Everyone deserves to be treated exactly the way they treat others.
So be racist to racists. Exploit the rich. And kill all Nazis.
Submitted 2 weeks ago by Godric@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ed0e4996-e0ad-4948-b511-75c74886f43e.jpeg
Everyone deserves to be treated exactly the way they treat others.
So be racist to racists. Exploit the rich. And kill all Nazis.
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.
A system of fair rules does not always lead to fair outcomes, if the rules don’t accommodate the asymmetry in capacity, motivation, resources, etc.
also, you cannot be tolerant to intolerant people. any system of beliefs like that is doomed. this is what is happening now.
Blatant flaw in this: I don’t want to murder anyone. I don’t want to rape anyone. I don’t want to be racist to anyone (though I acknowledge I am). And the moment I would do something like that to anyone, I would be a murderer or a rapist, and that’s a shitty thing to be. So no thanks.
It’s just an endless line of good intentioned rapists.
Yeah, also, I’d like my moral reasoning to have evolved past Hammurabi.
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
Tolerance paradox in action!
I remember being told it makes more sense when you realize it’s a part of the social contract. Breaching it prevents you from taking part in it.
The tolerance paradox does not exist. See BeardedSquidwards comment.
“An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.” -Gandhi
So should we just tolerate the intolerant? Cause that’s going to end well. We’d still have half a planet with stabbed eyes while they go scot free.
It’s a nice quote but doesn’t really make sense. The eye for the second eye is the first eye, there’s only two eyes involved, not a nonsensical endless chain of eyes. This concept of justice predates the quote.
There’s a line in The Republic that states something to the effect of “You cannot persuade someone who doesn’t want to listen” at that point firing their own venom back at them is justified.
Edgy 14 year old logic
I mean, what if the Bad People are N
Unpopular opinion:
Universal human rights apply to all humans, including Nazis.
Dehumanizing people and denying them their human rights is what Nazis do.
Nazis do have human rights. Including the right to be punished for their actions. Just like everyone else.
But if the governments don’t punish them for their actions then don’t be surprised if people take matters into their own hands. Which again, what happened to any group of people that were perceived as having too much power and being given too much leeway by the government, regardless of political beliefs.
I’ll agree this should be an unpopular opinion. When they deny the rights of others, they forfeit their own.
Society is generally based on social contracts regarding human decency, respect and what apparently are more extreme ideas like compassion and empathy. It’s an agreement to be a part of a community, not to exploit it for selfish gain. If they want to do that, at the very least they should be exiled and allowed only care about themselves by themselves.
We need to stop tolerating intolerance. If you’re harmful to our species letalone our planet that we share with so many others, part present and future, ostracize or eradicate. This high road shit has gotten use nowhere in the entirety of our planets history but right here where monsters are allowed and encouraged to reign.
I’ll also agree to step up to the chopping block if it means I take some of these assholes to hell hand in hand with me.
“Universal” human rights can be forfeited by the individual by attempting to restrict another’s rights.
Done and done.
Lets debate the SS in the marketplace of ideas…
Trolley problem — save the human rights of billions by sacrificing the human rights of the few who want to tie all of these people to the trolley tracks
It is sad for us to have to go through such trauma but violently murdering fascists is not dehumanizing. We are honouring them by believing the true extent of their evil, respecting their decision by reacting truthful to reality. It’s inhumane to let such sick individuals believe they might be right, when they believe in power being absolute. Natural order is what they want, why deny them?
Doesn’t seem like a very unpopular opinion tbh
Not that I don’t agree but if I was a nazi i would prefer to die anyways. Even if I didn’t get killed my cellmates would probs kill me unless im isolated which is… even worse. Besides if I ever realized how messed up that was i would probs kill myself but idk how likely that is.
“Everyone I don’t agree with is a nazi therefore I am justified”
That’s the flipside, but also, some people are Nazis
this is a poorly cropped repost from tumblr, there is no critical thinking here.
Which is funny because if people listened to what you said and followed your instructions, then there literally would be no critical thinking here. Whereas if you choose to utilize critical thinking, you would not actually dismiss this thing entirely simply because it came from Tumblr because that is a logical fallacy called poisoning the well.
And if all it took to stop critical thinking for anybody was just saying, oh it comes from a bad place, then nobody would ever really do any critical thinking, right?
So let’s ignore where it comes from and talk about the topic that’s actually being presented, ok?
What definition of “Nazi” are we working with here? I assume it’s a set of beliefs and not Germany’s Nazi party from WW2. So what are these beliefs? Genuine question.
Quite a severe lack of intellectual rigour is going on there. If nothing happens to bad people then they’ll keep being bad people. The difference between the bad people and the good people is that the bad people do bad things because they like it. Good people do bad things to stop bad people from being bad people and doing bad things.
If you like the bad people do bad things because you’re a good person and as a good person you don’t do bad things then the bad things may as well be done by the good people. It’s all the same.
Light went after people in the prison system or suspected of being criminals, without ever doubting the justness of the system in any way. He is useful idiot, delusional agent of the system or megalomaniacal bootlicker. Choose your pick.
Also, just a plain old idiot. Imagine having the magical power to kill anyone undetected and you’re like “hooray, I can go after local crooks!”. Had Light ever seen a newspaper? Did he know the world outside his city existed? If you aren’t starting with and primarily focusing on people globally known are you even trying?
I mean, wasnt he being led by a literal trickster demon…?
The problem with most things that use good and bad as a foundation is that they never account for perspective.
Good and bad are made up and subjective.
If you don’t account for that in your positions then you’re setting yourself up for fundamentalism.
Absolutely I am merely responding with the same level of intellectualism as the original comment.
If we can’t even get as far as sometimes violence is necessary bey absolutism is a useless philosophy, then there’s no point getting into nuance.
