How can she be fertile if her ovaries are removed?
In heat
Submitted 16 hours ago by benni@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/63e8a3bb-8e0f-4fd9-ab6e-457807a10f23.png
Comments
serenissi@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Cordyceps@sopuli.xyz 35 minutes ago
And the text even ends with a mention of her being in early menopause…
stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 hours ago
Why do people Google questions anyway? Just search “heat cast” or “heat Angelina Jolie”. It’s quicker to type and you get more accurate results.
dutchkimble@lemy.lol 33 minutes ago
Why use many word when few work
warbond@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
As a funny challenge I like to come up with simplified, stupid-sounding, 3-word search queries for complex questions, and more often than not it’s good enough to get me the information I’m looking for.
nyctre@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
I just tested. “Angelina jolie heat” gives me tons of shit results, I have to scroll all the way down and then click on “show more results” in order to get the filmography.
“Is angelina jolie in heat” gives me this bluesky post as the first answer and the wikipedia and IMDb filmographies as 2nd and 3rd answer.
So, I dunno, seems like you’re wrong.
stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 minutes ago
both queries give me poor results and searching “heat cast” reveals that she is not actually in the movie, so that’s probably why you can’t find anything useful
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 hour ago
That’s why you just add “movie” to the search.
GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Search engine algorithms are way better than in the 90s and early 2000s when it was naive keyword search completely unweighted by word order in the search string.
So the tricks we learned of doing the bare minimum for the most precise search behavior no longer apply the same way. Now a search for two words will add weight to results that have the two words as a phrase, and some weight for the two words close together in the same sentence, but still look for each individual word as a result, too.
More importantly, when a single word has multiple meanings, the search engines all use the rest of the search as an indicator of which meaning the searcher means. “Heat” is a really broad word with lots of meanings, and the rest of the search can help inform the algorithm of what the user intends.
bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 1 hour ago
It works. It will also find others who posted that question.
stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 minutes ago
Until they worded it as “Does Angelina Jolie appear in heat?”
ByteJunk@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Because that’s the normal way in which humans communicate.
But for Google more specifically, that sort of keyword prompts is how you searched stuff in the '00s… Nowadays the search prompt actually understands natural language, and even has features like “people also ask” that are related to this.
All in all, do whatever works for you, it’s just that asking questions isn’t bad.
stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 hours ago
Google is not a human so why would you communicate with it as if it were a human? unlike chatgpt it’s not designed to answer questions, it’s designed to search for words on webpages
GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Why do people Google questions anyway?
Because it gives better responses.
Google and all the other major search engines have built in functionality to perform natural language processing on the user’s query and the text in its index to perform a search more precisely aligned with the user’s desired results, or to recommend related searches.
If the functionality is there, why wouldn’t we use it?
stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 minutes ago
that is true but the results will be the same at best, not better
Valmond@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
You won’t get funny answers if you do it correctly.
daerion@feddit.org 16 hours ago
Google was fine as it was before, now it does shit like this. I hate how AI is shoved down our throats. And the results on google nowadays feel so much worse and generic than a few years ago. That isn’t just a feeling I have, right?
Dettweiler42@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
Add obscenities to your search for the most optimized results. It drops the AI component and seems to provide the more direct results we used to get.
iamkindasomeone@feddit.org 7 hours ago
Add …in my ass to your last search query.
kibiz0r@midwest.social 14 hours ago
They’re an ad company that just happens to offer search as a way to show ads.
Their ideal scenario is one where you search forever and never find what you were looking for.
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 13 hours ago
Really? Felt like Google jumped the shark quite awhile before this even started.
doingthestuff@lemy.lol 11 hours ago
It been a downhill slope that just keeps getting steeper. They’re basically falling off a cliff right now, and their parachute is improving AI.
officermike@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Not just you. I feel like search modifiers like “NOT” or “OR” haven’t been working for a good long while either.
ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
They stopped supporting booleans in 2013. Glad you’ve finally noticed.
jasep@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Append ?udm=14 to your Google search results
trolololol@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
I’m not opening that Rick Astley link, thank you.
pyre@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
I’d rather use anything else
alexaralvarado@infosec.pub 2 hours ago
Leaving aside the fact that this looks like AI slop/trash bait; who the fudge is so clueless as to think Ashley Judd, assuming that she’s who they’re confusing, looks anything like Angelina Jolie back then
Bosht@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
First, it’s the internet, you can cuss. Either structure the sentence not to include it at all or just cuss for fuck’s sake. Second, not everyone knows every actor/actress or is familiar, especially one that’s definitely not in the limelight anymore like Ashley Judd. Hell even when she was popular she wasn’t in a lot.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 hour ago
How do you know that OP even saw Heat?
wander1236@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
Wouldn’t removing your ovaries and fallopian tubes make you not “fertile” by definition?
