Now can we get proton support for GoG that is as convient and reliable as it is in Steam?
Steam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'
Submitted 3 months ago by ooli@lemmy.world to games@lemmy.world
Comments
BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 3 months ago
Remember when they said Galaxy would get linux support?
That said, Heroic is unofficial but has worked quite well.
brrt@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Heroic giving GOG an excuse not to get their shit together.
Banichan@dormi.zone 3 months ago
Dafuq is a proton
officermike@lemmy.world 3 months ago
A proton is a positively charged subatomic particle doing in the nucleus of an atom. But in this context, Proton is a translation layer that allows games that were built for Windows to run on Linux.
_Sprite@lemmy.world 3 months ago
it’s what people on linux use to play windows games on linux
ulkesh@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Lutris + GE-Proton + umu works. If you use GE-Proton as the runner, Lutris automatically uses umu to launch the game which launches within the Steam Pressure Vessel container.
You can manage GE-Proton downloads using Protonplus. The latest version, last I checked, is GE-Proton9-15.
Aceticon@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I’ve been playing more GoG games with Lutris + Wine in Linux than Steam games with Proton and I even have one situation of a game were the copy I bought in Steam doesn’t work with Proton, but the pirated copy I downloaded to see if that would work runs absolutely fine with Lutris + Wine.
For me at least it’s actually easier to sort problems out with games when using Lutris + Wine than it is with Proton and I can even make sure all games I run from Lutris are wrapped in a “firejail” sandbox, which amongst other things blocks all network access, something I can’t do with Proton.
It’s a vendor-tied solution meant to keep you in the Steam ecosystem, so for all the great work they did in past with it, the future is not Proton, it’s Wine.
BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
I’m not saying it doesn’t work. I’ve set several things from GoG up using Lutris. But in Steam it’s a two step process:
- Click Install
- Click Play
I want that level of ease from GoG.
ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Proton in Steam is absolutely easier. Lutris just automates work that some other user did, and if you’re doing it in something like Heroic launcher instead, you have to figure that out yourself. It often involves things like installing other Microsoft components that are bundled with the application on Steam, and in one case, even though the game was verified on Steam, there was no Lutris script, and I just couldn’t get it working on the GOG version.
Vespair@lemm.ee 3 months ago
I like GOG, but this is just weasel-words to take advantage of the ignorance of the public. Whether you receive the installs directly or not, you still don’t own your games, you are just licensing them, same as Steam.
This doesn’t tip the scales into the “this is wrong” territory for me, but I do think this kind of word manipulation exploiting an unknowledgeable public is a little bit slimy.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I just like calling it “the kill shot”, as though GOG is about to take all of Steam’s market share some time next week.
disdain@lemmy.world 3 months ago
please let this be true it would be really funny
ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
I think it is fair. When you buy games through GOG, you get the offline installer. Nobody can take that away from you.
When you buy games through Steam, you can only install them via the Steam client. If the Steam servers are offline, you cannot install your games. In theory, some games are without any DRM, and you can just zip them up, but even then that doesn’t always work, and you shouldn’t have to.
Providing an offline installer that works no matter what is as good as “owning” the game IMO, even if “technically” you are just purchasing a license to use the game.
Vespair@lemm.ee 3 months ago
I think it is more than just technically, personally. A thing I own is a thing I can pass down to my children, a thing I can break apart and rebuild, a thing I can modify without needing permission. I’m not denying that GOG offers a great asset that frees you from a corporate leash; that is awesome. But that’s not the same thing as owning, and presenting it as if it is is disingenuous. You are still licensing, not owning.
Again, I’m not saying this is egregious enough to be wrong, but I don’t like when any company uses manipulative language when speaking to me, even if I appreciate their intent. I just think it’s slimy.
Vintor@lemm.ee 3 months ago
I don’t think “weasel words” is the right term here.
You own the GOG games like you own a book you bought, and like you don’t own a DRM-crippled book, even though you might be entitled to read it under certain circumstances. The difference between downloading an installer and downloading a game on Steam is, the installer will continue to work even if GOG folds or decides they don’t like you anymore. But if Steam blocks your account, all the games you bought are gone, and Steam is fully in the right to do so since you don’t own their games.
cadekat@pawb.social 3 months ago
That’s not true. You still only receive a license to play the game, you do not own it. Directly from GOG’s website:
We give you and other GOG users the personal right (known legally as a ‘license’) to use GOG services and to download, access and/or stream (depending on the content) and use GOG content. This license is for your personal use. We can stop or suspend this license in some situations, which are explained later on.
Practically this means you cannot resell your GOG installer in the way you could resell a physical book.
Vespair@lemm.ee 3 months ago
I don’t think “weasel words” is the right term here.
