mexicancartel

@mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[XKCD] Pascal's Law⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Pully system is pretty weird, but I like levers for my intuition. You can directly see smaller part moving smaller distance but with greater force. Also you always experience it when opening doors by pusing various parts

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨4 fundamental forces⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Yeah but aren’t they the antimatter version of thoose colour charges? Didn’t mention it for that reason but yeah mesons

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨4 fundamental forces⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I mean, increasing with distance isn’t that bad, since it only increases upto a point and goes out of range.

  I like that its analogous with springs and all, which also increases force with distance from mean position

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨4 fundamental forces⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  “Colour charge”, ehich has nothing to do with colors though. Its like electric charge but instead of two opposite(called posotive and negative), it hace three “colours” which obeys R+G+B=colourless(white) just lije positive+negative equal zero

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Pictures of Animals Getting CT Scans Against their Will: A Thread⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  The mice got a nice pillow

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Caption this⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I know how hard it is to write {curly braces} by hand. This is terrrifying

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨3 minutes and 8 seconds in Google Slides. Remember to study your humanities as well kiddos⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  !Squorlple@lemmy.world sleep well

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Well, that's no ordinary rabbit!⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Neeed images

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨i feel called out⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Syntax error: the ‘(’ opened was never closed

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨This is a shit post.⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Its vertical component, due to gravity

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Why Chrome only?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  I don’t think that app check signature or so. Its probably checking if app exist or not. Except if the app launches chrome by its indent action instead of normal link opening method

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Why Chrome only?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  I guess you are talking about the in app browser thing and not the webview. I just don’t get sign in requiring communication to the camera. Its things you usually do after signing in. But idk maybe a weird implementation

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Why Chrome only?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  [@s08nlql9@lemm.ee](lemm.ee/u/s08nlql9] try making a dummy app with com.google.chrome(not sure) as package name and login again. Maybe the browser check get bypassed and it opens in the default browser.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Why Chrome only?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Looks they failed to implement “open in default browset” and used “open in chrome” instead. Or maybe it has a stupid check if chrome is installed before opening link externally to avoid problems

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Why Chrome only?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  But this is just for sign in right? Its a fking native app

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨ONE OF US⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  One man’s trash is other man’s wealth. Nuclear reactor’s waste can also be in my periodic table collection

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨ONE OF US⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  You think i can run particle accelerators from power grid??

  I’ll have a nuclear power plant

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨ONE OF US⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  I’ll have multiple particle accelerators that constantly runs as they decay in my basement

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨ONE OF US⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  How to get Oganesson

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨the duality of beetle⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I’m no beetle expert. I thought it’s a weird beetle that has asymmeyric pair of scissors, and male and female had left/right handedness

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨the duality of beetle⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Ohh ohh damn lol. Posting two pictures was extremely confusing given “left” and “right”

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨the duality of beetle⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  The one tagged “female” was just a bottom view and they both look similiar? Is that the joke?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Physicists vs Normal People⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Increasing speed -> acceleration Decreasing speed -> negative acceleration Changing direction -> Vector acceleration(change in velocity)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨"You should probably just throw it away"⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  It’s called dual-booting, and yes there are so many tutorials availiable. But you have to be a little more careful in that process. I do dualboot but almost never uses windows. I have heard situation where windows updates messing linux installs on same drive. The safest route might be to do what others suggested but it is possibe to install that way. Be careful with partitioning and formatting. You also have to determine the sizes for each partitions yourself too

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨explain deez nutz⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I don’t think i’m getting what you said or you are not getting what I said. It makes no sense to me(not about charge attract thing, but the overall argument). Does the nucleus accelerate when there is electrone cloud on all directions? It just cancels out. But i don’t think nucleus will freely move if temperature is low. You don’t apply pressure to the nucleus, you apply it to the electron cloud around. Nucleus won’t fly off the electron cloud because they are bound by electrons attracting in all directions. Only way I can see neutrons moving is when enough temperature is supplied. Otherwise its just squishing electrons into the nucleus(before squishing nucleii together). I don’t understand why you keep it does not matter because there is so much pressure or so. Clarify why you said so

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨explain deez nutz⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Umm why are they accelerated to electrons?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨explain deez nutz⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  What about the inverse beta decay thing? If electrons are also being compressed it should end up becoming neutrons right?

  Electron repulsion might be irrelevant but being bound to electrons isn’t. Electrons aren’t being thrown out of the orbit here since its cold. It’s getting squished into.

  (I also disagree with the net zero claim, due to the sheilding effect of outer electrons, but still that too is irrelevant so np)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨see the joke is that someone else does the work⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  There is magnetic force. A moving charge across a magnetic feild experiences it and it is always perpendicular to motion of the charge. So it changes the direction of motion. Since magnets are basically objects with electrons spinning in an oriented fashion, making a current loop(like an electromagnet), it is also appling to the macroscopic case. But the work done is probably done by electric feild in some manner as the title implies. I don’t know how exactly it plays out though.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨see the joke is that someone else does the work⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  But magnetic force does no work to a charged particle in any way. While gravitational force CAN do work and it does work on most cases(every non circular orbits or just a mass falling down). That’s why magnetic force case is emphasised

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨see the joke is that someone else does the work⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Gravity does no work on satellites or objects that go in circular orbits. The force is there but it does no work and hence no energy change/transfer. Work is defined based on energy change by work-energy theorem