That is a masterfully crafted mansplaining trap.
Chappeau.
Water
Submitted 4 months ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/2a871671-ed57-4180-bd00-3c62e1da0ba6.jpeg
Comments
mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 4 months ago
noobface@lemmy.world 4 months ago
That’s actually just the first part of the phrase. The whole thing is “je ne suis pas français, chappeau”
victorz@lemmy.world 4 months ago
just the first part of the phrase
Seems to me like it was the last part of the phrase.
Vespair@lemm.ee 4 months ago
je ne suis pas français, chappeau
I tried googling this to see if I was missing some reference or something and it led to strange google behavior I’ve never seen before… When I search “je ne suis pas français, chappeau” without the quotation marks, Google automatically changes the French to English in the search bar when I hit the search button.
Anyone else experienced this? For what possible fucking purpose would that exist?
mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 4 months ago
Huh, this is an interesting intercultural communiaction trap.
In my area, this is just used as a shorthand/slang/idiom for “nice, i respect that” or in place of a nod or “thank you”
PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Hat
TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee 4 months ago
Click here if you don't understand
There is only one star in our solar system - the Sun.
Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 4 months ago
And if you still don't get it, click here
Meanwhile, there are two hydrogen atoms in a water molecule - H~2~O
Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 4 months ago
If you're still having trouble, click here
2 is greater than 1
affiliate@lemmy.world 4 months ago
i don’t understand
why are you quoting the sun?
Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 4 months ago
I understand
It’s clearly short for “Sun Wukong.”
Rusty@lemmy.ca 4 months ago
Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 4 months ago
Yes, the “if you don’t understand the joke” comment explains the joke. That’s the point.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 months ago
I really need to read better, I still thought it said galaxy.
psud@aussie.zone 4 months ago
It’s 2 > 1, so correct two hydrogens versus one star: Sol
Slovene@feddit.nl 4 months ago
O sole mio!
MamboNo5@lemmings.world 4 months ago
What about celebrities?
WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Celebrities contain more than one hydrogen, true.
ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 4 months ago
There are more memes estimating the size of the universe than there are stars in the galaxy.
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 months ago
Solar system.
Pandantic@midwest.social 4 months ago
You’ll have to prove this one.
LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 months ago
With greater hydrogen comes greater responsibility.
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 months ago
Like twice as much
NutWrench@lemmy.ml 4 months ago
- Number of hydrogen atoms in a single molecule of water (H2O): 2
- Number of stars in our (ENTIRE) solar system: 1
That’s the joke.
Etterra@discuss.online 4 months ago
Thanks, I never would have been able to understand 2>1 if you hadn’t written up that amazing power point slide.
MagnyusG@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Most people have more balls than there are stars in our solar system.
Metostopholes@midwest.social 4 months ago
Wait, are you counting ovaries?
phobiac@lemmy.world 4 months ago
The average human has somewhere between 1.1 and 1.4 testicles.
then_three_more@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Not Hitler though.
grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 4 months ago
I have a dog, so I’m bringing up the average. We’ve got (dog-sare) tennis balls galore!
pyre@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I skipped reading the word stars, and I thought it was deliberately wrong to rile people up.
RandomVideos@programming.dev 4 months ago
Petition to classify Pluto as a star
4oreman@lemy.lol 4 months ago
petition granted
Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 months ago
We can just add it to Jupiter.
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 months ago
Even with the +200 other dwarf planets we wouldn’t get there.
RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Sedna had it’s chance.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 months ago
My autopilot brain kept skipping over molecule and missing the joke lol.
Subverb@lemmy.world 4 months ago
There actually are more molocules of H2O in 10 drops of water than there are stars in the observable universe.
Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 4 months ago
Optimists: the glass is half full
Pessimists: this half empty glass of water has more molecules than there are stars in the observable universe; life is meaningless
Chakravanti@monero.town 4 months ago
I don’t think we can much, now can we?
vithigar@lemmy.ca 4 months ago
“Observable universe” isn’t how much we can see, rather how much it is theoretically possible to observe by any physical means.
don@lemm.ee 4 months ago
There are fewer hydrogen atoms in a single molecule of water than there are fingers on my hand.
Check and mate.
NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org 4 months ago
Also interesting: If you were to take your nerves out and lay them end on end you would die.
