I hate how misogynistic traditional art is! Just last week, when I was drawing, my pencil started ranting about “feeeeemales.”
this is not satire this is not satire this is not satire
Submitted 1 month ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to [deleted]
https://lemmy.cafe/pictrs/image/fc9ab27d-4b0b-4b39-940f-cd8150b30242.webp
Comments
i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I tried to draw a bunny rabbit for Easter and instead I drew Harvey Weinstein! shakes fists Aaaaaart!
cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 1 month ago
Hate when this happens
saltesc@lemmy.world 1 month ago
When I was a kid, every time I tried to draw something it just ended up being a dick and balls.
Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 1 month ago
Please tell me you gave him the bunny ears and if so where I can purchase this masterpiece.
ICastFist@programming.dev 1 month ago
And transphobic! My baby blue and light pink pencils never draw straight lines!!!
SARGE@startrek.website 1 month ago
Oof, you must have gotten a shipment of Ferengi pencils, they can be a little… “Eccentric”
MNByChoice@midwest.social 1 month ago
Don’t create or spread bait.
Most people are too stupid to know the difference. Not you of course. You know what is up.
spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 month ago
sorry consider the bait spread i personally have the opinion that bait inoculation is possible
db2@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Bahnd@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Thats the scary part, in 2023 that was a good way to identify AI slop. Its getting tricky bow and you need an eye for detail and lighting. By 2027, I fear people wont be able to tell the difference.
WuceBrillis@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Next up is music. It’ll start with jingles and the background music for commercials, then background music for movies and eventually most of the beats you hear on the radio will be made by AI.
I think the industry will still want to have real singers, so they can still make money on concerts. But the AI will be writing a lot of the lyrics for many of the big pop hits.
Your kids will be fed this garbage all throughout their childhood, and when they’re old enough to develop a critical sense they will just be used to it.
mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Sometimes non vegan… it’s boiling the fucking planet.
Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
I mean, the impact AI has on the climate is nothing compared to the animal product industry
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
The impact per work of AI vs, say, a set of pighair brushes is massively higher.
Which is the fairest way of comparing them, per artwork.
pewpew@feddit.it 1 month ago
Nice ragebait
spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 month ago
is it bait if i posted it because i thought it was funny
mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
I’m building a house in the middle of nowhere without internet. Anyone want to join me?
TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
there’s a website called like “land of text” or something which is basically an infinite .txt where people can edit stuff in real time. You should build a house there
SerotoninSwells@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Omg yes how do I throw money at you.
ameancow@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This is also my plan, but for real.
mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
We can go 50/50
HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
This feels just like the twitter men roleplaying as women saying that they love misogyny.
They’re using “woke” language to promote anti-woke subjects.
spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 month ago
good way to put it
Etterra@discuss.online 1 month ago
OP: Nothing’s better than AI art!
Me: counts fingers suspiciously
Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 1 month ago
That’s a pretty long pencil
Etterra@discuss.online 1 month ago
And wobbly.
Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 1 month ago
Something is making me suspect this is AI generated, but I can’t quite put my finger on it.
vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
also sharpened by some wacky sharpener that leaves an off-center tip
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
I mean, the shorter an object is, the harder it is to snap.
WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I pressed the demo button on a keyboard in a music store once.
My second album will be out next month if anyone is interested.
moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
this is obviously satire
Hobo@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The title assured me that this was not satire. Since I have no critical thinking skills I’m not sure who to believe.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 month ago
-More Creative
-Creates the same thing over and over
-Cannot create new things like an overfull wine glass without reference imagesdaannii@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
The only thing it can do is regurgitate.
I think it has some value. I’ve been enjoying political deep fakes. Like that one of trump sucking musk toes.
I also think AI has some value for artist to use as a tool. Not to fully create pieces but to help.
If it’s used in that way it’s more ethical. . For instance, if I’m working on a painting, I often start with a real photograph. (My own or free to use reference image from a source giving permission).
I put it in Photoshop and use filters to increase edge contrast. Then I create a sketch over it. I print the sketch to scale and then transfer it to my canvas or paper. Or use it to make digital painting.
Another thing I do is use filters in Photoshop (the cutout one) to help me better able to see blocks of color changes. Because human perception makes it difficult for us to actually perceive these.
I then reference that image during the painting process.
With a specific AI you can apply a painting style of one image to another. This was actually the first free AI type art. It was called deep dream or something like that. About 5 years ago. The website is still up but doesn’t offer this anymore. But I found one that does.
So yeah you upload two images. A photo you took. And a painting you made. And set the percentage of change.
And it can help you plan a painting by making a version that will have your painting style applied. It’s actually kinda awesome.
But as you can invade you could upload someone else’s photograph. And someone else’s art piece.
Stealing their style.
I still think this specific AI tool has the most value for artist to use.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
I don’t have time to read replies like this.
DrunkAnRoot@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
theres no thumb just another index finger …
werewolfborg@ttrpg.network 1 month ago
They have reverse toe thumbs.
T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Digglet thumbs
Strider@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Please make me a wine glass filled to the brim with wine, almost spilling over.
Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
I to have no talent and am unable to create traditional art.
Valmond@lemmy.world 1 month ago
But what about getting likes without any effort or personal involvement??! /s
AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
To be fair, sourcing vegan-friendly art supplies is often significantly more frustrating than finding vegan food. But as others have said, doing - do I call it ‘traditional digital’ art? - is going to have a much smaller environmental impact than AI generation systems that are dependent on servers. A used Thinkpad x230 > Midjourney?
AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
Also wanna add that in theory I’m not against AI art generation, only the way it’s usually implemented. All creativity is derivative, and as long as the user is remixing free and public domain content, I think the gained accessibility for far more people to bring their expressions to life where they otherwise would not have been able to, is worth far more than the perceived threats felt by a stagnant copy monopolist industry.
But the key thing here is proper implementation. It’s like every time we get a new toy, we forget all over again that software freedom is a moral imperative in all forms of software.
mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Freedom relies on consent and mutual reciprocity, otherwise it’s exploitation. AI art diffusion models that scraped digital art portfolios and did not gain the consent of the artists nor did the artists get compensation is exploitation full stop. There is no freedom in exploitation.
anotherpurpleheathen@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
I’m tired.
Anyone can make art if they want. I’ll just keep saying it. Look at hyperbole comics, Cyanide and Happiness—you already know the spiel. There are classist traditions in some art spaces but you don’t have to participate in them. We have outsider art. We have fringe subcultures and movements.
I’ll be honest, it’s hard to tell if anything is a joke anymore. I thought Trump was a joke and he’s in the White House now… blame the autism.
ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
if traditional art is transphobic how are drag queens a thing
(i know drag !== trans but still)
2ugly2live@lemmy.world 1 month ago
What art are they looking out? Artists have been making powerful pieces with hidden messages and symbols since forever. Even graffiti can be used to disrupt and inform. Yes, there is garbage, but there’s garbage everywhere.
kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I notice they used an actual photograph for their post… isn’t photography “traditional” artwork? Why not generate a person with weirdly smooth features, 6 and a half fingers on one hand, a pencil that looks vaguely like a bunch of dry spaghetti, and a sports team jersey with a garbled illegible logo? It’s so much faster, more accessible and less misogynistic.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 month ago
How much you bet on that this very same person is now part of the “dark enlightement” after the progressives almost unanimusly rejected generative AI slop?
bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
I asked an AI to draw me a group friends celebrating a birthday. The result was all blond white dudes. Then I asked it to make a diverse group of friends instead. The result was all black women.
nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
easily3667@lemmus.org 1 month ago
Sounds like a thing that Really Happened.
AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 1 month ago
I like how a few people have commented disputing the meme.
You don’t need to argue against it. We all know it’s bait/satire.
spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 month ago
but the title said explicitly the opposite!
RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 month ago
Wouldnt this argument only work when responding to the original post? I doubt the original poster uses lemmy
nebulaone@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Meaningless. Soulless. Dead.
Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
I hope we all realize that this is clearly satire or some weird way to make “woke” people seem stupid, right? 😭
anotherpurpleheathen@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
It truly does get hard to tell after a certain point, though. People get mentally fatigued when “it’s just a joke bro” has been said the millionth time. And when crazy awful people with too much money are backing that joke. I’m tired.
Battle_Masker@lemmy.world 1 month ago
inclusive
accessible
make some stuff with disabled people and people of color featured and see what happens
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Take an older model and you’ll get nothing but disabled people
mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Because of the mangled hands? Like the ones in OPs image?
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
🪝
5in1k@lemm.ee 1 month ago
What a dumb asshole.
HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
All that person is gonna do with that grip is rip the eraser off.
sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
“Anarchist” lololol
Yeah, using the corporate product that stole all individuals’ work to regurgitate abortions from billionaire oligarch’s algorithms is totally “anarchist.”
Comrade_Spood@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
Exactly. I remember in Conquest of Bread when Kropotkin talked about freeing up more time by automating creative and intelligent pursuits so we can focus more on menial labor.
Obviously /s
ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
He would say that to lure more people into his North Pole workshop
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
It’s not stealing if there are no rules whatsoever, which is exactly what anarchy is!
/S
sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
There are rules. But rich people don’t have to follow them. It’s domination. Not anarchy/anarchism.
nialv7@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Uhhh I will get downvoted but I have to say, anarchy capitalism is still anarchism. And obviously disrespecting property rights is a very anarchist thing to do, so.
And many AI models you can run completely on your own hardware, no billionaire oligarchies have a say in what you do.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Most anarcho-capitalists, especially the Curtis Yarvin types, just want fascism, but with Inc. at the end, and call their dictator “Chief Executive Officer”.
ameancow@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Sounds more like people who want to have luxuries and comforts and money but don’t want to have anyone telling them what they can and can’t do.
Sounds about right for the current fascist techbro community.
niktemadur@lemmy.world 1 month ago
bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL aMiRiTe… i’M sUcH aN aNaRcHiSt HyUcK hYuCk HyUcK!!!
It’s like these mentally lazy ignorant people look all around themselves, see how the horizon is basically at the same distance all around them, therefore conclude that they must be the center of the universe, then sprinkle in a few fashionable internet soundbites and catchphrases to “make themselves sound interesting” and “with it”.
100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 month ago
Anyone who claims “AI = anarchy” deserves to have a canvas broken on its head cartoon style
anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
What classic art is transphobic. Lots of renaissance artists were LGB, the T came out when many of them painted themselves into biblical characters of different genders. It gets written off as because using themselves as models was more available than models, or vanity, but transphobic is far from the first description I’d come up with for the art history I learned.