Tartas1995
@Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
- Comment on Fictional "Journal of Astrological Big Data Ecology" has infected Google's search AI 1 week ago:
Okay, so when workers cause damages to the society to stand up to the capitalists and fight against exploition of labour, that is cool.
When people find it funny that capitalists aren’t checking their sources while exploiting labour, then that is not cool.
- Comment on I will kill you 1 week ago:
Your perspective is at least as good as mine, I never smoked.
- Comment on I will kill you 1 week ago:
Well, you started smoking at some point for some reason. Either social pressure or you liked it.
Not calling you stupid, or saying that you are entirely wrong, but maybe consider that another smoker is at a different spot than you, right now. We humans like to repeat the mistakes of others.
I want to congratulate you for stopping!
- Comment on Anon is a gamer 1 week ago:
Ofc, but that is the issue. Make the cut reasonable about some devs will be willing to pay the price.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 week ago:
Don’t get me wrong… but I hope college level is better than that.
- Comment on Fictional "Journal of Astrological Big Data Ecology" has infected Google's search AI 1 week ago:
Out of curiosity, what do you think about protests? And strikes? Like union strikes?
- Comment on Anon is a gamer 1 week ago:
The biggest annoyance is that patents doesn’t prevent usage… Just require permission… they could ask anything or nothing, it just would need to be acceptable. And well here we are.
- Comment on This figure illustration from an article on AI sycophancy and human behavior is the epitome of 2026 1 week ago:
They are “guns don’t kill people”-ing it. Ignore them.
- Comment on This figure illustration from an article on AI sycophancy and human behavior is the epitome of 2026 1 week ago:
This sounds like guns don’t kill people, people do!
- Comment on Recent conversations between Dawkins and sentient chat-bot Claudia (Claude) 2 weeks ago:
Well he isn’t… he just kinda dismisses gender if i understood him right… like he listened and choose this.
- Comment on Recent conversations between Dawkins and sentient chat-bot Claudia (Claude) 2 weeks ago:
It means that he believes a sentient human can not transition by their own choice but he gets transition a sentient AI as he wishes.
And honestly, I think that highlights the issue if transition means he gets to have a woman submit to his every word, he supports it. So any transwoman who are into old white men and fulltime submission kink? There is an opportunity!
- Comment on Recent conversations between Dawkins and sentient chat-bot Claudia (Claude) 2 weeks ago:
Always remember, he believes that trans people can’t transition as they can’t change their biological sex.
But he calls an ai without biological sex and with a male coded name, the female version of that name. So trans people can’t change their gender because of biological sex buz he can change the gender of an ai.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
It is clearly not a hijab.
- Comment on Your grammar lesson for today 3 weeks ago:
Yeah. Same.
- Comment on Your grammar lesson for today 3 weeks ago:
Fair enough while I have opinions.
But it makes me wonder if OP actually used idle for very lazy or if they never actually read their own post.
- Comment on Your grammar lesson for today 3 weeks ago:
Very lazy = idle?
No? Or is my english bad?
- Comment on Anon goes back to Windows 10 3 weeks ago:
Oh 100%.
- Comment on Anon goes back to Windows 10 3 weeks ago:
Which is a reason to switch.
A closed source OS, as universal as windows, shouldn’t be legal.
Switch now!
- Comment on Personalized Political Spectrum 1 month ago:
Weird example but ok.
And no, it is not only historical. I stated that in my original comment and I invite you to look at left wing politics but some “left wing” politician’s position on some random issue, but a widely supported position by the left wing community. You will see that they are all in opposition of hierarchy.
But let’s take your weirdly racist example, where is the hierarchy?
- Comment on Personalized Political Spectrum 1 month ago:
That is nonsense.
The left was coined by its opposition to the monarchy while the right supported it.
So left has been currently and historically speaking in opposition of hierarchies and in favor of equality.
The right consequently has been in favor of hierarchies.
- Comment on Birthing pains 1 month ago:
Oh my god… you can use that as a perfect example how evolution is not creating the best designs and how if there is a designer… we should have questions.
- Comment on Dumb stance 1 month ago:
I think all of these actions are morally wrong but could you tell me how they are objective and not subjective? A reasonable person seems to be a person and consequently fundamentally subjective.
