mexicancartel
@mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on ONE OF US 5 hours ago:
How to get Oganesson
- Comment on the duality of beetle 3 days ago:
I’m no beetle expert. I thought it’s a weird beetle that has asymmeyric pair of scissors, and male and female had left/right handedness
- Comment on the duality of beetle 4 days ago:
Ohh ohh damn lol. Posting two pictures was extremely confusing given “left” and “right”
- Comment on the duality of beetle 4 days ago:
The one tagged “female” was just a bottom view and they both look similiar? Is that the joke?
- Comment on Physicists vs Normal People 1 week ago:
Increasing speed -> acceleration Decreasing speed -> negative acceleration Changing direction -> Vector acceleration(change in velocity)
- Comment on "You should probably just throw it away" 1 week ago:
It’s called dual-booting, and yes there are so many tutorials availiable. But you have to be a little more careful in that process. I do dualboot but almost never uses windows. I have heard situation where windows updates messing linux installs on same drive. The safest route might be to do what others suggested but it is possibe to install that way. Be careful with partitioning and formatting. You also have to determine the sizes for each partitions yourself too
- Comment on explain deez nutz 1 week ago:
I don’t think i’m getting what you said or you are not getting what I said. It makes no sense to me(not about charge attract thing, but the overall argument). Does the nucleus accelerate when there is electrone cloud on all directions? It just cancels out. But i don’t think nucleus will freely move if temperature is low. You don’t apply pressure to the nucleus, you apply it to the electron cloud around. Nucleus won’t fly off the electron cloud because they are bound by electrons attracting in all directions. Only way I can see neutrons moving is when enough temperature is supplied. Otherwise its just squishing electrons into the nucleus(before squishing nucleii together). I don’t understand why you keep it does not matter because there is so much pressure or so. Clarify why you said so
- Comment on explain deez nutz 1 week ago:
Umm why are they accelerated to electrons?
- Comment on explain deez nutz 1 week ago:
What about the inverse beta decay thing? If electrons are also being compressed it should end up becoming neutrons right?
Electron repulsion might be irrelevant but being bound to electrons isn’t. Electrons aren’t being thrown out of the orbit here since its cold. It’s getting squished into.
(I also disagree with the net zero claim, due to the sheilding effect of outer electrons, but still that too is irrelevant so np)
- Comment on see the joke is that someone else does the work 1 week ago:
There is magnetic force. A moving charge across a magnetic feild experiences it and it is always perpendicular to motion of the charge. So it changes the direction of motion. Since magnets are basically objects with electrons spinning in an oriented fashion, making a current loop(like an electromagnet), it is also appling to the macroscopic case. But the work done is probably done by electric feild in some manner as the title implies. I don’t know how exactly it plays out though.
- Comment on see the joke is that someone else does the work 1 week ago:
But magnetic force does no work to a charged particle in any way. While gravitational force CAN do work and it does work on most cases(every non circular orbits or just a mass falling down). That’s why magnetic force case is emphasised
- Comment on see the joke is that someone else does the work 1 week ago:
Gravity does no work on satellites or objects that go in circular orbits. The force is there but it does no work and hence no energy change/transfer. Work is defined based on energy change by work-energy theorem
- Comment on see the joke is that someone else does the work 1 week ago:
It’s usually said about a charge under a magnetic feild. The magnetic force goes perpendicular to the direction of motion of the charge(F=qv×B*). Work is done only if the force is applied along the direction of motion. So on a moving charge, magnetic force does no work.
Not sure how that plays on magnets though. Magnets are magnetic because electrons go in circles producing the feild, and it might be because electric feild comes in and do the work but it’s not clear for me either
- Comment on explain deez nutz 1 week ago:
I am thinking, that when ionised, electron pressure only holds electrons away but does not prevent nuclear collisions because they are unbounded to electrons. But when not ionised, atoms are being pused together with electron repulsion holding back the nucleus.
I also doubt if the furnace is cold and high pressure, overcoming electron degeneracy pressure causes inverse beta decay and turns the thing into a neutron star? Then you wouldn’t get new elements but a pile of neutrons?
In stars, nuclear reactions happen at high temperatures and pressure and at death stage of a massive star(becoming a neutron star), all the electron degeneracy pressure is overcame by gravity and the same inverse beta decay happens and protons and electrons combine to give massive pile of neutrons.
If you think of a bunch of solid atoms(low temp) put in high pressure, why would nucleus react anyway? Nucleus are bound by electrons and are not able to collide with other nucleus in that state. Electrons need to combine into the nucleus with high pressure. For the case of hot plasma, nucleus are able to move through the electrons and react. You don’t need to overcome electron degeneracy pressure for that.
(I think i said things that i earlier said i’m not sure about, but this is a bit more thoughtful response while others were sent in a hurry mind)
- Comment on Trust your training 1 week ago:
Power plant🌱
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
I don’t think that’s how we should interpret as per english rules though
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
Atleast it put in correct order
- Comment on Trust your training 1 week ago:
*powerhouses might be better(it sounds better for me)
- Comment on Dunning-Kruger 1 week ago:
Error: url1 and url2 are the same - Comment on explain deez nutz 2 weeks ago:
Higher heat also means more violent collisions. It would be much harder to collide nucleus by just pressing it. But yeah maybe with even more pressure it might happen but nuclear reactions usually happen with high speed collisions.
When electrons are bound to nucleus, it may prevent collision by having an additional layer causing degeneracy pressure between two colliding nucleus. That won’t happen if electrons are unbounded to nucleus. Atleast that’s what i imagine
- Comment on explain deez nutz 2 weeks ago:
I guess to overcome electron degeneracy pressure. Nucleus would collide more easily when electrons are stripped away. Not sure if i am conpletely true though
- Comment on explain deez nutz 2 weeks ago:
Its harder but its necessary i guess. For ionisation
- Comment on that about 1/1000 of your phones RF power output, and the distance is 384400km 2 weeks ago:
I am worried about 2sec ping
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Forever single
- Comment on got any others? 2 weeks ago:
Every journal chages > 30 USD smh
- Comment on Equations can't hurt your feelings 2 weeks ago:
Correct, but nobody cares. Atleast we are allowed to use standard “clark’s table” which contains some basic math formulas but not too much
- Comment on Equations can't hurt your feelings 2 weeks ago:
Some guys say all particles are also waves, then some other guys says even feilds are just particles exchanging but then someone banged two protons together so hard and say theese particles are also emergent from some other feilds
We need to make a big bang to know if thoose feilds are also particles…
- Comment on Equations can't hurt your feelings 2 weeks ago:
If you bring formula sheet in an exam its “cheating”
- Comment on Acorns! 2 weeks ago:
Damn
- Comment on Acorns! 2 weeks ago:
Why so many people are complaining and having trypophobia in this thread? Is that very common? I’ve never heard of it before