Submitted 2 weeks ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to greentext@sh.itjust.works
https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/76612482-c444-4803-8075-26d0ee4a1c3b.jpeg
Credit scores are used to tell companies how much they can earn on lending you money.
Paying back quickly reduces the amount they can earn, lowering your credit score.
Not paying it back obviously lowers the score.
The way I understand it, to raise your credit score you need to slowly pay back your loans, so you pay back maximum interest.
Note however that I am just a cynical IT guy in Sweden with zero actual exposure to US/UK style credit scores, and that I may be talking out of my ass.
100% spot on.
It’s absolutely a scam designed to extract even more wealth from the poors.
No joke, I’ve had a car dealership tell me they can’t sell me the car I want because my credit score was nonexistent (no credit history in 7 years). I was paying in full, in cash, literally in an envelope in my hand.
Grand total of 8k, all in 100s, super easy to count.
But no, I didn’t have a “good enough credit score” so I couldn’t buy that car from them, despite having the money to do so.
Mental gymnastics on that one.
Here in Sweden, that would also have been rejected, most stores won’t accept cash at all.
I had to pay for my car using a wire transfer a few days before I picked it up.
I do think that it would have been funny to just use tap to pay, but apparently that would have increased the cost by a lot.
I think you just got a shitty dealership. “Legal tender for all debts public and private” means just that, they aren’t allowed legally to refuse dollars. My cousin also successfully did what you are describing.
No joke, I’ve had a car dealership tell me they can’t sell me the car I want because my credit score was nonexistent (no credit history in 7 years). I was paying in full, in cash, literally in an envelope in my hand.
There are car dealers (especially at the low end of used cars) that don’t make money selling cars. They make money with horrible debt and payment terms trying to trap vulnerable people. The worst of these dealers may end up “selling” the car 2 or 3 times repoing it each time when the buyer can’t pay.
So its first possible that this dealer didn’t want to sell you a car for cash because its against their business model.
Grand total of 8k, all in 100s, super easy to count.
$8k in cash is super sketchy for a single purchase. Its untraceable and that sets off fraud alarm bells. The dealership also may not be set up to deal in large sums of cash like that lacking the security to do so. Lastly there are laws at the state and federal level called KYC (Know your Customer) for some transactions that require the seller to verify the money is legit. With cash, thats nearly impossible.
You might have had more luck showing up with an $8k cashiers check or offering an $8k wire transfer from your bank. Both of these are exempt from lots of regulations (because there’s a paper trail) where cash would not have that luxury.
But no, I didn’t have a “good enough credit score” so I couldn’t buy that car from them, despite having the money to do so. Mental gymnastics on that one.
I’m guessing that was just an excuse to not sell to you because either they’re the sketchy dealer (that likes to sell loans not cars) or they thought you were super sketchy as a buyer.
No joke, I’ve had a car dealership tell me they can’t sell me the car I want because my credit score was nonexistent (no credit history in 7 years). I was paying in full, in cash, literally in an envelope in my hand.
The dealership wanted you to finance so that you’ll pay them interest, because they make more money that way. If they completely refused, what’s most likely is that the car was being sold at a price that gives them zero/negative profit margin, so without financing, they’d literally take a loss selling it for straight cash.
There must be something else to it. I’ve never paid any interest on my credit cards and I paid off my mortgage early; by your logic I should have a low credit score, but it’s actually in the “Excellent” range.
Yeah paying back early doesn’t affect it as far as I can tell. Lenders just want to know if you’ll leave them in the lurch or not. If you pay back early that just means they can reinvest the cash sooner.
You have great interest paying potential because of your reliable handling of finances, so your score is high to make it easy for you to take on a lot of debt down the road.
In another comment, someone mentioned that it’s not just repayment of interest that profits credit card companies.
Even if you pay all debts monthly before interest can compound, the CC companies still charge processing fees to merchants on a per-transaction basis (which merchants either pass directly to consumers or indirectly through higher prices). They still get their cut, even if you don’t see it on a line item.
