Scubus
@Scubus@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on Off topic 1 day ago:
Yep, only time i watch “tv” is when im visiting relatives
- Comment on Off topic 1 day ago:
That and that they intentionally make the commercials about 30% louder than the show
- Comment on Everybody gets one [choose wisely] 3 days ago:
On the other hand, the people who are intestered in federated dating are all going to be fairly similar, which would seem to be a good thing.
- Comment on Anon has learned enough 3 days ago:
Kid’s parents get murdered by hitler and he ends up with his north korean foster parents
This guy completely misses all the characterization
Completely misses on maliciously skips the entire 0lot revolving around sirius black
Completely misses that the point is that its your choices that define you, not the circumstances of your birth
- Comment on Everybody gets one [choose wisely] 3 days ago:
Does lemmy have a dating community? If not we need one
- Comment on 😭😭😭😭😭 3 days ago:
Id go back and kill the first bedbug, tick, and mosquito
- Comment on High quality sticker though 4 days ago:
As do you, for posting
- Comment on Rats. 2 weeks ago:
If an extra $20k isnt worth jail time to you, you aint broke lol
- Comment on Anon takes shots at Donkey Kong 2 weeks ago:
… that “style” is what makes modern games suck. They lack that authenticity. Rare’s games had personality.
- Comment on Anon takes shots at Donkey Kong 2 weeks ago:
Banjo kazooie and dk64 were tops, you take that back right now
- Comment on call of the void 2 weeks ago:
Thats a super cool outlook! Props to him for coming up with it. I really appreciate the response, i like your insights. I pretty much agree with all of that. There is another form though, people that have struggled with suicide their entire life, and for immutable reasons will continue to stuggle with until they die. For those people, there should be a humane path. But filtering out those from the temporarily depressed seems a gargantuan feat.
- Comment on Stardew Valley dethrones Valve classic as Steam’s top-rated game 2 weeks ago:
Here i was imagining “valve classic” was somehow a wildly popular game ive never heard of
- Comment on call of the void 2 weeks ago:
I do not recall, although if i did it clearly wasnt much of a hindrance. We do seem to be in agreement on this, although i have a tangentially related question for you. Do you believe suicide should be a human right?
- Comment on call of the void 2 weeks ago:
Ok, then we are in agreement. That is a good idea.
I think that at low levels the tech should not be hindered because a subset of users use the tool improperly. There is a line, however, but im not sure where it is. If that problem were to become as widespread as, say, gun violence, then i would agree that the utility of the tool may need to be effected to curb the negative influence
- Comment on call of the void 2 weeks ago:
Ok, people will turn to google when they’re depressed. I just googled a couple months ago the least painful way to commit suicide. Google gave me the info I was looking for. Should I be mad at them?
- Comment on call of the void 2 weeks ago:
… so the article should focus on stopping the users from doing that? There is a lot to hate AI companies for but their tool being useful is actually the bottom of that list
- Comment on Babe can you refill my drink from the cloaca dispenser please? 2 weeks ago:
As someone that is allergic to powdered aluminum, is she aware that almost half the sticks you find at the store are aluminum free?
- Comment on If people's voices become copyright protected in the future as a response to AI, will any non-commercial uses of voices be affected as well? 3 weeks ago:
Copyrighting voices to defeat AI would achieve nothing. Modern AI’s can be overtrained to the point where they strongly resemble their training data, but that is a problem that will be fixed within the next 5 years, which is way earlier than we will see any legislation regarding AI if our geriatric government is anything to go by. After that, AI will generate its “own” content that will be legally protected as its intellectual property.
I base this off of the fact that every media from humans is inspired by previous media. Fundamentally, once it stops directly plagiarising, there is no legal distinction between what a human would be doing and what an AI would be doing, unless we want to come up with a legal classification of “human” that explicitly rejects AI.
That opens up a whole new can of worms though. If you define human to be having human dna, does that mean the 3 babies they have been genetically altered are not human? Or are they, because they comtain at least some human dna? Does that mean i can give my AI a vestigial organ and now its legally protected? Does it have to run off a brain? What is a brain? If i duplicate the neural connections in a brain with mosfets down to every single connection, that is indisputably a human intelligence running on possibly non human hardware depending on the word of law. Or is it a human intelligence? They would react the exact same way to their organic counterpart, down to having the same memories and emotions. Does their non-biological hardware preempt them from being human? Does a pacemaker? Or neuralink?
