angrystego
@angrystego@lemmy.world
- Comment on Hobit ineptus 3 days ago:
Yep, that’s right!
- Submitted 3 days ago to science_memes@mander.xyz | 3 comments
- Comment on Anon watches a romance movie 6 days ago:
I think normalizing having more partners even in a stable relationship with one partner would make it much easier to actually talk to your partner and discuss it openly, because the percentage of partners that see it as something terribly wrong would be much lower and people wouldn’t feel like speaking about such things is risky. That would reduce the need for cheating, although it wouldn’t make it disappear (as it’s not the only cause, as someone’s correctly pointed out).
- Comment on Anon watches a romance movie 6 days ago:
I agree with the part that it’s really up to people. I don’t agree it’s ok to want people to hide their relarionships. And they do have to hide them or face problems. People who decide to live in uncommon relationships are a target for others. They often get questioned uncomfortably even by rather liberal people and attacked and bullied by conservative ones. It’s really hard to do this openly. In such circumstances, I do think it’s oppression. It’s also not really about me. But I have eyes and empathy.
- Comment on Anon watches a romance movie 1 week ago:
That’s just not true. Open relationships do exist (I’ve seen several work out nicely) but the overall opinion on them in most cultures is they’re weird, doomed or plain wrong and evil. Unless it is normalized that sex is not something fatal, it’s ok among consenting adults, we won’t move to a really sexually tolerant society.
- Comment on Anon watches a romance movie 1 week ago:
Infidelity is widespread, because it comes from human nature. Instead of vilifying it we should strive to find and normalize forms of relationships that allow for more liberty without the necessity of lying and cheating.
- Comment on Frigging peas 🫛 1 week ago:
Ok, now try with hawkweed.
- Comment on Bait or r*ta*d*ti*n. Call it. 1 week ago:
I don’t, I’m guessing.
- Comment on Bait or r*ta*d*ti*n. Call it. 1 week ago:
Recomendations from others?
- Comment on Bait or r*ta*d*ti*n. Call it. 1 week ago:
They hire people to do that for them, don’t they?
- Comment on want to be a woman 2 weeks ago:
I’d rather discuss lowering prices of quality cheese and the non existence of dinosaur patterns on women’s clothes - which is scandalous!
- Comment on want to be a woman 2 weeks ago:
I’m exactly what I want to be. And it’s not another gender, I want to be a woman.
- Comment on \( ・ω・)/ 2 weeks ago:
Fake but cute even originally!
- Comment on want to be a woman 2 weeks ago:
I also want to be a woman and don’t have dysphoria - it’s pretty common.
- Comment on \( ・ω・)/ 2 weeks ago:
Definitely. But which one?
- Comment on Comfy cozy 3 weeks ago:
The negative impact is real and very important. And in the future it can be even worse.
- Comment on 'Andor' Season 2 Debuts to Nielsen Viewership High With 721 Million Minutes 3 weeks ago:
Oh, I didn’t see the relationship in Rogue One as a love story. By the end, they just hold each other before the inevitable - I see no romance there. I can see how someone might find something there if they wanted to though.
- Comment on I'm gay and I dunno what it means 3 weeks ago:
That actually sounds logical.
- Comment on I'm gay and I dunno what it means 3 weeks ago:
Well, people do tend to have a type, right?
- Comment on Another CEO has been killed 3 weeks ago:
It is a sensation to those of us who haven’t heard before.
- Comment on Another CEO has been killed 3 weeks ago:
I haven’t heard about this one so to me it counts as fresh news. Don’t call people liars just because you’re better informed. I’d like the news to keep coming.
- Comment on First image of Zoe Saldaña as Neytiri in "Avatar: Fire and Ash" 4 weeks ago:
I’m a fan. I’m looking forward to the third movie. I don’t get the hate. You don’t like it, you don’t watch it - you’re obviously not the target group. I don’t go to discussions about films I don’t like just to say I hate them. I also don’t think just because I and my bubble don’t like something that automatically means noone does. I don’t get this approach.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
I agree. I just percieve OP’s post as trying to find a lable because they just want to know whether there is one. It’s ok to want to know and telling them they don’t need it is not helpful.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Yes.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Of course you don’t have to fit a box. But it’s easier to communicate your preferences if there is a lable you can use for yourself. OP is trying to find out if there is such a shortcut they could use. Explaining that they don’t necessarily need to do that is not helpful.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
Yep, but sometimes you want to communicate about your preferences, and then you need understandable terminology. Giving names to phenomena is generally useful. Discussing things is useful. Understanding natural diversity is great and important.
- Comment on ABSOLUTE MADNESS 5 weeks ago:
Birdman
- Comment on what are girls 5 weeks ago:
Dating may or may not be, having children is not.
- Comment on Memes from my biology class #5 5 weeks ago:
Lime! did? Where? I must have missed that.
- Comment on Memes from my biology class #5 5 weeks ago:
Who says they want to meet people. Also, not everyone wants to attract attention every day all day long. It’s a good strategy for many people to be anonymous most of the time. And those who are into extroverted effect can shine.