Actually interesting fact
Your height is closer to a light second than the size of an atom. And yet atoms seem more approachable in scale than light seconds. Fascinating stuff!
ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 4 months ago
How do you define “closer” here? I’m about 1.8m removed from the size of an atom but well over 299 thousand kilometers from a light second.
murtaza64@programming.dev 4 months ago
Ken M made a similar joke a while back right?
humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 months ago
I have as many assholes as stars in our solar system, even though it seems like more to Lemmy.
Nomecks@lemmy.ca 4 months ago
This is especially true for blind people.
billwashere@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Ok I had to think about this for a second.
anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 4 months ago
[deleted]NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 months ago
Woah!
Hyphlosion@lemm.ee 4 months ago
Remimds me of the time someone on Xitter said that there are more trees on Earth than there are stars in our Galaxy. They got ratio’d pretty damn hard for it. -_-
pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 4 months ago
Going by the top Duck duck go results for “how many stars in our galaxy” and “how many trees in the world”:
“According to Jos de Bruijne, a scientist at the European Space Agency (ESA), the current estimate is between 100 to 400 billion stars.”
and
“There are an estimated 3.04 trillion trees in the world.”Hyphlosion@lemm.ee 4 months ago
That’s why it’s so crazy it was that that person was shat on so hard.
Not finding the actual Tweet yet, but here’s a video covering it:
Pandantic@midwest.social 4 months ago
Yeah, if you think of it, stars are relatively rare in a galaxy when compared to living beings which are born to procreate. But once you go out to universe, it becomes true.
Isa@feddit.org 4 months ago
There might even be more hydrogen atoms in one molecule of water, than there are universes we live in!
Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 months ago
Uhhhh… No. Pretty sure it’s about equal.
bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 4 months ago
±1
Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 months ago
Weird water molecule if it had only 1 hydrogen atom. Pretty sure we call that peroxide.
Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 months ago
What’s the second star in our solar system?
Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 months ago
No one asked but you, so thank you.
Also,
Ringo.
randombullet@programming.dev 4 months ago
What’s the other star in our solar system?
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 months ago
So do we not count the mini suns being created at places like Livermore Labs? 🤔
Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 4 months ago
We can’t make plasma dense enough to have significant convention over radiance, and the longest active run is only a minute or so. We’re a good way away from plasma stable enough to be called a star, although it’s getting closer. Hydrogen bombs are probably the closest we have so far.
mspencer712@programming.dev 4 months ago
I couldn’t find the clip, but first thing that came to mind was the StarTalk Live with Buzz Aldrin and John Hodgman.
Hodgman: “maybe they’ll find H 2 2 2 2 O!”
RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 months ago
No need to feel foolish. You have introduced me to yet another John Hodgman project. And that’s all that matters in this world.
h3mlocke@lemm.ee 4 months ago
Infeel like this gets reposted here at least once a month, but this one has a different t pic, and way more likes
TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 months ago
clearly never been down the hollywood walk of fame
Sciaphobia@lemm.ee 4 months ago
Me: That doesn’t seem right. OH. Oh, I am stupid.
steventhedev@lemmy.world 4 months ago
*OH~2~
Sciaphobia@lemm.ee 4 months ago
I am impressed by how clever that was. Well done.
qarbone@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I very slowly zoomed in on the actual words in the post.
Started off processing “molecule” as “mole”, “solar system” as “galaxy”, and thinking “ha, don’t know if that’s true but it sounds both plausible and neat”.
TootSweet@lemmy.world 4 months ago
There are definitely more hydrogen atoms in a mole of water than stars in the Milky Way.
The Milky Way has somewhere between 100 and 400 billion stars according to Wikipedia (110^11 to 410^11). A mole of water has 6.02210^23 molecules in it, each of which has two hydrogen atoms in it for a total of 1.204410^24 hydrogen atoms.
10^24 / 10^11 = 10^13 which is ten trillion. So, a mole of water has roughly ten trillion times as many hydrogen atoms as the Milky Way has stars.
shalafi@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Wasn’t thinking moles, not that technical, but it sounded plausible vs. the number of stars in the Milky Way.
Wait…
selokichtli@lemmy.ml 4 months ago
The glass of water is a bit misleading. Your brain starts thinking about all the water molecules inside. That’s all.