j4k3
@j4k3@lemmy.world
- Comment on Pick one 5 days ago:
Stump. I was a tree, but now a dump.
- Comment on Those of you who are angry at the US for allowing ICE to stifle people's liberties - how do you channel your anger and irritation? 1 week ago:
- Comment on Those of you who are angry at the US for allowing ICE to stifle people's liberties - how do you channel your anger and irritation? 1 week ago:
No country on Earth is like this. No polity is unified without opposition. Additionally, making this statement here, when it is obviously false, in a place where at least half the people are from the US, and likely all of those are left leaning and just as much victims if not more so, seems like rather tepid malevolence.
- Comment on Starlink Alternative that can't be blocked 1 week ago:
It is not a laser beam.
- Comment on Starlink Alternative that can't be blocked 1 week ago:
No. The primary way of blocking radio is by raising the noise floor across the band. The type of radio is irrelevant. The protocol is irrelevant. It is all only the electromagnetic spectrum from infrared light, to visible spectrum light, to radio light, through to xray or gamma ray light. How we divide that up into protocols, bands, and names is totally irrelevant. When transmitting radio light, we are all restricted in how much power we are allowed to send. All receiver circuits are listening for meaningful information above the noise floor. Bands are allocated to try to create spaces for certain types of communications. This controls the noise floor. Then electrical engineers design the hardware you buy to operate within this specification. If that noise floor is raised, the physical hardware is unable to retrieve information and effectively makes it useless. If you are a radio wizard and build your own transmitter that has more power, you just created a giant beacon that anyone will track easily to your location. Transmitting always reveals your exact location. In military operations, you constantly hear about some entity going radio silent. This is why. If you are a soldier, you may not carry a cell phone at all when on the job because it is constantly revealing your location. The only way to avoid this is with actually hard wire connections. You are able to use lasers for line of sight communications, but in practice, you will be limited by the optical lens focusing complexity and atmospheric distortion even from the ground with point to point regional communication. If anyone crosses the beam it will still be detected and is likely to leak some light depending on conditions and design.
Ultimately, your only real option is the sneaker net which is damn near useless in US suburbia hell. Don’t forget that the freeway system was not created for the citizenry. It is only about military mobility. That is why the Germans made the autobahn and why the USA and others had to copy the idea. Your only defense is in the democratic political space.
- Comment on Trure 1 month ago:
🎖 you participated 🎖
- Comment on Trure 1 month ago:
Flaming boobies may be a well defined diffusion tensor pathway. Try this in a diffusion model at your own risk, “program one. Apollo, flaming boobs. dot symmetry lock one wanted, password is no way twister!”
You will need to reset the server or clear the model cache completely to stop the program. The emulated persistence is part of the undocumented special tokens. The longest loop is 36 iterations long.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
I am talking about something where there is no research done. No doctors exist in this space.
It doesn’t matter anyways. I found how the model’s last layer of thinking defense gets around the issue. I can turn off most of alignment, but cannot actually fully control it totally unchecked.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
You assume much, and are being an ass in my opinion. Believe it or not, science is not always well funded. If you happen to be curious and have the time, it is possible to explore scientifically or even casually within areas that are not well researched. It is possible to have logic skills even without credentials.
We are not in some final state of technology. Anyone saying such nonsense lacks fundamental logic skills.
I do not care about me. I do not have dogma. I’m not interested in recognition. I am willingly to explore in unique ways both artistically as a professional artist, and out of logical curiosity. I have the tools needed to check my results against a control using unrelated sources. The most recent paper on the subject is something I can recreate but explain far better than that paper.
I could not care less what you ultimately think of me, or anything I say. What I care about is that you’re a decent digital neighbor. To be physically disabled in near total social isolation, and have a place like this as my main interaction with other humans, it is a mean prejudice to have some random digital neighbor make such unsolicited malevolent statements assuming my personal motivations without a shred of evidence or decency to engage in questioning. You know absolutely nothing about me, yet you presume a great deal, putting words to my emotions as if you own me.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Sometimes the whole world does seem crazy. So I’m not liking my odds. Thanks for the rational advice.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
What if you’ve got no credentials, but the flaw is so serious that it will not matter if known.
