neukenindekeuken
@neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on The emotional support dunkies 1 week ago:
So… You’re sure you want to go with option number 2? You don’t want to trade that for what’s behind door number 3?
Disappointing how incredibly predictable you’ve been. It’s like you’re not even trying here.
Good luck with what all you’ve got going on in your life then. For you, I doubt it’s going to get much better.
- Comment on The emotional support dunkies 1 week ago:
You have proof of it not being a conspiracy theory? Go ahead and link it. I’ll check my account for replies. If the next reply to this isn’t a link with irrefutable proof of the things you’ve said that people have (repeatedly) asked for proof (and in fact those that “googled” found evidence refuting your claims); we’re done here.
Stop playing with rhetoric and link whatever it is you claim to have that 100% makes your case for you.
If you cannot, and if your reply to this never happens or doesn’t contain the articles and evidence to support your claim, then you’re a conspiracy theorist. That is exactly how that works. That’s how conspiracies work. You just started one, and/or perpetuating one.
You don’t even seem to grasp the difference between facts, and a conspiracy theory, so I suspect the kind of response I’ll be receiving is:
- Nothing
- More personal attacks with rhetoric trying to shift the blame and burden of proof onto the people asking for it to cover for the fact that you are indeed perpetuating a made-up conspiracy theory without any actual evidence or facts.
So which one is it, #1, or #2 here? You could always try for the #3 option and post evidence to your claims, but you’ve had hours, and dozens of interactions to do that with people and you haven’t yet. It would have taken you a fraction of the time to gather the data yourself and post, than what you’re doing now which is defending an indefensible position that appears to be some made up bullshit you either started, or bought in on because it already confirmed existing biases you had. But something tells me you’re not going to take door #3.
- Comment on The emotional support dunkies 1 week ago:
Do I really need to? It takes 5 minutes of Google and so me level of critical thinking to only review sites that aren’t trash.
Jesus.
This again?
There is no world that anyone lives in where the burden of proof is on the person asking for proof. That isn’t how this works. That isn’t how any of this works.
We did not get into space, to the moon, and back, by entertaining that thought terminating cliche of “Just Google it” in answer to people asking for proof of a claim.
You made the claim. You. Not me. Not the guy above you. You.
Several people in this thread **have ** done the “googling”, didn’t find what you said, in fact found articles that paint a very different picture; and yet here you are, back to defending the worst fucking logical fallacy known to mankind. And you’re also adding the Ad Homenim attacks to boot.
From what you’ve displayed today, I believe you to be a passionate but misguided individual and you will continue to struggle to get anyone to view the world from your perspective that you are unable to browbeat into believing you. This will be a significant bottleneck in whatever path in life you’ve chosen, if it hasn’t become one already.
There is nothing you can show or teach me in life with an attitude and disregard for research and debate like you’ve exhibited in this thread and I will learn nothing by continuing the conversation.
Good luck out there mate, you’re going to need it.
- Comment on The emotional support dunkies 1 week ago:
On this same thread this guy is attacking me for pointing out the similar.
I just think he’s a bit unhinged. Heart’s in the right place (I assume, if he really believes Affleck is as bad of a guy as he’s claiming), but I haven’t found any concrete evidence supporting a single one of the claims
sartalon
has made here. Mostly it’s speculation and a lot of conspiracy theory level nonsense.It may be true, but nothing they’ve said or shown so far has changed my opinion here. It just sounds like they’re latching onto a conspiracy theory around Weinstein and Affleck that doesn’t really exist. They did not like each other. Nobody really liked Weinstein, and every interview I’ve seen with Affleck is that he’s a deeply troubled individual who doesn’t know how to deal with the stress and issues his fame has created in his life, but I haven’t seen any indication that he’s a sleezy rapist, other than some wild rumors.
We can only make choices with the data available to us. I’m not defending Affleck at all here. If he did those things, then he deserves to burn. But
sartalon
would like to send him to El Salvador without trial based on their misunderstanding of an interview it seems.Now, if only we had an administration that also wanted to end due process, then
sartalon
and they might get along, despite their protestations that they’re nothing like each other. - Comment on The emotional support dunkies 1 week ago:
Did you provide links? Did you provide irrefutable proof of your assertions? If so where are they?
Without those, I’m free to believe your words as much as any other random person on the internet.
You could be telling the truth, you might not. I don’t really care because I don’t care about Affleck as much as you it seems.
Not sure if you’ve keep up with the news, but we’ve got heavier shit happening in the world that’s not related to whether or not an actor was worried about being on a list somewhere that sexual abused people.
- Comment on The emotional support dunkies 1 week ago:
To be clear, I don’t think anyone here is a celebrity suck up. They’re just empathetic humans seeing other humans struggle and wanting them to be OK or see how we can help. It’s the human condition, we shouldn’t discourage that.
Separately Ben Affleck may or may not be a shitty human being of what you said was true, but in the moment he still showed he was a depressed human, and other humans want to help. Not because they’re sycophants, but because they’re good people who want to help.
- Comment on The after party 1 week ago:
Like using Reddit?
- Comment on Ye song glorifying Hitler gets millions of views on X while other platforms struggle to remove it 1 week ago:
It can be both, but he’s still a piece of shit Nazi.
