Tartas1995
@Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
- Comment on This world is cruel… 3 days ago:
That explains why there are so many of them. It is for the WAP.
- Comment on This world is cruel… 3 days ago:
“traveling” yikes.
That is one way to say, you think wealth is attractive.
I have traveled quite a bit and I like it a lot, but it is no hobby. For it to be a hobby, I would have to have a lot more money.
Once or even twice a year, is hardly a hobby.
- Comment on Git good, son 1 week ago:
Oh and that is fine but then you have to ask yourself if you want to have a partnership with bad sex. If not, break up, or “teach” by communicating what you want, what is good and what is bad. There is no alternative, accept bad sex, break up, teach.
(Technically, you could let them have sex outside of the partnership to study, but… Well, not my cup of tea)
- Comment on Withdrawal is going to make people go mad 1 week ago:
Which is why I am almost certain that there is a reason why they import raw sugar
- Comment on Withdrawal is going to make people go mad 1 week ago:
I understand your perspective but I want to ask a question, not to you, but for you to think about it. What motivation causes the imports?
If corn syrup is a replacement for whatever they are doing, why are they importing raw sugar? If raw sugar is cheaper than you would expect them to already use sugar for everything and not corn syrup, and switching to corn syrup would be an increase in cost . If raw sugar costs the same, import is additional paperwork, why import? Raw sugar is more expensive, why would they pay more?
Raw sugar can’t be replaced easily in their use case? Now that makes sense.
- Comment on Withdrawal is going to make people go mad 1 week ago:
No. That is the point.
- Comment on Withdrawal is going to make people go mad 1 week ago:
Based on what I find online, the us import about $2B in raw-sugar, while some (about 100M) is exported again.
Source: oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-product/…/usa
How much “processed” sugar leaves the us again? I am not sure. Maybe all of it.
- Comment on Withdrawal is going to make people go mad 1 week ago:
Sugar too. That ain’t healthy and is kinda fancy but… Can you see them losing their shit over sugar prices? I do.
Tomatoes imports were 2.5B in 2023.
Apparently the us imports 15% of it’s food supply.
- Comment on oh shit 1 month ago:
Being corrected on a German industry norm, how does that feel? A little ironic, maybe?
- Comment on Very thankful 1 month ago:
Also imagine paying a creator of the media that you consume and not a platform which scams an agency which scams the creator.
How horrible…
Honestly people are fucking weird. What is wrong with actually supporting the creator?
- Comment on i need an rv, and lab equipment, and a helper 2 months ago:
I want to help you understand the situation and why people say what they say. Then you can better judge the situation for yourself and make your own decisions.
Situation “your own house”: You want to buy a house but you don’t have the money because… Wtf is the housing market??? 100k for a cardboard box??? So you lent money from your bank to pay for the house. With interest, you pay maybe e.g. 70% more than what you lent. And it takes you 30 years to do so. You might lose your job and have to save a little extra to cover those times and maybe the bank let’s you miss a payment once. After 30 years, you have now a house that needs some repairs but you got more money in your wallet because you are done paying the bank. So you do some repairs and it cost you money, maybe you need a small loan again. Eventually, you are retired and you have less money but you don’t have to repair your house anymore. Sure, there are some issues but the heater will manage another 10 years. You don’t have to worry too much because you don’t have to maintain it after your death. You don’t need to save for a new roof in 5 years when you are 95yo. You can make the call that you don’t care.
So in other words, you pay a little less than 70% more than the value of the house and afterwards you paid for YOUR UTILITY. Every repair was between you and future you.
Situation “I rent to you”: I am buying the house and of course, I am lent the money as it is financially easier and in some places, gives me tax cuts. I buy a house and I too pay 70% interest on it. I need to get the money to pay for my loan. I am not a asshole but also not a saint. So what is pretty fair? Mhm… You, as my renter, pay my loan back! If i ask less, I am literally losing money. But wait, you might move out at any time and I need to pay my loan, so I am asking a little extra… Just in case. But then there are repairs and someone needs to pay for those, so maybe a little extra. Okay now, you are paying for everything! I am safe and sound. After 30 years, you paid back my loan and I own the place. I am getting old and I let my son take care of the business. He takes good care of the house and makes sure that all the repairs are done. He is earning so extra money too as well the loan is paid back. He is looking for a new house for all his children and a big nice garden. With his day job and your rent, his bank gives him a big amount of money that he spends on a beautiful house, he gets the house as he has the cash. You are getting older and you retire, but your rent is not going down. If you could have bought the house 50 years ago, it would have been yours, but it isn’t and you are paying the new loan of my son. The heater could use a replacement in the next 10 years but you really don’t have the money for that but it isn’t your decision, my son wants to rent out the house another 50years if possible. My son feels forced to look for a new renter as you don’t have the money to pay for the new loan and the repairs. He kicks you out. You are homeless. You pay off the loan and some of another loan but you are homeless.
Now that story wasn’t even about actively trying to make money but not wanting to take a risk for someone else.
Most landlords want to make some money.