Recently I had house work done. The contractor offered to charge me 5% less if I paid with cash or check instead of credit card.
Well the back need some safe bets as a baseline.
There must be something else to it.
Massive understatement—it’d be more accurate to say they’re completely wrong, lol.
The way I understand it, to raise your credit score you need to slowly pay back your loans, so you pay back maximum interest.
I got an 800 credit score by just using credit cards and paying the balance each month. Lenders made literally no money on me.
Credit scores are used to tell companies how much they can earn on lending you money.
This is demonstrably bullshit.
Someone who maxes out a credit card, and then only pays minimum payments, and always makes them late, is, via interest accruing and late payment fees, making the lender basically the maximum amount of profit possible. And yet doing this will result in a garbage credit score, because using every penny of your credit limit is very detrimental to your credit score, and not making payments on time is extremely detrimental to your credit score.
Meanwhile, take me, someone who never pays a cent of interest, because he pays off his card every statement cycle (and on time, naturally), and because of card rewards, I’m the one profiting, the lender is literally the one paying me, and ‘yet’, my credit score is in the 800s.
So how do you reconcile that with the assertion quoted above? It’s very hard to understand how anyone can arrive at the conclusion you did, while also knowing (as I assume you do) that late payments simultaneously hurt your credit score and increase profit for the lender, just as one example.
Paying back quickly reduces the amount they can earn, lowering your credit score.
Straight-up lie.
The way I understand it, to raise your credit score you need to slowly pay back your loans, so you pay back maximum interest.
You don’t understand it.
Paying back quickly reduces the amount they can earn, lowering your credit score.Straight-up lie.
No, it doesn’t fit the definition of a lie, I didn’t know any better, so it was ignorance, not a lie, it would be nice if you could edit and correct this line.
The way I understand it, to raise your credit score you need to slowly pay back your loans, so you pay back maximum interest.You don’t understand it.
I wholeheartedly agree with you there.
Overall you do seem to know the subject better than me, so I will mostly defere to your judgement (apart from the thing about me lying).
There’s also an element of whether or not the lendee can reliably make payments. Always having late fees doesn’t show that you’re able to reliably make companies money. And when you’re making payments on time without fees, they still get money from the fees they charge the business. So using and paying back is still good for them. It’s still all about the money, because it always is in the US.
Paying back a loan quickly will not lower your credit score. If you have a line of credit that closes as soon as you pay off a loan (eg a car loan) your score can go down if it changes your utilization rate (how much you could take out in loans vs. how much you have taken out) but paying off a loan early won’t impact your score.
You can look up what things are factored into a consumer credit score. You can see for yourself that early payments are not part of the formula.
I always pay my loans back on time and every now and then the bank rise my credit limit. I think it’s because I also have a bank account with them and they can see I have the money ready to go. I don’t make much money for them, but I do make a consistent amount and the banks like that too.
If you’re talking out of your ass, I’m impressed
Thank you, I have been training daily
You are entirely incorrect. The credit card company makes most of their money from the fees paid by the merchant. They make money when you, the customer, spend money because the merchant gives a chunk of it to them, usually with an additional flat fee. (Different merchants and card processors have different payment structures. A grocery store is more likely to pay a much higher fixed daily fee to avoid unpredictable transaction fees on small purchases)
They don’t lower your score if you pay back early. People get confused because they see their score drop after going from $10k credit card limit with $800 in monthly usage paid on time every time and a $500 balance on a $25k car loan that’s been paid on time every month to just the credit card. The reason it went down is that the number of regular timely payments went down, which means fewer trust signals, and credit utilization went up. (3% to 8%). It doesn’t however snap down as though you hadn’t just made a bunch of good payments, it just doesn’t boost when you’re done.
The credit card company makes the most money when you make a huge number of modest purchases and then immediately pay them back. When you have credit card debt their money is sitting in the merchants account. They want to minimize the time they don’t have their money so they charge you based on the risk that you never pay them back, after a grace period. (You have usually a month before any interest acrues).
