Comment on UwU brat mathematician behavior

• HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  They’re actually very useful: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion

  source

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    (…I think you may have gotten whooshed…)

    source

    • HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Hehe, maybe a little, but wanted to share just in case someone didn’t know :3

      source

      • Jarix@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I clicked your link, I barely made it out of highschool so I have no idea what any of it means, but I like reading things I shouldn’t understand anyway, sometines it’s so interesting even without understanding.

        So I thank you!

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  It gets worse actually. You can define a number system using any power of 2 amount of i-like units in a similar relationship to quaternions using the Cayley-Dickson construction

  Fascinatingly, you lose some property of the algebra at each step. Quaternions aren’t commutative: ABC != CBA. Octonians aren’t associative: (AB)C != A(BC). Once you get into 16 i’s with subscripts, it really gets crazy.

  source

  • HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Hehe, yeah, the joke was too good :P

    source

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Maybe a bit too complex for its own good.

      source
• serenissi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  this isn’t real

  source