Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Linguistics

⁨1407⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨fossilesque@mander.xyz⁩ to ⁨science_memes@mander.xyz⁩

https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/639683da-7caa-4c96-9d86-a31df01cd300.png

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • cm0002@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’ve always said the dictionary is a follower not a leader, by the time a word gets added to the dictionary it’s already established widespread usage

    source
    • perishthethought@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Meh, seems cromulent.

      source
      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Adequately pondiferous.

        source
  • abbadon420@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The same rules apply to gods, according to Terry Pratchet

    source
    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Some of the earliest religions were just trying to figure out this whole ‘words’ thing. Describing abstracts consistently was developed over time across generations, sometimes very strictly.

      source
    • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s dangerous not to believe

      source
      • I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I rattle my kitchen drawers at least once a week

        source
      • Klear@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Take my S word.

        source
  • corvi@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Gonna go on Countdown with the line “Dictionaries aren’t rule books, they’re record books” and fight Susie Dent.

    source
    • ID411@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      “ sorry, xzzyghaoi Isn’t in the dictionary “

      It’s not fuckin rule book , suzi

      source
    • sundray@lemmus.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Académie Française: <<Ahem – pardon et moi?>>

      source
      • merc@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        You mean <<pardonnez moi?>>

        “pardon et moi” means “pardon and me”. “pardonnez moi” means “pardon me” (in a polite / respectful tense).

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Delightfully failing to be either but with a huge sense of superiority and disdain for the youth and migrants.

        source
      • SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        “Le Weekend.”

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • TheBat@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Try it, she’ll fuck you up with a bike chain (her weapon of choice in pub fights)

      source
  • z00s@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The problem is that people frequently use this type of argument when they are unable to spell or follow the basic rules of syntax and grammar instead of simply admitting they’re wrong.

    Language does change, over time and across many cultures. It doesn’t mean that anything you write is automatically correct.

    source
    • booly@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I’m a descriptivist but that doesn’t mean that there aren’t rules and that we can’t point out things still being wrong.

      Descriptivism still describes rules as they’re used in the real world. Breaking those rules still subjects the speaker/writer to the consequences: being misunderstood, having the spoken or written sentence to simply be rejected or disregarded, etc.

      “Colour” and “color” are both correct spellings of the word, because we are able to describe entire communities who spell things that way. “Culler” is not, because anyone who does spell it that way is immediately corrected, and their written spelling is rejected by the person who receives it. We can describe these rules of that interaction as descriptivists, and still conclude that something is wrong or incorrect.

      source
      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        “Culler” is not, because anyone who does spell it that way is immediately corrected, and their written spelling is rejected by the person who receives it. We can describe these rules of that interaction as descriptivists, and still conclude that something is wrong or incorrect.

        Orthography isn’t really a part of grammar, so it’s easily possible for natives to make mistakes when writing that might make a word difficult to understand. It’s much harder for spoken language to be misunderstood among the population that a native grew up in, because the words they use don’t come out of nowhere (despite the old prescriptivist argument that you can even see in this thread saying “I’m just gonna call houses xytuis because any words are ok!”) Obviously now with mass communication people pick up language from all sorts of places, so you might have words be unrecognizable even within a locality.

        Even so, an individual’s (native) idiolect can’t really be “wrong” to descriptivists in the way orthography can. It’d just be chalked up to differences from the local language or dialect.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • MonkRome@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        One who culls is a culler.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Wrong according to… who? Who is the authority? Who granted them that power? By what mechanism can one appeal their decision?

      What is “correct”?

      There are standards, but you can only really say something is “wrong” or “incorrect” in relation to a particular standard. You typically wouldn’t write “senator yeeted his hat lol fr” as a newspaper headline. That doesn’t follow the standards for that context. But that doesn’t mean it’s “wrong” in some universal sense.

      source
      • z00s@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Correct according to who? You? Lol

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • tdawg@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’ve always been a big advocate of the idea that the only part of communication that matters is communication. If people understand you then congrats you’ve successfully languaged

    source
    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      What if people understand you, but they think you’re stupid?

      source
      • Klear@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Congratulations! You did the best you could…

        source
      • MonkRome@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        That’s their problem, I always assume the stupid people are the ones that are so inflexible and uncreative that they don’t understand that language is entirely an amorphous flexible human creation.

        source
    • merc@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      The flip side of that is that if the words you’re using are wutdownrerary, you should be told to stop using those words because by using them you make communication harder.

      source
      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Does “glizzy” (i.e. hotdog) fit under this classification?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • OpenStars@discuss.online ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Just going to share this little gem again…

    img

    source
  • Eylrid@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I love militant descriptivists

    source
    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      we love you too

      source
  • Zacryon@feddit.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    One thing I learned as an information technology engineer: language is a tool for communication. As long as the sender can send his message unobstructed and as long as the receiver receives and understands the message as intended, the information transmission can be considered a successs.

    source
    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Just remember that language is an imprecise tool, and all too often the actual intended meaning that one is trying to convey, will get misunderstood.

      source
  • BenLeMan@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    And still I maintain that “alot” is not a word.

    source
    • Pulptastic@midwest.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      My favorite reference to “alot”

      source
      • BenLeMan@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Mine, too! I hope Allie is doing well these days.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Zoot@reddthat.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        God i love alot

        source
    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I’ve noticed a tendency of people to combine words that are frequently seen together: “alot”, “aswell”, “noone”, etc.

