yetAnotherUser
@yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
Hi!
My previous/alt account is yetAnotherUser@feddit.de which will be abandoned soon.
- Comment on 1 day ago:
So does every number:
6.000000…
- Comment on Ficken Zodiacs 5 days ago:
Ah yes, Bundesdepublik Reutschland
- Comment on Spicy spicy 1 week ago:
Right?? I genuinely don’t understand this meme, I have never wanted to stack my coins and hold them. Do these people not have wallets?
- Comment on If you're going to accept art this horny please pay someone 2 weeks ago:
If by “treating you right” you mean imprisoning you for speaking out against the referendum that only further strengthens the “President’s” power (like unilaterally dissolving the parliament and then being allowed to create laws at will, only being allowed to be replaced when sentenced of treason [but the President assigns the president of the constitutional court lol] and so on), then yes.
- Comment on Video game PEGI age-ratings are changing in Europe from June. Four new categories added to tackle elements of addictive design, unmonitored online communication and loot boxes 2 weeks ago:
The rating system isn’t meant to be taken literally though. It’s expected that parents make an informed choice based on the maturity of their child. The ratings are recommendations and as far as I know only actually enforced by stores/sellers and cinemas.
- Comment on PB&J 1 month ago:
Please provide an example that fits in the Red/Blue overlap.
- Comment on When you're smarter than the teacher that wrote the test 1 month ago:
You didn’t specify the unit.
What if the unit was points^-200 ?
- Comment on Every day, boss makes a dollar, I make a dime... 1 month ago:
What a nice company, providing its employees with free product samples!
- Comment on What's it like living in 2? 2 months ago:
To elaborate, it’s really easy to forge “regular” coins and really attractive to forge high value coins.
For example, the 1 British Pound coin was, before the redesign, widely forged:
As of March 2014 there were an estimated 1,553 million of the original nickel-brass coins in circulation,[6] of which the Royal Mint estimated in 2014 that just over 3% were counterfeit.
(Note for any languages that use the comma as a decimal separator: 1,553 million is referring to 1.5 billion)
- Comment on Sad Ganymede noises 2 months ago:
Yes, that is why I mentioned the IAU’s definition was more specific.
Very large? Enough mass to have a round shape.
Dwarf everything nearby? Clear out its orbit by colliding with/capturing/ejecting shit.
- Comment on Sad Ganymede noises 2 months ago:
I propose a better definition:
Planets are very large objects orbitting a star that dwarf everything nearby
I’m pretty sure this is the intent of the IAU’s definition. It’s just more specific.
- Comment on Sad Ganymede noises 2 months ago:
Do you mean the asteroids at the Lagrangian points? Every single planet has asteroids there because math/physics dictates those points to be stable. Jupiter has the most at its points because it’s the largest planet.
Same with Neptune cleaning its orbit: It has collided with every single thing in its orbit EXCEPT those that synced their orbits to Neptune. An object that is gravitationally dominated by a single planet should not be a planet under any definition.
Sources because I had to read into your claims and I’m no astrophysicist:
- Comment on Why is sharpedo blocked in image searches on DuckDuckGo and Bing, but not Google? 2 months ago:
Bing/DDG have a lot of weird censorship.
“Shapedo” and “Sharkpedo” both work btw.
- Comment on Anon is a linguist 3 months ago:
It’s calling a function without a parameter.
You know how in math you had something like:
f(x) = x²
Not all functions need parameters though. The function:
f(x) = 2
does not even use the provided x! So just leave it out:
f() = 2
Similarly, you could give a function two parameters:
f(x, y) = x + y
Programmers use functions to primarily organize their code. Otherwise it would get very unreadable very quickly. Those function are usually a bit more complicated than a single line, like.
Dog.walk() would call the walk() function of “Dog”. Some valid code could be:
Dog.walk() wait(10) Dog.stop()
This code would make the dog walk for 10 seconds assuming every function used is actually defined somewhere.
- Comment on Things used to be more simple back then 3 months ago:
🥺👉👈
- Comment on And my premature ejaculation is the shortcoming!? 3 months ago:
No, it’s a race and the winner takes all.
- Comment on *confused flatfish noises* 3 months ago:
Is it actually possible for a fish-like animal to have eyes at the front (i.e. an animal with a hydrodynamic shape that spends all its time underwater)?
I feel like that’s really difficult for evolution to achieve, especially because the mouth has to go somewhere at the front too. I mean, look at where the lights of a high-speed train are placed and their shape.