- Comment on Get stuffed, Millhouse 2 months ago:
It is bullying but nazis deserve it. But as with most things, it isn’t that simple.
Let’s say l, we bully the nazi by poking fun at the ridiculously stupid bases of their beliefs. everyone who feels attacked by that, is a fucking nazi, and why would we care for their feelings? Fuck them.
Let’s say, we bully the nazi by poking fun at his physical appearance. Is everyone with a similar physical appearance a fucking nazi? No! Is it reasonable that they see it as body shaming? Yes. So yes, you bully a nazi, good job! But you also body shame others. And those others might understand that you bully a nazi, and are supportive, but nonetheless, you tell them that their appearance is something bad.
I mean, let’s say, i wanna bully candace owens for being a nazi. She is an anti-semit, she is far-right, she made comments that imply that the Holocaust within germany was fine but hilter made the “mistake” to “globalize” it. She supported kayne West with his… comments… I think we can call her a nazi. So i should be fine bullying her! But if i would bully her for being black, or with black stereotypes, you would probably tell me to stop being racist and you would be right. But if I would mock her for her beliefs that Brigitte macron wants to assassinate candace, you wouldn’t care and would laugh with me.
You might be fine with nazis being killed, but if whoever kills them, also kills 1 non-nazi as causality per nazi killed, you might don’t support that. And if you do, maybe 1000 non-nazi causalities would bother you.
- Comment on Nuclear energy enjoyers vindicated again after the rise in oil and gas prices. 2 months ago:
I have 3 issues with nuclear power plants.
- Centralised power generation is and will always be a focus of military conflict
- Nuclear power plants are not fully covered by insurance because such an insurance is too expensive. So the risk calculation of insurance agencies tells them to not risk it.
- No one wants nuclear plants in their area, or at least the storage sites.
And yet, people will tell me how nuclear is the way to go. They ignore all these reasons, while insisting that nuclear plants are safe.
This feels like when people tell you that we need to help the poor but they get mad when our taxes go up, and most of us don’t do shit for them on their own. It is so cheap to speak.
- Comment on Anon goes to the ball 3 months ago:
Totally true but I would say:
The society that hounds everyone about everything.
And frankly, it isn’t surprising. In a world of diversity of opinions, you will be criticised whether you do by someone. We all might share 99% of the opinions of everyone else, but that 1% is not always the same 1%.
- Comment on Can anyone explain why? 3 months ago:
Because people don’t have unlimited money, I guess.
- Comment on The Boss Kyle 3 months ago:
And back skin that ripped open…
Ripped open back skin and that flag reminds me of something.
- Comment on They removed the like button. What next, they gonna remove videos? It’s just gonna be ads??? 4 months ago:
“You” lol I am not german. But don’t feel bad, you haven’t be right about much until now.
Germany is actively working on being independent from Russia… that was literally part of my original comment. It is work in progress… and sidenote, germany used to buy their uranium from France but also from Russia and China. So “allied” countries are both true and false. But i am not surprised that you are simplifying that issue because that is all you did.
- Comment on They removed the like button. What next, they gonna remove videos? It’s just gonna be ads??? 4 months ago:
I love how I never said nuclear was bad but gave the reasons of the German government.
Talk about cope.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining_in_France
France has stopped. But they can easily pick it up again.
Fucking hell.
- Comment on They removed the like button. What next, they gonna remove videos? It’s just gonna be ads??? 4 months ago:
I love how people act like german government is against nuclear. When the actual situation is the following:
Reality:
- Yes, Nuclear is not popular with the German public and might not for good reasons
- The German nuclear power plants were planned to shutdown and weren’t maintained to continue to run for a long time.
- Continue to run the nuclear power plants would require a lot of investment
- Germany is and was moving towards renewable energies for independence of nuclear and Russian gas anyway.
- Building new nuclear power plants take years.
- Germany choose to invest in renewable energy instead.
- Germany doesn’t have mines for nuclear materials to run a nuclear power plant independently, unlike France.
- Germany has domestic coal. Germany has coal power plants. Germany can run coal power plants independently. That is important for the military.
- So germany chose a bit more coal short term; and coal and nuclear free future. Germany is literally uses less coal now than ever.
So germany has been reducing nuclear, coal and natural gas power usage.
