Dasus
@Dasus@lemmy.world
- Comment on "That's terror." 15 hours ago:
Yes, because this definitely requires “in-depth” research, and that’s definitely not you moving the goalposts from “you don’t get it” to “well you might get it now, but you definitely didn’t get it before pouring hard research into it!”
And more futile attempts at personal insults. I was playing Nintendo when you da wasn’t even fertile yet, but I don’t see how that’s relevant to this being a shit “joke”? Ofc you’ll never be able to accept it, because you just have to go where the crowd points. You’re not used to reasoning or explaining things, it’s okay.
- Comment on When you cannot sleep but it's too late to take sleeping pills 15 hours ago:
Well it should be “tea” in the general form of the word then, as in some plant steeped. Because “tea” is also the name of the tea plant in some contexts. But yes, what you have should be completely caffeine-free per my understanding.
- Comment on When you cannot sleep but it's too late to take sleeping pills 15 hours ago:
Lately I’ve listened to Star Trek TNG and just yesterday started Voyager. They’re nice because I’ve seen them so many times and they’re usually pretty static from camera angles and dialogue heavy, so it’s fine just listening to them.
- Comment on "That's terror." 15 hours ago:
Ah yes. That’s why I can address the subject, while you avoid it like the plague. Not because you were wrong, but because you’re worried my ego might get hurt. And this definitely has nothing to do with psychological projection.
So please prove me wrong and tell me what reference I “didn’t get”…? ;>
- Comment on "That's terror." 15 hours ago:
Sort of. See you feel compelled to reply, but you now realise you were wrong, which you won’t be able to accept.
There’s nothing I didn’t “get”, I just think the “joke” is ass, which it is.
If there’s something I didn’t get, you could prove it by literally just saying it. But you can’t, because it doesn’t exist. Yet despite knowing that, you’re still compelled to reply. I’ve seen kids like you with the exact same tantrum literally hundreds ans hundreds of times over the years.
- Comment on dyk 16 hours ago:
And calling people objects is why the right is crazy.
If a person drowns and has no heartbeat, is it okay for you to have a quickie with them before the paramedics arrive to save him? Clinically they’re dead, so… by your logic, they’re an object, and never had the ability to consent in the first place, so quickly fucking them up the arse should be a-okay, right?
Or is there like a timer you have for when a person goes from a person to an object, which then retroactively never had personhood anyway? Is it just time, or is it temperature, or as soon as the smell sets in? Some people have been clinically dead for half an hour in cold water before being resuscitated, the cold helping protect from brain damage. And some people smell like dead bodies while alive.
I’m just curious as to your personal criteria.
- Comment on When you cannot sleep but it's too late to take sleeping pills 16 hours ago:
Just remember to check the entire tea is free of actual tea (black/white/green tea whichever), because while chamomile doesn’t have caffeine, lots of chamomile teas are actually black teas flavoured with chamomile, but also there are obviously tons of herbal chamomile tea mixes without caffeine at all. So those would be preferable for insomniacs
- Comment on When you cannot sleep but it's too late to take sleeping pills 16 hours ago:
If you’ve an OLED screen dialed dim with a blue light filter, the effect it’s having is going to be negligible, and having an e-reader is not gonna be much different.
Although audio-books etc still would be better than even very very mild reddish lights.
- Comment on "That's terror." 16 hours ago:
Which reference exactly do you think I didn’t get?
I wish I could communicate to you how well I understand people like you. You genuinely can’t disagree with people unless a bunch of people have done it first. You’re too afraid of deciding anything, ever. A follower.
What’s brown and sticky? A stick!
You’re not laughing? You must not be intelligent enough to understand that the joke is that a stick is brown and “sticky”, because “sticky” here is referring to the quality of being a stick, and not actually used as a noun describing adhesives, like it usually is. /s
Ofc you understand the joke, but unless your age is in singles digits, you’ll probably not find it actually amusing, and while technically a joke, it’s not exactly a prime example. But what’s the difference between me not finding that amusing and me not finding this post amusing? Literally nothing. Yet you think one is an arcane jest that only you chosen ones can understand and no-one could possibly not be amused by it so it must have just gone over my head. And I’m not closed-minded, so perhaps it did. Please, explain the joke I not getting.
- Comment on "That's terror." 17 hours ago:
Okay, so explain what I missed, please?
You don’t think people should say when they hear bad jokes, because you grew up without anyone being allowed yo criticised anything and eveyone having to simp to some societal order which you never even realised to think about.
So you literally think no matter how fucking dumb “a joke” is, you have to laugh at it. That probably means you’ve never actually laughed at a joke. So for you they’re not something fun, they’re just a social nicety. And not seeing that, well, that is a joke I am smiling aloud at. :D
- Comment on "That's terror." 18 hours ago:
So you’re one of those people who don’t think bad jokes exist? Or you’re a person who’s too afraid to say when they hear one?