      Some of these catch on, like “nevertheless” and “whatsoever”. Maybe eventually “alot” and “noone” will become standard English, too.

      source
      • DillyDaily@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        The way alot, aswell and noone are combining is expected given how many other words we don’t bat an eye at went the same way. “another” is the perfect example, it’s just “an other” combined.

        It’s sort of the reverse of what happened to words like apron and newt.

        The division and bracketing of phrases changes over time.

        “An apron” is the modern usage of the word “napron”, and a newt was originally called an eute. The grammatical need for “a” and/or “an” resulted in the root word being rebracketed and changed.

        source
      • pyre@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        it’s all just made up. you can see old writings without spacing. or punctuation. you can’t even define what’s really a word universally. people just decided what’s what and standardized it at one point just for some consistency. that doesn’t mean things won’t change; they most definitely will.

        source
      • TheBat@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Apart/a part is another one.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I recall “noone” being taught as acceptable by my english teacher back in 2004. That being said, she’s also said some things that ended up being very wrong

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I always imagine Peter Noone of Herman’s Hermits whenever someone does that.

        “Noone thinks I have a lovely daughter.” Yes, Mrs. Brown. Noone does.

        source
      • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Ampersand is another good example. “&” was considered the last letter of the alphabet for a while. Schoolchildren would recite the alphabet and finish it with the phrase “and, per se and” (“and, meaning and”).

        The words got mashed together over time and the word “ampersand” was born.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • vonxylofon@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        No body writes noone as one word because there’s a similar word written that way.

        source
    • Squirrel@thelemmy.club ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I think spellings and punctuation are still valid. Mostly. Ignore variations between English and Americanese.

      source
      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        In not the Americans’ fault that the English decided to butcher their own language after the US kicked them out

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Frankly this wouldn’t be a problem if it weren’t for “another”

      source
      • psud@aussie.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Which some who use alot consider as two words.

        source
    • JackbyDev@programming.dev ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I feel like that sort of misses the point. That really has to do with how we transcribe verbal speech into written. “A lot” is absolutely a phrase, I don’t imagine you’d disagree with that.

      source
    • Etterra@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Image

      source
    • ytg@sopuli.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That has to do with the definition of what a word even is. “Alot” is clearly made up of two separate units, but so is “anyway”. I think a lot of people don’t like this one because it’s simply unnecessary. You need “anyway” to show that the two words are not stressed separately, but treated as one unit, whereas with “a lot” this is already obvious (“a” is almost never stressed).
      Also has to do with English spelling just being bad, generally.

      source
  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    As a l33+ |><|@z0r, I’m here to criticize your command of the English language.

    source
    • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      You just described 90% of Lemmy users.

      source
  • Ferrous@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I dig the variety of topics on this comm, and I super appreciate how it doesn’t get STEMlordy at all.

    source
    • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s all connected. :)

      source
  • HollowNaught@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    While that’s correct and all, it still irks me when somwbody uses a word that has a shorter, older variant. (Gives side-eye to orientated)

    source
    • DillyDaily@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      orientated

      Is this common in American English? I don’t think I’ve ever seen the word oriented double handled like that. Irregardless, it slew me

      source
      • GiveMemes@jlai.lu ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        At least with orientated it kind makes sense because orientation is the process of orienting, so to have done the process would be to be orientated in a weird way but irregardless will always irk me because the ir and the less make a double negative, making the meaning as written ‘with regard’ which just doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. Like if somebody misunderstood a sentence with a double negative we would call them wrong but because it’s a single word they get to change the entire language, regardless of its structure and rules? Seems kinda bogus to me.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Never seen it here.

        source
      • davidagain@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        “Orientated” is reasonably common in British English, I think. I remember thinking someone had misspelt it the first time I saw “oriented” written down.

        source
  • sundray@lemmus.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    End prescriptuhvist speling! We haf nuthing to loose butt hour wigly red underlyns!

    source
    • maniclucky@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Ow. What did I do to you?!

      source
      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        If you think that’s bad, never try reading FEERSUM ENDJINN.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Empricorn@feddit.nl ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That hurt to read… Kudos!

      source
    • SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      undalihnz

      source
    • i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Would you look at the time? Loose butt hour.

      source
  • sxt@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That said I feel like when people are referring to whether or not something “is a word” they’re referring to whether not is has seen historical/widespread usage, not “has somebody ever just decided it meant something, somewhere, at some point”

    source
    • pyre@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      most often it’s said to dismiss people. AAVE gets a lot of that. but it’s used to mock and dismiss young people too by the “back in my day” crew.

      source
      • psud@aussie.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I know who AvE is; who’s AAVE?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • merc@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    “a language that doesn’t adapt to an ever changing society is bound to be lost”, sure, but adapt too quickly and you lose the ability to communicate between groups of people.

