Don’t create or spread bait.
Most people are too stupid to know the difference. Not you of course. You know what is up.
Submitted 3 days ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to [deleted]
https://lemmy.cafe/pictrs/image/fc9ab27d-4b0b-4b39-940f-cd8150b30242.webp
Don’t create or spread bait.
Most people are too stupid to know the difference. Not you of course. You know what is up.
sorry consider the bait spread i personally have the opinion that bait inoculation is possible
I hate how misogynistic traditional art is! Just last week, when I was drawing, my pencil started ranting about “feeeeemales.”
I tried to draw a bunny rabbit for Easter and instead I drew Harvey Weinstein! shakes fists Aaaaaart!
Hate when this happens
When I was a kid, every time I tried to draw something it just ended up being a dick and balls.
Please tell me you gave him the bunny ears and if so where I can purchase this masterpiece.
And transphobic! My baby blue and light pink pencils never draw straight lines!!!
Oof, you must have gotten a shipment of Ferengi pencils, they can be a little… “Eccentric”
Thats the scary part, in 2023 that was a good way to identify AI slop. Its getting tricky bow and you need an eye for detail and lighting. By 2027, I fear people wont be able to tell the difference.
Next up is music. It’ll start with jingles and the background music for commercials, then background music for movies and eventually most of the beats you hear on the radio will be made by AI.
I think the industry will still want to have real singers, so they can still make money on concerts. But the AI will be writing a lot of the lyrics for many of the big pop hits.
Your kids will be fed this garbage all throughout their childhood, and when they’re old enough to develop a critical sense they will just be used to it.
I pressed the demo button on a keyboard in a music store once.
My second album will be out next month if anyone is interested.
Sometimes non vegan… it’s boiling the fucking planet.
I mean, the impact AI has on the climate is nothing compared to the animal product industry
The impact per work of AI vs, say, a set of pighair brushes is massively higher.
Which is the fairest way of comparing them, per artwork.
OP: Nothing’s better than AI art!
Me: counts fingers suspiciously
I to have no talent and am unable to create traditional art.
But what about getting likes without any effort or personal involvement??! /s
-More Creative
-Creates the same thing over and over
-Cannot create new things like an overfull wine glass without reference images
The only thing it can do is regurgitate.
I think it has some value. I’ve been enjoying political deep fakes. Like that one of trump sucking musk toes.
I also think AI has some value for artist to use as a tool. Not to fully create pieces but to help.
If it’s used in that way it’s more ethical. . For instance, if I’m working on a painting, I often start with a real photograph. (My own or free to use reference image from a source giving permission).
I put it in Photoshop and use filters to increase edge contrast. Then I create a sketch over it. I print the sketch to scale and then transfer it to my canvas or paper. Or use it to make digital painting.
Another thing I do is use filters in Photoshop (the cutout one) to help me better able to see blocks of color changes. Because human perception makes it difficult for us to actually perceive these.
I then reference that image during the painting process.
With a specific AI you can apply a painting style of one image to another. This was actually the first free AI type art. It was called deep dream or something like that. About 5 years ago. The website is still up but doesn’t offer this anymore. But I found one that does.
So yeah you upload two images. A photo you took. And a painting you made. And set the percentage of change.
And it can help you plan a painting by making a version that will have your painting style applied. It’s actually kinda awesome.
But as you can invade you could upload someone else’s photograph. And someone else’s art piece.
Stealing their style.
I still think this specific AI tool has the most value for artist to use.
I don’t have time to read replies like this.
if traditional art is transphobic how are drag queens a thing
(i know drag !== trans but still)
I’m tired.
Anyone can make art if they want. I’ll just keep saying it. Look at hyperbole comics, Cyanide and Happiness—you already know the spiel. There are classist traditions in some art spaces but you don’t have to participate in them. We have outsider art. We have fringe subcultures and movements.
