megopie

@megopie@beehaw.org

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨EU probes SAP over anti-competitive ERP support practices⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  Enterprise Resource Planning.

  That makes a lot more sense than… uh… my first thought.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Regulating AI hastens the Antichrist, says Palantir’s Peter Thiel⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Sounds like a someone who needs to talk to an LLM less.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg unveils new smart glasses powered by AI⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  More like continuing to try to will something in to existence that can replace smart phones because they want to be in charge of the hardware so they don’t have to go through Apple and Google.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Samsung brings ads to US fridges⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Whole other part of the company.

  Like, Samsung is a big company, really like 3 or 4 companies in a trench coat.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Artists are losing work, wages, and hope as bosses and clients embrace AI⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  There are a lot of actors who are decently well known and talented who still make most of their income from ad work, and couldn’t afford to stay in the industry without it.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Artists are losing work, wages, and hope as bosses and clients embrace AI⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I suspect a lot of these layoffs are actually just cost cutting in response to these companies doing really poorly, the idea that the jobs are now being done by generative models is largely a smoke screen to save face and avoid admitting that companies are scaling back operations due to a lack of demand.

  Those few cases where they actually are just replacing people are going to vanish the moment that the people hosting the models run out of money to burn and have to charge full price. Like the scale of operating losses is orders of magnitude greater than anything we’ve seen in the past.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Artists are losing work, wages, and hope as bosses and clients embrace AI⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  This is the thing that really kills me, like, what an LLM can do is not a revolutionary leap, it’s an evolutionary step beyond basic grammar, tone, and spell checking. It’s more capable than traditional auto complete, but it’s not a fundamentally different capability.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Artists are losing work, wages, and hope as bosses and clients embrace AI⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Most actors don’t make much money playing roles in theater, movies or TV shows (obvious exceptions for big name stars), rather they do those when they can get them, but make most of their money doing ads. If that ad work disappeared, way fewer people could afford to be actors and the overall talent pool would shrink.

  Same goes for people doing drawn art or photography, the commodified work provides a stable income that allows them to pursue the career and creates space for them to produce genuine art.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨US Oversight Committee Requests Discord, Steam, Twitch CEOS At Online Radicalization Hearing | Aftermath⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  There is absolutely a lot of issues regarding things going on in certain discord servers, or in certain subreddits, less so on twitch or steam.

  But a lot of those issues are due to different use cases being pushed into proximity by being pushed off other platforms, ether by moderation decisions, or by their structure and user engagement maximizing algorithms making certain communities unviable.

  So you end up with communities that need forum or chat room style organization being pushed in to close proximity to communities that run afoul of corporate moderation. This was less of an issue when these things might have just headed off to dedicated websites, but with everything ending up on platforms now, you have this milieu of mundane game or hobbyist communities, communities for mental health discussions, communities about drug usage, explicit adult content, and fringe politics, all right next to each other. Thus cross pollination between all of them becomes inevitable at a far higher rate than if they were on separate platforms, or on a mega platform with a bunch of other things that would dilute the cross pollination.

  I’m not even saying that any of those are explicitly bad things that shouldn’t exist, just that having them all confined in such close proximity is a time bomb. This is not a result of careless management by these companies, but rather the result of pressures pushing these things off of other major platforms, and thus forcing them on to ones that are inherently more permissive.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨What do people actually use ChatGPT for? OpenAI provides some numbers.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  They get things wrong at a far higher rate than most of the websites that tend to end up at the top of a web result, and they get things wrong in weird ways that won’t stand out to users in the same way a shitty website will. These probabilistic text generators are much better at seeming like they have the correct answer than actually providing it.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨What do people actually use ChatGPT for? OpenAI provides some numbers.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  It’s crazy how much money they are losing, and that’s with most of their compute being provided by Microsoft at cost, if not for free in exchange for the use of their models in Microsoft products.

  Both they and Anthropic talk about their business as if they’re a software as a service company, but most SAS don’t get more expensive to run the more users there are, not to mention their conversion rate of free users to payed users is abysmal. Like, it’s an unsalvageable train wreck of a business model, I don’t see ether surviving more than a year unless they radically change their business models.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Microsoft mandates a return to office, 3 days per week⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  As other’s mentioned, probably more a way to fire a bunch of people without having to do so explicitly.

  Microsoft seems to be on a warpath this year regarding layoffs. I wonder if maybe they’re trying to compensate for some giant black hole in their budget. Like, keep the costs looking stable even as some specific department balloons out of control without providing commensurate revenue. Wonder what that could possibly be?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Sony is reportedly planning a Nintendo Switch-style PlayStation 6 portable | VGC⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Yah, I agree.

