CileTheSane
@CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
- Comment on Itch.io apologise for "frustration and confusion" after delisting thousands of NSFW projects 17 hours ago:
“it’s against my religion to eat fish.”
“Okay, then don’t eat fish.”
“It’s against my religion for you to eat fish”
“Fuck off.”
- Comment on Everybody gets one [choose wisely] 1 day ago:
I said spread, not share. One would not consider peanut butter spread on bread if you put it in one glob and then picked up and moved the glob somewhere else.
- Comment on Everybody gets one [choose wisely] 1 day ago:
Could you spread all then empathy across everyone evenly, and then increase it by about 10%?
- Comment on Itch.io is delisting NSFW games due to pressure from payment processors 1 day ago:
So what useful action can I take to push back against this censorship?
- Comment on Itch.io is delisting NSFW games due to pressure from payment processors 1 day ago:
So what do I, a common shlub, do to resist this? Boycott Steam and itch.io until they reinstate the games?
- Comment on The industry filed false claims against the "Stop Killing Games" initiative | Accursed Farms 3 days ago:
Well I think you’re old enough now to learn that not everything that gets created will be in the exact format that you specifically prefer. Some things will be made with other people in mind as the target audience and if you want to enjoy it you’ll have to engage with it in a way different from your own personal preference. It’s all part of being a grown up.
- Comment on The industry filed false claims against the "Stop Killing Games" initiative | Accursed Farms 3 days ago:
Why post it to youtube in that case?
“Why isn’t this text?”
YouTube has more accessibility and reach.
“Then why isn’t it an audio file?!?!?!”
Fucking what? You seem to just be upset that this exists in a way people will access.
- Comment on The industry filed false claims against the "Stop Killing Games" initiative | Accursed Farms 3 days ago:
-Written in text, in a long thread full of text
- Comment on Welcome to petty lane 2 weeks ago:
-sees traffic moving down the road with no accidents
“Is this Mad Max?”
- Comment on Welcome to petty lane 2 weeks ago:
your “example” is a bad faith gotcha based on an insane hypothetical.
This you?
you somehow think that if someone is doing 90 in a 55 and hits someone actually doing 55 that it was the normal person’s fault.
- Comment on Welcome to petty lane 2 weeks ago:
-
calls random people assholes and psychopaths with little to no provocation
-
claims other people lack empathy and consideration
-
- Comment on Welcome to petty lane 2 weeks ago:
If you’re argument requires everyone on the road to be a psychopath you might want to reconsider it.
You also haven’t been listening, perhaps you’re too busy ranting about “psychopaths” to pay attention: I’ve already said if someone is doing the speed limit and gets hit it is the fault the person speeding. However, I’d much rather not be in an accident at all than “be right” and not the person at fault.
I’m saying nobody needs to be doing more than the speed limit.
-
that’s not what you’ve been saying. You’ve been repeating “slower is safer” over and over and it was trivial to provide an example that made that argument absurd and untrue.
-
that statement is making a lot of assumptions. The primary one being that the speed limit is set accurately and appropriately. Again, if some politician decided “in the name of safety” to change the speed limit on the highway to 10 would you be arguing against increasing it because “nobody needs be doing more than the speed limit”? Would the people doing 20 on the highways now be psychopaths because the sign on the side of the road changed?
-
- Comment on Welcome to petty lane 2 weeks ago:
You’re in the wrong argument.
Looks like you’re in the wrong argument. The person I was replying to has repeatedly been saying “going slower is safer” and that is what I replied to. It was trivially easily to provide an example where “going slower” is 1) absurd and 2) more dangerous.
If that is not their argument then they need to stop repeating it as if it is and say their actual argument.
- Comment on Perspective 2 weeks ago:
We are looking down on the mattress and it is casting a shadow on the step below it. If we were looking up at the mattress it would be casting a shadow across the stairs in front of it.
- Comment on Welcome to petty lane 2 weeks ago:
Yup, I’m sure the highway is much safer if everyone is traveling at 10. However, if I’m the only one traveling at 10 I have made the highway much more dangerous.
I’m advocating for not being a fucking idiot and causing an accident because in theory it’s safer to travel at slower speeds.
- Comment on Welcome to petty lane 2 weeks ago:
It’s not uncommon for people to record their whole trip for social media, not just take to a picture.
That’s still a distraction. Even if they don’t intend to upload the entire recording they are paying less attention to the road in order to pay attention to their “performance”.
- Comment on Welcome to petty lane 2 weeks ago:
Cool, they are the ones that will get in trouble for the accident that I am still involved in. I’d much rather not be involved in an accident then be “right”.
Is this about safety, or is this about blind adherence to the law?
- Comment on Welcome to petty lane 2 weeks ago:
If everyone is driving that fast and there aren’t accidents happening consistently then the posted limit does not reflect the reality of the road.
- Comment on When you work for a company owned by a A..hole 3 weeks ago:
Broken link
- Comment on When you work for a company owned by a A..hole 3 weeks ago:
We need to start recognizing corporate greed as a mental disorder. This is a company large enough that employees don’t interact with the owner directly, and all the profits from the company aren’t enough for the owner: they also want the pen the delivery guy gave you. It’s a sickness.
- Comment on When you work for a company owned by a A..hole 3 weeks ago:
Explain to the client that your refusing because of the policy that all gifts must go to the owner.
- Comment on Anon loves The Lord of the Rings 3 weeks ago:
I played on the SNES, his name was “BUTT”
- Comment on Might be time to find another job 4 weeks ago:
Jim?
- Comment on Yes, this is what people did back then 4 weeks ago:
Press the snooze button and go back to sleep.
- Comment on A game you "didn't know it was bad 'til people told you so"? 5 weeks ago:
It also had some big gameplay departures from 1 & 2. I’m not talking about being an FPS (although no longer having to worry about accuracy was pretty significant) but the fact that putting on different clothing magically made you more intelligent, and that it was a lot easier to do everything.
In FO3 you can pick all the locks, hack all the computers, pass all the conversation checks, and take on hordes of enemies all by yourself. In FO1+2 you had to pick the couple of things you were good at and not be able to do the other things until your next run. - Comment on Baldur's Gayte 1 month ago:
A gear is not a wheel. That’s why it’s called a “gear” and a “wheel”.
- Comment on Baldur's Gayte 1 month ago:
A lot of transportation has an equivalent amount of doors, and there a lot of house, apartment buildings, offices… You use a lot more doors every day than you do wheels.
- Comment on Who did this 😂😂😂 1 month ago:
I had my computer plugged into a power bar and we’d turn off the power bar to turn off the computer so that we wouldn’t wear out the switch on the computer.
People actually thought you’d have a computer long enough to wear out its power switch.
- Comment on Anon studies human behavior 1 month ago:
it could mean girls or young women
young female is less opinionated & unlikely to clash with varied opinions on the distinction between girls & young women.
So how young are the girls OP is upset about not accepting his friend request? If there’s concern that some people would refer to them as “girls” instead of “young women” the grossness of the statement stands.
You go on this long when people make grammatical errors like using the wrong “their” in their posts? Or is it just excusing language the dehumanizes women that gets you fired up?
- Comment on Anon studies human behavior 1 month ago:
That’s my point. If OP wanted to use clearer language “Young Women” would have been better, unless they are in fact creeping on children.