Jupiter

Comments

• MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Jokes aside, damn thatssa a pretty planet

  source
• cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA23605

  And more image science.nasa.gov/gallery/junocam-images/

  source

  • meliaesc@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Thank you.

    source
  • flango@lemmy.eco.br ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    You’re amazing

    source
• BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Peter?

  source

  • nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    “girls go to college to get more knowledge, boys go to Jupiter to get more stupider”

    Kids say this to each other

    source

    • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Thanks ! Never heard it before

      source
    • 13igTyme@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Some of us went to Mars, to get candy bars.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Thanks. The rhyme doesn’t really make sense though, right? Or am I missing something?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • bstix@feddit.dk ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    No, you.

    source
• abfarid@startrek.website ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Isn’t that artificially colored?

  source

  • Zetta@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Ya, but I rather think about it as an ‘enhanced spectrum’ image. Not necessarily false color.

    Image

    source

    • FinalRemix@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Ahh, yes. Crank the saturation, crush the shadows, and blast the highlights.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • rockerface@lemmy.cafe ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Almost all gas giant images are

    source

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      The famous Jupiter one isn’t.

      source
    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yeah. Neptune’s a dull grey.

      source
  • lemming@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Not quite. It’s based on real wavelenths detected, but they might’ve been arificially assigned colours (although I think the images this is based on sort of correspond to human perception). But the colours are massively adjusted and contrast increased way past the point I would consider reasonable.

    source

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      These images are mindblowing. Bring me back down to Earth? Do you have a favorite image with reasonable coloring and contrast?

      source
• salacious_coaster@infosec.pub ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Why is it so swirly?

  source

  • Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Storms

    source
  • Zwiebel@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    There are jet winds circling around Jupiter westwards and ones that are circling the other way, which creates cyclones, and there are ginormous thunderstorms as well

    source
  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    the storms, and different chemical/compositions im guessing.

    source
• TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Why’s it blue?

  source

  • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    This is a really good question. I suspect the color in the image has been enhanced. I’ve been trying to find a scientific reason that the clouds could appear blue, but haven’t found anything conclusive.

    However, I did find a NASA page with raw images of Jupiter.

    Here’s a raw image: Image

    Here’s an image that’s been color-enhanced: Image

    It’s not uncommon for space images to be color-enhanced. On the one hand, it may feel less authentic. On the other hand, the visible light levels in space may be insufficient for our expectations and uses anyway. Although I don’t know the origin of the picture at the top of this page, I know that it’s common practice for space photos to be enhanced. In fact they’re often taken in non-visible spectrums and fully converted to something humans can see and comprehend. Ever see beautiful photos of galaxies? They were probably taken in X-ray and colorized in processing. You wouldn’t see those colors in real life.

    source

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      The junocam page has some from the actual device: www.msss.com/all_projects/junocam.php

      Image

      Caption of another:

      Multiple images taken with the JunoCam instrument on three separate orbits were combined to show all areas in daylight, enhanced color, and stereographic projection.

      In other words, the images you see are heavily processed composites…

      Dare I say, AI enhanced, as they sometimes do use ML algorithms for astronomy. Though onces designed for scientific usefulness, of course.

      source
    • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s not uncommon for space images to be color-enhanced. On the one hand, it may feel less authentic. On the other hand, the visible light levels in space may be insufficient for our expectations and uses anyway.

      Another thing to consider is that human perception of color in celestial objects is often just wrong, so enhancing the color of certain objects is more true than what we often see ourselves.

      The sun is the same color all the time: white, consisting of a broad spectrum of all the wavelengths in the visible light range. But our atmosphere scatters the different wavelengths differently, so we see a blue sky and we see yellow, orange, and red sunsets. The atmospheric effects are happening all the time, with all the other light that happens to hit our planet, like the moon seeming to change color while reflecting the same white sunlight.

      The stars in the sky are all sorts of different colors, but appear white to us, because our color-blind rods are much more sensitive than our color-sensitive cones, and the dimness of starlight just all looks like faint white lights regardless of whether the star happens to be red, yellow, blue, or white.

      Meanwhile, relativistic effects might actually shift wavelengths and resolution, too, whether we’re talking about redshift or gravitational lensing, and asking what the “true” image is supposed to be.

      So when we take a long exposure of something in space, that itself may represent something that the human eye can’t see. Using colors to represent the different wavelengths actually present may also require adjustment of what physical filters are used on the capture, and how the actual sensor is configured to account for different wavelengths (including potentially wavelengths not within the visible spectrum), and to account for literal noise captured by the sensor.

      Astrophotography needs to make choices about how to translate sensor data to an actual human-visible image displayed on a screen with its own limited color space of what its pixels can display, or printed on paper with its own limited color space of what inks are available for printing.

      source
  • ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I believe the image is from one of the poles, rather than the side view we usually see.

    source
• Quadhammer@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Mmnm I bet there’s chocolate nugat and bipedal organisms in there

  source
• HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Solid reference. 10/10

  source

  • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I don’t get it, do you mind explaining?

    source

    • kshade@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s a thing kids say, “girls go to college to get more knowledge, boys go to Jupiter, to get more stupider”.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Stary night vibes

  source
• AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  That looks like a lot of storms

  source
• BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Definitely a flat too

  source
• clot27@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Sexyy photo

  source
• betahack@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m no scientist, but I believe that is an image of Jupiter’s Uranus

  source

  • Obi@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I want to hang a picture of it in my house so when guests compliment me on it I can say “Oh you like it? Me too. It’s a picture of Uranus”

    source
• melsaskca@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It used to be called Christianpiter.

  source