neukenindekeuken
@neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on I'm so sorry 1 day ago:
That tracks.
- Comment on Home cooking 1 day ago:
Did they cook that meal with sunlight?
- Comment on I've got something special for you 1 week ago:
Roughly the size of an average penis. Makes it seem like he just offered to give her the “D”.
Which is a trip right to HR.
- Comment on Clair Obscur: Expedition 33. First time pay attention to the songs and I cried. This is the game that I cry over so many times. This is what I think about the game. Spoiler alert 1 week ago:
Try dodging over parrying. Much more forgiving. Not nearly as precise. You can dodge most attacks the first time just by waiting to see when the attack is going to hit/land after the windup. I’d say by the end, I was dodging about 80-90% of the attacks, even from things I had never seen before just because the wind-up system is fairly predictable. Once you get the hang of it, dodging is super easy.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
Nope. Even at 30 though, there will be a generational gap between the two of you. That’s a 21 year gap, and a full adult lifetime of experience between the two of you.
With that said, some women are extremely mature and if your daughter thinks it’s a good idea, there’s probably no harm in trying it out. She’s probably worried about you and wants to see you happy, and this is her way of solving that problem.
Take her up on her offer and have a good time on your date. Spend some time getting to know her like you would anyone on a date. Again, understand that even though you’re both fully grown adults, there’s going to still be a lot that you’re not going to connect with each other on.
For example, Pokemon. You’re not going to give a shit about Pokemon, but she grew up in the hayday of it and Harry Potter and a lot of other generational things that you’re either going to need to get on board with so you can have a connection with her or it will create a rift between you eventually.
- Comment on MindsEye boss claims game's negative reaction ahead of release has been paid for in "concerted effort" against studio 2 weeks ago:
You sound like one of those people he’s talking about
/s
- Comment on IT’S THE FEDS! 2 weeks ago:
Plus, car charging is changing the game vs 10+ years ago. Everyone’s got huge power draws happening all the time now while their 1 or 2 evs are charging each night/day.
- Comment on IT’S THE FEDS! 2 weeks ago:
Not even a power bill. They have been known to sign warrants for nothing more than an off the shelf infrared scanner/heat scanner showing increased heat from a specific unit in a building compared to the surrounding ones.
Like your house nice and toasty in the winter? That’s a no-knock-raid.
- Comment on Check out this alpha male 2 weeks ago:
Alpha in software means the worst possible version of the software a group feels comfortable showing people.
The only time Alpha means anything positive is literally in the Bible (Alpha and Omega, which are really just referring to letters in the alphabet, so I am the Aardvark and the Zed doesn’t have quite the same punch to it).
Then there was that flawed study of wolf pack behavior that was debunked ages ago that they’re still flaunting around.
When is alpha a good thing here?
- Comment on The emotional support dunkies 4 weeks ago:
So… You’re sure you want to go with option number 2? You don’t want to trade that for what’s behind door number 3?
Disappointing how incredibly predictable you’ve been. It’s like you’re not even trying here.
Good luck with what all you’ve got going on in your life then. For you, I doubt it’s going to get much better.
- Comment on The emotional support dunkies 4 weeks ago:
You have proof of it not being a conspiracy theory? Go ahead and link it. I’ll check my account for replies. If the next reply to this isn’t a link with irrefutable proof of the things you’ve said that people have (repeatedly) asked for proof (and in fact those that “googled” found evidence refuting your claims); we’re done here.
Stop playing with rhetoric and link whatever it is you claim to have that 100% makes your case for you.
If you cannot, and if your reply to this never happens or doesn’t contain the articles and evidence to support your claim, then you’re a conspiracy theorist. That is exactly how that works. That’s how conspiracies work. You just started one, and/or perpetuating one.
You don’t even seem to grasp the difference between facts, and a conspiracy theory, so I suspect the kind of response I’ll be receiving is:
- Nothing
- More personal attacks with rhetoric trying to shift the blame and burden of proof onto the people asking for it to cover for the fact that you are indeed perpetuating a made-up conspiracy theory without any actual evidence or facts.
So which one is it, #1, or #2 here? You could always try for the #3 option and post evidence to your claims, but you’ve had hours, and dozens of interactions to do that with people and you haven’t yet. It would have taken you a fraction of the time to gather the data yourself and post, than what you’re doing now which is defending an indefensible position that appears to be some made up bullshit you either started, or bought in on because it already confirmed existing biases you had. But something tells me you’re not going to take door #3.
- Comment on The emotional support dunkies 4 weeks ago:
Do I really need to? It takes 5 minutes of Google and so me level of critical thinking to only review sites that aren’t trash.
Jesus.
This again?
There is no world that anyone lives in where the burden of proof is on the person asking for proof. That isn’t how this works. That isn’t how any of this works.
We did not get into space, to the moon, and back, by entertaining that thought terminating cliche of “Just Google it” in answer to people asking for proof of a claim.
You made the claim. You. Not me. Not the guy above you. You.
Several people in this thread **have ** done the “googling”, didn’t find what you said, in fact found articles that paint a very different picture; and yet here you are, back to defending the worst fucking logical fallacy known to mankind. And you’re also adding the Ad Homenim attacks to boot.
From what you’ve displayed today, I believe you to be a passionate but misguided individual and you will continue to struggle to get anyone to view the world from your perspective that you are unable to browbeat into believing you. This will be a significant bottleneck in whatever path in life you’ve chosen, if it hasn’t become one already.
There is nothing you can show or teach me in life with an attitude and disregard for research and debate like you’ve exhibited in this thread and I will learn nothing by continuing the conversation.
