Retreaux

@Retreaux@lemmy.world

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The Onion wins bidding for InfoWars assets | CNN Business⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  This story reads like an Onion article and I’m absolutely fucking here for it. For someone who made a career out of owning the libs, having your assets owned by libs is sweet justice.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Save 100% on Minimalism on Steam⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Thanks! Free game!

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Borderlands' theatrical run grinds to a halt with just $31 million worldwide, which is barely enough to cover the marketing costs⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Found Butcher!

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Starbucks’ new CEO faces backlash over 1,000-mile commute to Seattle office⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  The Behind the Bastards episodes on this dickbag is a solid listen.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Pill bottle⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  It’s hella bangin’

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨2005 Chevy Astro⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  This sounds rad as fuck

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Run for it Marty!⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Who do you think?!?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Mysterious Arrival⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Wow Amon got Fabulous

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨InstantID: Zero-shot Identity-Preserving Generation in Seconds⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  This is one of the first posts I’ve seen that blows my mind about the possibility of AI for art that isn’t just mishmash.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The Weekly 'What are you playing?' Discussion - 02-10-2023⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  How do you like it compared to the first? Loved fallen order but holding off on Survivor until there’s a good sale.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The Weekly 'What are you playing?' Discussion - 02-10-2023⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  I’ve been bouncing between Red Dead 2 and Cyberpunk (don’t have the new DLC yet though, was going to clear all the base gigs first). I love the open world whiplash I’m getting between these two amazing character driven stories.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How are we supposed to convene an impartial jury for a trial involving high profile political people? [USA]⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Nobody’s ignoring it. There’s plenty of room to investigate that too. Corruption of any source SHOULD be confronted and removed regardless of affiliation, but that wasn’t the point of the exercise. Besides, your assumption of my lack of morals from a single reply (and regarding a what-aboutism to boot) is just another logical fallacy. There’s more of them too if you’re looking for more ways to be an unreasonable contrarian online.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨How are we supposed to convene an impartial jury for a trial involving high profile political people? [USA]⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Nice what-aboutism, Biden’s son isn’t even an elected official in any capacity. False equivalence is a red flag logical fallacy.