Ganbat
@Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on North Korea and South Korea isn't working. Let's try West Korea and East Korea instead. 1 day ago:
Korea the long way.
- Comment on Anon is Illiterate 1 day ago:
HE IS?
- Comment on what 1 day ago:
Alright.
- Comment on what 1 day ago:
Eh, doesn’t matter in the end. Came back to check the thread and it turns out, the guy I was replying to was lying anyway. Further down he admits that he only posted once and deleted it after the first bid.
- Comment on what 1 day ago:
I didn’t leave my goods up for a week and only get shitty bids. I stopped posting when the first bid on day one was insulting.
Congrats, that’s worse.
- Comment on vampires and werewolves 3 days ago:
breaks containment
mtf>mobile task force
- Comment on UwU brat mathematician behavior 1 week ago:
Pikachu engineer
That’s a fucking favorite now. Keeping that in my back pocket.
- Comment on Bring them back!!! 1 week ago:
I mean, it’s about both, but… do people really not catch the whole angle about capitalism and greed? Newman straight up gets everyone killed for a pay day, and doesn’t even make it out himself. The only way it could be more obvious is if it had giant flash red text.
- Comment on Anon plays the badguy 1 week ago:
Huh, I knew what it was, but never knew it was an acronym.
- Comment on Anon gets philosophical 1 week ago:
Huh… So, out of curiosity, how does Willem Dafoe smell?
- Comment on Now You Can Buy In-Game DLC And Pay It Off Later 1 week ago:
So it’s a great plan, then! Let’s go!
- Comment on yum 1 week ago:
Dan and Arin got ahold of one of those vibratora on a recent Ten Minute Power Hour. Kinda frightening tbh.
- Comment on what 1 week ago:
You replied to the wrong person methinks.
- Comment on what 1 week ago:
The issue is that people are not willing to pay the price that matches demand.
Uh… doesn’t that just mean that the price doesn’t match demand?
- Comment on THIS describes too many people today 2 weeks ago:
bald with beard meter
- Comment on Now that you mention it.. 2 weeks ago:
Yes.
- Comment on Hesitating getting a Switch 2 (1st game console in 15 years)... 3 weeks ago:
I personally don’t recommend anyone get the Switch 2. The new price points are frankly ridiculous, and I’d hate to see that shit get justified by sales.
Personally, I’d recommend looking into handheld PCs. I haven’t looked into them much myself due to lack of money, but they’re generally much more worth the cost from what I’ve heard.
- Comment on The Harbinger of the Dystopia 3 weeks ago:
That’s fair.
- Comment on The Harbinger of the Dystopia 3 weeks ago:
I mean, I wouldn’t say no to a brutalist McDonald’s.
- Comment on Anon's best friend is a repper 4 weeks ago:
I had bangs. I had proudly feminine hair right up until male pattern baldness told me to go fuck myself at age 26.
- Comment on Anon ups his fibre intake 4 weeks ago:
When ChatGPT was new, I had it rewrite that story in the style of Stephen King. I remember it ended with something like, “And in that theater, some say they can still hear the sound of a fork scraping the inside of a can of beans.”
- Comment on Are foldable phones as good/bad as they say? 5 weeks ago:
I have a Moto Razr. When opened, it has the form factor of a standard phone, but when closed, it’s a perfectly square little block. It’s honestly the best form factor I’ve had in a phone. It’s also a 2023 model, so I’ve had it for about a year and a half at this point, and the screen is still in perfect condition. There is a small ripple in the screen at the fold, but it’s only visible when shining direct light on it. You have to be looking for it under specific conditions.
- Comment on YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content 5 weeks ago:
If a “Ben Shapiro destroys” video doesn’t break any rules, then what’s the issue with it being monetized?
The issue, my friend, is that such videos often do break the rules on hateful content and on misinformation (though those rules may have also been removed after 2020), but are still able to be monetized regardless.
What I’m doubting here is the claim that this kind of content is somehow disproportionately pushed to people who have no interest in it.
Straw man. You may have had that argument with someone else, but no one on this comment chain ever made that claim but you.
- Comment on YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content 5 weeks ago:
My personal experience doesn’t support the claim that right-wing media is being disproportionately pushed to people who aren’t interested in it.
They didn’t ever make that claim, that’s just your straw man.
- Comment on YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content 5 weeks ago:
The person I was replying too didn’t mention Left or Right and neither did I.
Question: are you really this dense, or just acting in bad faith?
Silencing your ideological opponents is ethically and morally inferior and I don’t care what your supposed motivation is.
“I want to eliminate all of insert racial or religious slur.”
“That’s bad.”
“I want to stop that person from saying and doing that.”
"That’s exactly as bad.*
🤡
- Comment on YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content 5 weeks ago:
Ah yes, the classic “lOOk aT tHE TOlEraNt LEfT” argument.
Or is it maybe this one?
This exact argument has taken so many forms in the past decade, and they’re always founded on the same fallacy. It’s a false equivalency.
- Comment on YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content 5 weeks ago:
The moment I click on a “Ben Shapiro destroys” video, sure - I get plenty more in my feed. But they also go away when I stop engaging.
Uh huh. Which means they’re being pushed to people they think will engage, which means they’re being monetized or are at least considered monetizable if the creator isn’t eligible. Like they said.
- Comment on YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content 5 weeks ago:
In before this creates a safe space for transphobia and bigotry but does nothing to address shit like that one YouTuber that recently got permanently banned because she knocked over a lamp their automated systems flagged it as “child abuse content.”
- Comment on It was a cartoon version of Jackie Gleason and the Honeymooners TV series 5 weeks ago:
OP IRL
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
Can confirm. My friend is in a band and I’m featured on a track that used to be on Spotify. I can’t remember the exact numbers, but the listened stat was respectable, but the payout? I think it was about $0.16.