It’s why as you get better credit scores the credit card company starts offering you increasing incentives to buy things. Bonus cash back on purchases at places that tend to be frequent, smaller purchases without bulk processing rates and so one. They’ll refund you on purchases in a dispute with the merchant and then figure out the merchant dispute independently (usually by just dropping it because they don’t care about $124.99 in potentially substandard curtains or whatever they just want the customer to keep buying curtains and the merchant to keep thinking it’s a net positive). You’re a walking $0.25 + 3.0% per purchase. Making you regret spending money is the last thing they want.
Hmm, I don’t think so. I’m in my 60s and I’ve always paid my credit cards in full each month when they’re due. Until very recently, I did have a mortgage and paid the regular payment (with occasional extra payments for principle), do they did make money off of me there. My credit rating has pretty much always been at or near the highest it can be.
There are a lot of bad answers or misunderstandings about credit scores in this thread.
FICO Credit scores measure exactly one thing: How good are you at regularly paying on debt over time? Thats it.
There are some other companies that take your FICO score and make their own determinations from it, but those are not the intended purpose of a FICO score.
ANON is also saying “x raises” or “y lowers” but he’s missing one other part. Some of those raises and lowers are temporary meaning for a couple of months only, and those don’t have years long impacts.
Most of the big moving pieces are publicly published right on the FICO website too, so you don’t have to guess:
So lets look at ANONs complaints through the lens of what FICO scores address:
Using credit lowers your score
I’m assuming ANON means “using a portion of an already established credit line.” We can see in the chart that this would increase the red segment of the FICO score. FICO assumes the closer you get to your maximum credit availability, the more you’re being squeezed financially reducing your ability to pay on all of your debts. From a lender’s perspective, if your debts are piling up, then lending you more is a higher risk.
Not using credit lowers your score
If ANON means “using zero credit” then, yes, ANON wouldn’t have a recent history of paying on debt then the Payment History section of the graph would be thin or empty. From a lender’s perspective, if you haven’t paid on any debt in the last 6 months, how do they know you still have the ability to do so if you want credit right now?
Paying back late lowers your score
Absolutely! Its violating the very purpose FICO is made to measure: How good are you at regularly paying on debt over time?
Paying back early lowers your score
This one is a yes or no depending on what scenario ANON is talking about. Paying back a credit card early DOES NOT lower your score. In fact, it would likely RAISE your score. Paying back an installment loan, lets say for a car, early can lower your score, but not because its early, but because the load will disappear. Without a loan to pay on, you will have less recent history of paying on an installment loan for a car, and 6 months from now a lender may not know if you still have the ability to do so, so you score falls.
Even checking your score lowers your score.
ANON checking ANONs score DOES NOT lower your score. ANON allowing a lender to do a hard pull check does lower the score, but only a small amount 10-20 points and this is temporary about a month or two. Further, do several hard pulls at once, they don’t each lower by 10 or 20 points. If you do the pulls close together (within a week or two) it will be only the temporary lowering for a month or two. From a lender’s perspective if you’re reaching out for new lines of credit, it means you’re indicating you’re about to take on more debt which could affect your ability to pay on further new debts.
Taking out loans lowers your score
Temporarily, yes, but over time this can grow your score if its in a different loan type or length.
Paying back loans lowers your score
Yes and no, circumstances depending. If you pay back that one loan type lets say a car loan, and you have have no other installment loans, then you will have no more recent history of paying on any installment loans. However, if you have a mortgage which is another type of installment loan, you’ll take no hit for paying back the car loan as you will continue to have a recent payment history of paying on installment loans. You could take a hit because a nearly paid off loan looks good for the “Amounts owed” component of the score, but you could use a trick like getting a credit card of the same credit line (and not charge anything on it) to avoid that if you really need to.
Not taking out loans lowers your score
Not quite true. Having no recent payment history means a lower score, but it you already have some type of loan or credit you pay on every month, not taking out more loans will not hurt your score.
One final thought I really really want to dispel: YOUR FICO SCORE IS NOT INCREASED BY PAYING INTEREST ON CREDIT CARD DEBT!