I’ll be honest, it’s hard to tell if anything is a joke anymore. I thought Trump was a joke and he’s in the White House now… blame the autism.
That’s a pretty long pencil
And wobbly.
Something is making me suspect this is AI generated, but I can’t quite put my finger on it.
also sharpened by some wacky sharpener that leaves an off-center tip
I mean, the shorter an object is, the harder it is to snap.
Nice ragebait
is it bait if i posted it because i thought it was funny
To be fair, sourcing vegan-friendly art supplies is often significantly more frustrating than finding vegan food. But as others have said, doing - do I call it ‘traditional digital’ art? - is going to have a much smaller environmental impact than AI generation systems that are dependent on servers. A used Thinkpad x230 > Midjourney?
Also wanna add that in theory I’m not against AI art generation, only the way it’s usually implemented. All creativity is derivative, and as long as the user is remixing free and public domain content, I think the gained accessibility for far more people to bring their expressions to life where they otherwise would not have been able to, is worth far more than the perceived threats felt by a stagnant copy monopolist industry.
But the key thing here is proper implementation. It’s like every time we get a new toy, we forget all over again that software freedom is a moral imperative in all forms of software.
Freedom relies on consent and mutual reciprocity, otherwise it’s exploitation. AI art diffusion models that scraped digital art portfolios and did not gain the consent of the artists nor did the artists get compensation is exploitation full stop. There is no freedom in exploitation.
theres no thumb just another index finger …
They have reverse toe thumbs.
Digglet thumbs
I’m building a house in the middle of nowhere without internet. Anyone want to join me?
there’s a website called like “land of text” or something which is basically an infinite .txt where people can edit stuff in real time. You should build a house there
Omg yes how do I throw money at you.
This is also my plan, but for real.
We can go 50/50
Please make me a wine glass filled to the brim with wine, almost spilling over.
This feels just like the twitter men roleplaying as women saying that they love misogyny.
They’re using “woke” language to promote anti-woke subjects.
good way to put it
What art are they looking out? Artists have been making powerful pieces with hidden messages and symbols since forever. Even graffiti can be used to disrupt and inform. Yes, there is garbage, but there’s garbage everywhere.
this is obviously satire
The title assured me that this was not satire. Since I have no critical thinking skills I’m not sure who to believe.
I’m kinda done trying to have some sort of anti-stance with this. AI reminds me too much of smartphones, where anybody who didn’t have one was an asshole, ignorant stupid old person blah. I held out on a smartphone for something like ten years, just because they were pricey, I had my dumbphone and PC, I didn’t need one. Eventually you just couldn’t do adult business effectively without one and there I stood with an iPhone 4 when 3G was getting ready to disappear.
Everyone does nothing but piss and moan about their phones, now, all the “normal” people have been sucked into the vortex that created the “neckbeard”, and we live in a dystopia where everyone can’t seem to leave the house without their government tracking device. It didn’t matter at all back when they were hot and new, every kid had to have one and now we’re fucked.
It’s the same with AI. People jumped on that shit scary fast, I think GenZ was desperate to have something that felt like “their” technology. Once I heard the scientists acting like people were stupid for being anti-AI, then I knew it was over. The upper-middle-class has spoken, all you can do now is decide to get treated like crap. Capital wants AI, and what baby wants, baby gets. They have learned to whip you with your own children to make you obey.
My favorite use for Copilot is using it to translate normal declarative sentences into that awful passive-aggressive language they use in offices because they just can’t have the terrifying confrontation of, “I put all that information in the last email, please read it again.” It’s really good at that because it’s been trained on everything you’ve probably ever sent though Outlook.
That shit’s an arbitrary class barrier, so it’s good that you can use Copilot to translate sentences into White Woman to learn office talk the way I can use SpanishDict to translate my English into Spanish and back. There wasn’t really a way to do that before, and now you can study it and learn it so you can deal with the fucked up social requirements that go into a job that pays above the median wage.
