mexicancartel
@mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on Satan's Ballsack 23 hours ago:
Is this the B1
- Comment on Fingies 3 days ago:
They slideeeee
- Comment on Seafood!!! 6 days ago:
Well its directly to soil so all is fine
- Comment on Seafood!!! 6 days ago:
Okaay so the cats beside my house who just come to eat fish are fine then
- Comment on Seafood!!! 1 week ago:
Wait what? I thought cats eating fish were universal no matter if it’s a pet eating canned foods or not
- Comment on Yay, sponsored emojis! 2 weeks ago:
I hope you have many
- Comment on Yay, sponsored emojis! 2 weeks ago:
I have lost friends this way lmao
- Comment on Yay, sponsored emojis! 2 weeks ago:
Probably because “Network effect”. Many places whatsapp is basically the texting app and you are fucking forced to use it
- Comment on Ada Lovelace 4 weeks ago:
Well obviously for you if username checks out…
- Comment on Some people really lack civic sense 2 months ago:
Vande Bharath(indian train)
- Comment on Every.time. 2 months ago:
Bottom white
- Comment on Some people really lack civic sense 2 months ago:
It is indian railways train called “Vande Bharath”.
- Comment on Theories on Theories 2 months ago:
I’ll pick my side. They are all mathematics
(I belive math and mathematics are different. What is commonly called math is just numbers and stuff. But mathematics fits the general description of all axioms)
- Comment on Theories on Theories 2 months ago:
There are no correct axioms. You can change the axioms as you wish and make your own math2.0. And you will be able to apply it to things that follow thoose axioms but finding such things that follow them is the only hard part. We define 1+1=2 and that is true because we define it that way. If it does not hold true in any physical or something then it is that you are applying a correct math for a system which doesnt work with that math(i.e, you are the problem for assuming the same axiom is true for the real system)
- Comment on Rule 1: Don't talk about the 🫘 2 months ago:
Bro lmao
- Comment on not so free thinking now are we? 3 months ago:
Thanks
- Comment on not so free thinking now are we? 3 months ago:
What is that reaction? I honestly don’t know
- Comment on Just like me fr 3 months ago:
I mean topologically no, since sock is equivalent to some flat surface.
And to your original question, when you put a hole in the sock, it does become a tube. And a tubr can be seen as a surface with one hole
- Comment on Just like me fr 3 months ago:
second hole
You mean the first hole
- Comment on Gottem 3 months ago:
Well but this meme is accurate because it said monitoring the situation. So when you start monitoring which slit the particle goes through, you changed the outcome.
- Comment on Precognition proven! Parapsychology vindicated! 3 months ago:
Lots of triangles
- Comment on Happy 3.14 Day 3 months ago:
NOT for mathematicians
- Comment on owo 3 months ago:
If you think of water pressure from a tank to a tap as a “push” then potential difference is also making such a push. Well yeah ambiguity from colloquial terms exist here, but it is not between push and pull. The two points making potential difference, “pushes” amps through the wire connected in between them. You can say that is not a push but like a chain being rotated. The volts is doing the rotating aka pushing+pulling of the chains. But saying a device pulling amps is essentially that devuce becoming less resistive to the push done by volts
- Comment on owo 3 months ago:
Nahh the “significantly higher voltage” comes only because your device having some form of protection preventing too much current flow. The most simple device would be a resistor and any change in voltage leads to a change in current. So yes you are pusing amps by changing voltage. Pulling amps is by changing resistance so that volt can push amps easier
- Comment on owo 3 months ago:
True, but as someone doing physics, I’ll say both is fine. You can push amps by increasing voltage, and also pull amps by varying resistance. After all, ohms law basically is the balancing of theese three.
And if i’m gonna go too far pushing amps is the most sensible thing. The thing we call pulling amps is just decreasing the resistance against the push(voltage) so that pushing becomes more effective. And also what I just called push is also a pull, at negative terminal.
- Comment on owo 3 months ago:
You absolutely can push amperage. You just have to increase volts
- Comment on Just one more square bro 4 months ago:
Mathematicians: makes something with zero practical applications
Waffles:
- Comment on big facts 4 months ago:
No it can’t be then The Force will be equal to The²(Mass times Acceleration) Its either The mass times acceleration or mass times the acceleration
- Comment on No More Neutral ⚛ 4 months ago:
Damn seems like I can only find one typo at a time
- Comment on No More Neutral ⚛ 4 months ago:
Add one extra melectron to all the atoms in the universe – adds one electron to all the atoms bit not one each for each atom