What’s brown and sticky? A stick!!
“Why aren’t you doubled over, laughing so hard you have diarrhea? Oh, you just didn’t get the joke.”
- Comment on Dick Pick. 2 days ago:
What a POS
- Comment on A job's a job 4 days ago:
This is how it works in Finland at least.
I know that for certain.
One could technically argue you’ve attempted to steal them by stuffing them in your pockets, but apparently that would never work.
Still though, it’s not as if the cops and guards are aware of that. Just today I had a guard hassle me, asking me what the can is in my pocket, in a store I went to a few hours ago. We went just a few min before it closed, but we never even went near the drinks section. The guard was just a babyfaced young guard who wanted to somehow try his authority. I had better things to do so I said nothing and showed the can, as it was a cold beer can, and they don’t stock that beer, or even if they do, they don’t chill any of their beer cans. I knew I could’ve legally refused from showing him, but eh, couldn’t really be arsed, as it would’ve taken so much of everyone’s time and no-one would’ve got why I would even do something like that. (Finns don’t understand the risk of authoritarianism)
- Comment on "That's terror." 5 days ago:
Again with the “apparent lack of understanding”.
Don’t you realise how hilarious it is to pretend someone can’t “get” your “joke”?
It’s not exactly rocket fucking science.
- Comment on "That's terror." 5 days ago:
Got pretty offended I called your post dumb, huh?
Sure, yeah, this is tooootally gone over my head, because the joke is just soooooooooo intellectual and cryptic.
- Comment on "That's terror." 5 days ago:
Of which games? Of existing games, per year? Or what the fuck is the stat.
Who is dumb enough to post shit like this
- Comment on [deleted] 5 days ago:
He did write “the” correctly. He didn’t write “are” correctly.
You however wrote “how much of a cringe child your made yourself look like by writing it”.
Which is… sort of ironic.
- Comment on Osk‽ Pfffft 1 week ago:
Yeah the first one makes me think that it’s at most for speakers.
Weird.
Thanks for teh information.
- Comment on Osk‽ Pfffft 1 week ago:
I haven’t had a TV in like 15 years, what do they look like nowadays?
- Comment on Anon is terminally lonely 1 week ago:
LSD, shrooms and MDMA are a specific groups of drugs. Just like narcotics are. But they aren’t the same group. Opiates, benzos, etc “downers” are narcotics if we’re being technical.
Tell me, how long have you suffered from treatment resistant severe clinical depression? Oh you haven’t? Ah. But you’re just saying those people would be just as well off without said medication?
Mind you, I don’t think you complain when people have a drink or two to relax.
- Comment on Anon is terminally lonely 1 week ago:
It also depends a lot on how you did and what and in what sort of an environment and with what sort of company.
These experiences are highly subjective and I don’t deny that often mushrooms cause nausea for instance. LSD and MDMA less so, but it’s not unheard of.
They’re not perfect, but there’s very much is science behind my point.
- Comment on Anon is terminally lonely 2 weeks ago:
It also won’t fix the problem
It most definitely can. While obviously recreational use is a bit different than having MDMA/psilocybin/LSD-therapy (or ketamine, which is slightly more acceptable for some reason, but works in a different fashion psychoactively so not relevant here).
And then you further realize that you never will feel that way again without drugs.
Lol any other drug propaganda you heard in preschool you wish to share? I’ve done every single drug you can think of, never addicted to anything except maybe weed a bit (and when I was younger also cigarettes and caffeine), and I’ve never felt anything even close as powerful as when you properly get infatuated. Because that is honestly a very strong cocktail of hormones and the difference between hormones and neurotransmitters is quite small, some acting as both.
Remember that the first time is always the strongest!)
Also incorrect. Was you first time tasting coffee the strongest caffeine rush you’ve had, or was it a bit later when you’d got used to it and could binge? Same with alcohol. Except that with serotonergic substances, you don’t do that.
One single use can alleviate severely depression on terminally ill patients for months. Literally. That’s not those people being high or having some false sense of happiness.
If you want me to get more objective about how it works and why I suggest it to OP, then here. Think of your emotional memory being associative memory, like smells are. You can probably remember what your first gf/bf smelled like, at least vaguely, but if you actually had the taste in front of your nose, it would unlock just tons of visceral memories. Now you had those memories even before having the scent in your nose, but they were sort of “locked” behind the associated trigger. It’s not about what is a trigger and what is not, but the general associative nature of it. When you do a serotonergic substance for a sufficient dose, it floods your head with all sorts of those triggers, but the ones that have to do with serotonin, ie good feelings of unity etc orrr on the flipside high anxiety (that’s why MDMA with a therapist is preferred to shrooms by yourself, so it actually goes the pleasant route and you don’t get a serotonin induced panic response, ie a “bad trip”). And since your brain is flooded, it also unlocks a lot of memories of happy times and contentedness, which in depression just sort of “fade away” because you haven’t felt them in a long time and depression is a feedback loop.
