BodyBySisyphus
@BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net
- Comment on Resources 2 weeks ago:
The syllogism P (you read something) then Q (you learn something) presumes a) you can process information contained within the written word and b) you have the capability of learning. While not conclusively falsified by these exchange, a postpostivist interpretation suggests that the preponderance of the evidence rests with the counterfactual. No need for P to actually take place. Thanks for playing, best of luck in your future endeavors.
- Comment on Resources 2 weeks ago:
You’re not really considering the article in the context of what it’s arguing against, which is the implicit position of the World Bank that someone is not “poor” if they’re living on the equivalent of over $3.00 per day (as of 2025). The standard that Hickel et al. are proposing, while low by Western standards, is still much higher than what billions of people are currently experiencing.
- Comment on Resources 2 weeks ago:
My position was that you might actually learn something if you read the article, but I think you’ve provided sufficient evidence that I was wrong.
- Comment on Resources 2 weeks ago:
Nope, guess you’re going to have to read it yourself to find out if they’re assuming instant, frictionless transport of goods.
- Comment on Resources 2 weeks ago:
It’s not my job to read papers for you. You don’t get free labor
- Comment on Resources 2 weeks ago:
Because it would be a more efficient way to understand their actual methodology than posting random guesses on a comment thread?
- Comment on Resources 2 weeks ago:
Maybe you should read the paper and find out.
- Comment on Resources 2 weeks ago:
The bulk of labor under capitalism goes toward maintaining conditions of artificial scarcity, not supporting wellbeing.
- Comment on Antz in my Pantz 3 weeks ago:
Any explanation for why there was similar convergent evolution toward goofy names? C’mon, numbat, mongoose, sloth bear, aardvark, pangolin, echidna? No way that’s coincidence.
- Comment on 3 weeks ago:
You are, just not in the part of the spectrum visible to humans
- Comment on Contributions 5 weeks ago:
I feel like a more common reaction is “Finally I am rid of this terrible burden that I took on in my naivete. It is riddled with errors that the cruel arrow of time prevents me from rectifying. May I be lucky enough to get a publication or two out of it and then finally be rid of it forever” but maybe I’m speaking too close to my own experience.
- Comment on EVERYBODY IS DOING SOMETHING 1 month ago:
Pictured: The creature who has promised to protect us from sentient machines not sounding like a carbon-based life form
- Comment on RIP America 1 month ago:
I’d say we had a good run but we really didn’t.
- Comment on Carnivory in Plants 1 month ago:
Not really seeing the niche overlap there, as most carnivores are small, shallow rooted, and herbaceous. Gingkos are relicts, conifers tend to be woody, deep-rooted, and can’t grow in pure peat, so there’s probably less pressure to solve nitrogen deficiency. That leaves cycads, which do grow in swampy soils, but they haven’t changed a whole lot in tens of millions of years.
- Comment on Carnivory in Plants 1 month ago:
If you go out in a bog and look around, most of the plants there are angiosperms. The non-angiosperms are mainly mosses (capable of surviving on atmospheric deposition, not really producing the sorts of complex structures that can be adapted for carnivory like leaves and roots), ferns, and horsetails. “Why no carnivorous ferns?” seems like an interesting question but it’s also kinda like “Why no flowering ferns?” Because you need structures (leaves, glandular trichomes, or roots) that can be exapted for a new purpose and flowering plants seem to have the most plasticity.
- Comment on geneticists 2 months ago:
morshupls They’re all QTLs! Phenotype is influenced by the environment! An h squared of 0.2 is actually highly heritable, guys!
- Comment on originality 2 months ago:
Zoologists were all “we need the type species of every genus to have the generic epithet” and then someone raised their hand and yelled “what about subspecies?” and they went “screw it, same rule applies for subspecies” and then it turns out the whole thing was a just a prank on Thomas Savage because it’s not like anyone was about to rename humans to Homo homo
- Comment on MEN. 2 months ago:
- Comment on MEN. 2 months ago:
Okay but I want to know where they got that stovetop alembic from. Were they just hanging out on Amazon the entire time while I had to struggle with wok distillation?
- Comment on On trees... 2 months ago:
Oof, I do not envy anyone trying to identify fungi through the fossil record. Color and fruiting body structure tend to play pretty big roles in ID because the spores themselves tend to be small and fragile, so except for a few genera that are known for highly ornamented spores it can be pretty challenging.
- Comment on On trees... 2 months ago:
That’s super neat. Is that little triangular bit at the top a germ pore or something else? It’s funny how you get one clade that takes what you’d think would be a really optimizable form like a spore or a pollen grain and takes a left turn with it. In fungi, Entolomas are really identifiable because their spores are pink and cube shaped.
- Comment on On trees... 2 months ago:
The genus Cornus is a huge middle finger to growth-form-based taxonomy. It contains dogwood trees and also bunchberry, an itty bitty herb that grows on the forest floor.
The first “trees” were also lycopods whose closest extant relatives are the club mosses, a name which gives you an idea of how big they get.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
And so the Western Roman Empire would cease to exist by 476 A.D.
And Byzantium, which survived for another thousand years, always therefore free from issues around currency debasement?
- Comment on PLEASE bro 2 months ago:
Metabolomics isn’t a real field, it’s a trap invented by sadists.
- Comment on Least anticipated game in history 2 months ago:
I’m glad it’s not just me
- Comment on Dolphins Communicate with ‘Fountains of Pee’ 3 months ago:
It’s a cetacean micturation week, huh?
- Submitted 3 months ago to science_memes@mander.xyz | 6 comments
- Comment on Caption this. 3 months ago:
sees ur north pole OuuuO
- Comment on womp womp 6 months ago:
Autopipette tips. Wet lab work will consume a lot of 'em.
- Comment on listen, have you tried Positron yet 6 months ago:
Do you have a couple hours to hear about my lord and savior ggplot2?
