TropicalDingdong
@TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
- Comment on A Jamaican accent just makes me smile 10 hours ago:
Waahn ded
- Comment on Sbeve 11 hours ago:
Until I saw your brown eye
- Comment on I fall for it every year. Every. Year. 3 days ago:
that depends.
How much you charging for a nibble? Also, do you have McRib sauce?
- Comment on I fall for it every year. Every. Year. 3 days ago:
I would 100% try earlobe meat.
- Submitted 5 days ago to videos@lemmy.world | 1 comment
- Comment on The President of the United States of America 6 days ago:
Its lump.
- Comment on oh no 1 week ago:
- Comment on Honestly wtf? 1 week ago:
why man?
- Comment on oh no 1 week ago:
When you trying to explain how seeds aren’t analogs of eggs, and how pollen isn’t even analog of sperm
- Comment on Honestly wtf? 1 week ago:
I was gonna right my final report, but then I got high…
- Comment on Lying can be so complicated 1 week ago:
The internet is method acting and some of us are in too deep to come out
- Comment on Go with the flow 1 week ago:
Eat a few figs and a square of dark chocolate with that first cup. Also, make sure your bathroom has a grab bar.
- Comment on When you ask a question online and a person answer you instead of telling you to Fuck yourself or Google it 1 week ago:
Suck my ear
- Comment on Insulin 1 week ago:
- Comment on Happy DB Cooper Day to those who celebrate! 1 week ago:
My misspelling it doesn’t change its meaning, which is obvious in its context.
Again, pedantry.
- Comment on Happy DB Cooper Day to those who celebrate! 1 week ago:
When using aphorisms, please try and Google them.
Cajones has been a slang term for “balls” or “bravery” or “having the guts” for over a hundred years. So not only are you being a pedantic prick, you are also a wrong pedantic prick. If you are going to be a pedantic prick, you should be the one to google if you are even right first. I grew up in a Spanish/ English speaking community, this is the word we used (although we used huevos too, but that literally meant like, your balls; less “having the balls”, or having courage to stand up to someone). It should occur to you that you don’t have a monopoly over the use of language, so maybe check that.
- Comment on Happy DB Cooper Day to those who celebrate! 1 week ago:
Just think of all the crazy shit you might be able to pull off if you had cajones the size of cantaloupes.
- Comment on ✨️carboniferous trees✨️ 2 weeks ago:
Trees and plants fossilize well, particularly due to celluose, and lignin.
Plant fossils before lignin are more problematic. But once you’ve got lignin, which is really when we started getting trees, the conditions for fossilization become much broader. Maybe a big storm happened and a huge amount of sediment buried a forest. Well now the process of mineralization can begin. It’s not especially special conditions required to make plant fossils.
Some plant fossils are of such high quality we can still make out cellular structure. But again, this is because of lignin and cellulose in the cell wall.
- Comment on Realistic Scientific Method 2 weeks ago:
This makes no sense. Where is all the masturbation?
- Comment on Caption this. 2 weeks ago:
Gods of death love apples
- Comment on Feeling that groove 2 weeks ago:
Beep bop beep boop beep
- Comment on Moss survived for nine months outside International Space Station 2 weeks ago:
Not surprised. Moss is incredibly poikilohydric.
- Comment on Jeopardy wall calendar pretending that the coastline paradox doesn't exist 2 weeks ago:
Theorem (No True
ScotsmanFractal)Let F be a geometric object. Then:
- If F exhibits infinite detail → F is a fractal
- If F has finite structure → F wasn’t a true fractal anyway
Proof: By definition of true fractals.
- Comment on Jeopardy wall calendar pretending that the coastline paradox doesn't exist 2 weeks ago:
Some infinites are larger than other infinites.
- Comment on Where u at? 2 weeks ago:
Isn’t this how some people at like, a very high level, were communicating??
Like it wasn’t in excel, but they had an e-mail account which they both had access to, and would just edit drafts back and forth instead of sending.
How do you know Kelly Rowland isn’t just texting back and forth with a high level CIA operative and is engaging in quality opsec?
- Comment on Heh, got eeeeeeeem 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on Heh, got eeeeeeeem 2 weeks ago:
Please, no one actually fuck James Carville, ever.
- Comment on What ever you do, don't think of the number 37. 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on Apropos the American Standard 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on Drug deal 3 weeks ago:
The pebbi is heroin
