I came across this after someone I know made some claims about pedophilia prevalence I found unbelievable. Leading me to the survey.
Surveys are hard, there’s always some percentage of people that say strange things, and self reports could be over or underestimates of prevalence.
I think that the way the results bundle 19 year old who watch a porn video that had a 17 year old in it, and 50 year old that watched a porn video of a 5 year old together is needlessly inflammatory. While neither is good I think culturally we are generally vastly more worried about what leads to the second, or even what makes the 50 year old look for 17 year olds (i.e. cases where the 19 year old didn’t grow out of it).
Still, some of these stats are extremely troubling to me, and I’m interested in what people make of it.
appetizer@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
Given the age of consent is 16, it’s a bit stupid to include 17 year olds as children.
naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
You should read the study if you want to know why it was done the way it was done. Scientists are very good at explaining why the criteria they selected are the criteria they selected.
JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
That is very different to the headline, which is about feelings, which is what the top comment is referring to.
eureka@aussie.zone 3 weeks ago
Generally true for most states, a couple are 17 and there are various special cases. I didn’t realise how different it is between states and about authority rules (e.g. in some states, a person has a higher AoC for a guardian or teacher).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent_in_Oceania#A…
I also didn’t know how recently some states passed anti-homosexuality laws, esp Tasmania.
appetizer@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
That’s interesting! I didn’t know that SA and TAS had separate ages.