neukenindekeuken
@neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on Are a few people ruining the internet for the rest of us? 1 week ago:
I see what you did there
- Comment on it's a war out there 2 weeks ago:
The gymnosperms also did not survive anti-aircraft fire.
- Comment on How does AI use so much power? 2 weeks ago:
This is a pretty great explanation/simplification.
I’ll add that because the calculations rely on floating point math in many cases, graphics chips do most of the heavy processing since they were already designed for this pipeline in mind with video games.
That means there’s a lot of power hungry graphics chips running in these data centers. It’s also why NVidia stock is so insane.
- Comment on King forgot his crown 2 weeks ago:
Seems to fit the official definition pretty neatly. Colloquially, I tend to agree with you, there’s a spectrum for fraud. But this still counts as fraud. It’s a fraudulent misrepresentation of the truth to convince others to part with something of value (a gift).
The fact that it’s a gift doesn’t change that this is fraud, only the severity of fraud in a legal sense. Image
- Comment on Why don't Americans use electric kettles? 2 weeks ago:
That’s very true. With that said, I still find 110v kettles to be pretty fast for my needs. Especially if just making a single cup.
- Comment on Why don't Americans use electric kettles? 2 weeks ago:
I…what? I do, most of my friends do. They’re amazing.
- Comment on Blobfish 2 weeks ago:
“eye popping ape”
- Comment on Oatmeal 2 weeks ago:
Awww, he’s such a cute little protein shake.
- Comment on Wake up babe new shape just dropped 2 weeks ago:
And the right angles are supposed to be inside, not 2 out 2 in
- Comment on I watched several videos on a Combine Harvester's inner workings and I still don't understand how this thing works. 2 weeks ago:
It is the savior of mankind.
- Comment on Guess I'm banned by Know Your Meme now. [yippee.wav] 2 weeks ago:
And also a huge issue for anyone using a VPN to browse the web
- Comment on Why do so many homes in rural areas have a front yard full of junk? 2 weeks ago:
That’s wild and awesome, TIL, thanks!
- Comment on Jupiter 2 weeks ago:
Ah, got it, thank you!
- Comment on Why do so many homes in rural areas have a front yard full of junk? 2 weeks ago:
Is that a reliant robin? Badass.
Wasp nest was definitely worth it, agreed.
- Comment on Jupiter 2 weeks ago:
I don’t get it, do you mind explaining?
- Comment on Anon has a warning for incels 3 weeks ago:
This was a test. You failed.
And by that, I mean you passed.
- Comment on Size Matters 3 weeks ago:
Its the consistent part that’s important. Everyone exaggerates by about 15-20%. Everyone.
That actually makes the self reported study accurate, if you account for that happening across all countries.
- Comment on RIP America 3 weeks ago:
It absolutely won’t be.
But it might be moving in the right direction.
Regardless, will take decades/generations to fully recover from this, if ever.
- Comment on surprised_pikachu.jpg 4 weeks ago:
Jared leto does think cats are delicious, despite what Jared Leto said about Alf.
- Comment on I'm so sorry 5 weeks ago:
That tracks.
- Comment on Home cooking 5 weeks ago:
Did they cook that meal with sunlight?
- Comment on I've got something special for you 1 month ago:
Roughly the size of an average penis. Makes it seem like he just offered to give her the “D”.
Which is a trip right to HR.
- Comment on Clair Obscur: Expedition 33. First time pay attention to the songs and I cried. This is the game that I cry over so many times. This is what I think about the game. Spoiler alert 1 month ago:
Try dodging over parrying. Much more forgiving. Not nearly as precise. You can dodge most attacks the first time just by waiting to see when the attack is going to hit/land after the windup. I’d say by the end, I was dodging about 80-90% of the attacks, even from things I had never seen before just because the wind-up system is fairly predictable. Once you get the hang of it, dodging is super easy.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Nope. Even at 30 though, there will be a generational gap between the two of you. That’s a 21 year gap, and a full adult lifetime of experience between the two of you.
With that said, some women are extremely mature and if your daughter thinks it’s a good idea, there’s probably no harm in trying it out. She’s probably worried about you and wants to see you happy, and this is her way of solving that problem.
Take her up on her offer and have a good time on your date. Spend some time getting to know her like you would anyone on a date. Again, understand that even though you’re both fully grown adults, there’s going to still be a lot that you’re not going to connect with each other on.
For example, Pokemon. You’re not going to give a shit about Pokemon, but she grew up in the hayday of it and Harry Potter and a lot of other generational things that you’re either going to need to get on board with so you can have a connection with her or it will create a rift between you eventually.
- Comment on MindsEye boss claims game's negative reaction ahead of release has been paid for in "concerted effort" against studio 1 month ago:
You sound like one of those people he’s talking about
/s
- Comment on IT’S THE FEDS! 1 month ago:
Plus, car charging is changing the game vs 10+ years ago. Everyone’s got huge power draws happening all the time now while their 1 or 2 evs are charging each night/day.
- Comment on IT’S THE FEDS! 1 month ago:
Not even a power bill. They have been known to sign warrants for nothing more than an off the shelf infrared scanner/heat scanner showing increased heat from a specific unit in a building compared to the surrounding ones.
Like your house nice and toasty in the winter? That’s a no-knock-raid.
- Comment on Check out this alpha male 1 month ago:
Alpha in software means the worst possible version of the software a group feels comfortable showing people.
The only time Alpha means anything positive is literally in the Bible (Alpha and Omega, which are really just referring to letters in the alphabet, so I am the Aardvark and the Zed doesn’t have quite the same punch to it).
Then there was that flawed study of wolf pack behavior that was debunked ages ago that they’re still flaunting around.
When is alpha a good thing here?
- Comment on The emotional support dunkies 2 months ago:
So… You’re sure you want to go with option number 2? You don’t want to trade that for what’s behind door number 3?
Disappointing how incredibly predictable you’ve been. It’s like you’re not even trying here.
Good luck with what all you’ve got going on in your life then. For you, I doubt it’s going to get much better.
- Comment on The emotional support dunkies 2 months ago:
You have proof of it not being a conspiracy theory? Go ahead and link it. I’ll check my account for replies. If the next reply to this isn’t a link with irrefutable proof of the things you’ve said that people have (repeatedly) asked for proof (and in fact those that “googled” found evidence refuting your claims); we’re done here.
Stop playing with rhetoric and link whatever it is you claim to have that 100% makes your case for you.
If you cannot, and if your reply to this never happens or doesn’t contain the articles and evidence to support your claim, then you’re a conspiracy theorist. That is exactly how that works. That’s how conspiracies work. You just started one, and/or perpetuating one.
You don’t even seem to grasp the difference between facts, and a conspiracy theory, so I suspect the kind of response I’ll be receiving is:
- Nothing
- More personal attacks with rhetoric trying to shift the blame and burden of proof onto the people asking for it to cover for the fact that you are indeed perpetuating a made-up conspiracy theory without any actual evidence or facts.
So which one is it, #1, or #2 here? You could always try for the #3 option and post evidence to your claims, but you’ve had hours, and dozens of interactions to do that with people and you haven’t yet. It would have taken you a fraction of the time to gather the data yourself and post, than what you’re doing now which is defending an indefensible position that appears to be some made up bullshit you either started, or bought in on because it already confirmed existing biases you had. But something tells me you’re not going to take door #3.