  At the very least much better optimized, with what length there is focused on meaningful content rather than low effort padding.

  Again, it requires market pressure, something that a boom in portable games on less performant devices could cause.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Sony is reportedly planning a Nintendo Switch-style PlayStation 6 portable | VGC⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Something like the steam deck or the original switch were probably on the upper end of meaningfully “portable” in that sense, and even they can’t really compete with smartphones on that front. But with the currently available chips/batteries/screens, you cannot really get much smaller without starting to limit the games that can be played on them.

  There is a whole other conversation to be had about game optimization and the push in large parts of the games industry towards more power intensive games. If the PC/console games space had an incentive to better optimize for lightweight devices, that could change. Especially if something shifted on the smartphone storefront market that created more demand for better less exploitative games there.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Sony is reportedly planning a Nintendo Switch-style PlayStation 6 portable | VGC⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  But, they do for mobiles, because mobile app storefronts force micro transactions to go the through them and they take a significant cut on each one. The 30% apple tax for example.

  So they have a huge incentive to put F2P slop front and center which other storefronts on other devices don’t. In the context of steam, they do make money on the micro transitions of games that valve owns, but they make more money selling everyone else’s games over all, so they still have a reasons to show those.

  It’s not so much saying that other storefronts are angles who love their customer, but more that their incentive structures are aligned differently.

  If there were significant shake up in the mobile storefront market, or in terms of how they can make money, there might be a shift in they type of content they push.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Sony is reportedly planning a Nintendo Switch-style PlayStation 6 portable | VGC⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  How much of it is that no one is willing to pay 20 or 30 dollars for a mobile game, and how much is it that anyone willing to pay is unable to find them, or has just given up on the prospect because of lack of visibility.

  Of course the mobile store fronts have no incentive to increase the visibility, because a free to play game is liable to make them significantly more money in the long term due to their cut of each micro transaction.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Sony is reportedly planning a Nintendo Switch-style PlayStation 6 portable | VGC⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  It’s a very interesting trend, it seems like companies are convinced that this form factor is the future, that consumers will choose something with a portable option over something stationary.

  Like when the steam deck and switch came out, they both did well, I think the switch did well mainly on the grounds that it was the Nintendo device for that console generation generation. But they’ve hardly taken over the market.

  I think the console industry kind of just wrote off the mobile market because they were late to the party, despite it being immensely profitable and a huge market segment. It seems now they’re becoming interested in it again, and I wonder if it’s due to there being an unmet demand, people who want to play games outside of their living room, but who are turned off by the state of games on mobile.

  Like, the mobile games market is just a swamp, and people who want a more meaningful experience than a time waster puzzle game, or a cash grab gatcha game, are kind of left out in the cold. Maybe this is the legacy games companies seeing an opportunity, all it would take to smash that opportunity is for the mobile phone games market to start being… not awful.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Meta might be secretly scanning your phone's camera roll - how to check and turn it off⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  The problem is that for a lot of people it has become a substitute that has filled the void left by the slow destruction of other social organizations and institutions. It’d be easy to say that social media sites like Facebook killed them, but I think they were already throughly hollowed out and made inaccessible by the economic pressure on people to be ever more productive workers and ever more economy driving consumers.

  To ask people to dispense with whatsapp, instagram or facebook is to ask them to abandon their ability to be part of communities that matter to them. It’s sort of an intractable problem as it requires whole communities to abandon ship together, which is difficult to do. The solution to the problem is to easy that process and decrease barriers to doing so.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨"A culture of intimidation, retaliation and oppression": How Microsoft’s Gaza stance fuelled an industry-spanning boycott⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  It’s one of those situations where we see how kind people can be, and how indifferent and cruel to that kindness a depersonalized organization can be.

  The type of thinking that says “ well, yah, sure users won’t like ads in the start menu, but we need to make money on the unlicensed installs, and they’ll switch to something else if we brick them for not paying, so we’re going to inflict this on paying users as well, because they’re not going to switch.”

  Is the same type of of thinking that says “well, this government is willing to sign a huge contract to use our infrastructure, but only if we punish anyone in our organization who speaks out against them, so we’ll just fire anyone who does so. This would be much harder if they were all unionized, but luckily we nipped that in the bud.”

  Microsoft’s organizational and incentive structure makes these outcomes inevitable. Profit before people is the rule.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Our GPU Black Market Documentary Has Been Taken Down by Bloomberg⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  The Streisand effect.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Why Haven’t Sanctions on Russia Stopped the War? The Money Is Still Flowing. | For decades, companies feared being on the wrong side of U.S. sanctions. That’s not always true anymore.⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Sanctions do not stop wars, nor do they outright stop trade, they inflict costs for doing trade and for doing a war. They are there to make it harder to prosecute and fund a war, not impossible. It was always understood by those making the calls that these sanctions would be subverted and worked around, but that this would increase costs and lower Russia’s capacity to divert resources to fight the war.

