Honestly, most new games just fucking suck. They’re too expensive, often don’t run properly at launch even on excellent hardware, and those that don’t have micro-transactions built-in require you to purchase DLC to get the whole game.
On the other hand, the older titles almost always run well on my machine, have a ton of community DLC, and in general are just designed better because they were built to bring the player as much fun as possible, not to extract as much money as possible.
Plus, the quality content generated from 2005 - 2015 represents some of the best ever, and can provide hundreds of hours of enjoyment before you even get into the 2010s. Why waste money on something that may not work, and that I likely won’t enjoy as much as the games I bought 10 years ago?
It’s why I usually wait at least a year after release to consider whether or not I’m going to buy a title.
tal@lemmy.today 1 week ago
That is a lot of people playing F2P competitive multiplayer games.
GoumLeChat@jlai.lu 1 week ago
Free is an important reason why. Also, these games run very well on old machines. If you mostly play that and get a new rig, you don’t have to spend a lot.
tal@lemmy.today 1 week ago
I get free reducing the barrier-to-entry, but I kinda look at games in terms of “how much is the ratio of the cost to how many hours of fun gameplay that I get?”
I mean, I have some games that I briefly try, dislike, and never play again. Those are pretty expensive, almost regardless of the purchase price.
But the thing is, if it’s a game that you play a lot, the purchase price per hour of play becomes almost irrelevant in cost-per-hour of gameplay. I’ve played Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead — well, okay, you can download that for free, but I also bought it on Steam to throw the developers some money — and Caves of Qud a ton. The price on them is basically a rounding error. And the same is probably true for the top few games in my game library.
You could charge me probably $2000 for Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead, and it’d still be cheaper per hour of gameplay than nearly all games that I’ve played, because I’ve spent so many hours in the thing.
If people are playing these like crazy, you’d think that the same would hold for them. That the cost for a game that you play like crazy for many years just…doesn’t matter all that much, because the difference in hours played is so huge that it overwhelms the difference in price.
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Its the replayability. I mean, look how many people are still playing chess. Stick a human intelligence on the other end of the stick and you’ve pretty much got it figured out.
LacklusterGamer@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I read every one of those and thought. Well that’s a new game. Apparently I’m old.
tal@lemmy.today 1 week ago
Further down in the thread, I ran into someone talking about an older RPG, Realmz. I dug up a subreddit on Reddit related to the game, and the stickied post had this gem:
old.reddit.com/…/assorted_realmz_files_codes_real…
Nothing like a comment about someone’s grandfather having tried twenty years ago to modernize a game you’ve played in its original form.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
League of legends is two decades old now, so if you’re thinking it’s new, yeah that’s on you 😜
blazeknave@lemmy.world 6 days ago
The amount of times I “finally sit down and watch that new Netflix show I’ve been putting off” and it’s 7 years old. My kid is into “newer Disney stories” I don’t know from my day… that are 25 year old films!
kionay@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I’m playing Counter-Strike 2
… exclusively on a modded server hosting a Warcraft mod
… that I found because I was searching for the same thing I played on CS:S over a decade ago
Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
besides the lower bar of entry due to being free, Midias research has shown that yhr younger generation prefers online multiplayer, and as you grow older, you start yo favor single player games more.
smeg@feddit.uk 6 days ago
My personal hypothesis is that everyone likes online multiplayer initially because it’s pretty cool, then you get bored it when you realise playing with angry randos is no fun. It’s not that a younger generation prefers online multiplayer, it’s that they haven’t got sick of it yet!
AnyProgressIsGood@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I don’t get how people are still into those old games. I like new experiences too much
icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 1 week ago
People don’t get bored of playing Basketball because they want Basketball 2
Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 week ago
The game may be old but that doesn’t mean a particular person has played it before.