Please bro

Comments

• RedStrider@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

  99% of ai companies go under before they win agi!

  source
• rem26_art@fedia.io ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  OpenAI has this warning about halfway down the page on one page of their website that says that money may not even matter in a post AGI world. So that means we should just give all our money to them now, bro!

  source

  • chuckleslord@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Gods. People aren’t stupid enough to believe this, right? AGI is probably a pipe dream, but even if it isn’t, we’re nowhere even close. Nothing on the table is remotely related to it.

    source

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      May I introduce you to the fucking dumbass concept of Rokus Basilisk? Also known as AI Calvinism. Have fun with that rabbit hole if ya decide to go down it.

      A lot of these AI and Tech bros are fucking stupid and I so wish to introduce them to Neo-Platonic philosophy because I want to see their brains melt.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      we’re nowhere even close. Nothing on the table is remotely related to it.

      meanwhile

      Somewhere in America: “My wireborn soulmate is g-gone!”

      source
    • brathoven@feddit.org ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      They’re having a hard time defining what AGI is. In the meantime everyone is playing advanced PC scrabble

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • passepartout@feddit.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Doesn’t matter if the tool is good enough to analyze and influence peoples behaviour the way it does. Any autocrats wet dream.

      source
    • Laser@feddit.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      None of this matters, what matters is what dumb money believes

      source
• Empricorn@feddit.nl ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I know some whine that the money could be used to literally solve world hunger forever. Or to help needy people, or sick kids, or to fund tangible scientific progress… But they’re not thinking about the fact that instead, we’re going to have the absolute best hallucinations from the richest companies!

  source
• Donkter@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  They don’t even know what they’re doing or why they’re doing it.

  We know, right now, without AI, that we have enough resources in the world to feed, house, and educate everyone. The only reason that doesn’t get done is an inscrutible system of beurocracy and propaganda.

  So what happens when something they would laud as an “AGI” says “hey, to solve your economic issues you have to recognize that we have the ability to create so much food it’s no longer profitable”?

  Well the truth is that they would most likely hide it.

  source
• metoosalem@feddit.org ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Just a trillion dollars more in data centers and we’ll get there bro. We’re gonna have billions of users bro I promise.

  source

  • Shaper@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Just One More Trill!

    source

    • TheBat@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Just one more data centre bro.

      source
    • Apeman42@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Help us, Curzon Dax, you’re our only hope.

      source
• ininewcrow@lemmy.ca ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Image

  source

  • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    AI sh*t as much as you want, but that AGI they promised is not going to be there.

    source
• SpicyAnt@mander.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  GPT-6Σχ is so powerful that it created the even more powerful GPT-Ωלֶ. Humanity is doomed. Invest before too late.

  source
• mitch@piefed.mitch.science ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Congressperson: “Okay, so, let me get this straight. Your company has spent over 20 billion dollars in pursuit of a fully autonomous digital intelligence, and so far, your peak accuracy rate for basic addition and subtraction is... what was it, again?”

  Sam Altman: leans into microphone “About 60%, sir.”

  [Congress erupts in a sea of ‘oohs’ and ‘aahs’, as Sam Altman is carried away on top of the cheering crowd of Congresspeople wearing a crown of roses and a sash reading, “BEST INVESTMENT”]

  source

  • chaos@beehaw.org ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    It’s making mistakes and failing to think abstractly at levels previously only achieved by humans, so it’s only rational to expect it to take over the world in 5 years

    source
• mushroommunk@lemmy.today ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  You dropped a few of these -> “0”

  Sam Altman has been taking about planning to spend trillions on just the data centers, let alone everything else that goes into creating their slop machines.

  source
• demizerone@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Reignite three mile island reactors bro trust me bro

  source
• Ryktes@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Gonna need at least three more zeros on the end of that number, boss. AGI is nowhere near viable with the tech we have now.

  source

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Add that to years in the timescale as well.

    source
• Pistcow@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It’s simple, as soon as the Dyson Sphere is completed, we’ll have a fully functional product.

  source
• Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  What are we going to call actual AI when AGI starts being bastardized by marketing the way “AI” was before it?

  source

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    AGI. Fuck marketing.

    source
• lasers4eyes@piefed.zip ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  How do we even know if AGI is achievable? I don't know anything about this topic but as far as I've heard AGI might actually just be impossible.

  source

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    If you define it in a “artificial person/as smart as a human/can do anything a human can do” sort of way like I usually see, then yes, we know that it is possible, because if it were impossible for a system with human-equivalent capabilities to exist, than humans couldn’t exist, and well, we clearly do. That being said, that doesn’t mean that all we need to do to make one is to just feed more and more data into our existing AI tech.

    source

    • lasers4eyes@piefed.zip ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I mean when you put it like that it makes a lot more sense, but even that requires a sort of technology to accurately build a brain that works the same way a human brain does. Maybe AGI can be built but we have none of the resources to synthesize a human brain?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • TheBat@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    There’s no definition of ‘human intelligence’ in the first place.

    source
  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    We don’t, thats the neat part. It might be like proving God. Impossible to prove its impossible, but maybe possible to say “look see its really whoops shitshitshitturnitoffhelp”

    source

    • mitch@piefed.mitch.science ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      i think that these tools will probably be foundational to discovering more about the human mind and how words or images are received, stored, and assembled in the brain, but people like sam altman and elon musk are convinced that there is nothing else to a ‘person’ beyond that.

      ‘humanity’ is an emergent phenomenon. you don’t need a god or any kind of religion to understand this. as far as we know, we might be one of the least likely things to ever happen in the universe, ever.

      source
  • vane@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    We know it’s not. It’s Zeno’s paradox.

    source
• Part4@infosec.pub ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I Am Once Again Asking for Your Financial Support so I can run chatgpt in the midterms

  That disclaimer - post ai money might not mean anything - is like something on the back of a joke shop toy.

  source
• daddycool@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Sad John Travolta is a f…ing scam artist.

  source
• crank0271@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It’s for environmental protections and mitigations from their datacenters, right?

  source

  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    close. mitigations for the environmental protections.

    source