Intuitively it feels easier to just put the eyes on the side. Plus it feels like there’s a lower risk of damaging them when bumping into something.
- Comment on Euler's Meme 4 months ago:
Let M be the set of all memes.
Is this well-defined? How can you tell whether something is an element of M?
f(x) is a meme making fun of x for all x in M
Does such an f even exist? Why? Obviously it exists for some x in M but for all?
Thus there exists a normie meme n
What’s a normie meme? Why does its existance follow?
and a unique function F for all natural number k
This again requires f to be well-defined.
The set M is also equipped with a dankness norm.
Prove it has that norm and please also prove it fulfills all properties of a norm.
with property that ||F(k)|| ≤ ||F(k+1)|| for all k in N.
[proof required]. Idea for a counterexample: A meme making fun of a meme in such a terrible way it cannot possibly be “danker”. Though this would require f^-1(terrible meme making fun of meme) to not be empty.
- Comment on When "AI" content becomes indistinguishable from human-made content, is there, philosophically speaking, any meaningful differences between the two? 4 months ago:
Disagree slightly, human created content can have intent but doesn’t automatically have it.
A corporate ad does not have any artistic merit besides grabbing as much attention as possible. Actually creative ads where some thought was put in are the very rare exception.
The same goes with a lot of pop music today. I cannot speak too much about English language pop but German pop is nothing more than fast food. See the Wikipedia article of Menschen Leben Tanzen Welt.
Or take a look at video games. How much artistic effort is put into AAA games? Maybe someone spent 40 hours making the lootboxes as satisfying as possible to open but that’s probably where the most thought was put in.
And movies? Aren’t Disney’s recent “live remakes” of their old, successful animated movies anything but CGI slop? Sure, I admit it takes a lot of effort to make and animate all these models. Just like it takes effort to shit when you’re constipated.
Honestly, the only thing distinguishing AI from megacorp content is that the latter has more consistency and fewer “mistakes” than the former. The sole intent of both is making money.
- Comment on She strongly disagrees 4 months ago:
The bible is most definitely subject to interpretation based on the reason 95% of it is illegible without interpretation.
As far as I know, taking that thing literally is a very Protestant/Evangelical way of looking at it.
Like, I distinctly remember in catholic education at school (since that was at the time my “official” religion) the teacher mentioning this. As an example they mentioned Jesus allegedly walking on water. Was it a miracle actually performed? Maybe. More likely it’s just a story made up to convey a message about Jesus since humans cannot physically walk on water and the act of walking on water alone is meaningless without interpretation.
- Comment on pwned: do you pronounce it as "pohned" "pawned" or "owned" 4 months ago:
Your description made me read it like “pooned” at first.
- Comment on Parkinson's sufferer wins six figure payout from GlaxoSmithKline over drug that turned him into a 'gay sex and gambling addict' 4 months ago:
One more key point:
The court heard that Requip’s side-effects had been made public in 2006, but had reportedly been known for years.
If the manufacturer did not know about these side effects despite their best efforts the awarded damages would presumably have been lower. And if the side effects were known to the patient prior to taking the drug, there wouldn’t have been a case at all.
- Comment on You guys ready for NO Nut November? 4 months ago:
Dammit, I failed that one too already.
- Comment on i hate myself and i want to die lol 4 months ago:
Don’t you mean you use th— all the time?
- Comment on Meta denies torrenting porn to train AI, says downloads were for “personal use” 4 months ago:
Torrenting for commercial use is probably worse, legally speaking.
- Comment on Progress 5 months ago:
My requirements are bidirectional communication. If the buttplug doesn’t register and decode clench-morsecode, I will not use it!
- Comment on Bought to you by the central limit theorem society 5 months ago:
By induction, you are gay too.
- Comment on May or may not be based on some comments I've read 5 months ago:
Fair enough, I thought the “Fuck the colorblind” meme/image was somewhat known and changing it to “Fuck the imgur-blind” would make sense.
At least it will – presumably – make more sense for nearly every single British person that might see this in a couple of hours.
Though I do agree imgur sucks. I usually use img.bb when I need external image hosting, catbox occasionally blocks the IP address(es) of my VPN.
- Comment on May or may not be based on some comments I've read 5 months ago:
You didn’t put this on imgur! Now every Brit can tell what it says >:(
- Comment on May or may not be based on some comments I've read 5 months ago:
I now see how posting this at 12 am UTC could lead to more colorblind people than British people stumbling across this meme first.
