FAIL
yyyy-mm-dd
Submitted 2 weeks ago by PopcornPrincess@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5ab2dd41-bf06-4a03-8c7e-dd3ac3c57563.jpeg
FAIL
yyyy-mm-dd
ISO 8601!
Long live the 8601
my beloved
Bear in mind that
YY-MM-DD or YYMMDD -YY-MM or -YYMM --MM-DD or --MMDD --MM ---DD
are all valid 8601
Yep. Doing that joke and landing on anything but ISO-8601 would be a huge red flag for me.
Being able to sort numerically and have it also be in chronological order is sooo cool.
Lithuania, Hungary, Japan represent
Tik gryžtu ir randu Lietuva.
yep… this or dd.mm.yyyy (for texts)
Based
This is the answer. So easy to sort.
YYYY-MM-DD
Yep and it needs to use hyphens and not slashes. It helps avoid missed typos or mis-reads in some situations, especially if hand-written.
There are also variants with single dots too. I sometimes do timestamps without any separator too, depending on the context (such as file backups): YYYYMMDD in example 20260805.
ISO 8601 my beloved
I read this meme and was physically revolted and wanted to immediately down vote. Great job.
The superior date format is, of course, ISO 8601. YYYY-MM-DD.
RFC3339 is better than ISO8601 since it doesn’t allow some of the esoteric formats, and allows some useful formats that ISO8601 doesn’t (like separating date and time by a space instead of by T)
yyyy/mm/dd, it’s less ambiguous and it sorts nicely
nerd detected
Beat me to it, except I’d do yyyy-mm-dd because some OSes throw fits about having slashes in file names. Way better than the “Group Project-final FINAL v3 PAUL USE THIS ONE.file” versioning system that people seem to use.
HISSSSSS.
switch the slashes to dashes
[Angry ISO-8601 noises]
I should turn your comment into a shitpost…
Ew.
yyyymmdd
Tis the Canadian way.
ISO 8601 or gtfo
I feel like DD/MM/YYYY is the same as doing: ss:mm:HH and I find that confusing.
That’s really funny. DMY is more like Hms in that it is in descending order of relevance. Most people asking the date or time are looking for the hour of the day or the day of the month, and the rest is context.
I see the duality in this but I still think both are valid. When telling the time, there’s usually no point in including the seconds since they’ll have changed before you finish saying the whole thing anyway. In spoken word IMO it makes sense to go from more specific to less specific, and even not include extra parts sometimes (e. g. “today is the 3rd” when it’s expected to know the month and, well, year from context, or “it’s half past” to someone whom you’ve told the time a couple of minutes ago).
The point is the order of importance, i am gonna need to know day and month we are in way more often than the year, i also want to know more often the hours and the minutes than the seconds, the seconds change way too often to be useful in most scenarios
ITT: people saying one thing is better than any other without thinking of context.
If I want to know today’s date ISO 8601 isn’t a good answer. And if I put stuff in folders by date then DD-MM-YYYY is a real bad way to do it.
But MM-DD-YYYY is the worst one no matter the context.
I like YYYY-MM-DD because then I don’t have to figure out half the time if they used MM-DD-YYYY or if they were sane.
If I want to know today’s date ISO 8601 isn’t a good answer
Can be tailed to the relevant bit though.
The one you grew up with tends to be your preference. But the usual reason I give for MM-DD-YYYY is it matches how it’s said.
December 25th, 2026
12-25-2026
I also know there’s no point in arguing about this because, again, my first sentence. It’s just team sports stuff, as usual. The only reason why you would bother to argue is if you were trying to convince people to use a standard. But as you pointed out, ISO 8601 already exists. That is the agreed upon standard already. But no one uses it, since we have our preferred systems of date format already ingrained.
I became an evangelist for YYYY-MM-DD format once I had to deal with a legal battle that had multiple years of documentary evidence. I sorely regretted my choice of naming files when I had to wade through a heckton of upsetting reminders. It got a lot easier when I renamed everything according to YYYY-MM-DD (and the lawyers probably appreciated it too)
YYYYMMDDHHMMSS
Anyone who wants to write the millennium between the month and century loses all credibility when arguing about date formats.
YYYY-MM-DD is the only coherent date format.
Months are stupid anyway, lets drop them and swap for what they were supposed to represent instead: the moon phase, so today would be 216-2026-Waning Gibbous
The one that ends us with f… I mean ISO 8601 of course
I proper shit post would have suggested “mm/dd/yyyy”.
ISO 8601 (yyyy-mm-dd) for storing dates in software. Any format that that goes in the order of day, month, and year for conversational/presentational purposes, preferable the format is dynamic depending on the user’s locale (even for those that want the month first). There now everyone is happy.
I’m a YYYY/MM/DD man myself
I prefer ddd/yyyy, much simpler
1785793853 seconds since Linux epoch
Y-DDD-MM
It is currently 6-004-08
other formats are confusing
Good luck sorting anything by date!
We grew up on MM/DD/YYYY but all our computer stuff is YYYY/MM/DD however now that we live in EU we use DD/MM/YYYY and still YYYY/MM/DD for files in pc
April 25th.
We’ve already established this.
Because it’s not too hot and not too cold. All you need is a light jacket.
Why? dd/mm/yyyy isnt practical. If you are asking someone to check out part of a book, you wouldn’t say “paragraph 4, chapter 3”, you start broad and become more specific. Calendars, at least in the US, are organized by month. You have turn turn to the month page before finding the date, it makes more sense to say month first because its the first piece of information that you need (unless its a more rare case that you are talking about an event in another year).