I agree with you. GOG’s wording is fine, I was hasty in my reaction.
auzy@lemmy.world 3 months ago
People use steam because it’s good service, and a good product.
In fact, they also gave Linux a boost
They also have things like cloud saving
Developers use them because apparently they have some awesome features too for things like multiplayer and such and a great API
lapislazuli@feddit.org 3 months ago
I like steam as a user but it’s still proprietary software and I’m slightly concerned about what is going to happen when Gabe Newell steps down as president and ceo of Valve.
umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
100% agreed. just wish GOG was more linux friendly.
best of both worlds: piracy.
Burghler@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Much of the pirated games though will be GOG installers so might as well just install it with lutris/wine
umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
yes
goat@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
i wouldn’t pirate an indie game tho
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Unless you already bought it
daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Now if we could just have GOG Galaxy for Linux. It would make my life so much easier.
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Lutris lets you add your GOG account and download/install games directly. its not Galaxy, but its pretty flawless.
finestnothing@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Lutris is awesome.
Open source games, games with their own launcher, games on steam, gog, etc are all in it. Can pick to run things natively on Linux, use proton (pick your version or just use latest), wine, or choose from others, and it does it seamlessly. For games you already have installed on steam, you don’t need to reinstall them, it finds them and makes them runnable from within lutris once you connect your steam account, you can also install games that you own on any of your connected launchers, and browse/download your undownloaded games from themExamples for some of the stuff I have all in it now:
Catacyslm: DDA catapult launcher (free and open source game - highly recommend you try it out. Takes some getting used to, but there isn’t much you can’t do. Also, make sure you get cataclysm-tiles or use a launcher. ASCII is pure, but hard to get used to. Also, DO NOT buy it on steam.)
All of my installed steam games
Cyberpunk 2077 and the witcher 3 via gog
FFXIV (the official launcher, not steam)
Vintage story (open source but not free - highly recommend if you like open world survival crafting games with a big emphasis on survival)
davad@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Heroic Game Launcher is pretty cool. It does game save sync with GOG games too.
daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I know, I use it. I’d prefer an official Galaxy port though.
Famko@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I feel you. Installing Fallout London was such a pain in the ass for Linux.
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I wrote a guide for getting fallout london up and running if you need a hand
KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de 3 months ago
The amount of people thinking they are getting ripped off by steam now is astounding.
They are the reason this step is incredibly necessary.
jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I mean I’ve always had an issue that digital goods could always be revoked/taken back. That’s why I didn’t buy things on steam until it became basically the only way (as consoles have less physical media). This is just a great reminder for the public that we’re consistently loosing control over our digital lives.
I’ve been an advocate for forcing companies to change the wording for digital goofs to “lease” rather than “buy”. Cause at the end of the day, no one owns their steam library.
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
I mean, we are… Gabe became a billionaire that owns a yacht collection, his money came from somewhere, there’s no reason to defend any billionaires or their companies unless you are a billionaire yourself.
Adalast@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Gabe heads a company which is successful because it respects its employees, customers, and suppliers instead of constantly trying to marginalize and abuse them. They are not perfect by any means, but they do fit into the definition of ethical capitalism, which should not be understated. They don’t employ anticompetitive tactics like bribing/coercing developers into exclusivity contracts. They don’t operate with a bunch of 1099 contractors so they can avoid providing benefits. Etc.
mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
All online storefronts doing business in California will soon be required by law to stop lying to customers with words like “buy” when they really mean “license”. GOG is no exception.
blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 3 months ago
My understanding is that GOG is an exception to this. Here is a quote that I got from an Ars Technica article
California’s AB2426 law, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom Sept. 26, excludes subscription-only services, free games, and digital goods that offer “permanent offline download to an external storage source to be used without a connection to the internet.” Otherwise, sellers of digital goods cannot use the terms “buy, purchase,” or related terms that would “confer an unrestricted ownership interest in the digital good.” And they must explain, conspicuously, in plain language, that “the digital good is a license” and link to terms and conditions.
Since GOG does offer permanent offline installers that can be used without an internet connection, GOG is except from the new law.
DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
This has literally always been the case with Steam, the only difference is that people are told up front now. Things will likely continue to operate exactly the same as it has until now, I doubt Valve wants to disrupt the giant money train they have.
lud@lemm.ee 3 months ago
I would be surprised if it even was possible for them to change so that the games are bought. I suspect that would be quite complicated legally.
CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 3 months ago
It’s literally in the title that GOG does exactly that. Why would Steam’s hands be legally tied if GOG’s aren’t?
asexualchangeling@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
[deleted]Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Seriously not trying to just be contradictory:
What’s the difference? In practical terms, what does this mean for me as the consumer? We don’t own the intellectual property, but may use the software as-is? From a practical, consumer standpoint that feels the same as the days of owning your software on a disc, unable to be taken as long as you have physical control over the device. I’m fine with calling this “owning” personally.
