chuckleslord
@chuckleslord@lemmy.world
- Comment on mfw shitposting 2 days ago:
no American influence
Well, yes and no. Hitler did love all the racism we were so good at, so he did copy our notes pretty extensively. But yes, no American exceptionalism was exported for this crime against humanity, just imported.
- Comment on Why does the microwave button have a "popcorn" button when every microwave popcorn brand says "DO NOT USE THE POPCORN BUTTON"? 3 days ago:
Nope, that’s not the case. It’s for bag popcorn. The technology connections video talks about it
- Comment on These gas station pills are getting sketchier 4 days ago:
Yep, saw a video of one that was Viagra and Cialis together (which shouldn’t ever be taken together)
- Comment on Any form 4 days ago:
Green potatoes
- Comment on Anon thinks she's exaggerating 5 days ago:
You mean Rick Castle (he’s really rugged and handsome)
- Comment on More smart planning by your local government 1 week ago:
Yeah, like corpos do any better. Fuck off with this shit
- Comment on literally 1984 2 weeks ago:
Oof, ouch, my bones
- Comment on It's the most wonderful time of the year! 3 weeks ago:
Man, remember when nazi was experiencing semantic drift to encompass extreme nitpickers and hardasses because it just wasn’t being used enough? Damn, we didn’t know we even had it good, now that the fucking nazis are back to take the term back to its roots.
- Comment on Do creatives maintain relevance because lay people can't edit AI generated works? 4 weeks ago:
AI looks like bland shit. Anyone drawing something by hand gets infinity more points that the slop machine.
- Comment on I regret to inform you all that I will not be purchasing the OoT remake. 4 weeks ago:
That’s not a remake, it’s a reboot. They’re starting from near the beginning of the timeline again, but it’s not the same story or same company. I’m genuinely excited from gameplay trailers.
- Comment on Anon has a nephew 4 weeks ago:
For any one curious, this is an example of spamming links that seem related to what you’re saying as a way to make your argument seem more rigorous. None of those links talk about what this poster is saying, just their URLs look like they might.
- Comment on Anon has a nephew 4 weeks ago:
Nah, it’s important for everyone to have experience taking the lead and the risk for doing so is much lower when you’re younger. It’s the best time to train that skill set.
Your apprehension to the concept is one of the reasons most leaders are selfish dicks, since those were the only people who wanted to practice being a leader growing up (cause they like the power of it)
- Comment on Getting a little bit of sweet revenge 5 weeks ago:
Lights on above the regular dispenser, so the number isn’t displayed because it’s not the fuel being currently pumped.
- Comment on WHAT? 5 weeks ago:
Multiple?! Nicodemus will hear of your hoarding
- Comment on Trump blasts CNN's Kaitlan Collins, media outlets over UN coverage: 'SLEAZEBAGS' 5 weeks ago:
Blasts and slams are both tired and boring. Time to bring ‘detonates’ to its time in the spotlight.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
You’ve already made it pretty clear that you find the idea repugnant, so what’s the point in asking? You want to moral grandstand that you’re better than those people?
- Comment on WHAT? 5 weeks ago:
You don’t know how fae work if you’re applying logic to their shit like that. The ancients said the truce is ended. There’s probably some rules lawyer bullshit that the courts are pulling to assert that the sea has already overwhelmed the land. Probably some climate change shit (sea levels will raise to this level now, and ‘the land’ actually refers to a court appointed spot off the coast of Ireland, which will be under water within the century. Since it’s a done deal at this point, with no way to reverse course fast enough, the deal no longer holds)
Point being… the truce is over. Buckle up, buttercup.
- Comment on Classic error 5 weeks ago:
- Comment on You can't advertise that on a train! 1 month ago:
“Penis”
- Comment on Andy Burnham: UK must fully commit to reaching net zero by 2050 1 month ago:
Kick the can, but pretend that you’re doing stuff instead. Woohoo?
- Comment on You have to stop doing this. 1 month ago:
- Comment on the lesson here is you tried your best 1 month ago:
Yes! Is this a thing?!
- Comment on the lesson here is you tried your best 1 month ago:
This is why my couch broke after less than 6 months. There were, like, a hundred staples definitely not in the right place.
- Comment on Republicans after seeing Hasan Piker's meat on the jumbotron 1 month ago:
No, the RNC blurred it.
- Comment on So sensible 1 month ago:
That’s why we created an AI of Edward Teller to revive Project Sundial. We’ve already collected enough nuclear material from
Israelour enthusiastic business partners and plan to complete the bomb within the next few months. If AI fails to kill humanity within the decade, we’ll make sure no one knows that. That’s theAnthropocideAnthropic way! - Comment on That's the worst possible view for a hotel 1 month ago:
Here’s the real question. Why are they touching the beds without checking them for bugs first?! Seeing the horrors one time was enough to never, ever touch soft surfaces in a hotel until they’re all thoroughly checked.
- Comment on Exclusive: 3 Lindsay Clancy jurors speak out on holdout, prosecution, defense and more 1 month ago:
Yep. It sucks, but jurors are allowed to do that. Jury nullification comes from this same type of exercise.
- Comment on Anvil falling from sky 1 month ago:
- Comment on I'm right and the other vegans are wrong 1 month ago:
The comment you edited
I have to be done with this conversation because we are on different wavelengths and you’re stepping on all of my buttons and I can’t not show that that’s bothering me.
I have ASD. That is a reason, not an excuse, for the confusion. I genuinely cannot read your first question as anything but bad faith framing that pits the morality of conservation against veganism, like they’re at odds with each other. I was trying to be as kind as I could in my first response, but when you responded like I was refusing to answer when I thought I was I started to lose the plot.
- Comment on I'm right and the other vegans are wrong 1 month ago:
Why is kangaroo meat not vegan, even though the animal was killed to preserve the remaining population? Cause the animal did not consent to being killed, it did not want to be killed, and killing it caused it pain.
Could a vegan internalize your logic and therefore consume kangaroo meat? Yeah. Does that make kangaroo meat vegan? Not even close. Hell, the usual loophole meat of oysters aren’t vegan even though lots of vegans eat them.
Veganism isn’t a religion, and each person lives it differently as a result. Like your assertion that veganism is or should be about the consequences isn’t even a factor for everyone. Some people are vegan cause eating dead things is creepy and stealing food from babies feels wrong, and that’s a perfectly legitimate reason to be vegan.
Also, you edited a previous comment to suggest that you only care about this for non-vegans. In which case, why do you care if it’s vegan or not? Why do you care if vegans care or not if omnis eat it?
Also, I jumped to conclusions because I thought I was answering what you asked, but apparently I wasn’t so I needed to guess at a different interpretation of your question since you didn’t actually clarify what you meant, just accused me multiple times of not reading what you said.