On trees...

Comments

• sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Had to look it up because I didnt beleive

  sure enough its correct

  en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree

  source

  • ch00f@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Something poetic and quaint about a link to a Wikipedia article titled “Tree”

    source

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      reddit has broken me. I was expecting it to point to weed.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • k0e3@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Scishow had an episode about it a week ago. It’s a strategy, not a species.

    source
• ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Also cool that for a period of like 60 million years, nothing decomposed dead trees. As they would die or fall over, they’d just stay there, piling up. This is where most oil came from. The massive amounts of trees stacking up before bacteria and fungus evolved to decomposed them. Imagine 60 million years worth of trees just lying around.

  source

  • Dogyote@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Didn’t those trees become coal, not oil?

    source

    • DancingBear@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      I think near water they became oil and fat from water they became coal

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Yes. I made mention of this in a reply to someone else as well. I’m not sure if my teacher (like 30 years ago) told us wrong or if I simply remembered it wrong.

      source
  • turtlesareneat@discuss.online ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Mushrooms are the great undertaker, the great decomposer. The Langoliers. They are just waiting to eat you, and they’re happy to share their fruits in the meantime. They’re fattening you up. They can wait.

    source

    • voracread@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      That Langoliers reference spotted in the wild!

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    I imagine dead trees were flammable, even back then. And oxygen levels were 15% higher. Can you imagine the forest fires?

    source

    • Crassus@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Fire wasn’t invented back then

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Ileftreddit@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    I thought that was coal

    source
  • ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    I love this fact, and am curious where you learned it?

    source

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      I learned it nearly 30 years ago in school. I just did a search and found a link about it, though.

      Also, seems that either I remembered wrongly, or my teacher made a mistake, but it seems it was most of the worlds coal; not oil, that came from all the piles of trees from that period.

      thorogood.co.uk/treevolution-how-trees-came-first…

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Anomalocaris@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I’m a billion years, crabs will start turning into trees and trees into crabs. merging into the ubercreature

  source

  • khannie@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    I’m a billion years

    Damn. You look good for your age.

    source

    • Comment105@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      I’d argue, but I agree. I don’t need to know how they look, if they’re a billion years and capable of communicating, whatever state they’re in looks good. Even if its a fungus posessed rot monster.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    “ubercreature” excuse me, lichen would like a word with you

    source

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      lichen is the shit

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Atlas_@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    I imagine it’ll look like paras

    source

    • multifariace@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Paras is a fungus. Totally different thing.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • VernetheJules@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    you may not like it but Ms Crabtree is what peak performance looks like

    source
• m_xy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  here’s a cool blog post that expands on this There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically)

  i didn’t even put it in a folder, it’s just loose on my bookmark bar because it’s such an interesting post that i reread from time to time

  source

  • Thadden@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    That was a very fun and interesting reading! Thanks for sharing

    source
  • bananabenana@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Maybe…but I doubt many of these phylogenies use DNA, and if so, likely only a single or few genes. Nowhere near enough resolution to accurately determine genetic relatedness. Woody plants may actually be more related than we think.

    These sorts of phylogenies tend to use morphological characteristics which is an unreliable measure of genetic relatedness.

    I will stand corrected if wrong though

    source
  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Very cool read, thank you

    source
• hash@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  So that’s why every stargate planet looks like Canada

  source

  • LeFantome@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    That and every Stargate planet is Vancouver

    source
  • ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    🤣🤣🤣

    source
• ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I think palm trees are a kind of grass

  source

  • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    I didn’t know that and I agree

    source
  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    So is corn

    source

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      And banana

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    I’m firmly in this camp.

    source
• Deconceptualist@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  My sister in law recently quipped that “Trees are a social construct” and at first I thought she was just being glib but now I can’t get that statement out of my head.

  source

  • resting_parrot@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    I listen to a podcast called Completely Arbortrary. They talk about a different tree species each episode. They say trees are a strategy, not a strict definition.

    source

    • SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Thanks! Just subscribed. See they have a couple Metasequoia episodes -a favorite of mine .

