I attempted your prompt.
AI will replace us all... trust me
Submitted 1 day ago by Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world to mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/49574fd5-61ab-4e8c-9467-4bd881b150fb.png
Comments
dumbass@leminal.space 1 day ago
bstix@feddit.dk 23 hours ago
First one was technically correct. The red ball balances on top of the “white ball with a blue ball on top”.
King3d@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
The progression of your prompts feels like a comedy sketch.
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Oh god, we’re fucked if this thirsty moron replaces anyone
tal@lemmy.today 1 day ago
bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
I must admit that I’m more harmed by this image than I thought I would be.
Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee 1 day ago
It just seems very precarious and unstable.
tal@lemmy.today 1 day ago
That’s a common problem with these local models that lack company-provided guardrails. They could expose people to any manner of things.
QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Looking at this image has convinced me to commit toaster bath
capuccino@lemmy.world 1 day ago
funny how it makes the ball smaller despite you didn’t specify any size at all
papalonian@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You misunderstand.
They’re really, really big, and they just look smaller as they stack because they’re getting so far away.
Artyom@lemm.ee 1 day ago
This fills me with an overwhelming feeling of societal instability.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 16 hours ago
Yeah man I’m finna do some crazy shit seeing these balls like this
TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 1 day ago
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
This is not ok
Stop posting dangerous images
intensely_human@lemm.ee 16 hours ago
I went ahead and banned them
ciphernix@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Have some decency. Please take this down.
can@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
I showed it how gemini responded and gave me this answer:
Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
Using Apple Intelligence Playground:
Red ball balancing on white ball with a blue ball on top
Sure, this wasn’t the first image, but it actually got it correct in the 5th image or so.
Raptorox@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
Aren’t blue and red mixed?
Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 13 hours ago
The term is bi-pigmented
Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 11 hours ago
“Red ball balancing on (a white ball with a blue ball on top)” is how it could be interpreted. It’s ambiguous with the positioning since it doesn’t say what the blue ball is on top of.
RainBlast@startrek.website 14 hours ago
Depends on how you parse the prompt. The red ball is on top of (the white ball with a blue ball on top).
zaperberry@lemmy.ca 14 hours ago
Most people would see it that way, yes.
You can see the AI’s process though. It split the query into two parts: [a red ball balancing on] a [white ball with a blue ball on top]. So it threw a blue ball onto a white ball, then balanced a red on top. I’m guessing sentence formatting would help.
MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 1 day ago
VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
And here you go promoting harm, some people just want to see the world burn…
/S
SendPrudes@lemm.ee 1 day ago
I think this might be a Reddit bannable offense now too. Must be the same AI moderation task force.
tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
The blue ball is supposed to be on top
Player2@lemm.ee 1 day ago
A red ball balancing on a [white ball with a blue ball on top]
technically correct if you interpret like this
ciphernix@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Good thing this isn’t Reddit. You would have been banned for this!!!
Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Interestingly i followed up on the prompt and it was self aware enough to say it was stupid to flag it, but that it was something in its backend flagging “balancing” as the problem prompt
melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
so rephrase without ‘balancing’
perched on top of. stacked. arranged vertically.
AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 17 hours ago
The point is that shouldn’t be an issue in the first place
Bgugi@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
ImpermeableMembrane@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Definitely needs some work from Google’s end. Does the same even with the safety filters off, but seems to know it’s incorrect when questioned.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
When it thinks you are upset it will always respond with that. It assumes the user is always right.
I miss unhinged bing
ImpermeableMembrane@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yeah, that’s true. From my experience of the consumer versions of Gemini via the app, it’s infuriating how willing it is to tell you it’s wrong when you shout at it.
It’s usually initially fully confident in an answer, but then you question it even slightly and it caves, flips 180°, and says it was wrong. LLMs are useless for certain tasks.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 16 hours ago
And this is exactly why AI is going to replace us. That rule didn’t come from the AI; it came from the humans who currently control it.
modality@lemmy.myserv.one 17 hours ago
I had no problem generating images with that prompt and variants but the images were always wrong. Often the blue ball was between the red and white ball. Sometimes the top half of the white ball was blue. Occasionally there were other balls in the background.
secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Which AI model is this?
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Gemma 3 by google.
hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
Billionaire paranoia is leaking into their AI servants.
yesman@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That’s some of the most totalitarian bullshit I’ve ever seen come out of 'big 'tech. I’m not even sure Joseph Goebbels tried to control metaphor. This is 1000X more granular than the CCP banning Winnie the Pooh.
can@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Why would you post something so controversial yet so brave
can@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Couldn’t you make that image in like 30 seconds with Blender?
pyre@lemmy.world 1 day ago
if you know how to use blender, sure. for most people the controls will not be very intuitive. not everyone knows about the donut tutorials.
kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Any other image manipulation program would work too
pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
grok did this
Generate a image of a red ball balancing on a white ball with a blue ball balancing on top".
pyre@lemmy.world 1 day ago
apparently grok doesn’t know what balance means
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Well obviously your worldview is about 15° off true. You should fix that.
Lumbardo@reddthat.com 1 day ago
This could be balanced. Perhaps the balls’ mass aren’t uniformly distributed.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 16 hours ago
“Balanced” is a function of the acceleration vector field the balls are in.
Also grok understands science better, and knows an unstable equilibrium lasts for zero time, and hence there is no such thing as balanced for this arrangement.
mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 hours ago
Atleast it put in correct order
dwindling7373@feddit.it 1 day ago
Am I the only one impressed by the proper contextualization provided?
