Dasus
@Dasus@lemmy.world
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
We’re not even close to the thread max, you’re just desperate to run away.
Because just like all the other kids, your letting your ego control you. Quite manly of you, really. Usually it’s teenage boys who have these tantrums. I genuinely wish you’re at most 25 and not an actual adult, because if you are, you’re gonna have a real tough time with your life. Although I don’t think I need to worry too much about it, since the worst insults you can imagine are “garglebargle” spam and “you’re probably a virgin”. Like what is this, 8th grade? :D
So, no more “lol look at how many paragraphs you’re writing” because I actually like writing, whereas you’re “wasting your time” as you put it.
Doesn’t matter how much you cry, you still say you believe in things which have no scientific support. And that just drives you mad realising how everyone is laughing at you, so you’re *itching" to run from the thread. But you can’t, since your ego won’t let you. :((
Men seem to be the better shooter than women, especially when shooting handguns.
gracefulinsights.space/blog/who-shoots-better
Now isn’t that weird? I can just imagine how furiously you’re googling something to find against it, but can’t and I can almost hear the steam whistling in your ears. Too bad, deary, won’t change the facts of life. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
Ah yes, back to pretending like you were never serious at all, even though that also implies you weren’t serious about women being better marksmen, even though you can’t actually admit to that.
Why do you kids never believe me when I say I’ve seen this tantrum you’re having hundreds of times?
Like I said, it’s alright for you to be religious and not understand science. Many people are. And your agreement isn’t needed, as you’re showing everyone. :)
Maybe it’s because you have a hard time reading actual hard science, and need someone to simplify it for you…?
This is seemingly an American woman, so you’ll feel comfortable with her language.
Most shooting instructors, both men and women, will happily tell you women are better shooters than men, followed by anecdotes to support their claim. But is this really true? Since I am a researcher, I do not believe in anecdotal evidence. I want the hard scientific facts. So, I did a little research on this topic sharing here with you what I found
Summarizing the findings of all these studies, I came to the following conclusions: Men seem to be the better shooter than women, especially when shooting handguns.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
Saying stuff doesn’t make it true, and willfully refusing to accept science showed at you makes you a religious person who will be sorely mocked.
I mean, you are publicly shaming yourself with this tantrum, but on top of that. :)
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
I don’t think you know what the word means, tbh.
You can check my history, dozens of kids there having tantrums exactly like yours, where they can’t talk about what they said earlier in the thread. Start avoiding. Then a little bit of “lol you waste your time writing paragraphs” to let me know how you’re actually disliking this. Again I’m not. :))
I’m getting “tons of enjoyment out of it” or whatever you said a day or two ago.
Sorry girls are better shots and you cant handle that. Its just objectively true.
Sorry, hunny, we’ve been over this. Something you believe but science says isn’t true isn’t “objectively true”, it’s “subjective delusion”, ie religion. (Although organized religion is sort of objective delusion as well.)
I know you don’t even register it when you see science but for the umpteenth time:
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068418/
Pistol and Rifle Performance: Gender and Relative Age Effect Analysis
Conclusions: The main conclusions of the study are: (1) the men’s pistol performance is better than the women’s even though RAE is not associated to the shooting score in any case; (2) men and women performed equally in the general analysis, but their performances were different depending on category and event with no RAE influence.
What’s that sentence?
men’s pistol performance is better
On a scales of 1 to PMS, how annoyed are you…?;>>
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
I wonder how old you are.
Usually it takes a day or two for you to realise how childish you’re being, just because you felt a bit silly when someone pointed out something you think is true was a myth.
But you’ll get there. Now it’s just a childish compulsion to answer, because you think you’ll get “the last word” ie “win” a thread if you can be the last comment in it, no matter what preschool word-salad you vomit. It doesn’t work that way. You’re just publicly making an idiot of yourself. I’ve seen this literally hundreds if not thousands of times. It always ends the same.
Because I like writing and am not delusional nor super upset (or "butthurt as the kids say.) None of which seem to apply to you. So now you’re just digging your pit deeper and deeper. Enjoy. ;>
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
Another miss with the preschool insults.
Your aim really doesn’t seem to be as good as you made it out to be.
I can show you my gold marskmen medals from the army though, but again, that wouldn’t mean men nor women are better marksmen. Just that I got gold scores in the army.
As I kinda doubt yours. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
By definition, you are, though.
You said you don’t care there’s no science to prove “girls are better marksmen anyway”, yet when it’s pointed out to you, you get a tantrum. Much like religious people when you point out how ridiculous they are.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
I have no need to “let it go”.
I’m on forums because I like it. How did you put it… “it riles people up and gives me a ton of joy.”*
My mom is also dead btw. Dad went last year grandma and mom this year. So idk, since you’re religious you’re probably gonna feel all bad about making jokes about dead people.
I find it hilarious that I can quote you back at you, while all you can do is spam nonsense. It’s not like anyone’s going to notice you’re desperately avoiding mentioning why you’re even in the thread to begin with. Can’t mention that you said “women are better markmen anyway”, especially not with how the votes stand on those.
You keep getting madder. I just enjoy writing. ;>
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
Oh so yeah you don’t believe women are better marksmen. Good that we cleared that delusion of yours right up. :)
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
So, refusing to answer whether everything is a shitpost and you’re not actually a better shooter than men in general?
