Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

UwU brat mathematician behavior

⁨872⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨fossilesque@mander.xyz⁩ to ⁨science_memes@mander.xyz⁩

https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/a9b2c785-b0aa-4481-a49c-7f7fc6e40b5f.png

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Fake and gay.

    No way the engineer corrects the mathematician for using j instead of i.

    source
    • LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      As an engineer I fully agree. Engineers¹ aren’t even able to do basic arithmetics. I even cannot count to 10.

      ¹ Except maybe Electrical engineers. They seem to be quite smart.

      source
      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Engineer here, I can definitely count to 10 tho

        0 1 10

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • gnutrino@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Electrical engineers are the ones that use j though (because i is used for current)

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • thomasloven@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        10? That’s the name some put to 1e1, right?

        source
      • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Except maybe Electrical engineers.

        Yup, I can count just fine to 10: black, brown, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, gray, white.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        The inner machinations of an electrical engineer is too complicated for me to understand, I think they might be thinking on a higher order to understand these circuits

        Thats why I barely passed my electrical engineering class lol

        source
      • Fedizen@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Having worked with electrical engineers, some of them are quite smart, the rest have lead poisoning.

        source
    • Hoimo@ani.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      How do we know it’s gay though? OP could be a girl (male)

      source
      • SippyCup@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Because it’s 4chan. And there are no women on the Internet on 4chan

        source
      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Sure OP is a girl. Guy In Real Life

        source
      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Newfag.

        (sorry! seemed like the appropriate 4chan reply)

        source
    • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Right? They got that shit backwards. Op is a fraud. i is used in pure math, j is used in engineering.

      source
      • Chakravanti@monero.town ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        That’s hilarious. You’re not seeing what’s going on backwards just like that (as I point at the point going nowhere shitty) in an equation that is finding as many clAEver ways to say something you actually not caring about talking about.

        That’s like, "How many time van express the only thing that van’t be done until the 'verse itself tries to do what can’t be done and sever your…

        …Oh, I see…you don’t have ([of course, because you can’t have to give {is}) nothing)] to give.

        Unable to sea time doesn’t mean we can’t see(k)ER the mAETh.ac(k).cc(k).08

        The only thin(g):(k) that doesn’t ever be never, is not at alla hack(g)in(g).G your lackthereof to divi…

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • kogasa@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      The mathematician also used “operative” instead of, uh, something else, and “associative” instead of “commutative”

      source
      • Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        “operative” instead of, uh, something else

        I think they meant “operand”. As in, in the way dy/dx can sometimes be treated as a fraction and dx treated as a value.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      My thoughts exactly lol

      source
  • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Wait bottom mathematican is using j=√-1 instead of i and not the engineer? Because I’m EE gang, and all my homies use j.

    source
    • GandalfTheDumb@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      That part also got me really confused. All the mathematicans I know use i while engineers use i or j depending on the kind of engineer. I’ve never seen a Pikachu engineer using anything other than j.

      source
      • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Pikachu engineer

        That’s a fucking favorite now. Keeping that in my back pocket.

        source
      • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        OPs boyfriend is obviously an i engineer and hates j engineers. No one can stay angry at mathematicians - engineers on the other hand…

        source
    • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      The fun starts when you study quaternions

      i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = −1

      source
      • pticrix@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        This can’t be real

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • bisby@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I agree. Clearly i is current. What is this i=√-1 nonsense.

      source
    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      [Lapsed] mechanical engineering gang checking in. I was also surprised. Though, tbh, I think it came down to personal preference of the professor more than field-wide consensus.

      source
    • affiliate@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      a real mathematician would use (0, 1) instead of i

      source
  • _stranger_@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    sado-mathochist

    source
    • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Well done, truly

      source
    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Thado-mathocist. The real chad all along.

      It makes me wonder if somewhere out there in a multiverse, a community of lisping incels all collectively draw the chad wojak as as an aramaic looking dude.

      source
  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Image

    Is anyone doing anything tonight?

    source
    • serenissi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      no, d…do you have a plan?

      source
    • Randelung@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Something something distance calls for norm, not just squares.

      ||i||² + ||1||² = 2

      source
    • bitcrafter@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Imagining your death.

      source
    • davidagain@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      This one made me laugh almost as much as the OP. Thank you!

      source
  • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    NGL, this is hot.

    source
    • AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I’m a mechanical engineering student with a math minor and I’m a switch so yeah, I’d take either side of this

      source
  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    operative?

    source
    • sartalon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      As an EE, I used both. Def not a mathematician though. Fuck that, I just plug variables into programs now.