Im sure programmers prefer something different, but humans shouldn’t have to communicate differently to make computing easier. Computing exists to make human life easier, not the other way around.
Apparently im a freak who is MM/DD/YEAR.
ISO datetime, let’s goooooo YYYYMMDDHHmmSS
For organizing my stuff I use yyyy/mm/dd because in my opinion it’s much better. Otherwise dd/mm/yyyy.
4/Aug/2026
Already saw 1 person write 4/7/26. Writing that 3-4 letters for the month both solves the day/month vs month/day issue, and the off chance someone makes mistake of the month number
DD(First 3 of Month, All Caps)YYYY examples: 01JAN2026, 24MAR1987,20DEC3065
This is how I had to write dates when I worked for a cGMP pharma manufacturing facility and did controlled paperwork. The idea was it was it was impossible for any mistakes when reading the date, only the days were 2 digits, the month was letters, and the year was 4 digits.
Basically all of the validated SOPs were written so that anyone could pick up the paperwork and execute the instructions, and the inverse had to be true as well anyone picking up a completed SOP should be able to read and follow everything written down, and literally every step in the process required initials and date it was executed.
Fun fact, if you fucked up and wrote something wrong or illegibly you were punished twice, once because you had to strike out the mistake, initial date the strikeout and write correctly the next time, and the second was when you get stink eyed by the QA people who have to review all the paperwork before it’s scanned and logged back into documentum.
red_tomato@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
ISO 8601
7EP6vuI@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
ISO 8601
jlow@slrpnk.net 2 weeks ago
👆
GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 weeks ago
RFC 3339 FTW!
Open source, and no ambiguous options grandfathered in.
plasma8726@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
This is the only way to date.
Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
No need for dashes
bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I’ve recently noticed web forms and appointment emails start to use that format. Maybe web devs are sneaking it in bit by bit.
Nonononoki@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Are a lots of things gonna break in about 8000 years?
CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
ISO week date
merc@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
As for why it’s better:
Rothe@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
ISO is better for archiving and sorting, inarguably so. But dd-mm-yyyy is better for day to day daily life usage, where the day and month are much more important than the year.
Both have their uses, but for different situations. mm-dd-yyyy is just batshit though.
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
To be fair, the time separators don’t behave well on all implementations of filesystem access by filename. Need to use underscores or omit them at times.
TootSweet@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
This is the way.
davidagain@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
This is the way.
mkwt@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
ISO would be great, but sadly OmegaStar doesn’t support ISO timestamps yet.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Wtf is an omega star?
bss03@infosec.pub 2 weeks ago
“While Galactus has omniscient knowledge of all current user data providers, it doesn’t have future sight”
Just use EKS to deliver the feature this quarter, and block the OmegaStar migration on “the team gets their shit together” and supports ISO timestamps.
trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
RFC 3339
BigDiction@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s great, and standard for software. But do any of y’all communicate dates like this in your personal life?
Like “want to go to a hockey game with me 2026-10-17?” Like as cursed as mm-dd-yy is, it feels a lot more natural in conversation.
dantel@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
Say when is that independence day of yours?
There is nothing ‘natural’ about mm/dd/yy, it is just what you are used to - end of story.
Quokka@quokk.au 2 weeks ago
dd-mm feels completely natural to say in conversation. “Do you want to go to a X with me on the 3rd of August”
bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I absolutely full out dates in iso 8601 any time I’m required to sign a form.
lena@gregtech.eu 2 weeks ago
Yes (I’m insane)
laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
Yes, kind of.
I shorthand it verbally unless I’m giving a full date, but typed, it’s almost always yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss (whichever part of that is relevant).
I do this because I believe it’s the most logical, it sorts properly without having to use a datetime library, and it can’t be confused with another system (is 12-1-2026 in the future or the past? No way to know just by looking at it).
Just shortening it to MM-dd could cause confusion with anyone not in the US so I’ll typically include the year as well (also useful if I wind up having to look at old notes or emails to not have to figure out the year I meant … Which has happened more than once …)
lividweasel@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Only a truly insane person would use mm-dd-yy in conversation. “Want to go to a hockey game with me ten seventeen twenty-six?” Or worse, “…oh four oh seven twenty-seven.” Pure madness.
Conversationally, mmm d yy or d mmm yy (usually just shortened to mmm d or d mmm) is where it’s at.
Dookieman12@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
There’s no reason the two need to be the same. We don’t talk in heximal either
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I spell out the month, but I’m fancy
mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
yes, I’ll send dates as mm-dd in my personal life as well. only when discussing exact dates for scheduling things, otherwise in conversational messaging it’s mmmm dd
like if we’re talking about when we want to go do x activity, I’ll propose August 8th. but if we’re scheduling trip dates, it’s 08-08 through 09-12
trainsrkool@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
💯
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Except I can’t get behind the time part of it, personally. I can see the point of doing GMT with the offset if you’re working across multiple timezones, but it’s overkill for situations where you aren’t.
Dookieman12@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
There’s no way to predict how a date will be used. No reason not to be flexible. No reason to break convention.
Eq0@literature.cafe 2 weeks ago
That’s how my brother missed a train: the linux planner used GMT while the local train company planner used assumed local time…
CannedYeet@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Yeah, the time part should obviously be written in Swatch Internet Time, he writes at @910.
laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
How so, out of curiosity?
Serinus@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Not shit enough for a shitpost.