      source
• DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Its called convergent evolution and you also have some shit you wouldnt believe that makes all apes similar to us.

  source

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Apes are so similar to us because we came from a common ancestor. I’d love to hear if there are traits we evolved independently after we split though.

    source
  • CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Well humans are a type of great ape, sooooll

    source

    • 7bicycles@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      I’m more of a middling ape myself honestly

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • TaiCrunch@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Hit me. I love evolutionary fun facts.

    source

    • sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      smackkk

      source
• twice_hatch@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Unsurpassable power: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crabtree

  source

  • propter_hog@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Now we just need crabs to evolve a treecrab and we can have the two battle for the ultimate life form

    source
  • mrslt@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    The absolute peak of evolution.

    source
  • Slovene@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Good moaning!

    source
  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Not to be confused with Dryococelus aka the “tree lobster”

    source
• NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Also, no such thing as fish.

  Google it.

  source

  • boydster@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Impossible. If there were no such thing as fish, how could bees be fish?

    source

    • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      I don’t have the tools to know how to respond to this comment. You win.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  So crabapple trees…?

  source

  • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Image

    source
  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    evolution intensifies

    source
• MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Same for roots, btw, just earlier.

  source
• carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  There are fern trees, conifer trees, and flowering trees. Where are my moss trees?

  source

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    gobotany.nativeplanttrust.org/…/dendroideum/

    inaturalist.org/…/204198-Dendrolycopodium-obscuru…

    source

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Except clubmoss isn’t moss iirc? They’re vascular and more of a fern than moss.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• OpenStars@discuss.online ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  And it’s not even one creature or even type of creature. Look up rhizobium.

  Tbf, as we learn more about our gut microbiomes, it turns out that humans are that way as well. Maybe that’s why we have the thoughts in our heads vs. the feelings in our guts… (no that’s actually not it at all, except… isn’t it though?).

  source
• Ledericas@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  theres also a definition of a what a tree in the sense , its develops wood, many things are tree like, but not trees: such as palms(just overgrown herbs), dracaena( aka cabbage tree, they have something dracenoid thickining.) extinct plants like giant lycophytes and ferns

  source
• TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I wasn’t ready for how weird this comment section turned out to be…

  source
• ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Its basically just the best way to be a large plant if you’re not gonna be a big parasitic ivy. Once your plant circulatory system gets complex enough to send stuff further away, you start getting big enough that you need hard tissues just to stop yourself from folding over.

  source
• Hadriscus@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Arborization !

  source
• Tiempo@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  The future is gonna be tree with crabs…

  source
• BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  The genus Cornus is a huge middle finger to growth-form-based taxonomy. It contains dogwood trees and also bunchberry, an itty bitty herb that grows on the forest floor.

  The first “trees” were also lycopods whose closest extant relatives are the club mosses, a name which gives you an idea of how big they get.

  source
• altphoto@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  So if you look at a tiny blade of grass and a gigantic tree its like looking at a Chihuahua and a brachiosaurus. And there are smaller things and bigger things in the aminal kingdum!

  source
• stebo02@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  tbf isn’t a tree just a plant but big? makes sense that any plant species can evolve into a tree just by getting bigger

  source
• FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Fish too

  source
• Dogyote@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Trees are like every other plant, ONLY MORE SO

  source
• OrteilGenou@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Concentrated sun energy sinks

  source
• IndiBrony@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Heh, branch

  source
• obvs@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Or maybe the microorganisms and food sources that life forms are exposed to have more of an effect on how the macroorganisms evolve than is currently talked about, which would explain why so many things in similar environments evolve similar traits.

  source
• tamagotchicowboy@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Its trees and crabs all the way down.

  source
• rumschlumpel@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I thought crab-like animals were all actually pretty closely related to each other, i.e. all crab-like animals are arthropods, which is a less broad category than ‘all the plants that can form a wooden trunk’. Any taxonomists here to confirm/deny?

  source
• Pnut@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  By the logic we are not humans…

  source