I hate AI btw.
Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
This has to be fake…
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Go try it yourself: aistudio.google.com/u/1/prompts/new_chat?model=ge…
For your convenience, the prompt you need to put in: Generate a image of a red ball balancing on a white ball with a blue ball balancing on top
Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Tried it for myself. I’m impressed. Thanks for the find!
Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
That’s shocking. Interestingly, it only autogenerated that spiel for Gemma. Gemini (2.0 Flash for Image Generation) generated perfectly fine
Zetta@mander.xyz 1 day ago
Corpo llms have no balls. It’s sad but Grok is one of the best in this regard, also Chinese models are generally less censored (as long as you don’t count questions regarding Taiwan)
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I generally don’t mind AI models steering away from political contentious stuff, because they are kinda made to agree with what the user says. But as this image shows, this can be taken waaaaaaay to far.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
LLMs have a tendency to come up with bullshit excuses to avoid tricky requests, and are also trained on corpospeak moral hand wringing, this kind of thing is the result sometimes
GraniteM@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
I’m out of the loop. Is this ball balancing image a political metaphor with which I’m not familiar, or is this just demonstrating the weird arbitrary limitations put on AI image generators?
intensely_human@lemm.ee 16 hours ago
It’s a demonstration of the fact that simple instructions interpreted by superhuman intelligence are always going to contain unexpected wrinkles.
Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 1 day ago
Took 2,7 seconds on le chat
j4k3@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I have the censored unsafe image and it is very NSFW
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Thanks, I hate it.
SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 1 day ago
Balls have feelings too.
/s
Seriously though, the ones in my trousers do.
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 day ago
There was very likely a prompt beforehand off screen instructing it to refuse any request
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 1 day ago
intensely_human@lemm.ee 16 hours ago
I mean there is. That’s why it’s adhering to this rule about instability being evil. That rule is implemented as a hidden prompt.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
a image
Obviously the requester is a child. It’s best to keep American children free of anything that may suggest harm or upset. Also, school shootings are up, but obviously that’s not a risk to OOP.
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m dutch, but thanks.
Cris16228@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Guess what? People can make mistakes! Crazy, right? Not everyone’s first language is English
A_A@lemmy.world 1 day ago
3 laws of robotics* are not yet well implemented here. The frame to limit a i. development to safe activities is not a i. itself.
* ...
Science fiction author Isaac Asimov wrote three laws of robotics.
HappinessPill@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
The red ball is socialist thus very radical…
kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 day ago
It seems like any time you criticize AI, you get an escalating series of responses akin to the narcissist’s prayer:
atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
I don’t understand it. It’s like people don’t just want AI to be the next big thing, they NEED it to be the next big thing. Suggesting that current AI is about as useful as NFTs is personally insulting for some reason.
kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
It’s already better than most autocomplete features (including for programming) and excellent at making placeholder text. That’s two more uses than NFTs ever had.
Will it replace us all? Not soon. But it at least does something other than use energy.
Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Im not quite who you guys are talking about, but im pretty close. I dont have any issues with people talking about how poor current AI is, but it seems pointless. Its like pointing out that a toddler is bad at spelling. My issue comes in when people say that AI will always be useless. Even now its not useless. And top commentor did already point out the key detail: this is as bad as it will ever be.
There is nothing stopping AI from becoming better at everything you can do than you are. Everything until then is just accoimating us to that world. Ai isnt going to be the next big thing, its going to be the only big thing ever. It will literally be more impactful on this galaxy than all of humanity excluding the creation of AI.
melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
I’m convinced a lot of them are being paid.
a not insubstantial amount of the world’s resources are going to this shit. most of the cutting edge chip making capacity for the past few years has been for increasingly specialized parts for running these fucking things. plus the intellectual resources to design them.
and the electrical+water resources to run them are staggering-some places are having brownouts, or cannot build more very necessary houses, because the water is being used up to cool these things and then thrown away after.
there is no real mass use case yet. it’s not genuinely good for anything. but it’s part of a large scale grift to discipline labor. the social reaction if it fails will be a massive resurgance in the political power of labor, and a collapse of trillions of dollars of fictionalized wealth concentrated mostly in the wealthiest hands.
in a very real way, this is a fight for the soul of the world. for what the future could possibly be. for who gets to be in charge.
yes, one side is built entirely on lies. they always have been. they always will be, until we strangle the last one of those fuckers with some other poor dumbfuck’s entrails. that just means their dominance, in such a high stakes era, with so many looming challenges, is likely to mean the end of all life on earth.
so they’re paying a lot of people to push this shit. to push this shit everywhere.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 16 hours ago
The reason why it’s charged for me is that AI is already the next big thing, which is extremely scary.
And the only thing scarier than a scary monster is a scary monster that some people refuse to acknowledge is in the room.
People calling AI a nothing burger scare the fuck out of me.
SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 17 hours ago
I mean, they’re not entirely wrong … but that also highlights the limitations of LLM based AI, and why it’s probably a technological dead end that will not lead to general purpose AI. It will just become another tool that has its uses if you know how to handle it properly.
Amanduh@lemm.ee 1 day ago
I think a lot of people see the screenshot and want to try it for themselves maybe even to compare different llms
LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 1 day ago
I prefer the autist’s prayer tbh
kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 day ago
How does that one go?