    There needs to be some compromise where new words are adopted, and changed words are accepted, without flooding the language with garbage. For example, English should still be taught in schools, and English teachers should still have the freedom of correcting the writing kids produce, and taking points off for “mistakes”.

    Like, if you go pure descriptivist, “it’s” and “its” can now mean the same thing. There is no ability to distinguish between their, they’re and there. A business email describing a product as “cheugy, no cap” is perfectly acceptable and it’s up to the reader to figure it out, because every word is a real word and perfectly valid, and every grammar deviation is acceptable because languages evolve.

    Even on social media, I think it’s fair to push back on “mistakes” that make it hard to understand something. An error that might take a poster 1 second to fix, might cost the world minutes, as thousands of people each take a few seconds to puzzle out what the OP meant to write.

    Languages are about communication, and that can suffer whether the language police are too rigid and forbid any deviation, are too easily bribed and allow for anything.

    source
    • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Formality, just like meaning, is decided collectively. The reason you wouldn’t use “cheugy no cap” in a formal email is not because they’re not words, but because they are commonly understood to be informal.

      source
  • Jakdracula@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Great post, I offer my most enthusiastic contrafribularities.

    source
    • bluewing@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I agree, a perfectly crommulant statement from a Word Warrior.

      source
      • Jakdracula@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I’m anaspeptic, phrasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulation.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    “That’s not a word” only applies to scrabble and boggle. Fuck any other context.

    source
    • str82L@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      And Wordle

      source
  • Draegur@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    “refrigerate” at least has sensible etymological roots in its constituent components.

    The problem with brain rot lingo is that it isn’t constructed from precedent but a decay therefrom, corrupted by niche “meta” references that are little more than inside jokes that escaped their in-group, divorced of the context that brought them about.

    …

    Then again, though, the most popular word that humans speak all over the world is “OK”, which is itself a memetic corruption of a fad, wherein people were saying “All Correct” with a deliberately exaggerated fake British accent: “Oll Korrect” (which became abbreviated).

    And brain rot does have the fact that it’s very funny going for it. It sounds silly which makes it fun to say and it pisses people off which makes it even funnier, because getting mad about it is a drastic overreaction. So I don’t think it’ll even really BECOME an actual serious problem, because the moment it hits mainstream and corporations start publishing commercials about “skibidi Ohio GYATT” it’s going to implode like “it’s morbin time” burned Sony.

    source
    • scratchee@feddit.uk ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      “Divorced from the context that brought them about” Ahh, so you’re complaining about all the Germanic words in English, or the Latin words? The whole point of their diatribe is that the “brain rot” words you hate are little different from most words. It’s just that for some words the “in group” is Latin speakers, and for some words it’s some group nerding out about their own topic that spread their word to the rest of us… actually, I’m still talking about Latin speakers.

      source
  • sgtlion@hexbear.net ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Descriptivists will never haltodulate the hatsrglabatude of us prescriptivists.

    source
  • Snowclone@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’m old enough to have noticed that a huge amount of language has changed in American English in the Westcoast at least. It’s pretty remarkable even myself and other middle aged people I know have changed their word use and slang.

    source
  • homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Gronk. Now bleet glanmar.

    source
  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Studies linguistics, but not grammar.

    source
  • 7bicycles@hexbear.net ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    You know what my biggest problem with descriptivists is? What is “correct” always coincides exactly to what they learned in school or university from 15 - 20. It’s never anything else. Never in like 20.000 years of human history did we nail language except for that timeframe, and never will it happen again. what a coinkidink.

    source
  • lightsblinken@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    ferpectly cromulent!

    source
  • Sat@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Skibidi rizz

    source
  • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    ITT we fight against the evil descriptivist windmills

    source
  • Professorozone@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    So why teach English at all? People could just make it all up theirself.

    source
  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’m curious. How many people does it take to make a word a word?

    source
  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    While I get the point they’re making, I have a counterargument:

    Ngqnund urnidng bptgx durunbde druxng.

    What, you didn’t understand that? Are you dissing be just because you didn’t bother to learn new words?

    source
  • spirinolas@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    When you read texts of an ancient language than span several centuries, and the language itself stays the same, it’s a strong indicator the language was no longer spoken.

    Living languages always change. Only dead languages stay the same.

    source
-> View More Comments