      source
      • the_tab_key@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I have both mechanical and electrical backgrounds. MEs like I, EEs prefer j

        source
    • SanicHegehog@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      imaJinary

      TIL engineers can’t spell for shit.

      source
    • zeca@lemmy.eco.br ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      The associativity thing also doesnt make sense.

      source
    • Unlearned9545@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Engineer here: mostly use i, but have seen j used plenty. First time I saw j used was by a maths professor.

      source
      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Interesting I never saw j from a maths person. Friends (from a decade ago!) in electronics eng dep said they use j because i was reserved for current.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Cannot confirm, we always used i.

      source
  • Kolanaki@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Me, a language/arts person: “Huh?”

    source
    • axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Web dev here. “Huh?”

      source
      • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Webdev not knowing anything about computer science (and thus mathematics)? I am shocked. Shocked!

        source
      • lena@gregtech.eu ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Fullstack dev here. “Huh?”

        source
    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Medical here. “Huh?”

      source
      • nfamwap@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Moron here. “Huh?”

        source
  • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This is the kind of brat I can get behind. 😏

    source
    • _g_be@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      😏

      source
  • Almacca@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I have no idea what they’re talking about, but I do love a happy ending.

    source
  • vivalapivo@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    As a physicist I can’t understand why would anyone complain about a +jb or $\int dx f(x)$. Probably because we don’t fuck

    source
    • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      As a software dude I can see you wrote a regex, I just can’t find out what you’re trying to match.

      source
      • AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Pardon my denseness, but is this sarcasm? Since that is a TeX snippet.

        Why would a RegEx start with a $?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • vivalapivo@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Heeyy… So when you need to express something more, well, delicate than just code, you need to use math symbols. For that you can use tex expressions. Modern markdown supports it: just copy and paste the $…$ part

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I think rather d/dx is the operator. You apply it to an expression to bind free occurrences of x in that expression. For example, dx²/dx is best understood as d/dx (x²). The notation would be clear if you implement calculus in a program.

    source
    • bhamlin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      If not fraction, why fraction shaped?

      source
      • Amir@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        If you use exterior calculus notation, with d = exterior derivative, everything makes so much more sense

        source
    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I just think of the definition of a derivative.

      d is just an infinitesimally small delta. So dy/dx is literally just lim (∆ -> 0) ∆y/∆x. which is the same as lim (x_1 -> x_0) [f(x_0) - f(x_1)] / [x_0 - x_1].

      Note: ∆ -> 0 isn’t standard notation. But writing ∆x -> 0 requires another step of thinking: y = f(x) therefore ∆y = ∆f(x) = f(x + ∆x) - f(x) so you only need ∆x approaching zero. But I prefer thinking d = lim (∆ -> 0) ∆.

      source
  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Better plot than 50 Shades of Grey

    source
    • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      hehe plot. getit? math and graphs and shit

      source
      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Lmao kill yourself

        source
  • laserm@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Why would a mathematician use j for imaginary numbers and why would engineer be mad at them?

    source
    • CyanideShotInjection@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      The only thing I can think of is that the OP studied electrical engineering at some point. But it’s a 4chan story so probably fake anyway.

      source
      • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        fake and gay?

        source
    • prex@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I think it might be the wrong way around: Engineers like to use j for imaginary numbers because i is needed for current.

      source
  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    They both bottoms.

    source
  • edinbruh@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Relationship goals

    source
  • Thordros@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I believe the correct terminology is denominator mathematician.

    source
  • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    $\int dx f(x)$ is standard notation for physicists

    source
  • BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I love how that wannabe 4chan nerd just got outnerded in the comment section

    source
  • Etterra@discuss.online ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Can somebody ELI5 this for my troglodyte writer brain?

    source
  • marcos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Hum… I don’t think the integral “operator” applies by multiplication.

    You can put the dx at the beginning of the integral, but not before it.

    source
  • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Gods I wish I had a top to troll like this

    source
  • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Physicist behavior

    source
  • answersplease77@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    so after he angered his bf he got fucked as in trouble with him or sex? raped? wtf lol

    source
  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Why are we still visiting literal pro-Nazi websites?

    source
  • woodenghost@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    But physicists actually do that? They often write it like this: ∫ dx f(x) or this: ∫∫∫ dxdydz f(x,y,z)

    source
  • davidagain@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Thank you for the belly laugh!

    source
  • jsomae@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    My initial thought was that it’s surprising that the engineer is using i whereas the mathematician is using j. But I know some engineers who are hardcore in favour of i. No mathematicians who prefer j though. So if such an engineer were dating a mathematician of all people who used j, I could see that being ♠ .

    source
  • tfowinder@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Learned a new word, Hate ****

    source