- Comment on Keeping me up at night 2 weeks ago:
Instructions unclear, am now in charge of zombie giraffe.
- Comment on Anon watches Spider-Man 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on Three years after a cinematographer was killed by a stray bullet on set, "Rust" is being released in theaters this weekend. Funds from the release will go to the victim's family, mainly to her son. 2 weeks ago:
It’s almost like there’s no reason anyone in Hollywood should ever actually use real guns on set for any reason.
- Comment on Could wastewater plant simply heat up water past 500C to decompose all chemicals and output clean water? 3 weeks ago:
You definitely wouldn’t want to drink the water from any of those systems you’re describing though :)
- Comment on Schlurp 3 weeks ago:
There’s likely not much rain where this elephant is at. I’d guess the savanna where there’s 6 month dry spells between rains.
- Comment on Feds Threaten Wikipedia After Right-Wing Media Uproar 3 weeks ago:
They’re pretty flush with cash still. Trump can go after them, but for what? They’d need more corruption than they have in the judicial system today. They’ll get there eventually, but they don’t have it yet.
- Comment on Instead of Orange Man doing Tariffs would it not have been better for him to talk about shopping locally and so forth. And giving more tax breaks to companies that stay and sell in the US? 3 weeks ago:
Yes, literally anything communicated or a plan would have been better. A fart in an enclosed room of crowded people would have been a better way to communicate than what this orange idiot did.
- Comment on when 4 weeks ago:
There was a meme a while back that done there was nobody with blue hair or nonbinary at the barrista, that their coffee was going to suck.
This is kind of a continuation of that meme.
- Comment on What's the point in getting married? 4 weeks ago:
It can be very, very inexpensive for the costs of a court filing fee and a friend getting an online certification to officiate the wedding.
You get tax breaks while married, and a lot of things in life are easier when you’re married and sharing the same living space, bills, etc. The world has been built to make it more economical and easier.
It’s the getting divorced that’s expensive and sucks. As long as you can avoid doing that, or have a prenup in place, you’re good.
- Comment on are there bots that downvote every comment users have? 4 weeks ago:
Pretty sure it’s just users that disagree going and downvoting latest comments. At least for me, there was a MAGAt that didn’t like anti-trump stuff and gave me 1 downvote on everything I posted from that single comment, on backwards in my history for about a week or so.
I thought it was a bot at first, but then I realized it started right after my comment replying to him correcting him on his conspiracy theory stupidity cult nonsense. Everything posted after that comment received no downvotes.
- Comment on We sure do like our Fungi 4 weeks ago:
ahh, that makes sense, thanks. Yeah, in what brief research I did, it does appear like there are a lot of mushrooms that aren’t safe for chickens and lizards, possibly due to their biological differences, but that there were still a good number of mushrooms they could eat.
The interesting thing you were alluding to is that they have some biological instinct to not eat shrooms because maybe it wiped a lot of them out at one point. That’d be super cool to link :)
- Comment on We sure do like our Fungi 4 weeks ago:
That’s a cool fact, do you have a source I could check out and read through? I tried some light web searching but couldn’t find anything saying this.
- Comment on Think they talked about this in the group chat? 4 weeks ago:
I mean, you’re both right here
- Comment on how do I avoid becoming conformist, lazy and completely incapable of learning something new? 4 weeks ago:
Stay curious about the world around you and improving your arsenal of skills. Skills and knowledge are the one thing nobody can take away from you, and that you only get through hard work and dedication to a craft or multiple crafts.
Get into and out of new things all the time, or focus on one new thing until you run it into the ground. Do whatever your excitement leads you.
Learning about new technologies, playing with them and practicing with them are the core of what keeps us sharp and young. You’re only old once you start believing you have everything figured out.
- Comment on Anon contracts herpes 4 weeks ago:
You can’t get it multiple times from the same partner unless it’s hsv-1,and even then it’s rare after you’ve built up a resistance to the virus and they’d need to be in an active outbreak.
But yes, you can migrate the location of hsv1, the most common herpes type (incorrectly referred to as oral herpes). You want to be especially careful if it migrates to your facial area beyond your mouth/lips as occular herpes can cause blindness, and if it spreads to your nose and brain, there’s a real chance you could die.
These are rare in first world countries though and are typically seen in places without access to clean water and sanitation access.
- Comment on Steven Soderbergh Says It’s “Frustrating” When Mid-Budget Films Like ‘Black Bag’ Underperform At Box Office: “Not A Good Thing For Movies” 4 weeks ago:
While that all checks out, you should never buy all that stuff at a cinema stand unless you’re willing to take out a small loan. It’s always been a massive ripoff.
- Comment on zoomers are the new blooners 5 weeks ago:
They did back in the MySpace days
- Comment on Maryland Senator Meets With Wrongly Deported Man in El Salvador 5 weeks ago:
Willful noncompliance
- Comment on The duality of man 5 weeks ago:
This is basically what David Attenburough does
- Comment on What is Superman's "kryptonite"? 5 weeks ago:
The color yellow
- Comment on I ran out of toilet paper 5 weeks ago:
Feed him a pizza and let him return to the sewer.