Good luck out there mate, you’re going to need it.
- Comment on The emotional support dunkies 4 weeks ago:
On this same thread this guy is attacking me for pointing out the similar.
I just think he’s a bit unhinged. Heart’s in the right place (I assume, if he really believes Affleck is as bad of a guy as he’s claiming), but I haven’t found any concrete evidence supporting a single one of the claims
sartalon
has made here. Mostly it’s speculation and a lot of conspiracy theory level nonsense.It may be true, but nothing they’ve said or shown so far has changed my opinion here. It just sounds like they’re latching onto a conspiracy theory around Weinstein and Affleck that doesn’t really exist. They did not like each other. Nobody really liked Weinstein, and every interview I’ve seen with Affleck is that he’s a deeply troubled individual who doesn’t know how to deal with the stress and issues his fame has created in his life, but I haven’t seen any indication that he’s a sleezy rapist, other than some wild rumors.
We can only make choices with the data available to us. I’m not defending Affleck at all here. If he did those things, then he deserves to burn. But
sartalon
would like to send him to El Salvador without trial based on their misunderstanding of an interview it seems.Now, if only we had an administration that also wanted to end due process, then
sartalon
and they might get along, despite their protestations that they’re nothing like each other. - Comment on The emotional support dunkies 4 weeks ago:
Did you provide links? Did you provide irrefutable proof of your assertions? If so where are they?
Without those, I’m free to believe your words as much as any other random person on the internet.
You could be telling the truth, you might not. I don’t really care because I don’t care about Affleck as much as you it seems.
Not sure if you’ve keep up with the news, but we’ve got heavier shit happening in the world that’s not related to whether or not an actor was worried about being on a list somewhere that sexual abused people.
- Comment on The emotional support dunkies 4 weeks ago:
To be clear, I don’t think anyone here is a celebrity suck up. They’re just empathetic humans seeing other humans struggle and wanting them to be OK or see how we can help. It’s the human condition, we shouldn’t discourage that.
Separately Ben Affleck may or may not be a shitty human being of what you said was true, but in the moment he still showed he was a depressed human, and other humans want to help. Not because they’re sycophants, but because they’re good people who want to help.
- Comment on The after party 4 weeks ago:
Like using Reddit?
- Comment on Ye song glorifying Hitler gets millions of views on X while other platforms struggle to remove it 4 weeks ago:
It can be both, but he’s still a piece of shit Nazi.
- Comment on Keeping me up at night 5 weeks ago:
Instructions unclear, am now in charge of zombie giraffe.
- Comment on Anon watches Spider-Man 5 weeks ago:
- Comment on Three years after a cinematographer was killed by a stray bullet on set, "Rust" is being released in theaters this weekend. Funds from the release will go to the victim's family, mainly to her son. 5 weeks ago:
It’s almost like there’s no reason anyone in Hollywood should ever actually use real guns on set for any reason.
- Comment on Could wastewater plant simply heat up water past 500C to decompose all chemicals and output clean water? 1 month ago:
You definitely wouldn’t want to drink the water from any of those systems you’re describing though :)
- Comment on Schlurp 1 month ago:
There’s likely not much rain where this elephant is at. I’d guess the savanna where there’s 6 month dry spells between rains.
- Comment on Feds Threaten Wikipedia After Right-Wing Media Uproar 1 month ago:
They’re pretty flush with cash still. Trump can go after them, but for what? They’d need more corruption than they have in the judicial system today. They’ll get there eventually, but they don’t have it yet.
- Comment on Instead of Orange Man doing Tariffs would it not have been better for him to talk about shopping locally and so forth. And giving more tax breaks to companies that stay and sell in the US? 1 month ago:
Yes, literally anything communicated or a plan would have been better. A fart in an enclosed room of crowded people would have been a better way to communicate than what this orange idiot did.
- Comment on when 1 month ago:
There was a meme a while back that done there was nobody with blue hair or nonbinary at the barrista, that their coffee was going to suck.
This is kind of a continuation of that meme.
- Comment on What's the point in getting married? 1 month ago:
It can be very, very inexpensive for the costs of a court filing fee and a friend getting an online certification to officiate the wedding.
You get tax breaks while married, and a lot of things in life are easier when you’re married and sharing the same living space, bills, etc. The world has been built to make it more economical and easier.
It’s the getting divorced that’s expensive and sucks. As long as you can avoid doing that, or have a prenup in place, you’re good.
- Comment on are there bots that downvote every comment users have? 1 month ago:
Pretty sure it’s just users that disagree going and downvoting latest comments. At least for me, there was a MAGAt that didn’t like anti-trump stuff and gave me 1 downvote on everything I posted from that single comment, on backwards in my history for about a week or so.
I thought it was a bot at first, but then I realized it started right after my comment replying to him correcting him on his conspiracy theory stupidity cult nonsense. Everything posted after that comment received no downvotes.
- Comment on We sure do like our Fungi 1 month ago:
ahh, that makes sense, thanks. Yeah, in what brief research I did, it does appear like there are a lot of mushrooms that aren’t safe for chickens and lizards, possibly due to their biological differences, but that there were still a good number of mushrooms they could eat.
The interesting thing you were alluding to is that they have some biological instinct to not eat shrooms because maybe it wiped a lot of them out at one point. That’d be super cool to link :)
- Comment on We sure do like our Fungi 1 month ago:
That’s a cool fact, do you have a source I could check out and read through? I tried some light web searching but couldn’t find anything saying this.
- Comment on Think they talked about this in the group chat? 1 month ago:
I mean, you’re both right here