Try everything you can to avoid carrying credit card debt into next month. Interest rates are crazy high and it does nothing to help you. If you put a purchase on a credit card, make sure to pay the full statement balance every month. If you do this, you’ll pay zero interest on any credit card purchases.
tldr, debt is a trap. only when you accept it’s a trap does it become a tool
you want more $…learn the value of your labor.
For the vast majority of people the only debt they should ever get is a house.
That is a horrible tldr.
A better tldr is lenders are looking at your current and past ability to pay your current, past, and predicted debt.
Nothing in that message has anything to do with better wages.
Thank you, holy shit, I get so frustrated seeing the most obviously-disproven misconceptions flying around even communities that purport to be savvy, lol.
I’m pretty sure they see everything, but the way it’s chunked up can create artifacts. Balances are tabulated monthly, but they also see your payments. A higher balance means higher utilization which lowers your score. Paying early counts as a history of on time payment and lower utilization, which is good for your score.
Excellent summary, and thank you for the bold section on paying credit card interest. I can’t count the number of times I’ve heard that myth.
Great write-up, thanks!
Having said that, it’s hard not to feel that these rules have been semi purposefully left vague so that people take the wrong actions that will cost them extra money
To add on-top of that, I feel like this system, and most systems around this, are all setup to work great for the rich and the “providers” and just plain less good for us. It’s almost like a casino in that the house always wins
Having said that, it’s hard not to feel that these rules have been semi purposefully left vague so that people take the wrong actions that will cost them extra money
This sounds like perhaps you believe this is an intentionally convoluted process designed to trap people. Like it is a set of financial gymnastics that borrowers must learn and perform before getting a loan.
I don’t think thats the case or the origin. I think its much more likely that, prior to FICO scores, lenders went looking at people that successfully pay on debt and then started analyzing those borrowers choices. They found those that were successfully followed a set of behaviors, and then Fair Isaac (the company behind FICO) created a FICO score (there are actually a whole bunch of different FICO scores) baking in those behaviors.
I will admit that companies that have no business using credit scores are now using them for various other aspects of life, but that wasn’t the intent for FICO scores to begin with from the outset.
To add on-top of that, I feel like this system, and most systems around this, are all setup to work great for the rich and the “providers” and just plain less good for us. It’s almost like a casino in that the house always wins
The truly rich likely don’t have to deal with FICO scores as the lending products they’re using are asset based anyway. I will say that this system is NOT designed to help borrowers. Its not meant to hurt them, but its certainly to let lenders know who has a better chance of servicing a loan or not.
I mean, the rule is to not carry a balance, make payments on time, and don’t borrow more than you can pay back. They aren’t very cagey about those rules. The exact ways particular actions impact your score isn’t relevant to the best practices.
There’s a lot wrong with the credit industry, but being upfront about payment practices really isn’t a problem.
One weird thing you missed is the “length of credit” though. Let’s say you get your first credit card somewhere as a kid, and now you’re 40 and haven’t had anything else. Suddenly, that bank wants you to pay a monthly fee to keep your account open. If you get a new credit card somewhere else, and cancel your kid-card, your score is going to get hit quite a bit, no?
If you did it “correct”, you’d have 10+ different cards lying in a drawer at home to tons of different credit agencies.
It’s all an insane game that you have to play, despite the fact that it can usually be played “for free”.
Only the Uber wealthy credit cards really have annual fees. For everything else they just expect a minium balance of like 20 bucks. My bank only wants 12.50 in a savings acct and there’s no fee for checking or saving.
If your checking acct or credit card has an annual fee and it’s not an absurdly high end amex or some shit then it’s likely a predatory acct and not a real bank or credit union.
I kept my kid card open for exactly this reason, but thankfully there were no fees involved. The issuer cancelled the card after two years worth of not using it though :(
because that’s weird. that’s not a situation most people would have.
the card they got as a kid would be a shitty card with a very high APR. any smart person would dump it and replace it with a better card.
