OsrsNeedsF2P
@OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
- Comment on Anon plays pretend 1 day ago:
Lmao sure ♥️ twitch.tv/dginovker
- Comment on Teef stonks 📈 2 days ago:
Yes: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation
Water fluoridation is the addition of fluoride to a public water supply to reduce tooth decay.
- Comment on This world is cruel… 2 days ago:
Assuming your my brother, the answer is you’re ugly
- Comment on This world is cruel… 2 days ago:
It’s a bit of both. I can see these hobbies leading to a healthy relationship, but anyone who thinks the answer isn’t “hit the gym” is coping.
(Btw I’m no gym rat, but this is a fact)
- Comment on YouTube devs be like 3 days ago:
This but unironically? One of the reasons there’s no YouTube alternative is because it’s not profitable, but the other is it’s a monopoly. If YouTube failed tomorrow I’m sure a lot of free alternatives (Odyssey, Peertube instances, etc) would blow up
- Comment on YouTube devs be like 3 days ago:
On one hand, yes, on the other, the devs won’t pitch ideas that go against the ad machine either. So ideas from devs are either neutral or pro-ad as well.
- Comment on Anon plays pretend 4 days ago:
Your body adapted after realizing it was a total waste of energy?
A less cynacle (however you spell that) theory might be it’s useful for language learning/practicing.
- Comment on Anon plays pretend 4 days ago:
I tried streaming for the first time over the weekend. Damn is it hard to keep talking for multiple hours straight. Especially when there’s zero messages in the chat. Streamers make it look normal but damn is it not
- Comment on Anon questions our energy sector 4 days ago:
I think a town burning down would be fatal for most the inhabitants 3000 BC
- Comment on Never change, Internet. Check out his new title 6 days ago:
Oh lmfao I missed that
- Comment on Never change, Internet. Check out his new title 6 days ago:
Thank you, random Wikipedia vandal
Wikipedia doesn’t act as an arbitrar of truth. If reliable sources (en.m.wikipedia.org/…/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources) call Jake Paul a boxer, Wikipedia will reflect that. If you think the sources are unreliable, you can debate that: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/…/Perennial_sources
- Comment on Jake Rule vs Mike Ruleson 6 days ago:
Even if you’re anti-Paul, watching the fight is free press for him. Same as how Trump did it
- Comment on Habits of Insects 6 days ago:
No no, you don’t understand. This is what people have actually been asking for this whole time. Nobody wanted the budget randomly cut, they wanted it distributed
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
But I can also bully them, humiliate them, degrade them, psychologically annihilate them even, and that’s fine, legallly.
It’s not legal in a lot of cases
Why?
It’s very hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
You can punch them, but it’s battery. The same way you can mentally assault them, but that’s harassment.
- Comment on Windows 7 and 8 now dead for gaming, as new Steam update pulls support 1 week ago:
People will mention Gimp, but check out Krita as an alternative to Adobe
- Comment on Can you draw a perfect circle? 1 week ago:
92.3%
- Comment on No meme today 1 week ago:
I love throwing a few for KDE!
- Comment on l fixed it! 1 week ago:
what
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
Free RuneScape I shill 2009scape.org but there’s others. I know there’s free WoW, Maplestory, and pretty much every other popular MMO as well
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
Another reason to play open source remakes instead of the original
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 1 week ago:
I know you’re memeing, but to be honest, yes, I want a President whose platform is somewhat like what you described. Obviously I disagree with some random parts (i.e. “with more communism, no, more socialism, with consequences for the right”), but for heavens sake, at least the theoretical person running for President above is trying something new.
This is what the Right is doing with Trump after all, and clearly people like it.
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 1 week ago:
Because apparently, “not bothering” means more people not supporting Democrats, which means Republicans getting elected more. See? I can do DNC logic too. It’s actually your fault Trump got elected.
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 1 week ago:
Ok. Sure. Myself and millions of others helped get Trump elected. Hopefully you can figure out how to appeal to us next election.
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 1 week ago:
I’m not surprised you misinterpreted my comment, I’m surprised people upvoted your misinterpretation. I never said Trump was third party
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 1 week ago:
I think some people have explained it decently, but as someone who did not vote for Harris, I have a simple explanation:
I do not want the Democratic party to think it’s Ok to be slightly better than Trump. If I’m going to be honest, trans rights and immigration are minor issues compared to inequality and war in Gaza.
The Dems can be better, but they choose not to. Me voting for them tells them that’s acceptable, but it’s not. I supported third party in 2024, and I will continue to do so until the Democrats get serious reform.
(For those who think it would be “less bad” with Harris, that’s the problem. I don’t care for “less bad” when the duopoly got us here regardless. Represent the people.)
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 1 week ago:
Third parties represent the poor better
- Comment on How is it that "protecting basic democracy and the rule of law, and not crowning a criminal dictator" wasn't even on the chart?! 2 weeks ago:
Lmao liberals downvoting you for daring to think sums up the 2024 election pretty good
- Comment on How is it that "protecting basic democracy and the rule of law, and not crowning a criminal dictator" wasn't even on the chart?! 2 weeks ago:
Nah they wouldn’t shut up about him til the point it got numb. Maybe they should have focused on Kamala instead.
- Comment on How is it that "protecting basic democracy and the rule of law, and not crowning a criminal dictator" wasn't even on the chart?! 2 weeks ago:
I would assume the answer to your question is “this data sucks”