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Yes, it contradicts itself within the next couple of sentences.
SARGE@startrek.website 12 hours ago
Is it considered normal to type out a normal question format when using search engines?
If I were looking for an answer instead of making a funny meme, I’d search “heat movie cast Angelina Jolie” if I didn’t feel like putting any effort in.
Then again, I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. I’ve seen someone use their phone to search google “what is 87÷167?” instead of doing “87/167” or like… Opening the calculator…
People do things in different, sometimes weird ways.
LePoisson@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
This is like the difference between normal and right. Like I know a ton of people normally search for answers by putting full questions in. With the advent of LLMs and AI being thrown into everything asking full questions starts to make more sense.
For actual good results using a search engine, for sure what you said is better.
ArchRecord@lemm.ee 12 hours ago
It depends on the person in my experience.
For instance, I’ll often use a question format, but usually because I’m looking for similar results from a forum, in which I’d expect to find a post with a similar question as the title. This sometimes produces better results than just plain old keywords.
Other times though, I’m just throwing keywords out and adding
“”to select the ones I require be included.But I do know some people who only ever ask in question format no matter the actual query. (e.g. “What is 2+2” instead of just typing “2+2” and getting the calculator dialogue)
0range@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 hours ago
Yeah, the way that i would do it is to look up the Wikipedia page for the movie Heat and go to the cast section.
I always do things like this and it can actually be to my detriment. Like that time i went to Reddit to ask them what that movie was where time is a currency, and somebody pointed out that i could have just googled “time is money movie” and it would have immediately shown me In Time (2011).
Also, when i want something from an app or website i will consult the alphabetical list or look for a link to click, instead of just using the search bar.
I don’t know, somehow it never entered my brain that search bars are smart and can figure out what you meant if you use natural language. Even though they’ve been programmed that way since before i was born
chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 hours ago
I sometimes ask questions, and sometimes I’m forced to because the original answer somehow misinterpreted my query. I also do searches like you mentioned, but I don’t exclusively do one of the other.
otacon239@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
It also contradicts itself immediately, saying she’s fertile, then immediately saying she’s had her ovaries removed.
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 13 hours ago
NGL, I learned some things.
frezik@midwest.social 14 hours ago
We all know how AI has made things worse, but here’s some context on how it’s outright backwards.
Early search engines had a context problem. To use an example from “Halt and Catch Fire”, if you search for “Texas Cowboy”, do you mean the guys on horseback driving a herd of cows, or do you mean the football team? If you search for “Dallas Cowboys”, should that bias the results towards a different answer? Early, naive search engines gave bad results for cases like that. Spat out whatever keywords happen to hit the most.
Sometimes, it was really bad. In high school, I was showing a history teacher how to use search engines, and he searched for “China golden age”. All results were asian porn. I think we were using Yahoo.
AltaVista largely solved the context problem. We joke about its bad results now, but it was one of the better search engines before Google PageRank.
Now we have AI unsolving the problem.
doingthestuff@lemy.lol 11 hours ago
I was okay with keyword results. If you knew what you were dealing with in the search engine, you could usually find what you were looking for.
cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 7 hours ago
Why is the search query in the top and bottom different?
Allero@lemmy.today 7 hours ago
Google correction
Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Deepseek also gets this wrong.
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
So she is in heat …
General_Effort@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
In short: BONK
It probably thought you were Elon Musk.
doug@lemmy.today 15 hours ago
Ashley Judd looks nothing like Angelina Jolie.
adarza@lemmy.ca 14 hours ago
ddg isn’t really any better with that exact search query. all ‘fashion’ related items on the first page.
you get the expected top result (imdb page for the film ‘heat’) by using simply: angelina jolie heat
jaschen@lemm.ee 12 hours ago
I never heard of the movie and was enjoying the content you created that I thought was supposed to be funny.
wander1236@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
It’s not helpful for OOP since they’re on iOS, but there’s a Firefox extension that works on desktop and Android that hides the AI overview in searches: addons.mozilla.org/…/hide-google-ai-overviews/
Glifted@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
I think Gemini is “in heat”
nickiam2@aussie.zone 2 hours ago
I think the trick here is to not use Google. The Wikipedia page for the movie heat is the first result on DuckDuckGo
BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 26 minutes ago
DDG also has a quick answer AI
zaphod@sopuli.xyz 31 minutes ago
You can also search Wikipedia directly.
Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 2 hours ago
I use duck duck go as well. I wish it wasn’t just anonymised Bing search. One of these days I’ll look into an open source independent search engine.
Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 59 minutes ago
Qwant
arin@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
try Gibiru.com ?