captainlezbian
@captainlezbian@lemmy.world
- Comment on my own personal Chatgpt 14 hours ago:
Yeah you gotta use usb b, it’s the one that fits into your ear
- Comment on Loosing my religion 15 hours ago:
Dammit you’re making me kinda want to try larping
- Comment on Loosing my religion 15 hours ago:
“I really like you, but you and your family are religiously insane so I think we should see other people. I’m gonna try to see someone with a grip on reality, and you should try to see a professional”
- Comment on Every summer 2 days ago:
Idk new jersey kinda slaps
- Comment on Kentucky pastor defends viral video showing mock firing squad, who call themselves Commandos for Christ, enter the chapel to apparently “shoot the devil.” in front of children during bible school 2 days ago:
Jesus did not say any of that…
- Comment on Anon comes up with a dating strategy 3 days ago:
Yeah stupid high standards also aren’t what I’m advocating for. I may not be an expert, but I’m happily married.
Being with someone with similar goals to you is important. Going in expecting your partner to have figured everything out is important. But also important is being ok with where they are.
If you go into a relationship with someone who’s fat you need to be ok with the reality that they might never become skinny, even if they want to (but also it’s a lot of work and plenty of people are ok with their body as is).
I’d never enter a financially tied relationship with a spendthrift, it would stress me the hell out and I’d rather be single. But a partner who struggles with depression, adhd, and other mental issues that can get in the way of life? Yeah I can live with that, though it’s important that she not be resigned to it and that she keep trying to deal with it. A partner who isn’t as in shape as I prefer to be? Yeah I can live with that, I’d prefer if she be interested in and capable of long walks and going on bike rides, but if not that’s ok.
Plenty of chronically single people have too high standards, but getting a fixer upper isn’t a happy sustainable solution, figuring out your actual priorities and becoming the sort of person who’s attractive to the people who match those priorities is. Or don’t, I already got mine.
- Comment on Anon comes up with a dating strategy 3 days ago:
Yes, but if you’re dating someone because of who you can change them into you’re setting yourself up for disappointment.
- Comment on Anon comes up with a dating strategy 3 days ago:
Yeah he’s dating Anahita. I’d brag if I could pull her too.
- Comment on Anon comes up with a dating strategy 3 days ago:
Sounds like a lot of work. I just date women I find attractive regardless of size and encourage them to live a lifestyle that makes them happy. If a hot chick that’s into me is fat I’m just going to be happy a hot chick is into me.
- Comment on Help 3 days ago:
Good name for a disgusting shithole (Dixie is a nickname for southern part of America that fought a war to maintain slavery)
- Comment on Help 3 days ago:
Same in the Midwestern US
- Comment on it's true 3 days ago:
True my Domme does hear better than me
- Comment on Mighty fine 3 days ago:
“You’re a mighty fine oyster diver, always quick to find a gal’s pearl”
- Comment on Mighty fine 3 days ago:
Muff is a classic. But as a classy broad I’m quick to address mine as a cunt
- Comment on [deleted] 3 days ago:
Or maybe he’s just allergic to meth
- Comment on [deleted] 3 days ago:
I’d ask what the fuck, but my ex’s ex husband was basically that guy too lol
- Comment on Genius 3 days ago:
Oh it’s delightful, but I’d rather not have to worry about breaking it when I’m in a position where being careful is difficult.
- Comment on Genius 3 days ago:
My hips are too wide to comfortably fit in men’s pants without using the hell out of a belt
- Comment on Thoughts and prayers for them. 3 days ago:
Well clearly they wanted to be judged solely by the color of their skin
- Comment on It's that time again 4 days ago:
DC isn’t a state or in one. The original idea was that it wouldn’t be a meaningful permanent residence, but as the federal government grew it became a real major city with a lot of permanent residents.
They have 1 non voting representative, no presence in the senate, and starting in 1961 they’ve had 3 electoral votes for president.
Oh also in 1973 they were granted the right to elect a mayor and city council rather than being directly governed by the federal government. The federal government still has the constitutional power to overrule them and has done so several times.
DC wants statehood, and I generally support it (alongside Puerto Rican statehood), but for DC even just giving them a single senator, true home rule off federal land, voting representatives proportional to population, and the ability to gain electoral votes as population grows would be huge.
- Comment on It's that time again 4 days ago:
It’s on DC license plates
- Comment on Been about a week 4 days ago:
A more stable world is financially beneficial. Allies are strategically beneficial. The eradication and minimization of pests and disease are both.
- Comment on Yes, yes they are 5 days ago:
- Comment on Newsflash pal 5 days ago:
They’re using it in its chemistry meaning. In chemistry organic means a category of carbon based chemicals and reactions. Ironically that includes petrochemistry. This is a popular gotcha for a certain type of nerd.
But yes, organic farming is a different meaning of the word, and it derives from a movement to treat the farm as an organism.
- Comment on Newsflash pal 5 days ago:
It’s more that banana flavoring is a simple chemical (isoamyl acetate) that when tasted was kinda closer to bananas (and pears apparently) than anything else in their minds. Old bananas had more of it than modern ones, but it isn’t like it was ever a faithful recreation.
It’s similar to how some grapes taste more or less like methyl anthranilate, but the chemical itself really just distinctly tastes like artificial grape.
- Comment on America continues to fall behind the rest of the world 5 days ago:
They’ve also been attacking tricare and the va like it’s the nhs. (Aggressively, but without openly saying that’s what they’re doing)
- Comment on America continues to fall behind the rest of the world 5 days ago:
Even within free market logic free healthcare just makes sense. It enables people to more comfortably quit their job to start a business or take any better job. It also allows people more freedom to choose medical professionals based on their merits rather than on who their insurer says they can use.
- Comment on 6 days ago:
Also nobody who ever took steroids or testosterone supplements.
- Comment on 6 days ago:
You could also have a high tolerance for DHT, which is the metabolite of testosterone associated with hair loss.
In general though I think a lot of people focus very hard on the specific hormones, and typically they’ll do what they say on the tin in standard doses. But there are a lot of edge cases. Higher or lower sensitivities, general proclivities, etc.
Before transitioning most people would’ve suspected I had very high T. I had a deep voice at a young age, built muscle fast, full beard as a teenager, the whole shebang minus baldness (but I transitioned young so that could just be time). But nope, my levels were average. I also responded fairly strongly to estrogen.
What’s far more important than your numbers is if you’re getting healthy and acceptable effects from your hormone levels. There’s no need to mess with your levels unless there’s need to mess with your levels.
- Comment on Single player games 6 days ago:
Your family sounds fun lol