In other words, Anon is right on every point? Honestly, I thought some were exhaggerations. But thanks for confirming each and every.
Anon is actually pretty far off.
Hes right in the same sense that saying the sky is blue is technically correct. If you ignore the countless other colors it can be.
My god, I want to write some things up but you NAILED it.
One thing I’ll back you on, one’s credit score can bounce in a month or three. No big deal. Learn how it works, work the system.
Your comment is a blessing, thank you for the significant effort <3
Also worth mentioning: what’s the alternative?
If there are no credit scores but there are still loans, the banks / entities making the loans have no real way to know if their loan is going to be paid back. Because of that, the loans are a lot more risky. What happens when a loan is riskier? The interest rate is higher, or people are just outright rejected.
Either or, depending on the risk tolerance of your lender.
A low limit credit card with 0 interest if you pay off in full before it’s due is a great way to build your credit score.
I’m Australian, and this post prompted me to research the US Social Credit system. The score can determine whether or not you’re accepted for home rentals, and even determine whether or not you qualify for medical treatments
You need to engage in having debt and credit in order to appease the score.
I bought an apartment recently, and I’ve never had a credit card or debt of any variety. When I was younger my bank would dip into negatives or reject a payment fairly regularly. In the US that could probably cost me a place to live.
And apparently the entire credit score is built up and perpetrated by these massive corporations? Like Credit Score is not even anything to do with the government, and yet it has such a pervasive effect on people’s lives and their behavior.
It’s straight up creepy. Dystopian vibes. How do Americans tolerate this?
It’s so much worse than I think you even realize, but you definitely nailed some of the key pieces.
It’s correct that we don’t opt in, that it’s strictly private companies (3 of them), and that modern life in the US makes it impossible to avoid playing this game.
Some additional details:
And nothing I’ve said is even recent insanity, all of that’s been true a long time. It’s really staggering just how effectively the US has systematized destroying our working class. We’ve been the global leader in innovating oppression for decades, it’s been interesting watching the rest of the world start to catch on just how severe it is here.
First off, it’s not a social credit score, it’s a financial credit score, we’re not talking about the system China has for it’s citizens.
As with many of these deep dives on Americanisms, what you’ve found is generally worst case scenarios and also not universally applicable. Some states have restrictions on what your credit score can be used for and how it can impact you, car insurance and rentals being a prime example.
Also, by simply having a credit card (and not using it!) and not having any lapsed debts (collections or reported unpaid bills) you will easily have a score in the mid to high 700s. If you carry a balance month to month but regularly make your minimum payments you will have a credit score in the low to mid 700s. Hell. my wife had 5 bills in collection and still had a 650 before I met her.
As far as credit score applicability, it’s often referenced by businesses as a measure of risk. If you have a 650 instead of a 750 your car insurance might be higher because your risk of payment is higher, but we’re only talking about 10-15% more per year (US south east). Same with with rental, if you have a bunch of bills in collection or default your score will be bad, but a rental provider will be less willing to provide you service if you have a history of not paying your bills. You should still be able to find a place to live, but it will likely be more limited (for example if you have a 400, but not if you have something like a 650) or you may have a larger security deposit.
Overall your credit score likely won’t be an issue 95% of the time, but if you habitually don’t pay your bills then your score will go down and businesses that check your score won’t want to do business with you. I can’t make this clear enough, you have to be deliberate in your actions if you want your score to be low enough to cause a problem. My wife had $15k in student loans, $10k in credit card debt, and 5 unpaid bills that had been sent to collections and she still was in the 600s. The score system exists for a reason, I would argue that it should be a bit more forgiving, but the reason it exists is fair.
