chuckleslord
@chuckleslord@lemmy.world
- Comment on It's the most wonderful time of the year! 6 days ago:
Man, remember when nazi was experiencing semantic drift to encompass extreme nitpickers and hardasses because it just wasn’t being used enough? Damn, we didn’t know we even had it good, now that the fucking nazis are back to take the term back to its roots.
- Comment on Do creatives maintain relevance because lay people can't edit AI generated works? 1 week ago:
AI looks like bland shit. Anyone drawing something by hand gets infinity more points that the slop machine.
- Comment on I regret to inform you all that I will not be purchasing the OoT remake. 1 week ago:
That’s not a remake, it’s a reboot. They’re starting from near the beginning of the timeline again, but it’s not the same story or same company. I’m genuinely excited from gameplay trailers.
- Comment on Anon has a nephew 1 week ago:
For any one curious, this is an example of spamming links that seem related to what you’re saying as a way to make your argument seem more rigorous. None of those links talk about what this poster is saying, just their URLs look like they might.
- Comment on Anon has a nephew 1 week ago:
Nah, it’s important for everyone to have experience taking the lead and the risk for doing so is much lower when you’re younger. It’s the best time to train that skill set.
Your apprehension to the concept is one of the reasons most leaders are selfish dicks, since those were the only people who wanted to practice being a leader growing up (cause they like the power of it)
- Comment on Getting a little bit of sweet revenge 2 weeks ago:
Lights on above the regular dispenser, so the number isn’t displayed because it’s not the fuel being currently pumped.
- Comment on WHAT? 2 weeks ago:
Multiple?! Nicodemus will hear of your hoarding
- Comment on Trump blasts CNN's Kaitlan Collins, media outlets over UN coverage: 'SLEAZEBAGS' 2 weeks ago:
Blasts and slams are both tired and boring. Time to bring ‘detonates’ to its time in the spotlight.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
You’ve already made it pretty clear that you find the idea repugnant, so what’s the point in asking? You want to moral grandstand that you’re better than those people?
- Comment on WHAT? 2 weeks ago:
You don’t know how fae work if you’re applying logic to their shit like that. The ancients said the truce is ended. There’s probably some rules lawyer bullshit that the courts are pulling to assert that the sea has already overwhelmed the land. Probably some climate change shit (sea levels will raise to this level now, and ‘the land’ actually refers to a court appointed spot off the coast of Ireland, which will be under water within the century. Since it’s a done deal at this point, with no way to reverse course fast enough, the deal no longer holds)
Point being… the truce is over. Buckle up, buttercup.
- Comment on Classic error 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on You can't advertise that on a train! 3 weeks ago:
“Penis”
- Comment on Andy Burnham: UK must fully commit to reaching net zero by 2050 3 weeks ago:
Kick the can, but pretend that you’re doing stuff instead. Woohoo?
- Comment on You have to stop doing this. 3 weeks ago:
- Comment on the lesson here is you tried your best 3 weeks ago:
Yes! Is this a thing?!
- Comment on the lesson here is you tried your best 3 weeks ago:
This is why my couch broke after less than 6 months. There were, like, a hundred staples definitely not in the right place.
- Comment on Republicans after seeing Hasan Piker's meat on the jumbotron 3 weeks ago:
No, the RNC blurred it.
- Comment on So sensible 3 weeks ago:
That’s why we created an AI of Edward Teller to revive Project Sundial. We’ve already collected enough nuclear material from
Israelour enthusiastic business partners and plan to complete the bomb within the next few months. If AI fails to kill humanity within the decade, we’ll make sure no one knows that. That’s theAnthropocideAnthropic way! - Comment on That's the worst possible view for a hotel 3 weeks ago:
Here’s the real question. Why are they touching the beds without checking them for bugs first?! Seeing the horrors one time was enough to never, ever touch soft surfaces in a hotel until they’re all thoroughly checked.
- Comment on Exclusive: 3 Lindsay Clancy jurors speak out on holdout, prosecution, defense and more 4 weeks ago:
Yep. It sucks, but jurors are allowed to do that. Jury nullification comes from this same type of exercise.
- Comment on Anvil falling from sky 4 weeks ago:
- Comment on I'm right and the other vegans are wrong 4 weeks ago:
The comment you edited
I have to be done with this conversation because we are on different wavelengths and you’re stepping on all of my buttons and I can’t not show that that’s bothering me.
I have ASD. That is a reason, not an excuse, for the confusion. I genuinely cannot read your first question as anything but bad faith framing that pits the morality of conservation against veganism, like they’re at odds with each other. I was trying to be as kind as I could in my first response, but when you responded like I was refusing to answer when I thought I was I started to lose the plot.
- Comment on I'm right and the other vegans are wrong 4 weeks ago:
Why is kangaroo meat not vegan, even though the animal was killed to preserve the remaining population? Cause the animal did not consent to being killed, it did not want to be killed, and killing it caused it pain.
Could a vegan internalize your logic and therefore consume kangaroo meat? Yeah. Does that make kangaroo meat vegan? Not even close. Hell, the usual loophole meat of oysters aren’t vegan even though lots of vegans eat them.
Veganism isn’t a religion, and each person lives it differently as a result. Like your assertion that veganism is or should be about the consequences isn’t even a factor for everyone. Some people are vegan cause eating dead things is creepy and stealing food from babies feels wrong, and that’s a perfectly legitimate reason to be vegan.
Also, you edited a previous comment to suggest that you only care about this for non-vegans. In which case, why do you care if it’s vegan or not? Why do you care if vegans care or not if omnis eat it?
Also, I jumped to conclusions because I thought I was answering what you asked, but apparently I wasn’t so I needed to guess at a different interpretation of your question since you didn’t actually clarify what you meant, just accused me multiple times of not reading what you said.
- Comment on I'm right and the other vegans are wrong 4 weeks ago:
The bees don’t want you to take their honey. They don’t make excess, they make what they need and we steal it and replace it with stuff that’s “just as good” according to us. Bees die in the process of harvesting honey.
These are reasons that honey isn’t vegan.
- Comment on I'm right and the other vegans are wrong 4 weeks ago:
I’m confused. Are you asking if killing kangaroos because they have no natural predators could be considered vegan? Yeah, probably. Are you asking what the point of veganism is since you’ve randomly decided it isn’t a coherent philosophy based on your own strawman? I can’t answer that question, it’s not based in reality. I mean, I could ask how you can talk with all that rebar in your mouth, but since you don’t have rebar in your mouth, the question doesn’t make sense, does it?
I chose to clarify that eating the kangaroo is the non-vegan act here, not culling the population, since you’ve somehow decided that eating an animal and killing them are somehow synonymous. I hope it’s obvious that they aren’t.
- Comment on I'm right and the other vegans are wrong 4 weeks ago:
Notice how your entire argument for ethical behavior applies to controlling the population rather than eating the animals after? The step of eating the animal is the not vegan act.
Control the population, leave the remains in the ecosystem it belongs to.
- Comment on I'm right and the other vegans are wrong 4 weeks ago:
No. An animal died for it, it isn’t vegan. Simple as.
- Comment on False advertising 4 weeks ago:
Literally nothing was added to this by using ai to make the person fat. Accelerating the burning of the world cause you don’t trust your joke to work unless you make the guy fat. Pathetic, man.
- Comment on Nice Going Buddy 5 weeks ago:
Sikh already got this one on lock.
- Comment on Nice Going Buddy 5 weeks ago:
My variant is “any god who requires me to suck his cock to get to the good place is a giant dick, undeserving of praise nor respect. Any god I’d bother to worship wouldn’t care if I did or not”