intensely_human
@intensely_human@lemm.ee
- Comment on Deep Rock Galactic roguelike dev says innovation for innovation's sake is too expensive to survive: "We're a studio of 50 people with bills to pay" 1 week ago:
I would pay $10 a month (ongoing, MRR) to be able to fly their home base ship to different asteroids and occasionally have the bugs invade it. I would play the fuck out of that game.
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
I mean there is. That’s why it’s adhering to this rule about instability being evil. That rule is implemented as a hidden prompt.
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
a dutch child, then
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
Thanks for your opinion, mexicancartel
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
Yeah man I’m finna do some crazy shit seeing these balls like this
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
Depends on your point of view
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
Not if you counter the mass distribution with a positional offset.
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
“Balanced” is a function of the acceleration vector field the balls are in.
Also grok understands science better, and knows an unstable equilibrium lasts for zero time, and hence there is no such thing as balanced for this arrangement.
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
I’m sure he does. I mean it too.
If you disagree, name something you don’t think AI will surpass humans in.
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
People who claim AI can’t do X never have an actual definition of X.
I’ve been challenging people with that same basic question (“How do you define understanding? How do you define reasoning?”) and it’s always, 100% of the time, the end of the conversation. Nobody will even try to make a definition.
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
The reason why it’s charged for me is that AI is already the next big thing, which is extremely scary.
And the only thing scarier than a scary monster is a scary monster that some people refuse to acknowledge is in the room.
People calling AI a nothing burger scare the fuck out of me.
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
I went ahead and banned them
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
It’s a demonstration of the fact that simple instructions interpreted by superhuman intelligence are always going to contain unexpected wrinkles.
- Comment on AI will replace us all... trust me 1 week ago:
And this is exactly why AI is going to replace us. That rule didn’t come from the AI; it came from the humans who currently control it.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
My guess is it’s an instinct. You haven’t demonstrated any conscious appreciation of why discussion happens, so I’m guessing you just inherited an instinct to discuss things from your ancestors, who were more likely to survive given their predilection to talk
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
If we could get around the DNC’s stranglehold on itself, Bernie Sanders.
I would have said Tulsi Gabbard but that ship has sailed.
- Comment on MAGA Republican Logic 2 weeks ago:
So what’s different about this election, that makes you think it was rigged somehow, when all the other ones weren’t?
- Comment on MAGA Republican Logic 2 weeks ago:
I was a Democrat too. Your refusal to believe is part of why your party has lost power.
Your blindness only flies in your own echo chambers.
The downvotes I’ll receive only drive the point home that you do not value information you don’t like, and that is your biggest political weakness.
- Comment on MAGA Republican Logic 2 weeks ago:
The burden of proof is on one proving MAGA is trying to ban all those things. Can you prove any of them?
- Comment on MAGA Republican Logic 2 weeks ago:
Really? Provide evidence for one of the bans mentioned in the OP
- Comment on MAGA Republican Logic 2 weeks ago:
Of course you are. Comment saved.
- Comment on Tried to order a part before the tariffs 3 weeks ago:
Solid boundaries, clearly communicated. Giving the customer a choice without hurting their own bottom line. I agree. Excellent handling of the situation.
- Comment on How was your valentines day weekend? 5 weeks ago:
The latter
- Comment on It's why they tried to get rid of it 5 weeks ago:
Far out, man
- Comment on It's why they tried to get rid of it 5 weeks ago:
Look man when I was a kid Pluto was a planet. Therefore Pluto will always be a planet.
This mental inflexibility on my part may be related to autism, but I will never admit it.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
Literally no part of this is arguing that businesses should be allowed to discriminate against minorities.
DEI is discriminating against majorities. Anything other than merit as a consideration is discrimination.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
It was upvoted at first but then went negative. I have to say it’s a relief that people aren’t yet willing to embrace that position openly.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
Upvote this comment if you think it’s okay to discriminate against white people.
- Comment on why do people say annoying/rude stuff and then tell you “it was a joke!” 5 weeks ago:
People will test the quality of a communication channel by saying nonsensical things on that channel, to see if those interpreting the message believe the nonsense.
It’s a way of affirming a bond of understanding between people.
- Comment on Can you eat soap for acid reflux? 1 month ago:
That’s a lot! What was the effect? Have you taken that much before?
In my own experience if I take more than a teaspoon in maybe a four hour period, I start getting undigested leaves coming out the other end.