Non US citizens might have trouble relating to this, but people in the US take blatant advantage of systems a lot of times. I have a coworker that moved for a new job, but he didn’t want to sell his house because he got it at a good rate and time. He listed his house for a decent rate and his first tenant stopped paying after the second month. He waited until 4 months hadn’t been paid to take them to court and it took another 6 months to have them removed. Just before they were going to be escorted out by the sheriff they paid him the entire back rent in cash to try to prevent the eviction (they had the money the whole time!) After they were evicted he reached out to the local municipality for the water account and they found out the tenant had bypassed the water meter (basically they were stealing). The municipality then said he had to pay to fix the bypass, penalized him for the stolen utilities, and said that for any future tenants he would have to keep the account in his name rather than having the tenants file it.
American credit score systems suck, but they are generally fair and they prove themselves necessary because a certain percentage of Americans seem to have fundamental problems with following common and decent rules of this world.
I just read an article the other day that said Gen Z has the highest rate of credit card fraud ever seen in US history. As a group they just don’t see any issue with ordering something online and then saying it never arrived and reversing the charges. I’m all for saying fuck the system and down with corporate interests, but it’s hard to have a functional modern society that casually commits fraud and theft.
Back in my day we just wrote bad checks! (I’m kidding, I’ve never even owned a checkbook unless it was a starter pad that came with the account)
How do Americans tolerate this?
Brainwashing. Americans don’t realize they live in a Dystopian shithole where, since the 80s, the rules are made by the rich to keep the common person down.
We’re coming to the end game of this now.
To be fair, the fact that you haven’t heard of any Aussie credit is because companies keep it private to themselves. They definitely have financial information on you and utilize it to decide the interest rate on your loans.
Much less horrible than the US dystopia for sure tho
Yeah, I would consider that somewhat “acceptable” usage though. It’d be irresponsible to approve a large loan to someone who’s already extremely overindebted, for example.
Sweden’s system doesn’t have a specific number like the US, but mostly just shows economical health. How many active loans you have, income over the last few years, and if you’ve had loans go to the enforcement agency. But we have the same sickness as America: if you have had something go to the enforcement agency within the last 3+ years, it’ll be basically impossible for you to rent an apartment (as if it wasn’t difficult in the first place).
because you deeply misunderstand it.
it basically lets lenders know if you have a history of paying back your loans or not.
it’s that simple. and in the USA medical treatment often requires loans.
Then why do you need to engage in having debt and using credit cards to have a good score? If having no credit score is nearly as bad as having a bad credit score then something is wrong.
Easy. It’s a scam to screw over anyone they feel like.
It stopped being a can the applicant afford their current outgoings and afford this loan type system a loooong time ago. Now it’s a noose round the neck of anyone that has ever lost a job and missed a couple of payments or got screwed over by a company changing billing software. The number means nothing, I’m sure on some kind of grading curve it averages out but so would throwing darts at a board and assigning scores that way.
The rich fail up and everyone else has to play by the rules or get fucked over.
/Rant over
The exact same as the Chinese “social credit” system that people whine about, except this one is capitalism based, so it’s ok.
Credit score = milkability score.
I follow the old-fashioned idea of buying things with money I have, debit instead of credit.
Its a very complex system of math and rules, but it isn’t impossible to … raise your credit score.
Closing a loan or credit line actually often lowers your score because it lessens the total amount of credit you theoretically could be using, if you maxxed everything out.
Your ‘Credit Utilization’ is what % of your total maximum possible credit you are using.
So, when you finally pay off a huge loan of some kind… well, that account closes, and now your relative credit utilization probably goes up, because the system is now only looking at say your credit cards, not them + your big loan.
So basically, you should actually never close down a credit account of any kind, after you fully pay it off. Just… use it sparingly, or put the card in a safe, destroy it, who cares, as long as the account still exists.
(big asterisk on that: unless it has some kind of regular due payment just to even have the account, even if you’re not using it at all)
Thats also true because another big factor in credit scores is how long you’ve had the accounts you have.
It literally does just take time to build up that element of it, time of you making regular payments and never leaving a balance that rolls over into the next month.
Number of regular payments made on time vs number of missed payments is another big factor of credit models.
I’m not trying to defend this system, its horseshit, truly evil.
I’m trying to summarize useful advice.
I was homeless for 2 years.