Ok, but you do realize you can punish someone without killing, right? It doesn’t have to be all or nothing. Bad people can be prevented from doing more bad things without any blood being shed.
That’s why America has so many “good guys with guns”.
This is intellectual rigor?
What is good or bad? Whats bad on one side is good on the other. Both sides are good with the other side bad, from their point of view. With no objective good or bad, neither is, and morality means nothing so you can do anything with a clear conscience.
I’ll allow you to call me bad if I’m also allowed to drop billionaires, the trillionaire, selected world leaders, and most of the Epstein class in to a woodchipper. It only seems fair.
What is more important: considering yourself a good person, or materially benefiting the world?
I’ll take option 2, thanks. Woodchippers! GET YOUR WOODCHIPPERS HERE!!
I mean, I know we should not generalize, but the Epstein class are bad people who deserve to be murdered in awful suffering.
It’s rare to see someone wno is evil without a doubt, but anyone from the Epstein class is one.
Who are “the Epstein class”? Just Epstein and Ghislaine? Just the rapists? Everyone in the files?
Seems like, whatever the punishment, you still need a process to determine guilt according to the evidence, rather than trial by public opinion.
People that treat people as things deserve the same courtesy.
Lemmy in a nutshell
actually , mostly facebook
Guilt tripping is a tactic often used by the abuser to control the abusued.
I think we should defend ourselves against the bourgeouise 🙋
I see lots of comments arguing about whether bad things should happen to bad people and missing the point that it’s criticizing the convenient, self-serving rationalization of doing bad things to [out-group enemy] going on.
Yarrr, it be a good shitpost. Stupid, provocative …
I feel this way about cops, land lords and billionaires. Tbf tho if those didn’t exist the world would be a much better place.
.ml in a nutshell.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince us he exists.
This unironically
Been a while since I watched Death Note, but did Light brutally murder people? I thought it was mostly heart attacks, which was the default way for someone to die unless otherwise specified.
State of many discussions about Gaza, Israel, Ukraine and Russia here on Lemmy.
Kira vs. Columbo is a great skit.
right, but they have been proven to be demonstrably evil. Or are we now sympathetic to cancer? If they want to be treated like people they should start acting like it. Just because one is a pacifist, does not mean they shouldn’t defend themself
Everyone who doesn’t support [insert group name here] or [insert cause here] is a NAZI
Oh for me, the literal nazis, child rapists, and Inmorally rich “leaders” are like dogs with rabies, a disease. There is no changing them. It is imparative that we stop them before they hurt more. If we can put down ol’ yeller, we can kill this evil.
90% of this thread: “nuh uh! I’m a good person and should be allowed to kill all those evil, bad cops and billionaire and nazis”
Also 90% of this thread: would piss their pants if given a gun and told to shoot another human being, no matter how evil they knew they were.
I am a good person and I will do what it takes to protect marginalized people from oppression and erasure. The morale high ground doesn’t matter when they want to kill millions.
Light Yagami would say that
We are all just apparati of systems. The system is bad, but some people stand in the way of ending the system.
Good and bad are defined both by actions and by their justifications. Not entirely by either alone. Somebody who accidentally does bad continously because they’re incompetent or not putting enough effort in still needs to be stopped. Somebody who accidentally does good can still be dangerous to you.
Shadiversity and his awful awful book in a nutshell.
Quality shit post, dung beetle certified
Yeah, but… Kirk tho.
Yes, thank you Elon, we’ve heard it all before.
makeshift0546@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Fuck this noise. Milk Nazis and fascists.
Agent641@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
“So MuCh FoR tHe ToLeRaNt LeFt!!”
Pictured: Antifa social group, North Africa club, 1943
Techranger@infosec.pub 2 weeks ago
Those Nazis really get my goat!
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
And if they don’t like this, there’s always the super easily, highly convenient solution of NOT BEING A NAZI.
Folstar@lemmus.org 2 weeks ago
Exactly. A person can want every nazi dead and hope that nobody has to die while being completely logically and morally covered.
YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
But that’s not fair my skin is white and that means I’m important because insert fascist leader said so.
uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
It can be super difficult when your only opportunity for survival is to become one of Immortan Joe’s war boys, and are trained that your only path to redemption is to be a hero, to be witnessed as you sacrifice yourself in battle.
Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
So much for the tolerant left…
Motherfuckers, you labeled me as tolerant because I don’t hate people for immutable characteristics they were born with. That doesn’t mean I’m tolerant of nazis maga traitors.
jamesrandysghost@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Tolerance paradox is the only way forward. They deserve no quarter.
plyth@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
So why shoot Nazis if that is mutable and we can help them to change?
Rooskie91@discuss.online 2 weeks ago
Hey now! Just look at history and you’ll see how often non-violence works! Like for instance checks notes …uh oh frantically flipping through notes guys, oh no!
TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Hooray
Let’s all have barbecue afterwards because these fucks don’t get to put a stain on our day
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Barbeque the Naizis ALIIIVE!
Zwiebel@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
Reign of Terror ass motherfucker
makeshift0546@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
#2 electric boogaloo
Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
Nah, they should be treated the way they treat others.
Nazis are the only group that deserve to be gassed.
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
But we must always focus on our goal of minimizing suffering. The path to evil comes when we focus more on us vs them and hurting the enemy than we are on building a better world. Fetishization of violence is a dangerous path.
I lament that I believe that violence and public executions are necessary, but I do. But I also don’t believe it’s sufficient. We must also build a better world.
gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
Image
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
A trial with due process is key. But, they’d need to be kicked out of power, first. Somehow. Because Nazis won’t convict Nazis, obviously.
I’m not looking forward to what happens if they steal the mid-terms.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I for one can’t wait to see who the modern John C Woods will be