s
@s@piefed.world
- Comment on Why is sharpedo blocked in image searches on DuckDuckGo and Bing, but not Google? 2 hours ago:
My guess is that it’s an offshoot of the Scunthorpe Problem. My theory (without hard evidence) is that Bing/DDG have a blacklist of terms to completely filter out from results, but a whitelist of words that contain those terms which are exceptions to the filter. This would explain why “torpedo” is ok but less common terms like “Sharpedo” wouldn’t be flagged as ok. You’d have to find other examples with other blocked words to test this idea.
- Comment on Delicious rocks 5 days ago:
Try Uranium
- Comment on Niche species 6 days ago:
No species for us niches
- Comment on There are no odd numbers divisible by 2 1 week ago:
Superposition since both +9 and -9 are in the expression
- Comment on There are no odd numbers divisible by 2 1 week ago:
(±sqrt(81) + 3)/6 is both odd and divisible by 2
- Comment on Nothing to see here folks 1 week ago:
My least favorite mythical creature
- Comment on Nothing to see here folks 1 week ago:
Thanks! I didn’t even know there was a preview option on Voyager since it’s not where I’d expect it to be— that’s also very helpful!
- Comment on Nothing to see here folks 1 week ago:
That’s what I have, with the second “spoiler” replaced with a space since it’s just the title of the spoiler
- Comment on Nothing to see here folks 1 week ago:
!Voldemort!
- Comment on Nothing to see here folks 1 week ago:
I don’t mean for the joke to be at the victims’ expense. More so ridiculing the absurd and incomparable expense and effort put into protecting the guilty you-know-who
- Comment on Head chog 1 week ago:
You chog any good heads lately?
- Submitted 1 week ago to [deleted] | 23 comments
- Chat, is this true? Can cybercriminals really just tick an "I agree" box and do a cybercrime? I'm literally shaking and crying rnmedia.piefed.world ↗Submitted 1 week ago to [deleted] | 5 comments
- Comment on Biphallic truthers spotted in the wild 1 week ago:
The Bible verse mentioned:
So I shepherded the flock marked for slaughter, particularly the oppressed of the flock. Then I took two staffs and called one Favor and the other Union, and I shepherded the flock.
- Comment on Neanderthals wouldn't be considered a person under U.S law 1 week ago:
What about test tube babies? Or corporations?
- Comment on My culture also loves music, dancing and telling stories 2 weeks ago:
Hollywood actress culture
- Comment on Is there a word or (concise) phrase to describe the paradox of sharing something (like a website) that you don't like, but because you're sharing it you're tacitly helping it? 2 weeks ago:
Sounds like a cross between the Streisand Effect and a very very mild and/or subjective information hazard
- Comment on Is there a word or (concise) phrase to describe the paradox of sharing something (like a website) that you don't like, but because you're sharing it you're tacitly helping it? 2 weeks ago:
Engagement bait?
- Comment on 👁️ 👁️ 2 weeks ago:
A panopticon is like a big loving hug for everybody at once
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to [deleted] | 6 comments
- Comment on Sans serif fonts are woke because they're easier for dyslexics to read 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on How can we stop bots on the fediverse? 2 weeks ago:
An independent bot catching instance specially created for flagging and IDing bot accounts that users can submit accounts to for inspection. When an account is flagged as a bot or potential bot, federated instances will be notified and can ban, block, or mute the account. Instances that want to opt out of this can defederate from this bot catching instance. Instances with a high rate of bot accounts can be defederated from.
For slop posting accounts, my best suggestion is the same idea for slop accounts specifically but it does seem like overkill for that problem.
Pinging u/rimu@piefed.social since they’re doing a great job of working to make the Threadiverse a better place and experience
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to [deleted] | 12 comments
- Comment on Accidental rapture 2 weeks ago:
I’d rather laugh with the sinners than cry with the saints
The sinners are much more fun - Comment on Sorry for bad crop 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Of course I get a cookie when I’m snarky — what kind of question is that?
- Comment on Did you know?... 2 weeks ago:
You can post that onto c/withoutthepunchline\@lemmy.world
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Sadly, no. DOGE really hit us hard and fired many of our workers. Not only that, but many of us, including myself, were unfortunately removed by DOGE.
- Comment on A Very Corntroversial Nativity 2 weeks ago:
Exodus 20:4
You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below.
AI art of Jesus, the Virgin Mary, God, angels, etc. makes you go to Hell. This also applies to hand-drawing a picture of fish or worms but that’s beside the point.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Yes, you’re absolutely correct! The real giveaway is indeed redundancy. Other people may think the real giveaway is excessive flattery and agreeability, waffling flowery sentences, surface level understanding, em dashes, redundancy, internal contradictions, obviously false made up claims, redundancy, and trite obscure diction, but you’re a real star and you caught that the real giveaway is redundancy.