When I finally got a bit more stabilized, I had scores around 520, because yeah, I spent money I didn’t have so that I could eat, and not sleep outside in blizzards and heatwaves.
Its now been about 2 years since that point, and I’m up to between 670 and 710, the 3 agencies still considerably disagree as to which accounts I even had… as I got mugged and had my identity stolen multiple times, and I was only able to convince different agencies of different amounts and extents of that… and also crippled by those muggings…
But the point is, its not impossible to rebuild your credit, even while you’re living off of only SSDI as I now am.
Its exceedingly dfficult to do so, but not strictly impossible.
Makes sense when you learn and realize that this is the new way of red lining people. Particularly POC who are less likely to be able to build credit because of poverty.
It’s an American and British affliction… This shit wasn’t even a thing in France and then I moved to the UK and people talk about “credit scores” and willingly going into debt to pay it off, huhhhhhh 🙄
It’s all a scam, man. Money’s just pretend. I converted all my cash to radishes. At least when the economy goes into a death spiral I’ll still have radishes.
I’m sure I’ll get down voted to holy hell for saying this, but I’ve always appreciated that the rules are pretty transparent and it was easy for me to rack up a great credit score even before I had a decent income. To me it always felt like an open book test.
USA’s very own social credit system
I think that’s misleading - taking out loans and paying them back is the most well known way of raising a credit score. I don’t see why the opposite would be true.
Supposedly some people actually do this, when they can afford to, because they see the boost to their credit score as worth the actual lost cash in interest. From what I gather, credit score helps you to attain more favourable mortgages or other loans, which helps when you make big purchases like cars or if you run a small business.
Example from my own life:
The first time i took out a student loan [UK] I left the course after about 2 weeks and repaid it all back because Student Finance England - a private entity that supposedly operates on behalf of the government - was hassling me to return the money straight away. Ironically, i didn’t need to do that, and there wasn’t much benefit to doing so. But my credit score is abnormally high ckmpared to other peoples’ so i think that’s why.
One arguably unjust part about credit scores is that the actions of people related to you, or simply sharing the same surname as you, can affect it! E.G i have heard that a friend-of-a-friend’s dad took out too many loans and now their credit score suffers.
Seems like a medieval system to me. People joke that it’s the capitalist approach to a “social credit score,” and I have to agree.
Anyway if it’s true that the actions of other people can affect your credit score, it seems like the number is nothing more than a “how much do bankers like you” score. I presume a bankers immediate family will have higher than normal credit scores. What OP/anon perceives as the score going down for contradictory reasons are actually just his score going haywire under a combination of factors outside of his control.
Most of these points are myths, but as long as it’s funny, right?
The trick is to not give a shit about credit scores, of course I don’t live in the US which helps.
I’ve had a consistent score of a little over 800 before and after purchasing my house by paying off my credit cards ahead of time. I had no major long term debt other than a mortgage either. That said, this is pretty much the equivalent to that Chinese social credit score crap but it’s real in this case. It just means you’re ranking high in some opaque game on your financial prospects that the banks are playing.
The dirty secret - they don’t work - and that’s by design
Credit scores are like… (And I’m sorry about this)… Like The Game
The cultists at Experian sacrifice a black goat and interpret the spatter patterns
Wait until they find out that the scores are created for consumers to bicker over and actual lenders only look at histories for their own criteria and they don’t even see a score as past of the report they examine
Credit just isn’t my thing. It feels like a scam
Don’t listen to people saying you should keep extra accounts open. If you have 1 credit card open that you use regularly and pay off every month you’ll pay no interest and have a good enough credit score.
Freeze Equifax, and then live your life within your means.
Paying other people money on a predictable schedule raises your score.
Did what I do, pay your bills and don’t think about it.
I live in Canada and I once went to a job interview. and in the application paperwork they asked for my credit score. I put the pen down and walked out of there. That was literally the only time it ever happened.
It was an American company…
The colours are the wrong way round
Be rich, have assets held in company stocks, get super low interest loans on your stocks, profit.
Yall are making this more complicated than you need to.
