neukenindekeuken
@neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on Trump in 2029 after removing the 22nd Amendment, watching Obama run again 6 hours ago:
And don’t forget, he has control of the whole federal government at the moment. He’s attacking his political enemies and attacking voting rights. It would be entirely within his current M.O. to either politically jail Obama, or change the voting laws to favor himself over Obama by restricting access to PoC being allowed to vote, sending ICE to deport anyone who tries to vote without bringing their social security card and birth certificate, etc.
The SCOTUS is also on his side if there ever ends up being a debate about the results, so super fucked.
- Comment on The fuck is the point 2 days ago:
That’s a good point, yeah, I was thinking like most Americans that you’d want some meat thrown in there for flavor.
Mostly a vegetarian as well so I agree with you is what I’m saying.
- Comment on The fuck is the point 2 days ago:
Yeah, this is beans and rice with little to no protein kind of money for a week, at best.
Didn’t used to be the case, but orange dipshit keeps causing inflation. - Comment on Iran Propaganda is very entertaining to follow 2 days ago:
Pretty much
- Comment on Quack 2 days ago:
On Lemmy?
- Comment on We Spoke To Game Devs And All Of Them Hate DLSS 5: 'What The F***, Nvidia?' 1 week ago:
I’ve never seen it used literally. Ever. Only ever figuratively.
- Comment on We Spoke To Game Devs And All Of Them Hate DLSS 5: 'What The F***, Nvidia?' 1 week ago:
I think they’re not using it literally. In this context, corpulent just means bloated/gross. That is also its literal definition.
So I think the word works here.
- Comment on Thank you, Nvidia 🙏😇 1 week ago:
Yeah, to add to that, a lot of people on Lemmy are left leaning (obviously), and Kirk was one of the key people who have instigated the huge divide between the left and right across America. He was extremely antagonistic towards minorities, specifically the Black population, and was just generally a horrible person to a lot of people on the left or minorities in general.
So the hate is justified, and he’s helped to ruin a lot of lives out there.
- Comment on Anon the explorer 1 week ago:
There might be something there next time.
- Comment on Anon blows his dad's mind 2 weeks ago:
I’M OLD GREG
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
If he’s coming over at 10pm, he knows that already. In fact, I suspect he’s counting on it.
- Comment on so cozy 🐟 2 weeks ago:
I also choose this guy’s wife.
- Comment on update 3 weeks ago:
Nono, go back to the first thing.
- Comment on [Physics Girl] My first science video in 3 years 3 weeks ago:
Long Covid symptoms I heard
- Comment on butts n beans 3 weeks ago:
Now it’s just missing the toast.
- Comment on Dear Faith I 3 weeks ago:
This is rally driving
- Comment on misleading cover 5 weeks ago:
It’s cute that he thought “Gay Minotaur Sex” would be a brand new sentence somehow.
My sweet, sweet summer child…
- Comment on Just a few 1 month ago:
We mustn’t answer the call!
- Comment on Toughest Job 💪 1 month ago:
It’s not about if that’s plausible, it’s about if it’s the most/only plausible explanation. In this case, it is not. There’s several scenarios where this could be a thing. Staging a blackmail being the most obvious one.
With that said, I still find it curious he’d have used that as a draft letter to himself. The only way that really makes sense, is if he knew his emails were being monitored, or that he’d have to turn over email evidence to the state or something like that. Otherwise, why do that other than just as a note to yourself (and admittedly, I’ve used gmail drafts for personal notes plenty before).
So, both seem plausible, but I will admit the “Bill did get an STI from an underage sex trafficked girl on Epstein Island and old Jeff made a note for himself in gmail quickly on his phone so he’d get back to it later when he had time” scenario seems more realistic.
- Comment on I might actually be a respectable member of society 1 month ago:
That’s been studied before, and IIRC, is not plausible, but is “acid lore”.
- Comment on I might actually be a respectable member of society 1 month ago:
Acid certainly changed my life for the better. I used to stress out about everything. I still stress out about things now, but I have the heads-up knowledge that all of reality is a fragile thread of consciousness where my brain is tricking itself into viewing and interpreting the world around me as a stable, solid thing, when the truth is that reality is as subjective as you want it to be.
There are no rules. You can make up and do whatever you want.
Then I stop worrying about why I got a $5 fee for some bullshit from my bank I’ll have to call them about tomorrow.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
There’s always an XKCD.
- Comment on 1 month ago:
Jetpack Cat was the original name of the cat though. It’s a tough corner they’ve backed themselves into there.
It was originally the model for Pharah, before they decided (Jeff Kaplan) that it should be more serious and not include actual animals in it (you have Winston, but he talks and acts like a human).
So they reworked the Jetpack Cat into Pharah and released her as the daughter of Ana.
Jetpack Cat is owned by Brigetta and is one of her emotes that she picks it up and cuddles it.
If they had named it anything else, it would have ruined the 10 years of lore they built up around it, so I understand why they did it.
The issue for me is that it’s a support character.
- Comment on Your teenager AND your husband 1 month ago:
Kids in Africa also don’t like soggy cereal?
- Comment on The #1 trick Furries dont want you to know! 2 months ago:
Depression.
- Comment on Jon Stewart on presidential runs and why there's hope for America 2 months ago:
Bernie Sanders was an activist.
- Comment on dating 2 months ago:
What kind of cheese are women in my area attracted to?
- Comment on Such a dreamy guy 2 months ago:
Jouisiana?
- Comment on Zootopia 2 months ago:
A handshake agreement
- Comment on Check mate, atheists. 2 months ago:
You appear to be moving the goalposts. These are all concepts. God is not as real as Money or Love or America. You’re conflating several things here to try and obfuscate that the existence of God being proven isn’t a “big deal”.
If something is real, it can be proven, observed, the effects replicated. This is how every thing in the universe works. No exceptions.
Money can be proven, even the idea of it, even though it’s “conceptual”. It has real value, it’s a construct we created and it has physical objects in the real world and can be exchanged for goods and services. It’s a real idea that takes physical shape in the world and it can be proven as a real world concept.
Love is a concept, and while the nuances behind it aren’t well understood, it’s as real as anything anyone feels, like hate, fear, or any emotion. It’s an emotion, and emotions are a part of the human empathic experience. It’s something we’ve evolved and learned over time. It’s real because we make it real every day. Love isn’t existential, it doesn’t have some power we’re unable to measure. It can’t bend or warp or shift reality. It can’t do anything more than we can do as a human. In all the ways that matter, any result of love is 100% measurable and observable in the physical world.
America is a real place, a real continent, a real country, with real people, and while the idea of a country or its people changes over time, it’s not “fake” or made up, in the same way a claim about a deity is. The idea of America might be what you’re referring to, but it’s as real as any other shared idea or dream people have had in history, including Rome, the EU, etc.
You’re intentionally trying to muddy the waters and misdirect here by conflating the “realness” of God with 3 things that are nothing like the claim of God, and that can be quite easily proven with objective evidence.
Anything anyone claims that exists outside of our ability to observe, test, or measure, is either talking about things so small or far away that we haven’t developed the tools to measure and observe them yet, or they’re spouting bullshit.
Which bucket do the claims of god, and all religions fall into do you think?