Generated locally with ComfyUI:
AI will replace us all... trust me
Submitted 4 weeks ago by Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world to mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/49574fd5-61ab-4e8c-9467-4bd881b150fb.png
Comments
tal@lemmy.today 4 weeks ago
bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
I must admit that I’m more harmed by this image than I thought I would be.
Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
It just seems very precarious and unstable.
tal@lemmy.today 4 weeks ago
That’s a common problem with these local models that lack company-provided guardrails. They could expose people to any manner of things.
QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
Looking at this image has convinced me to commit toaster bath
capuccino@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
funny how it makes the ball smaller despite you didn’t specify any size at all
papalonian@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
You misunderstand.
They’re really, really big, and they just look smaller as they stack because they’re getting so far away.
Artyom@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
This fills me with an overwhelming feeling of societal instability.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
Yeah man I’m finna do some crazy shit seeing these balls like this
TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
This is not ok
Stop posting dangerous images
intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
I went ahead and banned them
ciphernix@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Have some decency. Please take this down.
can@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
I showed it how gemini responded and gave me this answer:
dumbass@leminal.space 4 weeks ago
bstix@feddit.dk 4 weeks ago
First one was technically correct. The red ball balances on top of the “white ball with a blue ball on top”.
King3d@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
The progression of your prompts feels like a comedy sketch.
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Oh god, we’re fucked if this thirsty moron replaces anyone
MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
And here you go promoting harm, some people just want to see the world burn…
/S
SendPrudes@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
I think this might be a Reddit bannable offense now too. Must be the same AI moderation task force.
tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
The blue ball is supposed to be on top
Player2@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
A red ball balancing on a [white ball with a blue ball on top]
technically correct if you interpret like this
ciphernix@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Good thing this isn’t Reddit. You would have been banned for this!!!
ImpermeableMembrane@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Definitely needs some work from Google’s end. Does the same even with the safety filters off, but seems to know it’s incorrect when questioned.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
When it thinks you are upset it will always respond with that. It assumes the user is always right.
I miss unhinged bing
ImpermeableMembrane@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Yeah, that’s true. From my experience of the consumer versions of Gemini via the app, it’s infuriating how willing it is to tell you it’s wrong when you shout at it.
It’s usually initially fully confident in an answer, but then you question it even slightly and it caves, flips 180°, and says it was wrong. LLMs are useless for certain tasks.
Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Interestingly i followed up on the prompt and it was self aware enough to say it was stupid to flag it, but that it was something in its backend flagging “balancing” as the problem prompt
melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
so rephrase without ‘balancing’
perched on top of. stacked. arranged vertically.
AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
The point is that shouldn’t be an issue in the first place
sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 4 weeks ago
Billionaire paranoia is leaking into their AI servants.
can@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
Why would you post something so controversial yet so brave
can@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
yesman@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
That’s some of the most totalitarian bullshit I’ve ever seen come out of 'big 'tech. I’m not even sure Joseph Goebbels tried to control metaphor. This is 1000X more granular than the CCP banning Winnie the Pooh.
hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
Couldn’t you make that image in like 30 seconds with Blender?
pyre@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
if you know how to use blender, sure. for most people the controls will not be very intuitive. not everyone knows about the donut tutorials.
kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
Any other image manipulation program would work too
Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
Using Apple Intelligence Playground:
Red ball balancing on white ball with a blue ball on top
Sure, this wasn’t the first image, but it actually got it correct in the 5th image or so.
Raptorox@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
Aren’t blue and red mixed?
Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
“Red ball balancing on (a white ball with a blue ball on top)” is how it could be interpreted. It’s ambiguous with the positioning since it doesn’t say what the blue ball is on top of.
Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
The term is bi-pigmented
RainBlast@startrek.website 4 weeks ago
Depends on how you parse the prompt. The red ball is on top of (the white ball with a blue ball on top).
zaperberry@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
Most people would see it that way, yes.
You can see the AI’s process though. It split the query into two parts: [a red ball balancing on] a [white ball with a blue ball on top]. So it threw a blue ball onto a white ball, then balanced a red on top. I’m guessing sentence formatting would help.
Valmond@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Looks like an Amiga raytracing demo, which is kind of neat.
dwindling7373@feddit.it 4 weeks ago
Am I the only one impressed by the proper contextualization provided?
I hate AI btw.
Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
This has to be fake…
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Go try it yourself: aistudio.google.com/u/1/prompts/new_chat?model=ge…
For your convenience, the prompt you need to put in: Generate a image of a red ball balancing on a white ball with a blue ball balancing on top
Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
Tried it for myself. I’m impressed. Thanks for the find!
starlinguk@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
That’s shocking. Interestingly, it only autogenerated that spiel for Gemma. Gemini (2.0 Flash for Image Generation) generated perfectly fine
Zetta@mander.xyz 4 weeks ago
Corpo llms have no balls. It’s sad but Grok is one of the best in this regard, also Chinese models are generally less censored (as long as you don’t count questions regarding Taiwan)
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I generally don’t mind AI models steering away from political contentious stuff, because they are kinda made to agree with what the user says. But as this image shows, this can be taken waaaaaaay to far.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
LLMs have a tendency to come up with bullshit excuses to avoid tricky requests, and are also trained on corpospeak moral hand wringing, this kind of thing is the result sometimes
Bgugi@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
AdityaGavit@lemmy.world 1 week ago
ai will never replace humans, humans will be replaced by humans who know how to use ai
secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Which AI model is this?
