doesn’t change reality.
Honestly, how do you manage such cognitive dissonance?
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
Pretty much the first rule of every single community on the internet that has ever existed is “no spam”.
But you’re maintaining that this account which clearly is a human and not a newsbot, isn’t wildly spamming?
Honestly, this is like the rhetorical equivalent of fighting 5-year olds. Get a fucking education man
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
They don’t teach you basic maths either? Ohmygod, that’s kinda horrible. How do you manage basic everyday living?
There’s like four comments from today calling out months long spam, and instantly there’s people protesting and crying and yelling.
I’m not the least bit bothered. Your projecting your emotions onto me. You are bothered. You are offended. You are mad.
And probably all because I’m right, you know it, but you also won’t even accept it to yourself. It’s pathetic, really.
You should block me probably so you don’t need to be bothered by people calling out the existence of bad actors spamming propaganda, you’ll just then get the pure propaganda. Much better, right?
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
You mistyped “I don’t know if you are offended”.
Because you don’t. Evidenced by the fact you think I’m offended.
I honestly wish I was. I long for the days when people were able to offend me.
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
Why would you think I’m offended?
You’re pretending as if it’s a person just posting interesting things they’ve read, when they’re posting an article every 12 minutes 247.
You still pretend like his spam is just “regular interests”, but my completely appropriate criticism is “getting offended”?
Have you ever tried stopping to read your comment before posting, and just having a think about what you’re implying?
Unless of course, you know it all along and do it on purpose.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 days ago:
“Spamming is the exact same thing as actual content”
It’s kinda boring talking to people like you, because I don’t feel like playing pretend like you do.
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
I don’t believe a single person actually has trouble knowing what I mean, but lots of people in bad faith will pretend as if they do.
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
I don’t need to even open their user profile with the amount they spam to seem like I’m “stalking” them. The front page is filled with their spam.
I don’t believe a single person actually has trouble knowing what I mean, but lots of people in bad faith will pretend as if they do.
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
I don’t believe a single person actually has trouble knowing what I mean, but lots of people in bad faith will pretend as if they do.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 days ago:
Second time is nowhere near enough.
I’m sure everyone can make up their own minds. ;>
<3333
- Comment on Labor and the Coalition have very different ideas about ties to the United States 5 days ago:
Look at the poster’s profile and have a glance not only at the 17 articles they post every hour, but go and look at their comments.
- Comment on Speeding overtaking driver who left cyclist with life-changing injures in “horrendous” hit-and-run crash jailed for four years 5 days ago:
Look at the poster’s profile and have a glance not only at the 17 articles they post every hour, but go and look at their comments.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 days ago:
Look at the poster’s profile and have a glance not only at the 17 articles they post every hour, but go and look at their comments.
- Comment on Anon wants to be Truman 5 days ago:
If you had the disposable income of a 90’s middle-class person, you might find it claustrophobic that you aren’t allowed to take your holidays and see the world.
But like for us who only really imagine seeing it through screens, this would be a massive improvement.
- Comment on Game prices should have increased with every new generation, former PlayStation US boss says 6 days ago:
- Comment on Worst part about living in Europe 1 week ago:
It’s not really not the size, most backpacks really are at least 20 liters. It’s the shape. But mine would take 6 1.25 litre bottles, easy. It’s a large quality rucksack. I’ve had it for literally more than a quarter of a century. Something like 26-27 years prolly.
But I agree, 6x 1.25 l bottles in a very basic backpack might present a challenge, because it’s usually not wide enough for one to go sideways on the bottom (mine is tho, for 1.25l, which is uncommon size here tho). Or just put three at the bottom and then three upside down on top of them. Even a basic backpack could do that I’m sure.
