explodicle
@explodicle@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on smoooooth 6 hours ago:
I like this world. I don’t want it to end.
- Comment on Yes this year is going to be really good and productive 17 hours ago:
Every time you think “I don’t like this job but maybe it’ll get better after XYZ”, the answer is always the same.
- Comment on Yes this year is going to be really good and productive 17 hours ago:
Wait, you have to give 2 weeks notice in your country? Do employers have to give you two weeks notice of firing?
- Comment on Uhhhh sure? 20 hours ago:
I want its opinion on traffic once - before I leave - and that’s it. Once I’m on the road, I absolutely do not want to hear its suggestion to change 3 lanes to catch this next exit.
- Comment on Uhhhh sure? 20 hours ago:
I don’t want traffic updates. They keep changing my route to a complicated one I didn’t want, to save like 1 minute in theory. If I could change it to opt-in route suggestions instead of opt-out route switcheroos, then I might like that feature. I am not available to use the phone while I am driving the car.
I loved my old standalone GPS device until it was stolen.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 day ago:
At this rate the right is about to lose that principled crypto voting bloc.
- Comment on Uhhhh sure? 1 day ago:
Once I’ve got a path plotted, I switch on airplane mode so Google Maps can’t throw me any curveballs.
- Comment on Shell shock indeed! 1 day ago:
It might be hard to see with the speed blur, but the tortoise is in the center bottom of the photo in front of the grass.
- Comment on We live in the future! 1 day ago:
I’m really enjoying
- Confederate forums for furries
- Encrypted piracy
- Comment on We live in the future! 1 day ago:
If they’d simply held since birth, they’d be rich!
- Comment on We live in the future! 1 day ago:
It’s kinda sad watching the economy I grew up in come to an end. Who knows where all this will end up - I can only guarantee that it’ll be weird.
- Comment on cant take it anymore 4 days ago:
If it fakes people then it’s fake^2^
- Comment on A succulent meal 5 days ago:
This at least reduces bioaccumulation.
- Comment on Let's discuss the real issues. 5 days ago:
Zoomed out, it looks like we’re in a financial crisis.
Image - Comment on Price gouging 5 days ago:
Yeah that nut on the left is clearly still good.
- Comment on Sick days 1 week ago:
That happened
- Comment on My feelings on the Super Bowl 1 week ago:
Did you see that ludicrous display last night?
- Comment on Still alive? 1 week ago:
Money alone can’t buy all those rare collectibles!
- Comment on halal paintball 1 week ago:
Pectin FTW
- Comment on Top of the world, ma 1 week ago:
- Comment on Im curious what they will come up with 1 week ago:
TBF that AI video of Trump trudging through the desert is top tier.
- Comment on Checkmate, atheists! You are going to vagina hell! 1 week ago:
Actually the only way is from space. When you die you just end and don’t go anywhere.
- Comment on Naughty birds 2 weeks ago:
Theirs a safe spot right over they’re!
- Comment on What kind of stupid rule is that? 2 weeks ago:
To signal wealth
- Comment on 17 years* 2 weeks ago:
Doing it correctly requires a cost that can be verified by outside observers.
- Comment on 17 years* 2 weeks ago:
Nobody cares how much effort they put in if it walks like a scam and quacks like a scam. You’d have to be nuts to trust anybody in the crypto space.
Why stop developing while it’s still producing revenue? With >51% of the supply, they can leech off any remaining suckers indefinitely. The price of Nano relative to Bitcoin has done exactly what one should expect. It would need to have been done correctly to begin with and can’t now be un-fucked.
- Comment on 17 years* 2 weeks ago:
Like my Excel spreadsheet!
- Comment on 17 years* 2 weeks ago:
Why did NFTs only last a single bubble, while Bitcoin persists?
- Comment on 17 years* 2 weeks ago:
FYI you are correct
- Comment on 17 years* 2 weeks ago:
Nano gave out its supply with centrally administered CAPTCHAs. That means they could have simply exempted insiders from having to do the CAPTCHAs at all, getting >51% of the supply for free. You’re expecting everyone who ever uses that money supply to trust a central party for something we can’t audit.