ChaoticNeutralCzech
@ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
- Comment on 16 hours ago:
It’s a laptop so the battery will keep the RAM powered. Very clever and practical, especially for files so confidential you only have one copy − data burglars will be looking for disks. /s
- Comment on Valid 1 day ago:
Only asocial media
- Comment on What is the deal with IPv6? 2 days ago:
denary
Yes, that’s technically the correct 10th term in the Latin-based unary-binary-ternary-… sequence but nobody calls it that… I wondered what your mother tongue is but I couldn’t find a language in which the preferred name for “decimal system” would use den- rather than dec-, dek-, des- or a completely different word.
- Comment on New conspiracy theory just dropped 2 days ago:
This is canon
- Comment on 3 days ago:
The piano key is plucked and then vibrates at its own natural frequency (plus in practice, higher modes aka harmonics/overtones). Wind instruments are designed to create continuous oscillation from constant flow of air by amplifying reflected waves with incoming air pressure energy (blowing straight into a cylinder won’t work, hence the weird pipe shapes, holes and reeds). Either way, they resonate at their design frequency. So do self-oscillating piezo buzzers. The speaker membrane, ideally, does not have a resonant frequency (responds equally to disturbances at any frequency between 20 Hz and 20 kHz) and needs to be pushed constantly to create sound. Like the membrane of a mechanical phonograph/turntable, the shape of the wave it should create is delivered to it in real time, except electromagnetically. That’s why player pianos need very little data (literal punch cards) to reproduce entire songs as opposed to audio recordings
- Comment on 3 days ago:
Yup. When you add an electron to one end of a wire, the change in the electric field will be felt very quickly (high percentage of light speed) across the wire and the electrons, now outnumbering protons, will repulse and want to shed the extra one from any point in the wire.
Like when you add an atom to a sealed gas container.
- Comment on 3 days ago:
I could add to this analogy. Yes, the wind passes from a high-pressure point to a low-pressure one but that’s just direct current. The weather can change, reversing the wind every few minutes (alternating current) and you can still harvest it with a turbine (for example, a lightbulb filament or heater lights up in either polarity) but it wouldn’t help a ship with a basic sail travel to a destination (much like DC motors, it would change direction when polarity is reversed). And then there’s sound, akin to very quick polarity changes where particles never travel very far. It doesn’t carry much energy but the waves travel faster than wind and can be modulated with a signal to carry information. Both wired and wireless electronic communication is kind of like that.
- Comment on 3 days ago:
There’s a HUGE number of electrons in everything with a massive total negative electric charge but almost exactly balanced by protons. That’s why electrons move very slowly in a conductor but still transmit lots of current (electric charge over time).
Accumulating charge in a place is what charging a capacitor or battery is, it creates voltage (potential difference). Charges in an electric field store energy but also their presence/absence can represent data (DRAM and flash memory) and the field has various effects we can use, such as deflecting the beam in a CRT oscilloscope controlling the flow of electrons in an eectron tube or field-effect transistor.
And the current also creates magnetic field with some similar effects (deflecting the beam in a TV CRT) and some different ones (attracting magnets in a motor, inducing current in a transformer’s secndary winding).
Plus, both fields can oscillate a vast range of freequencies and travel in waves, making radio, microwave ovens, vision, UV sterilization, X-ray machines etc. possible (although each of these applications uses the properties of EM waves at specific frequencies differently).
- Comment on inception'd into reforming czechoslovakia 4 days ago:
Which Czechoslovakia? The states over its history were quite different.
- First Czechoslovak Republic (1918-1938)
- Declared as Austria-Hungary fell apart at the end of WWI. Industrial powerhouse dismantling Austro-Hungarian power structures, investment in modernizing rural Slovakia" nationality
- Second Czechoslovak Republic (1938-1939)
- Beaten into submission by superpowers signing the Munich agreement that was supposed to appease Nazi Germany but nobody believed that would hold
- Protectorate of Bohemia & Moravia + Slovak Staat (1939-1945)
- Two Nazi puppet states, not actually called Czechoslovakia. The democratic government fled to London and helped organize dissent via radio + sent elite paratroopers to sabotage the arms industry and assasinate the Protector
- Third Czechoslovak Republic (1945-1948)
- Struggling to restore democracy with the Soviet-puppeted Communist Party’s influence; controversial expulsion of Germans that was a humanitarian disaster and a massive brain drain
- Czechoslovak Socialist Republic (1948-1989)
- After Communists gained majority vote, they did a coup d’etat and Czechoslovakia became a Soviet puppet state. Collectivization and Stalinist purges in the 50s, hopes of democratization in 1968 crushed by Soviet invasion (the only success was that Slovaks gained more independence and it became a federation because the Soviets didn’t care), largely passive submission but moderate living standards increase in the 70s and 80s
- Czech and Slovak Federative Republic (1990-1992)
- After the Berlin Wall fell, it was obvious the Soviet sphere of influence wouldn’t hold so on the next protest opportunity (legal marches on 1989-11-17, 50th anniversary of protests for a Nazi-assasinated student), dissent members spoke out and a general strike announced; police beat some protesters but nobody died, hence "Velvet Revolution"
- Wild privatization started, people could get rich or poor overnight as the economy turned inside out
- Czech Republic & Slovakia
- Created after Slovak politicians wanted more independence and everybody was just trying to comprehend the market changes so nobody really complained and a no-fault divorce was scheduled on 1993-01-01
- The countries went their own ways and it’s clear there will most likely never be a Czechoslovakia again
- First Czechoslovak Republic (1918-1938)
- Comment on A classic movie 4 days ago:
There are 2 likely original word orders, just search for both
- Comment on Marriage 4 days ago:
Find an old post of it then. Or another photo from that place.
