I’m talking about games that you still like but you had no idea were criticized so much.
The perfect example for me is Sonic Unleashed.
I admit that the game has its bad things, but I would have never imagined that it was so hated at the time… Although, that could be extended to the entire Sonic franchise, since for many years I was not aware at all of that “Sonic was never good”, “Sonic had a rough transition to 3D” nonsense.
flamingos@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Fallout 3. The criticism is absolutely fair*, but it was the first RPG I ever played and I’m still very fond of it.
* I never got the ‘metros are hard to navigate’ criticism, I never had that issues. Most of them are pretty linear.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
So, I’m an ardent ‘New Vegas is the best 3D Fallout game’ person.
But… Fallout 3 is not a bad game.
It is fun, it is enjoyable. It has solid game mechanics, it has a good number of well written characters and questlines, it is fun to just explore and find crazy shit.
It has flaws, yes.
But it is far from bad.
It just isn’t as good as New Vegas, which imo, basically just did everything FO3 did, but better, had a better overall storyline, refined and improved on all the gameplay mechanics, added in new gameplay features/elements.
BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 day ago
i dont think new vegas had better exploration. fo3 is still pretty unmatched in that. so many unmarked gems in fo3
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 23 hours ago
It also had some big gameplay departures from 1 & 2. I’m not talking about being an FPS (although no longer having to worry about accuracy was pretty significant) but the fact that putting on different clothing magically made you more intelligent, and that it was a lot easier to do everything.
In FO3 you can pick all the locks, hack all the computers, pass all the conversation checks, and take on hordes of enemies all by yourself. In FO1+2 you had to pick the couple of things you were good at and not be able to do the other things until your next run.
Paranomaly@sh.itjust.works 19 hours ago
Not going to lie, I like it quite a bit more than New Vegas. I understand several criticisms that people have, but 3 was by far the better experience for me.
Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf 12 hours ago
Same here. NV was pretty boring to me while FO3 was actually fun.
LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world 1 day ago
A lot of the metros look copy and pasted; whole hallways, rooms, so it gets a little confusing.
flamingos@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Oh for sure, Fallout 3 Geoguesser would be hard. Idk, I just never had a problem navigating them, even if they were a bit samey.
Zidane@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
FO3 is my favorite Fallout (haven’t played 4 or 76 yet).
ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Have you played 1, 2, or New Vegas?
TheHotze@lemmy.world 1 day ago
To be fair, Fallout 3 is a bit more of a mixed bag of good and bad features.
criss_cross@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Fallout 3 for me works well as a sandbox and less as a narrative driven RPG. I had a lot of fun with it but I know if you went in expecting it to be something it’s not (like the first 2 fallout games) you’re gonna be disappointed.
Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I loved FO3. And coming from Bethesda, I was expecting a sandbox.
Actually, do people hate FO3? I thought it was well liked, even amongst New Vegas fanatics.
catalyst@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Guess that’s me too. I loved Fallout 3 and wasn’t really aware of a lot of hate for it.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I lived in D.C. when I played it. Between that and it being the first of its kind in the series, none of the others come remotely close for me.