I’m absolutely willing to be wrong on this. I’m by no means an expert. Please, if I have missed something, let me know.
Imhotep@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Can you sell them? or trade, give, even lean? My guess is you can’t. And when I was a kid I did all those things.
It’s not anedoctal IMO, but a change in paradigm. I’m not saying it’s all bad. I buy games on GOG. But I don’t own them really
A 2015 study in France showed 54% where more willing to buy a game when they knew they could sell them when done
HKayn@dormi.zone 3 months ago
There really is no difference. For almost all intents and purposes, GOG’s offline installers can be treated the same way as physical CDs of way back then, with one of the only exceptions being that you cannot resell them.
Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Plus, unless the installers have the full package, it’ll still require an internet connection. Usually installers download the files and then install them.
FelixCress@lemmy.world 3 months ago
You don’t have a clue, do you?
CryptoKitten@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
I like GOG and I like steam too. While it is true that GOG can’t take the offline installer from me, this does not make it true I can play the game forever since many games are dynamically linked to libraries that may not be available in the future. This happened to me with games I just had bought. Steam also dynamically links to libraries but what I like about the way they are doing it is that these are part of the base installation so as long as you keep these files, the games should keep working. Nothing being perfect, I think they both try to do things in their own way and try to convince us that it is the best one.
Klear@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Here’s another reminder to sign this initiative if you live in the EU.
Scribble902@feddit.uk 3 months ago
I’d totally sign…if the Russian funded tory party hadn’t decided we should leave because they were scared of the far right taking votes.
shiroininja@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Unpopular opinion: if I have to fudge with Wine instead of Proton, I simply will not bother. It’s 2024. I’m not going to fiddle with configs, or get a setup together just to play a single game. That’s ridiculous. A game should 100% be one click to run, whether it’s native or not. and if that’s not what is expected in 2024, Linux get it together. sincerely: a full time Linux gamer that is a single parent and doesn’t have time to fiddle just to play a game. Wine and most of its front ends need a major overhaul.
dingleberrylover@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Then just use Proton? You don’t need Steam for it. And sitting there and demanding “Linux” to get it “together” because it is 2024 is rather ignorant due to the fact that it is not Linux’ fault that the software in question needs additional workarounds in order to make it run. People out there are using their freetime to come up with solutions for problems caused by corporations using proprietary libraries and software. I don’t think that your opinion is unpopular. I get what you want, I do wish the same, and a lot of peoole would agree with it as well, but the context in which we operate here matters a lot.
Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 3 months ago
I test games for a living and most of the time wine runs perfectly fine. You can also just use umu laucher which does everything for you.
Also I don’t really get your point. Who’s forcing you to use wine instead of proton?
PushButton@lemmy.world 3 months ago
You need to “get it together” and buy games for your platform.
“That’s ridiculous”
keystome@lemmy.kde.social 3 months ago
What an ignorant and meaningless comment.
mrvictory1@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Heroic is decent imo. It lets you download Wine, manage prefixes, enable/disable dxvk/vkd3d, configure gamescope & mangohud and so on.
Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Does GOG work on Linux?
SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 3 months ago
2.1 We give you and other GOG users the personal right (known legally as a ‘license’) to use GOG services and to download, access and/or stream (depending on the content) and use GOG content. This license is for your personal use. We can stop or suspend this license in some situations, which are explained later on.
support.gog.com/…/212632089-GOG-User-Agreement?pr…
GOG has the same drawbacks as Steam without any of the useful features. They should cut down on their “owning games” lies and spend time improving their platform instead.
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Okay steam, if its just a digital license and not ownership… Then surely you’ll be significantly lowering prices, Since you charge full ownership prices for games, not license prices… Right?
callouscomic@lemm.ee 3 months ago
I’ll stick with my Steam cloud saves and game notes and community forums and community guides and custom controller configurations and community controller configurations and overlay and workshop and screenshots and steam deck and steam link and …
ekZepp@lemmy.world 3 months ago
As long as you understand the terms of your agreement with Steam as a platform, everything is fine. Physical media for games are outdated anyway, especially with frequent updates, patches, and DLC releases. Regarding older titles that are no longer supported, well, as the saying goes: “If buying isn’t owing…”
theneverfox@pawb.social 3 months ago
Doesn’t steam have a clause to the effect of “if we go out of business, you’ll get X period to download your games so you can manage them yourself”?
Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
Sure, and if you don’t uninstall Galaxy, go through some hidden menus and download the installers then your GOG games will be gone regardless.
bender223@lemmy.today 3 months ago
Chad GOG
Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Unfortunately the VR game selection in GOG seems pretty slim and they might still need steam VR to run anyways so either way i don’t have much choice.