- Comment on Marriage 4 days ago:
Probably fake
- Comment on As a small farm owner, no image has ever been more accurate 5 days ago:
I like how many kinds of leftovers can be given to chickens. The only limitation is that they have to get curious enough to peck at it. They’ll ignore some delicious shit on their regular food plate if it’s the “wrong” shape and color.
- Comment on 6 days ago:
There are actually two interpretations of
N/A:N/A(not available): There is lost media so it can’t be evaluated.N/A(not applicable): The show is in sign language so evaluating that is outside the scope of this string-matching program.
Meanwhile,
undefinedseems to mean the value has not yet been evaluated. Maybenullis really the best. - Comment on 1 week ago:
There are different kinds of non-number “values” for numeric variables. Is this
∞,Overflow,NaNorN/A? - Comment on An 82-year-old YouTuber grandma was raided by police and SWATs during her live stream last night where she plays Minecraft to raise money for her grandsons cancer. Authorities brought 20 police cars 1 week ago:
I’m afraid “Watch Streamer Get Swatted” is a saturated market. Likely breaking the age record may help though
- Comment on Does anybody actually work from 09:00 to 17:00 1 week ago:
Factory jobs are 6-14 and 14-22 (and 22-6 if there’s a rush), and office jobs usually 7-15, including a 30-min break
- Comment on New mrbeast video is dark 1 week ago:
Those two, and many others, paid to get excluded from the draw. Finances the whole enterprise.
- Comment on How do I type an apostrophe and use print screen on a European Spanish keyboard? 1 week ago:
Zalgo generators often have a settable range for the random number of diacritics per letter. If it includes 1 and you’re (un)lucky, you can get oops-all-acutes. Manually, you can copy the combining character alone (not easy, as you can’t usually select it, but you can use web apps or UnicodePad) and paste one after every letter.
Combining diacritics actually include some overlays (s̸l̸a̸s̸h̸e̸s̸, s̶̶t̶̶r̶̶i̶̶k̶̶e̶̶t̶̶h̶̶r̶̶o̶̶u̶̶g̶̶h̶, not⃠, bo⃞x etc.) and allow for vertical text without newlines (although support for characters except
aeioucdhmrtvxis spotty). Great for Kahoot names if the host machine runs Windows and displays them in a column, as opposed to overlaid like on Android.ͩͤͭͣͮͥͭͦͫ
- Comment on How do I type an apostrophe and use print screen on a European Spanish keyboard? 1 week ago:
It’s Zalgo (putting combining diacritics on every letter) but mild and consistent, plus I used native avcented characters if available to improve rendering consistency
àèìǹòùẁỳ áćéǵíj́ḱĺḿńóṕŕśúẃýź
- Comment on How do I type an apostrophe and use print screen on a European Spanish keyboard? 1 week ago:
T́h́é fóŕẃáŕd́ t́íćḱ íś áćt́úáĺĺý ćáĺĺéd́ áćút́é àǹd̀ t̀h̀è b̀àc̀k̀t̀ìc̀k̀ ìs̀ à g̀r̀àv̀è
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
Are people even allowed to vote for their own country?
- Comment on 🫡🫡🫡 1 week ago:
We’ve known about coronaviruses since the 1960s
- Comment on oh no guys theyre gonna report us to the FBI 1 week ago:
Reverse image search says The Triplets of Belleville
- Comment on When traffic comes to a standstill, drivers instantly shift left and right to create a Rettungsgasse, an emergency corridor right down the middle, so ambulances 1 week ago:
Well, it’s a high-speed 3-lane road that would fit 5 parked cars curb to curb so Rettungsgasse is where the space goes. Most other roads can barely yield 1 lane but emergency drivers are skilled and European fire trucks are not 1.5 lanes wide; still better to use a narrow free lane between 2 stationary ones rather than one of 2 crawling ones
- Comment on iHave a Lovesick Teacher 1 week ago:
That’s where the calculus comes in, otherwise it’s a basic Pythagorean theorem. I’ve compiled a list of possible latitudes, knock yourself out
- Comment on iHave a Lovesick Teacher 1 week ago:
Except now the walking speed of 1 m/s (3.6 km/h) and running speed of 5 m/s (18 km/h) are realistic
- Comment on iHave a Lovesick Teacher 1 week ago:
Instructions unclear, let’s assume he started 1,312,593,975 feet further back (see my other comment)
- Comment on SBA #119 maths 1 week ago:
CASIO calculators say 1, and I think it’s more intuitive with “÷2π” being equivalent to “÷(2×π)” rather than “÷2×π”. It took me a while to figure out why my results were almost but not quite one order of magnitude wrong after I was forced to switch to TI.