A whole paragraph. Do you feel like you’re “wasting time”?
Real mature looking profile btw. (I didn’t check it, but I’d assume, with comments like that.)
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
You know everyone can see you spamming nonsense, right?
Just because there’s no science to prove women are better marksmen, you take that as a personal offense so bad you just can’t let go. I’ve seen this exact tantrum hundreds of times. Last time a day or two ago.
It always goes the same way. You can’t address why you’re in the thread and try mocking people on forums for… using forums for writing things… while at the same time writing things like “k lol” or “didn’t read lol”. I fail to see how you think it’s a positive thing, but anyway, that’s what usually happens.
We’ll see how much you follow the pattern
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
More incoherent bullshit. I love it when I prove someone’s quite wrong, you know, scientifically speaking, and then they get so upset they just can’t let go unless they think they “get the last word.”
I don’t think like that, but I meet this daily. I have to say, usually it’s from men, because women tend to not let their egos control them.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
Ah, but you get so angry from someone posting that you regress into a child who writes
So it was “shitposting” when you said you shoot better than guys? Yeah I kinda saw that coming. No wörries.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
I always wonder what your self-image is like, when you write “I hate writing but I’m forcing myself because you made me feel stupid.”
I actually enjoy writing. That’s why I’m on forums. What about you? Clearly you’re not here for the facts, and clearly you hate writing.
So… ego issues?
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
Ah yes, the Schrodinger’s douche-defense.
If someone agrees with you, you were being serious, but if someone points out it’s not exactly accurate, ite “I didn’t believe it anyway”.
So…you and the girls aren’t better shots than the guys, I take it. ;>
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
I’m not offended. I’m not like you, I don’t get upset over random shit online.
Like someone pointing out something I said is actually a myth.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 1 day ago:
I’m not even following whatever bullshit you’re on about.
Why are you this upset someone called you out on something that’s a myth?
- Comment on Firearm Advice 2 days ago:
You’re using the wrong tense there, my dad died last year.
It’s okay to be mistaken. There’s no need to have a tantrum just because someone pointed out that something you believe in is a myth, not fact.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 2 days ago:
And still, that doesn’t change the fact you’re deluding yourself if you still keep your religious rant of “women are better marksmen”.
You know, when you change “marksmen” to “soldier”, it gets even worse. I did serve with a lot of women, but the plain fact is that most of them can’t be put in the frontlines, because most of them are incapable of evacuating all but the lightest of people.
But still, I wouldn’t assert “men are better soldiers”, because frontline is a relatively small part of what the military does.
I wouldn’t even assert men are better marksmen. But I most definitely would not say “women are better marksmen”, because I’m not deluding myself. Unlike some, cough cough.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 2 days ago:
Oh you’re really mad that I called you out on there not being scientific support for “women are better marksmen”.
I would wager that you’re American from your childish behaviour.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 2 days ago:
Ooh, lille missy is a bit pissy, because the facts don’t align with her religion…? :/
- Comment on Put the shoes on 2 days ago:
- Comment on Firearm Advice 2 days ago:
Hey you do you. If you want to believe in things which aren’t true, despite knowing that there is no science for them, you’re allowed to.
But we all know that’s what you’re doing, since the science simply doesn’t exist. Does it bother you so when I point that out…?
- Comment on Firearm Advice 3 days ago:
Hey, if you have to delude yourself that women are “great marksmen” for some weird reason you can’t even identify, then you go girl.
Just don’t expect the rest of the world to partake in your delusions. :)
- Comment on Firearm Advice 3 days ago:
And nothing else to say? Cool.
You do you.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 3 days ago:
Nor have I said that you have.
You’ve just pretended like it is true, despite the overwhelming lack of data showing any kind of mechanism for it.
You just like thinking women are better marksmen. Despite there being no proof.
It’s okay, many people are religious.
Results: The results of the study indicated that men scored higher than women in pistol events and that no performance differences were found in rifle events when the whole group was compared.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068418/
And these precision competitions utilise air rifles, which are much lighter in weight and recoil than “proper” firearms.
Notice how I’m still not claiming men are better shooters.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 3 days ago:
You have the writing skills of one, definitely.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 3 days ago:
Oh I’m not riled up remotely.
You just contradicted yourself quite badly, so I was clearing things up.
So you do believe the myth that women are better shots? Because unfortunately, science doesn’t seem to support that notion. But I’m not saying you can’t believe in what you want, lots of people believe in magic sky daddys to give them the mental support they need. If yours is thinking you’re better than others - while failing to prove it, well that’s up to you, hunny. :)
- Comment on Firearm Advice 3 days ago:
Oh. So you’re not a woman nor a shooter at all?
Okay, if you say so.
I just notice the “jk lols” coming out quite often after serious claims like that you then seriously can’t back up. Then it’s “jk lol never meant anything I said”
- Comment on Firearm Advice 4 days ago:
The other bit is
The other bit is also personal anecdotes. Just because they’re not your personal anecdotes doesn’t make them non-anecdotal.
I’m sorry but can you imagine the sort of bullshit you’d run into if you were to, idk, argue the opposite of that? If I were even to suggest that “men are better shots than women” I’d be instantly labeled a misogynist.
Yet you just keep repeating your assertion without any evidence.
What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