Otherwise I have no profitable use for it. I desperately need to learn one.
So yeah, start using the shit out of it or get kicked out the airlock. Sucks for the artists but capital wants change and you’ve already lost. Yeah, I don’t really want to get good at anything, either, if this thing’s just gonna suck it up, take my skills and make me go work at McDonald’s anyway after decades of dedication. Love how technology empowers like 2/10ths of the people and throws most of us under the bus, again and again.
How much you bet on that this very same person is now part of the “dark enlightement” after the progressives almost unanimusly rejected generative AI slop?
What a dumb asshole.
🪝
I notice they used an actual photograph for their post… isn’t photography “traditional” artwork? Why not generate a person with weirdly smooth features, 6 and a half fingers on one hand, a pencil that looks vaguely like a bunch of dry spaghetti, and a sports team jersey with a garbled illegible logo? It’s so much faster, more accessible and less misogynistic.
I asked an AI to draw me a group friends celebrating a birthday. The result was all blond white dudes. Then I asked it to make a diverse group of friends instead. The result was all black women.
Sounds like a thing that Really Happened.
I like how a few people have commented disputing the meme.
You don’t need to argue against it. We all know it’s bait/satire.
but the title said explicitly the opposite!
Wouldnt this argument only work when responding to the original post? I doubt the original poster uses lemmy
Meaningless. Soulless. Dead.
I hope we all realize that this is clearly satire or some weird way to make “woke” people seem stupid, right? 😭
It truly does get hard to tell after a certain point, though. People get mentally fatigued when “it’s just a joke bro” has been said the millionth time. And when crazy awful people with too much money are backing that joke. I’m tired.
inclusive
accessible
make some stuff with disabled people and people of color featured and see what happens
Take an older model and you’ll get nothing but disabled people
Because of the mangled hands? Like the ones in OPs image?
sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
“Anarchist” lololol
Yeah, using the corporate product that stole all individuals’ work to regurgitate abortions from billionaire oligarch’s algorithms is totally “anarchist.”
Comrade_Spood@slrpnk.net 3 days ago
Exactly. I remember in Conquest of Bread when Kropotkin talked about freeing up more time by automating creative and intelligent pursuits so we can focus more on menial labor.
Obviously /s
ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 3 days ago
He would say that to lure more people into his North Pole workshop
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
It’s not stealing if there are no rules whatsoever, which is exactly what anarchy is!
/S
sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
There are rules. But rich people don’t have to follow them. It’s domination. Not anarchy/anarchism.
nialv7@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Uhhh I will get downvoted but I have to say, anarchy capitalism is still anarchism. And obviously disrespecting property rights is a very anarchist thing to do, so.
And many AI models you can run completely on your own hardware, no billionaire oligarchies have a say in what you do.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Most anarcho-capitalists, especially the Curtis Yarvin types, just want fascism, but with Inc. at the end, and call their dictator “Chief Executive Officer”.
ameancow@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Sounds more like people who want to have luxuries and comforts and money but don’t want to have anyone telling them what they can and can’t do.
Sounds about right for the current fascist techbro community.
100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 day ago
Anyone who claims “AI = anarchy” deserves to have a canvas broken on its head cartoon style
niktemadur@lemmy.world 3 days ago
bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL aMiRiTe… i’M sUcH aN aNaRcHiSt HyUcK hYuCk HyUcK!!!
It’s like these mentally lazy ignorant people look all around themselves, see how the horizon is basically at the same distance all around them, therefore conclude that they must be the center of the universe, then sprinkle in a few fashionable internet soundbites and catchphrases to “make themselves sound interesting” and “with it”.
anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
What classic art is transphobic. Lots of renaissance artists were LGB, the T came out when many of them painted themselves into biblical characters of different genders. It gets written off as because using themselves as models was more available than models, or vanity, but transphobic is far from the first description I’d come up with for the art history I learned.