“It would get old fast”? Op, I’m afraid you don’t have good friends. When I was a university student, I was in a shared apartment with two friends. It was great: you always had someone to do stuff with and group activities were much easier to schedule.
Now that I’m older it would be nice to easily check who’s up for something, spontaneously grill with everyone or simply sit together in the evening and talk.
My friends group still goes on vacation together from time to time and I love it. If your friends are only enjoyable in small doses… I don’t know… that sounds sad.
Also with a house of your own, everyone would have enough space to retreat if necessary.
Besides from the bad gardening that was mentioned by the other posts, I would love to live like this.
Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
I’ll never understand why US suburbs like to utterly nuke any kind of nature around their houses and replace it with “lawns”. Like, I’d rip that stuff out and at least plant some potats and shit immediately.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
It is actually a anticommunist thing
Eq0@literature.cafe 2 days ago
Care to elaborate?
OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Also a chem industry lobbying to sell fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides and paint
gigachad@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Don’t they also have these “neighborhood associations” that forbid them to do anything that falls out of line?
Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
HOAs are indeed common in the “land of the free”.
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 days ago
even without HOA. non HOA streets often also maintain a perfect lawn
I don’t get it.
hate lawn maintenance, I find that if you let it run wild and full of local wild vegetation they are so much prettier and fun to look out, look at all those butterflies and bees.
tamal3@lemmy.world 2 days ago
It’s just that much easier for developers to raze all plants to the ground before grading and running other heavy equipment. These are new construction and so those developers aren’t accountable to anyone, and I’m sure the local jurisdiction doesn’t care. That’s not a justification, for what it’s worth, just an explanation.
What I’ve never been sure of is why people don’t eventually realize how much nicer everything would be if they just replanted trees (or left them in the first place) but they seem to be used to suburban hell. If you drive everywhere it’s less of an issue that your environment is shit.
Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You’re assuming people who are forced to buy into the suburban hell have a choice.
If a person had a choice between a 100k house in a suburban hell or a 100k house in secluded heaven. That they pick the suburban hell.
Have you seen the housing market in the US?
It’s also funny how “Suburban” meaning has changed. It’s supposed to be non-urban.
But with these “suburban” neighborhoods in cities. It has basically became a word for a neighborhood with houses built next to each other and less about where it’s located.
Suburbs use to be an inexpensive option as opposed to urban living.
dingus@lemmy.world 2 days ago
So what I suspect happens is that in newer development communities, the people building them just seem to find it easier to level/bulldoze an entire plot of land to build a neighborhood. Then they just don’t feel like putting plants and trees back in out of cost and laziness.
For older neighborhoods in the US, you’ll find a lot more foliage. I love it when I go to an older neighborhood that has large trees that canopy the area. They do exist here…it’s just that they have to be a bit older. My condo complex has some wonderful tall trees and plants everywhere. It’s not a new complex though and they seem to care more about plantife than some others do. They even randomly planted a massive tree last year for some reason lol. Seemed to require some pretty big machinery to haul it and put it in lol.
MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
Yeah, it’s impossible to develop a greenfield site without scraping everything off. You have to create and get approval on water runoff management plan for any new development. That means grading everything and often these days it also means managing and impounding water on-site without dumping it all into the (overloaded) storm drain system. When there’s no grass you have to install silt fences to keep silt out of nearby streams while building. You can’t get final approval, and remove the silt fence, until there is some kind of ground cover and that basically means grass since it grows fast and is easy to apply. Even if you somehow left the trees there’s no way they’d survive the process.
Fuck McMansion developers, and fuck lawns, don’t get me wrong. But it’s a reflection of an entire system of land-use policy and not just stupidity, or whatever.
RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I’m unsure if I’m allowed to have tomatoes growing but so far no one has said anything so places without hoa care a lot less!
flughoernchen@feddit.org 2 days ago
Imagine not being able to decide what you grow in your own yard. Wild.
Almonds@mander.xyz 1 day ago
A lawn is generally easier to take care of than a collection of various plants and trees. First thing I do at any new home is plant a fuck ton of edible plants, and my neighbors always talk about not having the time or energy to do the same
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
Pest control might be part of it.
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Pests, like birds, butterflies, bees…
BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
In a neighborhood like that, you’d probably end up with a fine and they’d charge you to ‘fix’ it for you.
Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
My British friend says that Americans don’t have lawns. They have grassed in areas.