stebo02
@stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com
alt: @stebo02@lemmy.world
- Comment on Anon gets investigated 3 weeks ago:
yayy problem solved
- Comment on Liquid Trees 3 weeks ago:
trees take a loooooong time to grow
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
a 5 hour video? aint nobody got time for that
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
lol that sounds like a toddler saying “mom I can fly but i can only do it if you look away”
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
I explained my reasoning here:
lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/18471645
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
Not reccomended
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
it has its charms
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
fair point, but at least it doesnt break so many symmetries
strong is like the cool hippie brother
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
well i meant every atom in the entire planet
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
You’re talking about electroweak unification. They’re unified because the force carriers of the weak interactions are charged bosons, which implies they also interact electromagnetically. Therefore you can’t physically describe the weak force without including electromagnetism. However these two forces are still fundamentally different.
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
sorry
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
just be glad that the planet is neutrally charged because otherwise you’d be toothpaste
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
it’s not about the strength it’s about the complexity of the theory
- Comment on 4 fundamental forces 3 weeks ago:
It’s not a meme about the strength but about how complex the physics are.
The weak interaction breaks a lot of symmetries that hold in EM and strong interactions, like CP symmetry. Its gauge symmetry is also completely wild: SU(2)~L~ x U(1)~Y~, compared to U(1) for EM and SU(3) for the strong interaction. And finally there’s also neutrino oscillations related to that. So to me the weak interaction is like a derpy brother to the other two.
Then gravity is something completely different and we are yet to figure out how to describe it in quantum physics. So that’s why I chose that creature.
- Submitted 3 weeks ago to science_memes@mander.xyz | 61 comments
- Comment on TRUCKIN' 3 weeks ago:
well he won’t live like that for long
- Comment on TRUCKIN' 3 weeks ago:
you say that as if most people drink on the job?
- Comment on TRUCKIN' 3 weeks ago:
clearly he’s completely over her
- Comment on TRUCKIN' 3 weeks ago:
probably because she didn’t fit
- Comment on TRUCKIN' 3 weeks ago:
he’s proud of that belly
- Comment on Disney wolves 3 weeks ago:
I like the idea of Disney talking to themselves
Disney: Well done, Disney!
Disney: Thanks, Disney!
- Comment on Me when I zoom past traffic on my e-scooter 3 weeks ago:
don’t forget the 15 minutes looking for a parking spot and 10 minutes walking from the parking spot tevthe restaurant
- Comment on It's worth the trip. 3 weeks ago:
OK i didn’t C that coming
- Comment on It's worth the trip. 3 weeks ago:
what about the C’s?
- Comment on AI Supremecy 3 weeks ago:
when doing scientific studies don’t forget to publish your results
- Comment on Literal interpretation 4 weeks ago:
ok then
- Comment on Literal interpretation 4 weeks ago:
what’s a girl gotta do besides being dead nice
- Comment on no way 4 weeks ago:
i mean this is lemmy after all
- Comment on Juan 👍 4 weeks ago:
Here’s the video for anyone wondering. Only subtitles in Dutch unfortunately…