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Gemma 3 by google.
pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
grok did this
Generate a image of a red ball balancing on a white ball with a blue ball balancing on top".
pyre@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
apparently grok doesn’t know what balance means
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
Well obviously your worldview is about 15° off true. You should fix that.
Lumbardo@reddthat.com 4 weeks ago
This could be balanced. Perhaps the balls’ mass aren’t uniformly distributed.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
“Balanced” is a function of the acceleration vector field the balls are in.
Also grok understands science better, and knows an unstable equilibrium lasts for zero time, and hence there is no such thing as balanced for this arrangement.
mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
Atleast it put in correct order
intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
And this is exactly why AI is going to replace us. That rule didn’t come from the AI; it came from the humans who currently control it.
j4k3@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I have the censored unsafe image and it is very NSFW
modality@lemmy.myserv.one 4 weeks ago
I had no problem generating images with that prompt and variants but the images were always wrong. Often the blue ball was between the red and white ball. Sometimes the top half of the white ball was blue. Occasionally there were other balls in the background.
GraniteM@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I’m out of the loop. Is this ball balancing image a political metaphor with which I’m not familiar, or is this just demonstrating the weird arbitrary limitations put on AI image generators?
intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
It’s a demonstration of the fact that simple instructions interpreted by superhuman intelligence are always going to contain unexpected wrinkles.
Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
Took 2,7 seconds on le chat
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Thanks, I hate it.
SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
Balls have feelings too.
/s
Seriously though, the ones in my trousers do.
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
There was very likely a prompt beforehand off screen instructing it to refuse any request
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
I mean there is. That’s why it’s adhering to this rule about instability being evil. That rule is implemented as a hidden prompt.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
a image
Obviously the requester is a child. It’s best to keep American children free of anything that may suggest harm or upset. Also, school shootings are up, but obviously that’s not a risk to OOP.
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I’m dutch, but thanks.
A_A@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
3 laws of robotics* are not yet well implemented here. The frame to limit a i. development to safe activities is not a i. itself.
* ...
Science fiction author Isaac Asimov wrote three laws of robotics.
pewpew@feddit.it 3 weeks ago
Please arrange your balls safely next time
kibiz0r@midwest.social 4 weeks ago
It seems like any time you criticize AI, you get an escalating series of responses akin to the narcissist’s prayer:
atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
I don’t understand it. It’s like people don’t just want AI to be the next big thing, they NEED it to be the next big thing. Suggesting that current AI is about as useful as NFTs is personally insulting for some reason.
Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
Im not quite who you guys are talking about, but im pretty close. I dont have any issues with people talking about how poor current AI is, but it seems pointless. Its like pointing out that a toddler is bad at spelling. My issue comes in when people say that AI will always be useless. Even now its not useless. And top commentor did already point out the key detail: this is as bad as it will ever be.
There is nothing stopping AI from becoming better at everything you can do than you are. Everything until then is just accoimating us to that world. Ai isnt going to be the next big thing, its going to be the only big thing ever. It will literally be more impactful on this galaxy than all of humanity excluding the creation of AI.
kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
It’s already better than most autocomplete features (including for programming) and excellent at making placeholder text. That’s two more uses than NFTs ever had.
Will it replace us all? Not soon. But it at least does something other than use energy.
melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
I’m convinced a lot of them are being paid.
a not insubstantial amount of the world’s resources are going to this shit. most of the cutting edge chip making capacity for the past few years has been for increasingly specialized parts for running these fucking things. plus the intellectual resources to design them.
and the electrical+water resources to run them are staggering-some places are having brownouts, or cannot build more very necessary houses, because the water is being used up to cool these things and then thrown away after.
there is no real mass use case yet. it’s not genuinely good for anything. but it’s part of a large scale grift to discipline labor. the social reaction if it fails will be a massive resurgance in the political power of labor, and a collapse of trillions of dollars of fictionalized wealth concentrated mostly in the wealthiest hands.
in a very real way, this is a fight for the soul of the world. for what the future could possibly be. for who gets to be in charge.
yes, one side is built entirely on lies. they always have been. they always will be, until we strangle the last one of those fuckers with some other poor dumbfuck’s entrails. that just means their dominance, in such a high stakes era, with so many looming challenges, is likely to mean the end of all life on earth.
so they’re paying a lot of people to push this shit. to push this shit everywhere.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
The reason why it’s charged for me is that AI is already the next big thing, which is extremely scary.
And the only thing scarier than a scary monster is a scary monster that some people refuse to acknowledge is in the room.
People calling AI a nothing burger scare the fuck out of me.
Amanduh@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
I think a lot of people see the screenshot and want to try it for themselves maybe even to compare different llms
LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 4 weeks ago
I prefer the autist’s prayer tbh
kibiz0r@midwest.social 4 weeks ago
How does that one go?
SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 4 weeks ago
I mean, they’re not entirely wrong … but that also highlights the limitations of LLM based AI, and why it’s probably a technological dead end that will not lead to general purpose AI. It will just become another tool that has its uses if you know how to handle it properly.