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 months ago
What the hell happened to Steam’s built in offline backup system, anyway? It used to have that when it was brand new.
Mwa@lemm.ee 3 months ago
wdym you can play steam games offline the only exception is needing the steam client?
cybermass@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
I love how this article takes shots at steam despite valve being THE company holding the bar up in the gaming space.
I could list examples but I honestly don’t even think I need to
b3an@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Yeah… it’s also a new law in California is it not? Kill shot? Hahahaha. Right. Who wrote this headline xD
PunchingWood@lemmy.world 3 months ago
It’s like every clickbait gaming website whenever a new MMO game drops and they call it the WoW-killer for the umpteenth time in the past 15 years.
RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
Valve is holding up the bar not because valve is great but because everyone else is so shit. I’ve had a ton of issues with steam throughout the years and it’s just… nothing else is better. I was actually excited for the epic store launch and it’s… Well, not the worst, because being the worst is a challenge some places take seriously, but certainly not a good steam replacement especially for low data people.
Steam may not let me control the updates to steam, but it won’t force refresh my library causing ping spikes all the time as an intended feature.
Grimy@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Lmao, He is colluding with the rest, not holding up the bar.
There is nothing rhat differentiate Steam from Microsoft or Nintendo. The only difference between Gaben and Bezos is that valve has a really good advertising team that’s managed to convince everyone he “isn’t your average billionaire”.
They charge 30% because they have a soft monopoly, it’s basically robbery and it is affecting the indie scene and the quality and amount of games we receive.
Gaben has 6 mega yatchs and a number of submarines. The yatchs alone are worth around 1 billion and cost an estimated 75 to 100 million.
Now I sit and wait for the Gaben simp squad to come compare him to Jesus and tell me how “he has the only good monopoly”. Both of these things literally happened last time.
Downvote me you bootlickers.
Glide@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
No one thinks Gaben is the second coming. His platform just, actually doesn’t suck, and genuinely functions as a service to its users. It’s a low bar, sure, but it’s a good one. Comparing it to Microsoft axeing any studio that produces something worth talking about while they force more datascraping malware and adware into Windows is just dishonest.
Your comment reads more like you get off on being controversial than having actual insightful thoughts and the comparisons in what these three companies you listed are actually doing.
NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 months ago
I’m guessing you don’t remember what the market was like for indie games before Steam. Valve’s platform has done a lot of work to expose small game developers, and made it economically viable to work on and publish games independently. Before this it was very difficult for small titles without the advertising budget of a AAA publisher to get any attention at all, let alone actual sales. There’s nothing else like Steam for small studios trying to find buyers for their games, and Valve does deserve credit for that because it’s improved the video game market overall to have more people making more games and able to earn a living doing it.
The other major effort that Valve has made is Linux compatibility. Even before their work on Proton, Valve released native Linux versions of their games (they were one of very few publishers to do so at the time). I’ve been gaming on Linux since 2006, and Wine was great but rarely easy or complete. Proton has made things so straightforward that people have forgotten just how difficult it was before.
Credit where it’s due. No other major publisher has contributed to the gaming community the way Valve has.
No, you’ll enjoy the attention too much.
null@slrpnk.net 3 months ago
How much do Microsoft and Nintendo contribute to open-source projects?
YeetPics@mander.xyz 3 months ago
What a weird hill to die on.
Anyway, enjoy being wrong.
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Preach brother!
NormalPerson@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Gaben has the only good monopoly, he’s pretty much Jesus.
GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I think you mean holding a monopoly in the gaming space.
JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 months ago
I think you don’t know what that word means.
Heck, even if you want to blatantly ignore every other platform and site you can buy games from, which there are plenty, Valve gives devs a supply of Steam keys they can sell anywhere they want, they don’t even get a cut from those.
TJDetweiler@lemmynsfw.com 3 months ago
They aren’t really a monopoly. You can purchase games elsewhere. They are simply the gold standard of gaming platforms.
turtletracks@lemmy.zip 3 months ago
A monopoly on what? PC game storefeonts? Itch.io, gog, epic, gamepass, some are better than others, but steam is anti-competition
cybermass@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
The reason they hold most of the market share is not because of bad business practices it’s because the opposite. People use their service cause it’s the best.
The gov only considers a large business a monopoly if it’s doing anti competitive practices to maintain or grow it’s market share. That description in no way fits steam or valve.
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
This isn’t about what steam currently is. It’s about what it will inevitably become.
I fucked up going with Steam. Should have just pirated everything Single player.
RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 3 months ago
You didn’t fuck up. You can always still pirate. Wait it out and see what happens, the moment it goes to shit put on your pirate hat and don’t give a fuck.