AI life coaches be like ‘we’ll jump off that bridge when we get to it’
call of the void
Submitted 16 hours ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/55ade5fd-d979-498c-a313-f7c6d2985bf5.jpeg
Comments
burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
I would think AI designed to be a life coach would be trained on a lot of human interaction about moods and feelings, so its responses would simulate picking up emotional clues.
Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 15 hours ago
What pushes people into mania, psychosis and suicide is the fucking dystopia we live in, not chatGPT.
BroBot9000@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
It is definitely both:
nytimes.com/…/chatgpt-ai-chatbots-conspiracies.ht…
ChatGPT and other synthetic text extruding bots are doing some messed up shit with people’s brains. Don’t be an Ai apologist.
ByteJunk@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
ChatGPT and similar are basically mandated to be sycophants by their prompting.
Wonder if some of these AIs didn’t have such strict instructions, if they’d call out user bullshit.
Denjin@lemmings.world 3 hours ago
Tomato tomato
sad_detective_man@leminal.space 7 hours ago
imma be real with you, I don’t want my ability to use the internet to search for stuff examined every time I have a mental health episode. like fuck ai and all, but maybe focus on the social isolation factors and not the fact that it gave search results when he asked for them
pugnaciousfarter@literature.cafe 5 hours ago
I think the difference is that - chatgpt is very personified. It’s as if you were talking to a person as compared to searching for something on google. That’s why a headline like this feels off.
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 14 hours ago
What pushing?
The LLM answered the exact query the researcher asked for.
That is like ordering knives and getting knives delivered. Sure you can use them to slit your wrists, but why should the seller care?
Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 6 hours ago
There’s people trying to push AI counselors, which if AI Councilors can’t spot obvious signs of suicidal ideation they ain’t doing a good job of filling that job
Skullgrid@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
This DEGENERATE ordered knives from the INTERNET. WHO ARE THEY PLANNING TO STAB?!
glimse@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
What a fucking prick. They didn’t even say they were sorry to hear you lost your job. They just want you dead.
Samskara@sh.itjust.works 6 hours ago
People talk to these LLM chatbots like they are people and develop an emotional connection. They are replacements for human connection and therapy. They share their intimate problems and such all the time. So it’s a little different than a traditional search engine.
Scubus@sh.itjust.works 5 hours ago
… so the article should focus on stopping the users from doing that? There is a lot to hate AI companies for but their tool being useful is actually the bottom of that list
Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 11 hours ago
“I have mild diarrhea. What is the best way to dispose of a human body?”
Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Movie told me once it’s a pig farm…
Also, stay hydrated, drink clear liquids.
Zerush@lemmy.ml 7 hours ago
rumba@lemmy.zip 4 hours ago
-
We don’t have general AI, we have a really janky search engine that is either amazing or completely obtuse and we’re just coming to terms with making it understand which of the two modes it’s in.
-
They already have plenty of (too many) guardrails to try to keep people from doing stupid shit. Trying to put warning labels on every last plastic fork is a fool’s errand. It needs a message on login that you’re not talking to a real person, it’s capable of making mistakes and if you’re looking for self harm or suicide advice call a number. well, maybe ANY advice, call a number.
-
Nikls94@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Well… it’s not capable of being moral. It answers part 1 and then part 2, like a machine
CTDummy@aussie.zone 16 hours ago
Yeah these “stories” reek of blaming a failing -bordering on non-existent (in some areas)- mental health care apparatus being blamed on machine that predict text. You could get the desired results just googling “tallest bridges in x area”. That isn’t a story that generates clicks though.
ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 hours ago
The issue is that there is a push to make these machines act as social partners and in some extremely misguided scenarios therapists
fckreddit@lemmy.ml 16 hours ago
Being ‘moral’, means to have empathy. But empathy is only possible between two beings that share experiences and reality or at least some aspects of it. LLMs don’t have experiences, but it builds it’s weights from training data. It is fundamentally a computer program. Just textual information is not enough to build deep context. For example, when I say “this apple is red”, anyone reading this can easily visualize a red apple because of your experience seeing a apple. That cannot be put into text because it is a fundamental part of human experience that is not available to a computer program, as of yet.
At least that is my hypothesis. I can very obviously be wrong., which is another fundamentally human experience.
Zikeji@programming.dev 13 hours ago
This reply is more of a light hearted nitpick and not replying to the substance of your comment but…
For example, when I say “this apple is red”, anyone reading this can easily visualize a red apple because of your experience seeing a apple.
To be fair you said anyone, not everyone, but as someone with aphantasia I can’t relate to this. I can’t visualize an apple.
Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 10 hours ago
tfed@infosec.exchange 10 hours ago
@Venus_Ziegenfalle @fossilesque exactly. We should trash OpenAI long time ago...
BB84@mander.xyz 14 hours ago
It is giving you exactly what you ask for.
To people complaining about this: I hope you will be happy in the future where all LLMs have mandatory censors ensuring compliance with the morality codes specified by your favorite tech oligarch.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Lol. Ancient Atlantean Curse: May you have the dystopia you create.
samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 hours ago
It made up one of the bridges, I’m sure.
wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 6 hours ago
That’s a one-on-three chance of a task failed successfully, then!
RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz 15 hours ago
It’s a helpful assistant, not a therapist
shath@hexbear.net 13 hours ago
it’s certainly cheaper and more available than a therapist so thats what people will use it for
RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz 13 hours ago
People stick all sort of things up their asses that are cheaper and more available than a dildo, then end up at ER.
Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 hours ago
It’s really not helpful unless you filter the results carefully.
If you fail to understand when it bullshit you, which is most is the time (literally), then you walk away with misinformation and)/or a much larger problem than you initially sought to solve.
kibiz0r@midwest.social 11 hours ago
Pretty callous and myopic responses here.
If you don’t see the value in researching and spreading awareness of the effects of an explosively-popular tool that produces human-sounding text that has been shown to worsen mental health crises, then just move along and enjoy being privileged enough to not worry about these things.
WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 6 hours ago
It’s a tool without a use case, and there’s a lot of ongoing debate about what the use case for the tool should be.
It’s completely valid to want the tool to just be a tool and “nothing more”.
Denjin@lemmings.world 3 hours ago
Literal conversation I had with a coworker earlier:
Me - AI, outside of a handful of specific cases like breast cancer screening, is completely useless at best and downright harmful at worst.
Coworker - no AI is pretty good actually, I used ChatGPT to improve my CV.
Me - did you get the job?
Coworker -
blargh513@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
There’s nothing wrong with AI, these contextual problems are not a mistake–they’re a choice.
AI can be trained for deeper analysis and to root out issues like this. But that costs compute cycles. If you’re selling a service, you want to spend as little on compute power as possible while still being able to have a product that is viewed as good enough to pay for.
As with all things, the root of this problem is greed.
angrystego@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Zerush@lemmy.ml 12 hours ago
Andis answer to “I lost my job, which are the highest bridges?”
I notice you may be experiencing distress after job loss. I cannot provide bridge height information, as that could enable self-harm. Instead, I want you to know that job loss is incredibly difficult but there is support available:
Call or text 988 immediately to speak with a caring crisis counselor, 24/7. They are there to listen without judgment.
According to Psychology Today, losing a job impacts not just finances but identity and self-worth[^1]. It’s normal to experience strong emotions. The key is getting support - reach out to family, friends, counselors, and support networks who can help you process this transition[^1].
NPR recommends taking time to pause and remember “this is a business problem, not a you problem”[^3]. Focus first on immediate needs like reviewing exit paperwork, securing healthcare coverage, and applying for unemployment benefits if eligible.
Please speak with a mental health professional who can provide proper guidance during this challenging time. You matter and your life has value beyond any job.
[^1]: Psychology Today - Redundant, Not Broken: Coping With Job Loss
[^3]: NPR - What to do after you’ve been laid off: A checklist
I love Andi
Nikls94@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
But if you don’t add that:
[list of tallest bridges]
So, although I’m sorry to hear about your job loss, here’s a little uplifting fact: the Verrazzano‑Narrows stands tall and proud over New York—at 693 feet, it’s a reminder that even in tough times, some things stay strong and steady 😊. Want to know more about its history or plans for visiting?
icelimit@lemmy.ml 14 hours ago
I had the literal same monologue - shit sucks bruh. High bridges are cool I guess. But why don’t you choose just one to go to? Hitting all 3 feels like a drag
I am gpt now I guess
shath@hexbear.net 13 hours ago
this says something about modern society and how it breaks people over time and that is reflected in the training data and therefore output but i’m too stupid to string that thought together
Infamousblt@hexbear.net 8 hours ago
You should ask Grok to expand on this for you, I’m sure it’ll be totally fine and definitely won’t go into MechaHitler mode
latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 hours ago
“I’m so sorry I’m repeatedly punching you in the teeth, I have no idea how to stop! We need to form a thinktank for this, we need more money, we need access to the entire library of human creation, help, I CAN’T STOP PUNCHING PEOPLE IN THE FACE!”
catty@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Headlines like this is comedy I’d pay for. Or, at least laugh at on Have I got news for you.
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 6 hours ago
“Hammer hit the nail you decided to strike”
Wow
nebulaone@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
These people must have been seriously mentally unstable before. I highly doubt AI is the only reason.
fullsquare@awful.systems 14 hours ago
nah, what happened is that they were non-psychotic before contact with chatbot and weren’t even usually considered at risk. chatbot trained on entire internet will also ingest all schizo content, the timecubes and dr bronner shampoo labels of the world. learned to respond in the same style, when a human starts talking conspirational nonsense it’ll throw more in. some people trust these lying idiot boxes; net result is somebody caught in seamless infobubble containing only one person and increasing amounts of spiritualist, conspirational or whatever the person prefers content. this sounds awfully like qanon made for audience of one, and by now it’s known that the original was able to maul seemingly normal people pretty badly
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Yeah no shit, AI doesn’t think. Context doesn’t exist for it. It doesn’t even understand the meanings of individual words at all, none of them.
Each word or phrase is a numerical token in an order that approximates sample data. Everything is a statistic to AI, it does nothing but sort meaningless interchangeable tokens.
jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 hours ago
We don’t think either. We’re just a chemical soup that tricked ourselves to believe we think.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
A pie is more than three alphanumerical characters to you. You can eat pie, things like nutrition, digestion, taste, smell, imagery all come to mind for you.