Thats why you need a powerful substance to break the loop.
So unlike psychiatrist have been pushing for like 30 years, serotonin reuptake inhibitors (prozac, cipralex, escitalopram, etc) don’t actually function well, despite there being a little bit of an idea behind it (as in a correctly identified system, serotonin). The problem is that low dose over a long time won’t help, high dose over a short time will. Kinda like setting something on fire. A slightly warm electric battery won’t help no matter how long you keep dry grass on it.
Shit analogy at the end but the theories hold true.
I can find more detailed sources but I’m kinda tired and wrote all that already so leave your questions/doubts under this akd I’ll adress them tomorrow if you can’t find it on this basic wiki which I didn’t read currently I’ve just read a lot over the years and can’t be arsed to try and look for specific references rn
- Comment on Normal 2 weeks ago:
That was a relatively recent invention
Idk man I think the paleolithic predates ancient Egypt.
Most date from the Gravettian period (26,000–21,000 years ago).[1] However, findings are not limited to this period; for example, the Venus of Hohle Fels dates back at least 35,000 years to the Aurignacian era, and the Venus of Monruz dates back about 11,000 years to the Magdalenian, and the Catalhoyuk figurine[2], 8000 years old.
- Comment on Anon is terminally lonely 2 weeks ago:
Trying doing some ecstasy/mushrooms/LSD
- Comment on My kind of Doctor 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on fuck it, just paste your clipboard in the comments 2 weeks ago:
“Animals are something invented by plants to move seeds around. An extremely yang solution to a peculiar problem which they faced.” -Terence McKenna
- Comment on cigs w/o u 2 weeks ago:
But he was always sucking on his fags and he paid for them fair and square.
And do you have any idea how high fags are taxed in this day and age?
It’s not like when I was a boy. I was sucking fags left and right without a care in the world about paying for them. Granted pretty often they were the cheaper sort that you got from cruise-boats, tax free.
Pic related, it’s one of those boats for cruising. I’ve also heard them referred to as “fuckboats” but honestly it’s more the tax-free that pulls in people.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 3 weeks ago:
We’re not even close to the thread max, you’re just desperate to run away.
Because just like all the other kids, your letting your ego control you. Quite manly of you, really. Usually it’s teenage boys who have these tantrums. I genuinely wish you’re at most 25 and not an actual adult, because if you are, you’re gonna have a real tough time with your life. Although I don’t think I need to worry too much about it, since the worst insults you can imagine are “garglebargle” spam and “you’re probably a virgin”. Like what is this, 8th grade? :D
So, no more “lol look at how many paragraphs you’re writing” because I actually like writing, whereas you’re “wasting your time” as you put it.
Doesn’t matter how much you cry, you still say you believe in things which have no scientific support. And that just drives you mad realising how everyone is laughing at you, so you’re *itching" to run from the thread. But you can’t, since your ego won’t let you. :((
Men seem to be the better shooter than women, especially when shooting handguns.
gracefulinsights.space/blog/who-shoots-better
Now isn’t that weird? I can just imagine how furiously you’re googling something to find against it, but can’t and I can almost hear the steam whistling in your ears. Too bad, deary, won’t change the facts of life. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Comment on Firearm Advice 3 weeks ago:
Ah yes, back to pretending like you were never serious at all, even though that also implies you weren’t serious about women being better marksmen, even though you can’t actually admit to that.
Why do you kids never believe me when I say I’ve seen this tantrum you’re having hundreds of times?
Like I said, it’s alright for you to be religious and not understand science. Many people are. And your agreement isn’t needed, as you’re showing everyone. :)
Maybe it’s because you have a hard time reading actual hard science, and need someone to simplify it for you…?
This is seemingly an American woman, so you’ll feel comfortable with her language.
Most shooting instructors, both men and women, will happily tell you women are better shooters than men, followed by anecdotes to support their claim. But is this really true? Since I am a researcher, I do not believe in anecdotal evidence. I want the hard scientific facts. So, I did a little research on this topic sharing here with you what I found
Summarizing the findings of all these studies, I came to the following conclusions: Men seem to be the better shooter than women, especially when shooting handguns.
- Comment on Firearm Advice 3 weeks ago:
Saying stuff doesn’t make it true, and willfully refusing to accept science showed at you makes you a religious person who will be sorely mocked.
I mean, you are publicly shaming yourself with this tantrum, but on top of that. :)