Theres a lot to be worked out here, but it seems to me to be much less problematic to target the people wanting to misuse AI rather than targetting the tool itself.
- Comment on What's up with the sudden increase in AI slop? 3 weeks ago:
Tfw i use AI as a tool to get stuff done, not to feel good about the process and get to call myself an artist.
- Comment on What's up with the sudden increase in AI slop? 3 weeks ago:
I think they were making a joke. Its the same vein as if you said you dont care about dad jokes then they made a really bad one and said “are you sure?”
- Comment on What's up with the sudden increase in AI slop? 3 weeks ago:
The issue with the leftists as youve described them is that AI IS happening. There will be no stopping it, no containing it. Its already reshaping our world. And by downplaying its future potential(ai will never be able to identify objects, oops it can now. AI will never be able to make art, whoops it can now. AI will never be able to replace a human in every industry…) you are actively stiffling discussion on how to manage those effects. Anyone who has been seriously following AIs progression over the last ten years can see the patterns on the wall. The time of human workers is over. The only question is whether were going to use AI for the benefit of everyone, or for the benefit of the elite. And by convincing consumers they shouldnt use, even though you cant convince the elite not to, you are only pushing the dial further in the wrong direction.
RIGHT NOW we need to embrace AI. Humans have already shown that we are either incapable or unwilling to run a functional society. Putting something else in charge to make the decisions humans cant or wont is the only possible future we have. Ofc Im not asking to out an llm in charge of the world. But I am asking that people actually do something about their world leaders and start getting ubi implemented today. Because soon enough we will have an AI capable of making those decisions. And make them it will. And thats either a good thing under the post scarcity society weve built, or people rolled over and ignored the problem until they decided they dont need us anymore and get rid of us.
- Comment on If this seems exaggerated to you then you haven't worked in IT long enough 3 weeks ago:
They did make the comic. They might not’ve made the images, but they are the ones that came up with the idea and put it together. It’s an expression from their mind, and therefore them watermarking it is a nonissue.
It does just seem scummy, it is scummy to gatekeep art.
- Comment on Does anybody actually care that a dude chanted "Death, Death to the IDF" at Glastonbury? 3 weeks ago:
Isreal is not all of the jews. Just because isreal is doing something does not make it OK to judge jews by that standard.
It also matter a lot because again it’s a religion directly feeding or being used as an excuse, for genocide. That is basically the one thing religion is really good for, making people feel okay about horrible actions
Thats… what I said. Those that attempt to justify anything by saying theyre Jews are outing themselves are genocide supporters.
- Comment on Does anybody actually care that a dude chanted "Death, Death to the IDF" at Glastonbury? 3 weeks ago:
Yikes, so definitely no winners there
- Comment on Does anybody actually care that a dude chanted "Death, Death to the IDF" at Glastonbury? 3 weeks ago:
After seeing what isreal is doing, Hamas doesnt seem so bad. The only thing I heard about them to begin with was that they launched a supposedly unprovoked attack on isreali citizens and kidnapped several. Well, in retrospect, yeah, kinda seems jusitifed.
I don’t actually support Hamas, I just don’t know anything about them. But at this point I know theyre fighting isreal so that makes them at least not the worst people involved in this conflict.
- Comment on Does anybody actually care that a dude chanted "Death, Death to the IDF" at Glastonbury? 3 weeks ago:
Yep, them being jewish matters exactly 0. Even bringing it up is literally just an attempt to muddy the waters, and as such it’s the simplest way to find out who supports genocide.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
I dunno, at this point im pretty sure trump could demand the death or every first born and americans would bend over. It is beyond wild that we have not had an armed uprising yet, and i gave up hope that we will ever have one years ago.
- Comment on Jarvis, change the scenery from a Jungle to a Desert 4 weeks ago:
Bruh the generational shit is propaganda. Take a normie from any generation and theyll be the same. The only legit generalization is that theres a much higher correlation with being a boomer and being a piece of shit. Having relatively little historical knowledge, i can only assume that back in those days being a piece of shit was literally taught in school.
Now class war? That I’m always down for.
- Comment on PewDiePie: I'm DONE with Google 4 weeks ago:
Afaik back in like 2014 or smth he got really mad and said nigger on stream. When confronted he claimed that he just said the most vile thing he could thing of out of anger, and that it reflected the idea that he doesnt agree with that philosophy more than the idea that he does.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Afaik theres the observable universe (their signals will reach us) and the smaller interactactable universe (our signals will reach them).