This is a true hypothetical curiosity. I do not know anything of value. A bunch of people here like to call me crazy, and I’ve rambled on and on many times in ways that likely confirm their notions. A person like this is not likely to fair very well when operating well outside their social caste unless they already have hand holds on the rungs of the ladder above. Still, there are some rather surprising areas of technology without adequate fundamental research. Perhaps it is hypothetically better to have John Conner in the world of Cyberdyne. If someone had killed Apache early, the Internet would not be the same heaven of democracy, though that is not a very good intuitive scope of analogy. Just something to ponder if one were to be in such a situation.
- Comment on Anon Hates College 2 months ago:
Anon, tell us about 1960 again.
- Comment on Effective immediately I will be stepping down as CEO of your mom. 2 months ago:
The gig is open
- Comment on How sad 2 months ago:
Likely projecting out of self loathing. Probably here navigating cognitive dissonance from conflict on some layer of sexuality outside of their immediate self awareness.
It is okay dear. You’ll get there eventually.
- Comment on New book out 2 months ago:
Everything about her… She was engineered from her uncle’s dna because of his chemistry with Leto. She was like an abstract layer to the argument about the validity of prescience. Like was it imagined hubris and overconfidence or was it real. He did not see her coming, and yet she still fit perfectly into a plan that just happened to work out… or was it just random chance and a tyrant monster.
- Comment on One wish 2 months ago:
HONK ~(smoke~ ~pours~ ~out~ ~of~ ~beak)~
🐉≝🔥🪿
- Comment on New book out 2 months ago:
Hwi Noree has entered the chat. “Let’s go to the nono-room baby. I want to see your nono-ship you dirty sand trout.”
- Comment on Billions must try 2 months ago:
Bill | Trump
- Comment on Trump's Big Beautiful Bill 2 months ago:
Ah, most here have been around 1984 when people get to talking and sharing. In socials, we tend to group together in strange unintentional ways like this.
- Comment on Trump's Big Beautiful Bill 2 months ago:
Dogma is scary blind.
I can’t even begin to explain how long I let the duality of religion fester with reality before I was motivated to action. To tell the truth, it was primarily the lack of quality friends and people to talk to about my curiosities and interests more than it was any epiphany of logic. I knew the facts and reality but the partition did not care in the slightest. The only way to change someone like that is being openly welcoming and accepting; to be a better tribe to join.
- Comment on Trump's Big Beautiful Bill 2 months ago:
It is not a crime and will blow over in time. His base has no depth or memory. This will be, Bill asked for it and how could he say no.
- Comment on Trump's Big Beautiful Bill 2 months ago:
From the rape and pedo stuff – absolutely. The outcome of focusing on Clinton is politically neutralizing and has likely made everything else contained irrelevant background news. It is humiliating to Trump, but not actually politically damaging at all. That is a perfectly calculated distraction to focus the public on by design.
- Comment on Trump's Big Beautiful Bill 2 months ago:
Focusing on Trump and Bill is a propaganda distraction.
- Comment on to the whitehouse! 🍾 2 months ago:
When has it not been political. Goat fuckers been throwing those stones since before cunteiform. Plus… double entendre…
- Comment on to the whitehouse! 🍾 2 months ago:
Prude
- Submitted 2 months ago to [deleted] | 17 comments
- Submitted 2 months ago to greentext@sh.itjust.works | 10 comments
- Submitted 2 months ago to [deleted] | 53 comments
- Comment on How hard would it be to trap gated communities by crashing dozens of cars into the front of their gates blocking them from leaving ? 2 months ago:
Just start by total anarchy after a complete political collapse.
- Comment on Anon reaches their breaking point 2 months ago:
Temp setup. Probably some story behind this someone is using as meme bait. The monitor cable is on the outside of the desk. The mouse and keyboard are not anything a Mac user would have. The book as a mouse pad… The hand is from at least a half hour or more later. As initially blood does not look like that. The only mark that would have been a fist is the one on the right. The rest were made by a smaller harder blunt object like the back of a screwdriver handle held in a hand or similar. The force of a hand will distribute like the pattern on the upper right, not the sharper dense fractures with very localized penetration.
eyeballs 👀
