Donkter
@Donkter@lemmy.world
- Comment on "I don't answer questions" 1 day ago:
Buddy, we’ve been over this, I don’t look at speed.
- Comment on Never a dull moment 3 days ago:
may brings up so many more questions than answers
- Comment on Supergirl 2026 storyline 5 days ago:
Very ruff you say?
- Comment on That Damn Smile 1 week ago:
It’s fake, op said so in the comments
- Comment on I know Reddit sucks but this one is funny. 1 week ago:
Yeah I’ve seen a bunch of these. It’s pretty clear that ID verification is just a drag net to catch the uninformed or stupid people which is going to be like 70% of traffic anyway.
- Comment on Technology 2 weeks ago:
Lol. It’s a fine idea but my first thought was someone going: “Yeah, sometimes I just want to listen to the laughter from a Bill Cosby special.”
- Comment on Anon notices a problem 2 weeks ago:
Now we’ve got gendered estrogen pills???
- Comment on Anon notices a problem 2 weeks ago:
This guy is pillesspilled
- Comment on Pot 3 weeks ago:
Prison sex
- Comment on Yes, yes they are 5 weeks ago:
I think the issue is we don’t really have a measurement for intelligence. Qualitatively, I think you are more intelligent if you have the reasoning capabilities to logic yourself out of reactionary feelings like racism, but it’s really hard to measure that.
- Comment on You got this dude. You're fineeeeee 1 month ago:
Be the change you want to see in the world
- Comment on Finally an explanation 1 month ago:
My point is not what my line for murdering someone is or how it compares to anyone else’s. My point is that most people have that line, so it’s not very deep to point out that it exists, and all of them will believe that they are still the Good Person and the person they want to murder is the Bad Person as laid out in the OP.
Now the very last sentence is a bit wibbly. I’m sure that many people might not automatically send someone who disagrees with their line into the Bad Person zone, but I’m sure you could construct scenarios similar to the last line that people would end up agreeing with, they just think that their particular line is justified.
- Comment on Finally an explanation 1 month ago:
I think funnily enough heart attack was meant as a catch-all kind death for people that was the authors first thought to just move past that hurdle. Heart attacks are definitely not the least harmful way to die, well, it depends on the type of heart attack. Certain aneurysms might be more painless. But overall it’s a bit of a hand wave.
- Comment on Finally an explanation 1 month ago:
(almost) Literally everyone inside and outside of social media. Everyone has a line for when they would murder someone, or at the very least think they deserve to die somehow. And almost everyone of those people would think they’re still a good person while wishing death on someone.
The op seems like a clever sort of epiphany about how everyone’s a hypocrite but it’s not that deep.
I think social media allows people to post their first gut reaction faster than they can think. And I think the op is maybe referring to specific online bubbles that will extrapolate “I don’t like dogs” into knowing that that person would be better off dead, but as it is I don’t think this post says much in itself.
- Comment on 🤔 Interesting 1 month ago:
It’s crazy that the tragedy of the commons is only a problem because the commons are also free for people to close up and start charging for.
- Comment on 🤔 Interesting 1 month ago:
I think twitter also might still give blue check marks to “important” people it’s just available for anyone to buy now
- Comment on Rough date 1 month ago:
But then the guy wouldn’t have “watched her chug vodka for 5 minutes” he would have watched her take one shot and 4.9 minutes not chugging. I don’t think they mean chugging for 5 minutes straight but I also think it’s silly to pretend like it was a teensy sip of vodka.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Yes, but why are we making fun of a guy for doing what he loves (posting “but what about men?” In a post talking about women)?
(This is a joke btw.)
- Comment on Rough date 1 month ago:
And there’s a difference between “I’ll have a sip of vodka to loosen me up” and “I’ll ‘pound shots’ and ‘chug from the bottle’ for 5 minutes”
- Comment on bone 1 month ago:
You can add new bones to your body any time you please
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Reading this thread I think the conclusion is that both men and women can consider themselves “perverted” but the bounds of what each consider “too extreme” is so different that they both think that the other side is just too kinky/disgusting.
- Comment on [deleted] 1 month ago:
Also these “jokes” come from the long history of women having to marry for status/stability instead of being able to think about their own attraction.
- Comment on Anon does some genealogy 2 months ago:
I thought it was a joke. Rephrase it a bit and it would be a funny standup routine. I guess anon should have emphasized that they didn’t support slavery (if they did) but it is a funny concept to ask how they fumbled the bag so hard.
- Comment on Know Yourself! 2 months ago:
I do use KY jelly to know myself.
- Comment on 🚨 Report: nity nite smooches DLC? 2 months ago:
I thought the CEO of sex was real and loved me :(
- Comment on Is Roots really that controversial that it needs to be banned? Haven't watched the movie cause I quit pot and haven't read the book but isn't it like historical or something? 2 months ago:
After some research it originated in the movie “half baked” and has been referenced more than once across other stoner films. So the guy’s not completely off his rocker.
- Comment on Is Roots really that controversial that it needs to be banned? Haven't watched the movie cause I quit pot and haven't read the book but isn't it like historical or something? 2 months ago:
Can you name more than one movie where they do this? I’m curious.
- Comment on Depluralize 2 months ago:
Godzillo
- Comment on You gotta try #19 2 months ago:
3 or 5 they’re two different moods. 4 is too in the middle for me.
- Comment on We're so back 2 months ago:
It was immediately and obviously debunked when conservatives and their movement were most vulnerable so the reaction was to cling to the totem of Ivermectin like it could give them salvation.