mexicancartel

@mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Some people really lack civic sense⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Vande Bharath(indian train)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Every.time.⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Bottom white

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Some people really lack civic sense⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  It is indian railways train called “Vande Bharath”.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Theories on Theories⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I’ll pick my side. They are all mathematics

  (I belive math and mathematics are different. What is commonly called math is just numbers and stuff. But mathematics fits the general description of all axioms)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Theories on Theories⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  There are no correct axioms. You can change the axioms as you wish and make your own math2.0. And you will be able to apply it to things that follow thoose axioms but finding such things that follow them is the only hard part. We define 1+1=2 and that is true because we define it that way. If it does not hold true in any physical or something then it is that you are applying a correct math for a system which doesnt work with that math(i.e, you are the problem for assuming the same axiom is true for the real system)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Rule 1: Don't talk about the 🫘⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Bro lmao

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨not so free thinking now are we?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Thanks

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨not so free thinking now are we?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  What is that reaction? I honestly don’t know

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Just like me fr⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  I mean topologically no, since sock is equivalent to some flat surface.

  And to your original question, when you put a hole in the sock, it does become a tube. And a tubr can be seen as a surface with one hole

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Just like me fr⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  second hole

  You mean the first hole

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Gottem⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Well but this meme is accurate because it said monitoring the situation. So when you start monitoring which slit the particle goes through, you changed the outcome.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Precognition proven! Parapsychology vindicated!⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Lots of triangles

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Happy 3.14 Day⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  NOT for mathematicians

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨owo⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  If you think of water pressure from a tank to a tap as a “push” then potential difference is also making such a push. Well yeah ambiguity from colloquial terms exist here, but it is not between push and pull. The two points making potential difference, “pushes” amps through the wire connected in between them. You can say that is not a push but like a chain being rotated. The volts is doing the rotating aka pushing+pulling of the chains. But saying a device pulling amps is essentially that devuce becoming less resistive to the push done by volts

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨owo⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Nahh the “significantly higher voltage” comes only because your device having some form of protection preventing too much current flow. The most simple device would be a resistor and any change in voltage leads to a change in current. So yes you are pusing amps by changing voltage. Pulling amps is by changing resistance so that volt can push amps easier

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨owo⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  True, but as someone doing physics, I’ll say both is fine. You can push amps by increasing voltage, and also pull amps by varying resistance. After all, ohms law basically is the balancing of theese three.

  And if i’m gonna go too far pushing amps is the most sensible thing. The thing we call pulling amps is just decreasing the resistance against the push(voltage) so that pushing becomes more effective. And also what I just called push is also a pull, at negative terminal.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨owo⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  You absolutely can push amperage. You just have to increase volts

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Just one more square bro⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Mathematicians: makes something with zero practical applications

  Waffles:

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨big facts⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  No it can’t be then The Force will be equal to The²(Mass times Acceleration) Its either The mass times acceleration or mass times the acceleration

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨No More Neutral ⚛⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Damn seems like I can only find one typo at a time

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨No More Neutral ⚛⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Add one extra melectron to all the atoms in the universe – adds one electron to all the atoms bit not one each for each atom

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Website delay⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  What launcher you use?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Beta Animals⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  But you can’t walk, noob.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨We're just scanning for the bear...⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Put the subject in an auto driving kart and make it go in same path for all of them

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Life without you, means desertification.⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Thanks for the context, i live in the opposite side of the world

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Life without you, means desertification.⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Man i really don’t know the “Valentine” format and why From and To are blank. This is the first time i’m seeing this and I’m only seeing this on lemmy(is there a knowurmeme?)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Life without you, means desertification.⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  What is this To: From: template?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Tesla's flashing lights⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Now run doom with that

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨50ohm goes brrrrrr⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Well it’s wrong. I suppose you are thinking so because Maxwell’s equations shows B depending on (∆E/∆t)[i cant write \partial symbol], BUT remember LHS is not B but is curl(B) so derivative acts on both sides. So they are in phase and not 90° out of phase. So the peaks should align

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨If God had wanted us to have nearly unlimited clean energy, He would have placed a fusion reactor into the sky.⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  BRotHeR i cRaVe foR tHe ForBiDDen liGhT