- Comment on iHave a Lovesick Teacher 1 week ago:
You actually only need to know the latitude for that… except the local terrain will play a larger role anyway, unless they started very close to a pole and follow rhumb lines (in this case a meridian/circle of latitude) as opposed to great circles, so better just ask for full coordinates.
We don’t have many data points in the question so let’s extrapolate into the past. There is the hint that they met 8 years earlier at the same spot, during which he’d have gone 1 262 304 000 ft or 384 750.2592 km, completing 9.617 polar circumferences of the Earth (40 007.863 km each).
Huh, that’s not a whole number. In some languages, “eight long years” might mean “a little over 8 years” so let’s assume he finished exactly 10 polar circumnavigations, which took 8 years and about 116 days. Her walked distance over that time is 5x smaller, 2 polar circumnavigations’ worth or 80 015.726 km. This is only exactly 2 great circles if they are polar, but we know that it’s impossible to go due east from either pole. Therefore, she must have gone around a circle of latitude. To end up in the same spot, she must have not-quite-circumnavigated-but-enough-for-Phileas-Fogg the Earth (aka crossed every meridian but not the equator) an integer number of times. After a simple conversion, we can construct a table of the options.
To calcuate latitude from circle-of-latitude circumference (colc), we’ll be using geodetic ↔ ECEF conversion equations (except those with the perverse prime vertical radius of curvature 𝑁 of course) and their notation (simplified with 𝑦 = 0, 𝜆 = 0, ℎ = 0 to ignore longitude and elevation) with values of the WGS-84 ellipsoid. The relationship we’re seeking is between colc/2𝛑 = 𝑝, circle-of-latitude radius, which is at zero longitude equal to ECEF 𝑋, and 𝜙 (latitude). See also Wikipedia on Earth radius by location but remember to skip anything with 𝑁, we’re not doing that.
The geocentric radius (𝑅) is related to 𝜙 (latitude) like this but we only need the distance to axis of rotation 𝑝.
(𝑍/𝑝)(cot 𝜙) = (1 − 𝑒²) → (𝑏²/𝑎²)(𝑍/𝑝) = 1/(cot 𝜙) = tan 𝜙 → 𝜙 = atan((𝑏²/𝑎²)(𝑍/𝑝))
(using 𝑒² = 1 − 𝑏²/𝑎²)Since sin² 𝛂 = 1 − cos² 𝛂 and we can normalize 𝑍 and 𝑝 to the unit circle with ellipsoid radii 𝑏 and 𝑎 respectively:
𝑍²/𝑏² = (𝑍/𝑏)² = 1 − (𝑝/𝑎)² = 1 − 𝑝²/𝑎², therefore 𝑍 = √(𝑏²(1 − 𝑝²/𝑎²)).All in all, 𝑝 → 𝜙 conversion is:
𝜙 = atan((𝑏²/𝑎²)(√(𝑏²(1 - 𝑝²/𝑎²))/𝑝))(Presumably, this could be simpified further but since I can just put this into a calculator so idc)
Per WGS-84:
𝑎 = 6378.137 km
𝑏 = 6352.752 kmHere are the results. Finding appropriate meeting locations at some of the 25+ possible latitudes on either hemisphere is left as an exercise to the reader.
nqcbefPFs colc = 2𝛑𝑝 [km] Latitude [°N/°S] 1 too big N/A 2 6 367.449 3.277975 3 4 244.966 47.934779 4 3 183.724 59.758044 5 2 546.979 66.211738 6 2 122.483 70.346611 7 1 819.271 73.238734 8 1 591.862 75.380740 9 1 414.988 77.033209 10 1 273.489 78.347789 11 1 157.718 79.419029 12 1 061.241 80.309059 13 979.607 81.060439 14 909.635 81.703329 15 848.993 82.259706 16 795.931 82.745975 17 749.111 83.174629 18 707.494 83.555355 19 670.257 83.895779 20 636.744 84.201988 21 606.423 84.478901 22 578.859 84.730536 23 553.691 84.960206 24 530.620 85.170671 25 509.395 85.364245 26 489.803 85.542885