- Comment on i need an rv, and lab equipment, and a helper 2 months ago:
Honestly I don’t get the OF hate in general. We all have watched porn and we probably liked at least some of what we have seen. What is wrong about earning a living with producing what other people want and like? And as I don’t think, we argue about people consuming porn but about paying for it, what the fuck is wrong with paying the content creator? Why do we prefer paying agencies with ad revenue while the agency effectively scams their talent? Why no ads but cash? Why agency and not talent?
- Comment on i need an rv, and lab equipment, and a helper 2 months ago:
Jealousy.
- Comment on President on President Violence 2 months ago:
I don’t know, I kinda like the implication that Nazis aren’t homo sapiens. And while being “homo” is certainly not bad, something tells me that Nazis wouldn’t enjoy being called a “Homo Nazi”.
- Comment on Facebook 2 months ago:
Facebook be like: “don’t worry! I will not print off your COMPUTER! it will be the printer muhahahahaa”
- Comment on Healthcare 2 months ago:
Honestly I don’t think anyone who is happy with their sex life is invested in how other people’s sex life is.
Looking at the homophobic crowd.
- Comment on Hah ha! Bye! *Gunshot* 2 months ago:
Great meme. Good protest.
- Comment on Grok do a good 2 months ago:
Musk’s PISS. I mean LLM or Ai.
PISS is the correct term though.
- Comment on No thanks. I'm good. 2 months ago:
I was told by a producer and seller, that they would keep the animal hostage for only a few months and would let them free afterwards.
What I heard, was “we force feed them coffee for a few months, let them free in a somewhat controlled environment and setup traps to catch them again and abuse them again for a few months”
I am not sure if I believe them about letting them free at all.
- Comment on Don't joke about daddy 3 months ago:
I don’t see the issue with people letting the outgroup do stuff that they wouldn’t let the ingroup do. It makes sense that you punish or lecture the ingroup about the negative effects of a behavior and it makes sense to surrender on here to educate the outgroup.
The people who joked about violence but are now against it, those people are funny.
- Comment on it stinks 3 months ago:
LLM? No, PISS, it is called
- Comment on Many such cases 3 months ago:
Like you said in your initial comment,
International money transfer But also I don’t want to give some random website my credit card
- Comment on Many such cases 3 months ago:
What first party solved the issue with PayPal? I literally want to see it burn but I don’t have an alternative.
- Comment on Breaking News! 3 months ago:
There are people called Sam and not Samantha. There are Matts that aren’t Matthews. There are Joes that aren’t Joseph.
Maybe don’t be a dick?
- Comment on How dare he 4 months ago:
Don’t know what idea I like more,
- He is doing the weirdest troll
- He is mistaken
- We are mistaken to think that he means Epstein and he is totally right and on the money.
I can’t choose
- Comment on Get in the Hilux 4 months ago:
That is the fun stuff. They don’t. That is the lie.
If the USA and EU decides that the rich has the pay taxes then where do the rich go? They go to XYZ country, you might think but they don’t. Their business is in the US and the EU and their wealth is. They can slowly move their business and wealth… But they can’t move their market, which is where? USA and EU.
Also e.g. The old money in Germany will never leave Germany. Due to privacy laws and the safety that they live in, they remember the RAF and they are thankful for the privacy and safety.
It is a lie that they tell you. They don’t leave.
- Comment on President 360 No Scope... 4 months ago:
If it is an official act, which would mean they would have to assassinate you in their function of being the president. In other words, they couldn’t just kill their neighbors.
They could probably kill them as part of a celebration, I guess. Jk, I hope.
- Comment on Stay Mad 4 months ago:
Who said that? No one said that refusing to vote is doing more damage than storming the Capitol.
You quoted it. Weird starting point to gaslight people.
- Comment on App development 4 months ago:
I like that you asked. While I don’t hold a strong opinion on it, I think you could argue that it is about consent.
I will argue more strongly than I feel because I think it helps to understand the point. (Assuming the person wearing makeup is a woman)
If you don’t know the woman, why do you care if she wears makeup and how she looks without? It seems like there isn’t a legitimate reason for it without it being a toxic reason, like “look! she isn’t prettier than me!” Vibe. Which is toxic for both people. Now it was a man who made the app. Now there is the hating of women for wearing makeup reasons but let’s ignore those. (Case: Unknown feelings of the woman)
If you know the woman and you don’t know how she looks without makeup, then that is clearly a decision made by the woman. Why do you have the right to expose her in a way that she doesn’t want to be. I mean some women don’t care if you see their tummies and others would rather die. Should you have the right to expose a woman’s tummy? (Case: Implied decision to not show herself like that)
If you know the woman and you want to argue that you have a justified interest in how she looks without makeup because she is a potential Partner (if she is a partner, you probably know already anyway). You could easily argue that you have the same legitimate reason to watch to see her naked but obviously you wouldn’t think that it is a legitimate reason.
In other words, you shouldn’t care and it is kinda toxic to care; you don’t have consent to see them like it otherwise you would; you have no right to know.
- Comment on Uncle Dad voted for him right before he went to get the meth from Aunt Grandma! 5 months ago:
You think that is an argument? That is not an argument. It is mocking people. You should know the concept of mocking, considering your name.