this is not satire this is not satire this is not satire

Comments

• sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  “Anarchist” lololol

  Yeah, using the corporate product that stole all individuals’ work to regurgitate abortions from billionaire oligarch’s algorithms is totally “anarchist.”

  source

  • Comrade_Spood@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Exactly. I remember in Conquest of Bread when Kropotkin talked about freeing up more time by automating creative and intelligent pursuits so we can focus more on menial labor.

    Obviously /s

    source

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      He would say that to lure more people into his North Pole workshop

      source
  • Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    It’s not stealing if there are no rules whatsoever, which is exactly what anarchy is!

    /S

    source

    • sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      There are rules. But rich people don’t have to follow them. It’s domination. Not anarchy/anarchism.

      source
  • nialv7@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Uhhh I will get downvoted but I have to say, anarchy capitalism is still anarchism. And obviously disrespecting property rights is a very anarchist thing to do, so.

    And many AI models you can run completely on your own hardware, no billionaire oligarchies have a say in what you do.

    source

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Most anarcho-capitalists, especially the Curtis Yarvin types, just want fascism, but with Inc. at the end, and call their dictator “Chief Executive Officer”.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • ameancow@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      anarchocapitalism is still anarchism

      Sounds more like people who want to have luxuries and comforts and money but don’t want to have anyone telling them what they can and can’t do.

      Sounds about right for the current fascist techbro community.

      source
  • niktemadur@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL aMiRiTe… i’M sUcH aN aNaRcHiSt HyUcK hYuCk HyUcK!!!

    It’s like these mentally lazy ignorant people look all around themselves, see how the horizon is basically at the same distance all around them, therefore conclude that they must be the center of the universe, then sprinkle in a few fashionable internet soundbites and catchphrases to “make themselves sound interesting” and “with it”.

    source
  • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Anyone who claims “AI = anarchy” deserves to have a canvas broken on its head cartoon style

    source
  • anomnom@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    What classic art is transphobic. Lots of renaissance artists were LGB, the T came out when many of them painted themselves into biblical characters of different genders. It gets written off as because using themselves as models was more available than models, or vanity, but transphobic is far from the first description I’d come up with for the art history I learned.

    source
• i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I hate how misogynistic traditional art is! Just last week, when I was drawing, my pencil started ranting about “feeeeemales.”

  source

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I tried to draw a bunny rabbit for Easter and instead I drew Harvey Weinstein! shakes fists Aaaaaart!

    source

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Hate when this happens

      source
    • saltesc@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      When I was a kid, every time I tried to draw something it just ended up being a dick and balls.

      source
    • Aggravationstation@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Please tell me you gave him the bunny ears and if so where I can purchase this masterpiece.

      source
  • ICastFist@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    And transphobic! My baby blue and light pink pencils never draw straight lines!!!

    source
  • SARGE@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Oof, you must have gotten a shipment of Ferengi pencils, they can be a little… “Eccentric”

    source
• MNByChoice@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Don’t create or spread bait.

  Most people are too stupid to know the difference. Not you of course. You know what is up.

  source

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    sorry consider the bait spread i personally have the opinion that bait inoculation is possible

    source
• db2@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Image

  source

  • Bahnd@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Thats the scary part, in 2023 that was a good way to identify AI slop. Its getting tricky bow and you need an eye for detail and lighting. By 2027, I fear people wont be able to tell the difference.

    source

    • WuceBrillis@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Next up is music. It’ll start with jingles and the background music for commercials, then background music for movies and eventually most of the beats you hear on the radio will be made by AI.

      I think the industry will still want to have real singers, so they can still make money on concerts. But the AI will be writing a lot of the lyrics for many of the big pop hits.

      Your kids will be fed this garbage all throughout their childhood, and when they’re old enough to develop a critical sense they will just be used to it.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Sometimes non vegan… it’s boiling the fucking planet.

  source

  • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I mean, the impact AI has on the climate is nothing compared to the animal product industry

    source

    • Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      The impact per work of AI vs, say, a set of pighair brushes is massively higher.

      Which is the fairest way of comparing them, per artwork.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• pewpew@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Nice ragebait

  source

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    is it bait if i posted it because i thought it was funny

    source
• mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I’m building a house in the middle of nowhere without internet. Anyone want to join me?

  source

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    there’s a website called like “land of text” or something which is basically an infinite .txt where people can edit stuff in real time. You should build a house there

    source
  • SerotoninSwells@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Omg yes how do I throw money at you.

    source
  • ameancow@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    This is also my plan, but for real.

    source

    • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      We can go 50/50

      source
• HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  This feels just like the twitter men roleplaying as women saying that they love misogyny.

  They’re using “woke” language to promote anti-woke subjects.

  source

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    good way to put it

    source
• Etterra@discuss.online ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  OP: Nothing’s better than AI art!

  Me: counts fingers suspiciously

  source
• Aggravationstation@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  That’s a pretty long pencil

  source

  • Etterra@discuss.online ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    And wobbly.

    source

    • Aggravationstation@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Something is making me suspect this is AI generated, but I can’t quite put my finger on it.

      source
  • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    also sharpened by some wacky sharpener that leaves an off-center tip

    source
  • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I mean, the shorter an object is, the harder it is to snap.

    source
• WrenFeathers@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I pressed the demo button on a keyboard in a music store once.

  My second album will be out next month if anyone is interested.

  source
• moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  this is obviously satire

  source

  • Hobo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    The title assured me that this was not satire. Since I have no critical thinking skills I’m not sure who to believe.

    source
• finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  -More Creative
  -Creates the same thing over and over
  -Cannot create new things like an overfull wine glass without reference images

  source

  • daannii@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The only thing it can do is regurgitate.

