Clever strategy: barely legal means legal, and if they make it illegal, there will just be a new category that is now barely legal…which now is illegal!
It’s a blanket ban by induction.
Or they could fuck off and leave people be
UK pornography taskforce to propose banning ‘barely legal’ content after Channel 4 documentary airs
Submitted 3 weeks ago by G4Z@feddit.uk to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
Comments
synae@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks ago
ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
These barley legal ladies are finally 65
Dasus@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Aria@lemmygrad.ml 3 weeks ago
The article talks about eighteen year olds that were hired “because they look very young”, playing children characters, with costumes and makeup meant to make them look younger.
Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Barely barely legal
Alloi@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
im assuming the idea is that a failing economy wants to instill puritanical bullshit like this because they think that young men and women will want to fuck each other more now that they cant masturbate as easily. and thus will increase the birthrate, which over time will stimulate the economy by having more low born wagies and soldiers to support and defend a dying status quo.
by formally giving your ID and biometrics for access to porn, you set yourself up down the line for legal blackmail if you ever try to resist, or become a personality of resistance in any way.
the elites have done this for years to one another, now, they want to create a system of manipulation where regular, normal pornography can be used as a tool of manipulation on the masses.
“oh, you think we shouldnt support israel? well thats a ironic coming from a degenerate deviant pervert who likes oiled up big booty latinas and stacked furry futa hentai”
people are gonna crank hog whether you like it or not. we’ve been doin it since we evolved thumbs.
fight the good fight UK, never stop crankin’. get a vpn and download everything while you still can.
ladfrombrad@lemdro.id 3 weeks ago
get a vpn
I think it’s even more important to pipe up about i2p
If we’re making it more our own again, and harder for them to understand it we then as people regain our Internet.
They wanna play whack a mole with millions bring it on 😅
cannon_annon88@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
This is really interesting, but I guess I don’t fully understand it. Does this replace your ISP (like Comcast for example), or am I just reconfiguring my browser to access these sites and not send my traffic through the regular Internet?
MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
are there any downsides like speed and connectivity?
or has all that been worked out since it’s been around since 2002 (and apparently I’ve never heard of it like Tot, which has its own drawbacks)?
blobchoice@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Honestly that would seem like the most common sense idea that anyone would/could draw up from this, and for the most part I think this is what the gov is trying to do.
I think there’s an unstated side effect from the Online Safety Act which nobody seems to be talking about - using the new powers to effectively censor Palestinian protests online.
You can read about it some more: openrightsgroup.org/…/human-rights-defenders-rais…
I’ve genuinely never felt so depressed about voting in this government in my entire life. Actual gross dystopian bullshit.
G4Z@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Yeah, I voted for Jezza but I saw this coming. While I wanted the Tories out, I couldn’t bring myself to vote for red Tories to replace them.
This is exactly the same shit they were pulling back in the Blair days.
cRazi_man@europe.pub 3 weeks ago
Yet another ill concieved piece of legislation incoming, from a bunch of elderly people who don’t understand anything and are quick to moral panic.
Imagine the recruitment process for this taskforce. A bunch of people rushing to volunteer for this taskforce that requires watching all the source material for research purposes.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
A reminder this government is also drawing up proposals for reintroduction of blasphemy laws. They know where they can shove their crucifix.
Highstronaught@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Do you have a link, not that I don’t believe you, but I like to check before I tell other people
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
A man was just convicted and fined for burning a Koran, under a blasphemy law by another name.
bigmamoth@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
😂 Yeah must be because Christian and not Muslim specifically since their law on internet censorship forbid criticism against immigrations and the only persons convicted was for critics against Islam
Taalnazi@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Christian fundamentalism is a thing, just look at the USA and Kony.
Not that different from the Muslims you demonise. Just with a cross instead of a moon.
MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
But its legal…?
essell@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
That’s why they need to change the law. Duh
MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
ok soooo… then you’re like making the legal age 20 rather than 18? What next 20 years olds are now barely legal? So we would have to make 20 year olds illegal now right? Whats the REAL legal age??
tal@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
The Online Safety Act charged the regulator Ofcom with monitoring whether pornography sites are protecting UK viewers from encountering illegal material involving …extreme content, such as…necrophilia.
Back when he had started out in law school, the Honourable Judge Hodgkins had not expected to be spending the seniormost years of his career ruling on whether or not a lich queen should be considered dead by British legal standards.
SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
“Barely legal” = totally legal and ok
We need to end orginized religion and stop these sex obsessed freaks from censoring our society.
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
And another turn of the screw.
Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Probably all the same people complaining about this, are the same ones who support “traditional values” like child marriage.
SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I think all adult performers should have gray hair and the only allowable category should be definitely legal.
socsa@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
2x legal, twice the law abiding.
cook_pass_babtridge@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
“UK pornography task force”
spacedogroy@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
steeznson@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’m doing my part
humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
All models and actresses should be over 30. Because if you are made to find a 29 year old attractive through exposure, then that is a gateway to 28 year old objectification perversions. We can examine barely legal 31 year olds after fixing the “young near porn” epidemic.
NickwithaC@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
They could start with the Daily Mail.
ICastFist@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
The programme followed the performer for six months and included her claim to have had sex with 1,057 clients over the course of 12 hours.
Holy shit, not even hentai can reach such high numbers. Even as a gangbang queen, that’s a lot of dick to satisfy
She found it in pursuing “barely legal” sex – traditionally one of the most searched-for terms in porn – with the twist that instead of men searching for videos of other men having sex with teenage (or teenage-looking, depending on how many internet layers you’re prepared to sift through for your purposes) girls, Billinger offered herself to young men. – She had sex with them for free on condition that they gave permission for her to upload the footage to her OnlyFans account
That’s about the smartest economical move she could’ve made
Taleya@aussie.zone 2 weeks ago
Ya fed the terfs, put them in power and now you’re discovering they’re ultra conservative sex-panicked weirdos.
People on fucking mars saw this coming.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Yeah, so I already see where this sliding scale is moving towards. Let’s just require all porn models to be 80, this way we.can be absolutely sure that they won’t be anywhere near the barely legal line!
We can also know that now almost nobody will be watching porn anymore
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Some people really aren’t comfortable with the fact that you do actually have to have a line where things are legal
mannycalavera@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Labour’s war on choke.
giant_smeeg@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
I knew I recognised her face.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Just ban porn at this point
flamingos@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
- Good luck enforcing that;
- No, let’s not just ban everything that some people find objectionable.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
mormund@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
I mean the barely legal stuff is certainly weird. But how are you going to restrict people over 18 from doing porn, just because they look young? And pretending that this will fix pedophilia is so dumb. But I’m not sure what I even expect these days…
candyman337@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I keep telling people around me, the more they do to the “questionable” shit like this it’s just testing the waters for ALL of it, it’s all puritan culture guilt tripping BS
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
They may as well be honest and just ban it all tbh
NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
The end game is probably sex isn’t legal unless married, but also, you’re allowed to marry 12 year olds again.
Then sex outside of marriage is isn’t legal.
All porn becomes illegal.
Berstrrs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Sounds familiar to some countries…
yeather@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
It’s a good thing England is importing people with this exact cultural view.