CosmicTurtle0
@CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Migrated account from @CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
- Comment on Symbiotic Relationship 2 days ago:
It’s parasitic if one of the species does not get a benefit.
- Comment on Polish it frequently to keep it looking good 3 days ago:
I remember when Aubrey Plaza’s Wood Milk ad came out. She lost so much credibility.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
If you think about it, both are technically correct. But what they are both seeing is the end result. They aren’t seeing the internal motions and the paying attention to detail, etc.
But in the case of incels, they think it’s unfair that Chads get to have sex and they don’t because they see nothing wrong with themselves. Since they are perfect it’s the system that is wrong
And this is why the alt right have their hooks in them. Oppressing women is their brand.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 days ago:
That last part is what trips so many incels. They can’t see women as equals. They see them as parts that operate upon a special sequence of words and actions that they don’t want to figure out because they are horny.
The number of women I talk with who have been harassed within the first message of a dating app is almost 100%.
I’m an average looking guy. I don’t consider myself funny. I genuinely enjoy getting to know people. I do pretty okay out there.
- Comment on Let's begin Friday with a smile 4 days ago:
This was not the shit post I was expecting, but the one we need right now.
- Comment on Real 5 days ago:
TL;DW: it’s okay. Not one of her best videos.
- Comment on What someone's doing to X right now 2 weeks ago:
Dumbass probably
forgotrefused to pay the power bill.Ftfy
- Comment on Nicole got a new outfit! 2 weeks ago:
Has anyone gone to her other links? Matrix, discord, etc?
- Comment on Nicole got a new outfit! 2 weeks ago:
The FBI is literally run by incels.
Must be the NSA.
- Comment on life changed due to shrimp 2 weeks ago:
“If you can’t be handsome, be interesting. If you can’t be interesting, be useful.”
I can’t remember who said it but it seems to fit here.
- Comment on What exactly are they teaching in our schools? 2 weeks ago:
Correlary: use a female-sounding username with a cutesy icon (e.g. flowers, butterflies, etc) and you’re more likely to get the help you need.
- Comment on we are stardust 2 weeks ago:
Yes you can. Though given the current state of affairs, if you’re able to efile, you’re more likely to get your refund (assuming you get a refund) faster than if you paper file.
- Comment on we are stardust 2 weeks ago:
FreetaxUSA.com
Free federal return. State is $15.
- Comment on fuck this asshole 3 weeks ago:
Yeah a lot of states passed “you must carry a doctor’s note to wear a mask in public” laws during COVID.
I’ve written to my Republican state lawmaker only to receive a form reply.
- Comment on This fucking bot is still out there messaging 3 weeks ago:
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
As of today, the latest Firefox Version 135.0.1 Binaries are released under MPL 2, which is open source.
Whenever the terms are implemented, the Terms of Use will replace the MPL for the binaries. Open source has a strict definition and goes beyond source code.
The Terms of Use, as current proposed, would violate #5 (“No discrimination against Persons or Groups”) as the TOU allows for Mozilla to terminate your use of Firefox for any reason.
As a result, their binary moves from Open Source via the MPL to Source Available, via a proprietary license.
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
Because I am but one man. 😂
Waterfox was what I noticed first. If waterfox didn’t work out, it’s next. Followed by ladybird.
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
Subbed!
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
There was a post made my Mozilla years ago (I’m too lazy to find it). It was in the shadow of Chrome getting more scummy. Anyway, paraphrasing horribly, the idea was that the humble web browser was starting to become an increasingly personal decision. It represents you in ways that many people may not fully appreciate, comprehend, or understand. Your browser history tells people what you like, what you are afraid of. Increasingly, it tells corporations and governments who you talk to, where you’re going, and what you’re up to.
It’s why it’s important for a browser to be built for people, not for corporations.
It’s so sad to see how far Mozilla has gone from that stance.
So I get how challenging and annoying changing a browser is because in many ways, it’s you. It’s who you are. But, like in life, sometimes we must choose to leave the friends who bring us down. It hurts, it sucks. But it’s the way of life.
