ByteJunk
@ByteJunk@lemmy.world
- Comment on Pikachew 1 hour ago:
But are Gyarados edible too? I feel Pokémon terribly neglects the nutritional aspect in the show.
- Comment on Pikachew 2 hours ago:
HMMMMM Dungeon Meshi.
I mean, surely people have tried to roast Pokémon before. Some of them look real plum and juicy…
- Comment on Very small deal 1 day ago:
Are they like one size fits all?
- Comment on RIP Thomas 1 day ago:
What other good things in life come in 6-packs, I wonder.
- Comment on Have a look around. Anything that brain of yours can think of can be found... 2 days ago:
There’s no need to panic, this isn’t a test
Just nod or shake your head and we’ll do the rest… - Comment on Hertz, showing the difference between science and engineering 2 days ago:
I feel like this is a very “scientisty” thing - the theoretical aspect is so fascinating and being able to fit all the pieces into a model that is mathematically accurate is the reward.
Considering the practical application of the model and how it can benefit society (or in other words, be marketed for profit) takes a different set of skills.
- Comment on Strawberries are nuts 🍓 4 days ago:
You celebrated 50 years together two years ago… Such a heartwarming story!
- Comment on CEOs Are Creating AI Copies of Themselves That Are Spouting Braindead Hallucinations to Their Confused Underlings 6 days ago:
Exactly my question. More often than not, I’d wager on AI making the right call instead of the arrogant, power tripping blabbering dimwit who got to CEO because he’s got absolutely no scruples or morals and absolutely zero shame and will sacrifice anything for his goal of hoarding more wealth.
It probably has less hallucinations.
- Comment on Anon plays Metroid 6 days ago:
Kinda reminded me of Warframe after you finish Vor’s quest and the game is like: here’s a billion systems I never properly explained, go have fun.
Totally based.
- Comment on PFP Evolution 1 week ago:
That was… not expected.
- Comment on Correct Grindr Response 1 week ago:
Good thing that was the giveaway, and not the “nice dick” edit, because I’d like to point out that it’s perfectly normal to compliment an acquaintance’s dick or give it a suck.
- Comment on Banana tonight 2 weeks ago:
@The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world undercover?
- Comment on Anon visits a guy's house 2 weeks ago:
Beyond the Wall we kneel for no man, you expect me to bend it to a bit of ice?
HA!
Stupid kneelers…
- Comment on Anon visits a guy's house 2 weeks ago:
They’re on the floor. How would I get them to the sink?? I don’t think even Messi could kick them up there.
- Comment on Bruh, chill 2 weeks ago:
I don’t know about associated punishments, but the highway code is clear.
Rule 267: […]Overtake only on the right.
Rule 268: Do not overtake on the left or move to a lane on your left to overtake.
It goes on to clarify that, in heavy traffic, the left lane could be moving faster and that keeping up with the flow is OK.
- Comment on Bruh, chill 2 weeks ago:
You know what’s a needless lane change? When I come behind you and have to cross 2 lanes to overtake you, because you’re totally zoned out and never saw me coming, and then I have to move back 2 lanes again instead of 1.
MOVE RIGHT jackass. If changing lanes on an empty highway is too challenging for you, maybe you shouldn’t be driving on one.
- Comment on Bruh, chill 2 weeks ago:
The highway code, the official rules for road use in the UK, reads:
(General Rules, 160) “keep to the left, unless road signs or markings indicate otherwise. The exceptions are when you want to overtake, turn right or pass parked vehicles or pedestrians in the road”
(Motorway lane disciple, rule 264): “Keep in the left lane unless overtaking. If you are overtaking, you should return to the left lane when it is safe to do so (see also Rules 267 and 268).”
Many other EU countries have the same rules. I wouldn’t know about America.
- Comment on Bruh, chill 2 weeks ago:
Right lane is for cruising.
Any lanes to the left are for overtaking, and you move back to the right after passing.
Of course it depends on how heavy the traffic is, but if you’re not willing to move faster than the cars on your right, CHANGE LANES.
People driving in the middle lane when there’s nobody on the left are a pet peeve of mine.
- Comment on No looky for you! 3 weeks ago:
Hold my beer.
- Comment on I hope i don't get downvoted for this 3 weeks ago:
- Comment on How I discovered my partner was an undercover police officer sent to spy on me 3 weeks ago:
“This is one of my fears”
I’m so sorry that this is actually a concern that someone legitimately feels. It’s unbelievable to me that anyone could date someone they don’t like, for whatever reason…
sends hug
- Comment on On trees... 3 weeks ago:
Reddit has broken me. I was expecting a rickroll
- Comment on Batterypunk 3 weeks ago:
I always assumed this was like a universal truth, but I’ve found a couple of cases recently where they wired it in series despite the batteries all pointing the same way, I was so confused…
- Comment on Anon isn't fooled by planes 3 weeks ago:
Since we’re being extra pedantic, what I said was:
As long as the tanker weights less than the weight of all that water it displaced, it will float.
This is factually true, and you didn’t disprove it.
As for “boat wall sticking out of the water”, that’s just grasping at straws man. If that boat is fully waterproof, like a submarine, the definition holds up. Or if you consider that water entering the boat adds to the boat weight, then again it will hold true as it will weigh more than the water it displaces.
- Comment on Anon isn't fooled by planes 3 weeks ago:
The bane of shipping is that a lot of money goes to shipping air around :)
- Comment on Anon isn't fooled by planes 3 weeks ago:
Well… When you put one of those huge tankers in the water, it will move a LOT of water out of the way.
As long as the tanker weights less than the weight of all that water it displaced, it will float.
As you keep loading up the tanker with more cargo, it will go deeper into the water right? But this means that it is pushing more water out of the way (the water that used to be where the boat now is), which balances out the weight because that creates more buoyancy.
A rock, on the other hand, is heavier than the water that it displaces, so it sinks like a tanker whose front fell off.
- Comment on Former Dragon Age writer says Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 and Baldur's Gate 3 prove 'what's possible when a game is given time to cook' 3 weeks ago:
To be fair, I’ve read that Sandfall also outsourced a lot of work for Expedition 33, which is how they’ve kept the team small.
I see no issues with outsourcing if done right: not every small developer needs to have a motion capture crew, etc.
If there are companies out there that can provide that for you at a reasonable cost, then you just need to focus on the core gameplay and the artistic aspects of your game.
This way you don’t bloat your headcount with hundreds of people that you’ll have to sack after the project is done, seems like a win for everybody.
- Comment on Portal 2 Community Edition's new, upgraded lighting system (no raytracing required) 4 weeks ago:
I don’t know that I can handle more immersion in the Portal universe, I kinda like being reminded that a 4th wall separates me from murderous unscrupulous AIs.
Hum.
In any case, it looks just gorgeous!
- Comment on Dammit dad 4 weeks ago:
You’ve seen us with our bowl cuts, honouring the Primordial Porridge.
- Comment on How dare you 4 weeks ago:
This guest remarked how my piccolo custome was cute. I thought I was a bassoon.