  The idea that they stop wars or are some magic trick to destroy someone’s economy outright is absurd. No one implementing them ever claimed they did or would, although people in media outlets sure seemed to talk about them as if they would.

  The sanctions have done what they were intended to do, and it is the fault of the writer for believing the media sensationalism around them, not the fault of the policy for failing to accomplish the unrealistic goals that were imagined for them.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Inside the Underground Trade of ‘Flipper Zero’ Tech to Break into Cars⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  It’s so crazy to me that people will rush out and try and ban tools like these, rather than force car companies to use more secure systems. Like, banning these is futile, they’re not that complex of a device to make, the core issue here is that car companies have fallen over them selves to be “tech forward” to justify pushing further in to the premium price range, but have completely failed to secure their systems.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨We can't keep making videogame stories for players who aren't paying attention to them⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  there probably shouldn’t be a lot of friction for things the player isn’t supposed to be focused on, like say the interface should be unobtrusive and easy to navigate…

  but a story driven game should have the player focusing on the story!

  Players who don’t care about the story would probably be better served by a different game altogether.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨We can't keep making videogame stories for players who aren't paying attention to them⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  the industry has also be caught in the grips of budget gigantism by an influx of investor cash for the past decade.

  Outside investors saw dollar signs with the rapid growth of the market, and also huge financial successes like fortnight. So they were willing to put up a lot of funding in hopes of outsized returns. Pressure from investors and management meant appealing to the largest audience possible, and also chasing the latest trends. Despite the huge budgets, the games were unfocused and bad, both from trying to appeal to too many audiences, and constantly changing direction during development to chase trends.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨We can't keep making videogame stories for players who aren't paying attention to them⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  I think that’s kind of the kicker, a lot of studios and franchises got big based on the quality of their story telling, but did poorly with audiences that were just there for the gameplay, since the gameplay is there to serve the story, to support it and facilitate it. But if you’re just there for the gameplay and don’t care about the story, then the gameplay will be boring.

  So they’ve sanded down the story to make the gameplay accessible to people who don’t care about the story.

  But now you have a story built to serve gameplay, and gameplay built to serve the story. Nether is good on its own merits, so no one really likes it.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨We can't keep making videogame stories for players who aren't paying attention to them⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  To me it feels like there is a fundamental dissonance in the video game industry. Where major publishers and studios can’t seem to internalize that there are two things that people might come to a game for; Video games as experiences, narratives, things to be explored; and video games as … well games, a set of mechanics to be interacted with, to be challenged by. This isn’t to say a game can’t be good at both, but many games are weighted one way or another.

  Factorio is a truly absorbing gameplay experience, but it doesn’t really have a story beyond what is needed to frame and flavor the gameplay.

  “Vampire the masquerade: bloodlines” is a classic of atmosphere, character interaction and role play, but just about everyone who played it will tell you the combat is serviceable at best, and there is one level in particular that most people just remove with a mod because it’s just combat, with no dialog or interactions with other characters.

  So many major studios and publishers seem to routinely focus on the wrong elements of previously successful games. Taking the wrong lessons and misunderstanding what made previous title’s a huge success.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Stop children using VPNs to watch porn, ministers told⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Oh boy, I can’t wait for the thriving trade in VPN accounts made outside of the UK then sold to UK citizens by a third party.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Musk threatens Apple and calls OpenAI boss a liar as feud deepens⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Pot calls the kettle black.

  Like, they’re both liars. Both are making unreasonable promises to suck up as much capital as possible.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨After using ChatGPT, man swaps his salt for sodium bromide—and suffers psychosis⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  “No, you see, we promise all this tech is real and awesome. It’s totally another hyper growth market that will drive economic development! Ignore the fact we’re slipping in to recession despite this being a “booming” market.”

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨AI Is A Money Trap⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  The thing is, companies like Google, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft are already profitable, so it could lose them huge amounts of money, with no real meaningful benefit to user retention or B2B sales, but the companies as a whole would still be profitable. It could be a huge money black hole, but they continue to chase it out of unjustified FOMO and in an attempt to keep share prices high through misplaced investor confidence.

  Apple’s share price has taken a pretty big hit from the perception that they’re “falling behind” on AI, even if they’ve mostly just backed away from it because users didn’t like it when it was shoved in their face. Other companies are probably looking at that and saying “hey, we’d rather keep the stock market happy and our share prices high rather than stop wasting money on this”.