I’ve spent a good part of this morning switching things over to Waterfox. It’s not perfect. There are gaps and for some reason, I can port over Chrome and Edge profiles but NOT firefox profiles. But sometimes a fresh start is good too.
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
The privacy centric way for Mozilla to have address this would have been to:
- acknowledge laws in certain countries have changed
- Due to those new laws, the definition of “sell” has changed and Firefox may no longer be in compliance with their desire to keep your data private
- Commit their desire to take the necessary steps to keep new versions of Firefox in line with their original vision
- update the “we will not sell” definition to within the jurisdiction of the United States, or indicate that the definition of sell may be different in different jurisdictions
- make the necessary extensions to jurisdictions where they were “selling” user data, self reporting where necessary
- Comment on Why's everyone freaking out about Firefox Terms of Service? Isn't it Open Source? 3 weeks ago:
Mozilla is changing the license used for the Firefox executable/binary. The TOS will be the governing license over Firefox, the branded browser executable. It will no longer be open source, as defined by the Open Source Initiative, as users are no longer free to use the software however they want. Firefox will now be source available.
The source code for the browser, is (at least as of this comment) FOSS under the MPL2 license. People are free to recompile the browser under a different name (e.g. Librewolf, Waterfox, etc.).
This is not FUD. I read through the new TOS, Acceptable Use Policy, and Privacy Policy. Since the browser executable was governed under the MPL2, there was little concern from the open source community. I made my judgement from those documents alone.
- Comment on Firefox deletes promise to never sell personal data, asks users not to panic 3 weeks ago:
Forks of Firefox is fine. Only their binary is subject to the TOS. The source code remains under MPL2
- Comment on Firefox deletes promise to never sell personal data, asks users not to panic 3 weeks ago:
Firefox is not a legal entity needing a license. Mozilla is.
Firefox is a product, not a service.
When I write notes in a book, I do not need to give the manufacturer of that book a license for my notes. If I mail that book to a friend, I do not need to give a license for that book to the post office.
The only other software that I can think of that has taken a similar stance on TOS vs an open license is Microsoft and their VS Code product. Precompiled executables are license under a non-free (libre) license while the sour code of VS Code remains under the MIT license.
The original license of Firefox MPL2 allow end users to freely use the browser, with no license needed to give to Mozilla. Thousands of open source software who all use GPL, MPL, MIT, et al. allow users to use their software however they want. The proposed TOS does not and you must abide by their Acceptable Use Policies.
Even if they require a license due to some legal reason, there is simply no reason why the license has to be a non-exclusive, perpetual license. If it really as they claim “to help you navigate the internet”, then the terms should explicitly say that, and not make it implicit.
The fact is Mozilla doesn’t need a license for me to operate Firefox locally. Any copyright claim they are making is in bad faith because anything you type into the browser would be covered under fair use. They have yet to convince me why they need a license for me to operate a browser fully locally.
The most likely reason why they are changing the license is because they want to start training AI data based on your browser habits. They may not be doing it now and they may say they have no plans to do it in the future. But the TOS, as currently written, gives them permission to do just that.
- Comment on BRASSICAS 4 weeks ago:
Citron broke my brain. If you’re telling me this is mustard and only mustard, my brain might just die in confusion.
- Comment on BRASSICAS 4 weeks ago:
How? Like… literally how?
I grow kale and it looks nothing like the plant in the OP. It looks like a regular bunch of kale.
Or is this like “all 6 vegetables come from one main vegetable”, kind of like how all citrus fruits comes from citron.
- Comment on place yer bets 4 weeks ago:
Look, it’s really simple. Just don’t look up. If we collectively ignore the problem, it won’t be a problem.
- Comment on She was thrilled at all the people running to confirm that she is still HOT 4 weeks ago:
She needs to start an OnlyGrans
- Comment on Consider placement before taking a picture 5 weeks ago:
Blocking NSFW content helps with getting rid of OF creators. I have a separate lemmynsfw.com account that I rarely use these days to look at amateur content.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
You must have had well lubricated partners then. I’ve tried shower, tub, and pool sex and it’s not as fun as I thought it was going to be.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
Yeah this picture reads as someone who has only read about sex and never done it. Sex in a tub is terrible.