-Using credit does lower your score, yes, because if you already have loans you are less able to pay off additional loans. However, once you are done paying off those loans you will have a higher credit score than when you started
-Not using credit will only lower your credit score because it turns you into an unknown quantity
-Paying back late does lower your score, duh
-Paying back early does NOT lower your score. The only thing is if you take out a loan and then immediately pay it back they will recognize that you didn’t really need a loan in the first place. But Paying back mortgages/car finances quickly is a great way to build credit
-Simply checking or looking at your credit score does not affect it. However, making a “hard inquiry”-actually going to the bank or dealership and asking them if you can afford X thing-can lower your score because it’s a clear sign you’re about to take on more debt. That won’t actually hurt you for that particular inquiry though, it only hurts you if you walk away.
-Taking out loans does lower your score because you have burdened yourself with debt, duh
-Repaying loans does NOT lower your credit score, it raises it, unless you no longer have any debt at all and they no longer have a feel for how good you are at repaying.
Having an excellent credit score is not hard. Use a credit card and pay the full balance every month - thats a good idea anyway since the cash back is free money. Take out loans only when you need to and repay them as quickly as you can (also a good idea, since the guaranteed ROI of repaying debt is going to be better usually than when what you can make guaranteed by investing).
Now is America over-reliant on debt? Oh yeah absolutely. But avoid revolving credit card debt and don’t get in over your head with mortgages and car loans and you can easily “game the system” and take advantage of cheap credit.
well from a capitalist viewpoint credit scores measure how good an investment you are. you are a good investment if you are reliable to pay back your loans at maximum interest. the more likely you are to pay back your loan at exactly the right time (measured by how often you’ve already done that) the more the banks trust you with their money.
Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
You know my favorite fact about credit scores? Paying your utility bills on time for your whole life will not raise your credit score one point. Forty years on time every month nobody cares. However missing enough payments on your utility bill that it gets sent to collections will lower your credit score. Kind of makes you want to burn down some buildings doesn’t it?
ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
And rent. My last rental had a special offer though: pay an extra fee every month and they’ll report your rent to the credit bureaus, raising your score through the roof.
shalafi@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Shitty deal, but yeah, moves like this will save you money.
Dad: “You know how when you and your gf want to learn how something works and you get books at the library and learn about it? (90s, OK?) You can learn how money works.”
Lemmy: NOAAWW! Want money want credit! No learn!
Reminds me of a coworker telling me overtime is bullshit because they charge you more taxes and you actually make less money.
Oh honey. That’s why you’ll never have more money.
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
You can report your own rent to the credit bureaus. Hell I report the rent I paided to family in cash and they accepted it and it rose my credit score. You just have to show reoccurring costs and bank statements.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
You can use Kikoff or CreditKarma or things like that to regularly report your paid on time bills, and that does, slowly, incrementally, increase your credit score.
Yeah its still total bullshit that that isn’t just like a pre-baked in part of the credit system, but you can do this.
wander1236@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Careful, that’ll lower your score
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
FICO Credit scores measure exactly one thing: How good are you at regularly paying on debt over time? Thats it.
Utility bills are generated and cleared every month (assuming you pay). If you got in a financial jam, you could probably lower how much HVAC you use or lower your water usage while times were tight. You can’t do that on installment loans. The full loan payment is due every month. Utility bills are not a great measure of the ability to regularly pay on debt over time, which is what FICO scores measure.
AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
That one actually makes sense to me. A utility bill isn’t credit, it’s a different debt, so paying it when you’re supposed to doesn’t demonstrate responsible use of credit. On the other hand, if you can’t pay off any sort of debt on time, you probably aren’t a good risk for loaning money to.
shalafi@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Also, it’s the kind of payment you cannot miss. I’m fucking off my CC bills ATM because I’m unemployed, cannot pay. I have to scrounge the power, roof and water bills.
gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
There’s some that have now adapted their policies to include bill payments
lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 2 weeks ago
Absolutely. I could candidate some buildings in particular. They have some sort of pedo brand.