Comment on Since we're doing magic eyes now...
angrystego@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoI know the definitions. The cross-eyed method is way easier for me than the wall-eyed one. It’s not that I don’t want to believe you, friend. I’m just reporting what I saw. Did you check the picks yourself with both methods? I did.
wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Yes, I made the second set. I have been looking at the originals since I found them months ago. Here, let’s do a test. jmol generated this image as “cross-eyed”. Do you agree?
Image
angrystego@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
This works perfectly for me with the cross-eyed approach, yes.
No disrespect meant when I asked if you tested your pictures. You know, it IS possible to swich the pictutes without testing, so it made sense to ask.
Thanks for being patient and troubleshooting my apparent viewing anomaly.
wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Very strange, because I can move from this image of PCl5 directly to the honolulu image in the OP and it works just fine. Meanwhile, if I move from there to the “are you not entertained” image, it makes the images go into the page, since they’re wall-eyed images.
angrystego@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Hi, I checked the crossed-eye system again. I’m sorry, I don’t know what’s wrong, but I still see mountains in the top photos as holes. I tried it on other people and they saw it just like me. I wonder what we’re doing differently. There must be some bizzare anomaly and we’re comunicating across realities with different geometry or something. I hope you’re doing great in your distant world where things make sense and NASA photos work just as intended! Greetings from here - where everything’s fucked up.