    I think it has some value. I’ve been enjoying political deep fakes. Like that one of trump sucking musk toes.

    I also think AI has some value for artist to use as a tool. Not to fully create pieces but to help.

    If it’s used in that way it’s more ethical. . For instance, if I’m working on a painting, I often start with a real photograph. (My own or free to use reference image from a source giving permission).

    I put it in Photoshop and use filters to increase edge contrast. Then I create a sketch over it. I print the sketch to scale and then transfer it to my canvas or paper. Or use it to make digital painting.

    Another thing I do is use filters in Photoshop (the cutout one) to help me better able to see blocks of color changes. Because human perception makes it difficult for us to actually perceive these.

    I then reference that image during the painting process.

    With a specific AI you can apply a painting style of one image to another. This was actually the first free AI type art. It was called deep dream or something like that. About 5 years ago. The website is still up but doesn’t offer this anymore. But I found one that does.

    So yeah you upload two images. A photo you took. And a painting you made. And set the percentage of change.

    And it can help you plan a painting by making a version that will have your painting style applied. It’s actually kinda awesome.

    But as you can invade you could upload someone else’s photograph. And someone else’s art piece.

    Stealing their style.

    I still think this specific AI tool has the most value for artist to use.

    source

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I don’t have time to read replies like this.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• DrunkAnRoot@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  theres no thumb just another index finger …

  source

  • werewolfborg@ttrpg.network ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    They have reverse toe thumbs.

    source

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Digglet thumbs

      source
• Strider@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Please make me a wine glass filled to the brim with wine, almost spilling over.

  source
• Simulation6@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I to have no talent and am unable to create traditional art.

  source

  • Valmond@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    But what about getting likes without any effort or personal involvement??! /s

    source
• AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  To be fair, sourcing vegan-friendly art supplies is often significantly more frustrating than finding vegan food. But as others have said, doing - do I call it ‘traditional digital’ art? - is going to have a much smaller environmental impact than AI generation systems that are dependent on servers. A used Thinkpad x230 > Midjourney?

  source

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Also wanna add that in theory I’m not against AI art generation, only the way it’s usually implemented. All creativity is derivative, and as long as the user is remixing free and public domain content, I think the gained accessibility for far more people to bring their expressions to life where they otherwise would not have been able to, is worth far more than the perceived threats felt by a stagnant copy monopolist industry.

    But the key thing here is proper implementation. It’s like every time we get a new toy, we forget all over again that software freedom is a moral imperative in all forms of software.

    source

    • mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Freedom relies on consent and mutual reciprocity, otherwise it’s exploitation. AI art diffusion models that scraped digital art portfolios and did not gain the consent of the artists nor did the artists get compensation is exploitation full stop. There is no freedom in exploitation.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• anotherpurpleheathen@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I’m tired.

  Anyone can make art if they want. I’ll just keep saying it. Look at hyperbole comics, Cyanide and Happiness—you already know the spiel. There are classist traditions in some art spaces but you don’t have to participate in them. We have outsider art. We have fringe subcultures and movements.

  I’ll be honest, it’s hard to tell if anything is a joke anymore. I thought Trump was a joke and he’s in the White House now… blame the autism.

  source
• ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  if traditional art is transphobic how are drag queens a thing

  (i know drag !== trans but still)

  source
• 2ugly2live@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  What art are they looking out? Artists have been making powerful pieces with hidden messages and symbols since forever. Even graffiti can be used to disrupt and inform. Yes, there is garbage, but there’s garbage everywhere.

  source
• kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I notice they used an actual photograph for their post… isn’t photography “traditional” artwork? Why not generate a person with weirdly smooth features, 6 and a half fingers on one hand, a pencil that looks vaguely like a bunch of dry spaghetti, and a sports team jersey with a garbled illegible logo? It’s so much faster, more accessible and less misogynistic.

  source
• ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  How much you bet on that this very same person is now part of the “dark enlightement” after the progressives almost unanimusly rejected generative AI slop?

  source
• bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I asked an AI to draw me a group friends celebrating a birthday. The result was all blond white dudes. Then I asked it to make a diverse group of friends instead. The result was all black women.

  source

  • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    just did the very same, inspired by your post. the image does not load but it looks better…

    Image

    source
  • easily3667@lemmus.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Sounds like a thing that Really Happened.

    source
• AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I like how a few people have commented disputing the meme.

  You don’t need to argue against it. We all know it’s bait/satire.

  source

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    but the title said explicitly the opposite!

    source
  • RandomVideos@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Wouldnt this argument only work when responding to the original post? I doubt the original poster uses lemmy

    source
• nebulaone@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Meaningless. Soulless. Dead.

  source
• Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I hope we all realize that this is clearly satire or some weird way to make “woke” people seem stupid, right? 😭

  source

  • anotherpurpleheathen@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    It truly does get hard to tell after a certain point, though. People get mentally fatigued when “it’s just a joke bro” has been said the millionth time. And when crazy awful people with too much money are backing that joke. I’m tired.

    source
• Battle_Masker@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  inclusive

  accessible

  make some stuff with disabled people and people of color featured and see what happens

  source

  • Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Take an older model and you’ll get nothing but disabled people

    source

    • mutual_ayed@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Because of the mangled hands? Like the ones in OPs image?

      source
• hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  🪝

  source
• 5in1k@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  What a dumb asshole.

  source
• HikingVet@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  All that person is gonna do with that grip is rip the eraser off.

  source